Student Race and Gender and Patient Encounters in a Family Medicine Clerkship.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the association of students' race and gender with the race, gender, age, patient numbers, and problems encountered during a third-year family medicine clerkship across a geographically distributed clinical teaching network. METHODS: Student patient experience logbook data from two separate but adjacent 3-year periods were analyzed. Mixed-effects regression models and generalized linear mixed models were used to determine the relationship between student race and gender on number and demographics of patients encountered and odds of encountering required conditions and gender-specific conditions at least once during the clerkship. RESULTS: A total of 458 students documented 66,752 encounters during academic years 2008 through 2010, and 498 students documented 70,213 encounters during academic years 2011 through 2013. The first cohort averaged 145.8 (SD 24.0) encounters per student and the second cohort averaged 141.1 (SD 19.5) encounters per student. Females had more encounters during the first period, but no difference in the second. There was no difference in average encounters between white and nonwhite students during the first period, but during the second, nonwhite students had more encounters. A few differences were found in odds of encountering required conditions or gender-specific conditions, but none were consistent across time. CONCLUSIONS: Family medicine clerkship students in this geographically distributed network did not experience significant differences in patient demographics, conditions, or gender-specific diseases, based on their gender or race. The teaching sites in the study were monitored continuously to ensure consistent clinical experiences in volume and scope.

Patient perspectives of an individualized diabetes care management plan.

PURPOSE: This cross sectional study examines patients' knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about a diabetic care management plan (DCMP) that was developed to provide patient education on diabetes guidelines and display individual diabetic core measures. Secondary objectives included a comparison of diabetic core measures [hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and urine microalbumin (Um)] before and after DCMP implementation. We hypothesize this tool will contribute to patients' awareness of current disease status, diabetes knowledge and diabetic core value improvement over time. METHODS: A consecutive sample of 102 adult patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 in a primary care setting participated. Patients' perspectives on the care plan and knowledge about diabetes was collected via survey after care plan implementation. A comparison of selected diabetic core measures was conducted at baseline and post-DCMP. Descriptive statistics summarized survey response and diabetic core measures. A repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess change in diabetic core measures over time. RESULTS: Participants understood the DCMP (96%), found it important because it explained their laboratory results and medications (89%) and believed it would help them to have better diabetic control (99%). There was a significant interaction between time and being at goal pre-DCMP for HbA1c, SBP and LDL. Patients not at goal pre-DCMP for the above measures decreased significantly over time (P = <0.01 for HbA1c, SBP and LDL). Participants at goal for all diabetic core measures increased pre- to post-DCMP from 13% to 20% (P = 0.28). CONCLUSION: Patients perceived the diabetic care management plan favorably and their diabetic core measurements improved over time. This simple and reproducible self-management intervention can enhance self-management in a patient population with diabetes mellitus type 2.

Medication use after bariatric surgery in a managed care cohort.

BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery has been shown to provide long-term weight loss, in addition to a significant reduction in obesity-related co-morbidities. The primary aim of this study was to describe the medication use and costs within a managed care cohort after bariatric surgery. A secondary aim was to describe the use rates for other health services after bariatric surgery. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used an administrative database from a large managed care organization to examine the health outcomes in persons 6 months before and 6 months after bariatric surgery. RESULTS: The average number of prescription claims per person decreased after surgery, from 6.93 (SD 7.16) before to 4.88 (SD 5.84) after surgery (P <.001). The average number of claims for office visits decreased from 5.52 before to 3.94 after surgery (P = .0028), and the average number of claims for outpatient visits decreased from 0.75 before to 0.40 after surgery (P <.001). However, the average number of inpatient visit claims increased after bariatric surgery, from 0.04 (SD 0.31) to 0.07 (SD 0.52) claims per person (P = .04). In the preoperative period, the paid costs for pharmacy claims were an average of $221.30 (SD $341.25). After surgery, the pharmacy paid costs decreased to an average cost of $158.90 (SD $454.13). CONCLUSION: Within this sample, medication use and costs decreased within 6 months of bariatric surgery. Decreases were also noted in the postoperative period in several obesity-related co-morbidities, office visits, emergency room visits, and outpatient visits; however, an increase occurred in inpatient stays after surgery.

Recognizing delirium superimposed on dementia: assessing nurses' knowledge using case vignettes.

Delirium is a serious and prevalent problem that occurs in many hospitalized older adults. Delirium superimposed on dementia (DSD) occurs when a delirium occurs concurrently with a pre-existing dementia. DSD is typically underrecognized by medical and nursing staff. The current study measured nursing identification of DSD using standardized case vignettes, and the Mary Starke Harper Aging Knowledge Exam (MSHAKE). Results revealed that the nurses in this study had a high level of general geropsychiatric nursing knowledge as measured by the MSHAKE, yet had difficulty recognizing DSD compared to dementia alone and delirium alone. Only 21% were able to correctly identify the hypoactive form of DSD, and 41% correctly identified hypoactive delirium alone in the case vignettes. Interventions and educational programs designed to increase nursing awareness of DSD symptoms could help to decrease this gap in nursing knowledge.