A smartphone oximeter with a fingertip probe for use during exercise training: usability, validity and reliability in individuals with chronic lung disease and healthy controls.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Telehealth is a strategy to expand the reach of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Smartphones can monitor and transmit oxygen saturation (SpO2) and heart rate (HR) data to ensure patient safety during home-based or other exercise. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usability, validity and reliability of a Kenek O2 pulse oximeter and custom prototype smartphone application (smartphone oximeter) during rest and exercise in healthy participants and those with chronic lung disease. METHODS: Fifteen individuals with chronic lung disease and 15 healthy controls were recruited. SpO2 and HR were evaluated at rest and during cycling and walking. SpO2 was valid if the mean bias was within +±2%, the level of agreement (LoA) was within ±4%; HR was valid if the mean bias was within ±5 beats per min (bpm), LoA was within ±10bpm. Usability was assessed with a questionnaire and direct observation. RESULTS: The smartphone oximeter was deemed easy to use. At rest, SpO2 measures were valid in both groups (bias <2%, lower bound LoA -2 to 3%). During exercise, SpO2 measurement did not meet validity and reliability thresholds in the patients with chronic lung disease, but was accurate for the healthy controls. HR recording during exercise or rest was not valid (LoA>10bpm) in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The smartphone oximeter did not record HR or SpO2 accurately in patients with chronic lung disease during exercise, although SpO2 was valid at rest. During exercise, patients with chronic lung disease should pause to ensure greatest accuracy of SpO2 and HR measurement.

Patient and health care professional perspectives on using telehealth to deliver pulmonary rehabilitation.

The objective of this study was to identify the necessary features of pulmonary telerehabilitation (P-TR) from the perspectives of individuals living with chronic lung disease and health care professionals (HCPs) who deliver pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Focus groups were carried out with patients ( n = 26) and HCPs ( n = 26) to elicit and explore their opinions about the critical elements of in-person PR and ideas for how these elements could be supported using technology. A questionnaire was used to assess technology use, PR experience, and general health status. Four key elements of PR were identified as critical to P-TR: the social aspect of PR; communicating with HCPs for education and support; using biosensors for monitoring and promoting self-knowledge; and the evolution of support with progress over time. A range of technology-enabled devices and programs were suggested as means to recreate aspects of these integral elements. Consultations with patients and HCPs suggest that users are interested in technology and want to ensure it recreates the important aspects of PR. Patients and HCPs identified similar key elements for P-TR. The opinions and suggestions of patients and HCPs should be the driving force of innovation if P-TR is to succeed in improving health outcomes.

Objective evaluation of functional capacity: medical, occupational, and legal settings.

Clinicians are called upon to perform objective evaluation of functional capacity in a variety of treatment and evaluation settings. To assist the clinician in selecting the appropriate testing methods for assessment of functional capacity in different settings, a survey of available techniques is presented. It is structured around the goals of treatment as the patient progresses from the stage of acute injury or disease through early postacute care to long-term rehabilitation. The role of the clinician in treatment of the patient is contrasted to the role of the clinician in evaluation of the patient for reasons other than making clinical decisions. In particular, the specific demands of workers fitness and risk evaluation are described. The goal-related differences in the design and the correct use of clinical dynamometers vs. work simulators are presented. The key concepts are the professional role of the clinician, reliability of measurements, and validity in the sense of the decisions one is justified in making based on the results of these measurements in a particular context.