Drain options after vertebral body tethering.

PURPOSE: Since the introduction of vertebral body tethering (VBT) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), a variety of post-operative chest drainage systems have been utilized. Most surgeons use formal chest tubes with a Pleur-evac, while others use smaller bulb suction drains (e.g., Blake drain). In addition, some centers utilize pleural closure. This multicenter study evaluates whether drain type or pleural closure impact perioperative and 90 day complication rates. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted from three institutions with established VBT programs. All preoperative, perioperative and 90 day postoperative data were analyzed to determine differences in outcomes between three cohorts: standard chest tube (SCT), standard chest tube with pleural closure (SCTPC) and 10 French Bulb drain (BD). RESULTS: 104 patients were identified for the study. 57 SCT, 25 SCTPC and 22 BD. All data are listed in order: SCT, SCTPC, BD. Length of stay (3.7, 4.3, 3.0 days) was less in the BD group (p = 0.009); post-operative drainage (460, 761, 485 cc) was less in the SCT and BD groups (p < 0.001); intra-operative estimated blood loss (EBL) 146, 382, 64 cc was less in the BD group (p < 0.001). No significant difference in number of days (3.2, 3.2, and 2.8 days) drainage was in place, groups (p = 0.311). Complication profile was similar with 2 chest tube reinsertions in the SCT and one hemothorax that resolved spontaneously in BD group. CONCLUSIONS: In this series of 104 patients, SCT, SCTPC and BD all had a similar safety profile. All three methods were safe and effective in managing post-operative chest drainage after thoracic VBT. In the series, BD group had significantly shorter LOS than both groups that used chest tubes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

Hip Impingement after Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine Avulsion Fractures: A Case Report with Review of the Literature.

Avulsion fractures of the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) are rare injuries in adolescent athletes. We present a case of a 15-year-old male who sustained an avulsion injury to his right AIIS when kicking a soccer ball. The patient had chronic pain and extra-articular subspinal impingement leading to decreased hip flexion and rotation. The injury occurred 1.5 years prior to symptom onset, and we were the first health care providers to manage the injury. We attempted six months of nonoperative management including activity modifications and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) therapy without improvement. Although this injury can often be managed nonoperatively, his symptoms required excision of the AIIS and associated heterotopic ossification. He had an excellent outcome with return to soccer and no pain at his final follow-up visit two years after surgery. Due to the limited literature guiding the surgeon's management of AIIS avulsion injuries with associated heterotopic ossification, we provide a review of the literature detailing pre- and postoperative ranges of motion, surgical approach, fixation or excision of the avulsion fragment, and return to sport in this patient population.

A study of the cutaneous nerves encountered during thoracoplasty.

STUDY DESIGN: Ten cadavers were dissected to describe the cutaneous branches of the dorsal rami nerves that should be identified and protected throughout the thoracoplasty procedure. OBJECTIVE: To identify the anatomic distribution of the cutaneous branches of the dorsal rami in the thoracic spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The last anatomic description of cutaneous branches of the dorsal rami nerves dates back to the early 1900s. METHODS: Ten cadavers were dissected. Each of the branches was followed deeper into the musculature of the back. The Steel 2-incision approach, the Geissele subcutaneous approach, and the subfascial/subtrapezial approach were then carried out on each cadaver. RESULTS: We determined the course traveled by each of these cutaneous branches of the dorsal rami. Medial branches traverse the paraspinal muscles running dorsally within a few millimeters of the midline before exiting beneath the trapezius. Lateral branches cross the top border of the inferior rib at an average of 6.8 mm from the tip of the transverse process and the lower border of the rib 27 mm from the tip of the transverse process. CONCLUSIONS: Both branches of the dorsal rami nerves are encountered during the posterior approaches used. Medial branches have the best chance for identification and preservation with the subtrapezial approach. Lateral branches can be identified and protected in each of the 3 posterior exposures.