Central response to painful electrical esophageal stimulation in well-defined patients suffering from functional chest pain.

BACKGROUND: Functional chest pain (FCP) of presumed esophageal origin is considered a common cause for chest pain in which central nervous system hyperexcitability is thought to play an important role. We aimed to compare cerebral responses with painful esophageal stimuli between FCP patients and healthy subjects (HS). METHODS: Thirteen patients with FCP (seven females, mean age 50.4 ± 7.5 years) and 15 HS (eight females, mean age 49.1 ± 12.9 years) were enrolled. Inclusion criteria consisted of typical chest pain, normal coronary angiogram, and normal upper gastrointestinal evaluation. Electrical stimulations evoking the pain threshold were applied in the distal esophagus, while cortical evoked potentials were recorded from the scalp. Pain scores, resting electroencephalogram (EEG), evoked potential characteristics and brain electrical sources to pain stimulation were compared between groups. KEY RESULTS: No differences were seen between patients and HS regarding (i) pain thresholds (patients: 20.1 ± 7.4 mA vs HS: 22.4 ± 8.3 mA, all P > 0.05), (ii) resting-EEG (P > 0.05), (iii) evoked brain potential latencies (N2: patients 181.7 ± 25.7 mS vs HS 182.2 ± 25.8 mS, all P > 0.05) and amplitudes (N2P2: patients 8.2 ± 7.2 µV vs HS: 10.1 ± 3.4 µV, all P > 0.05), (iv) topography (P > 0.05), and (v) brain source location (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: No differences in activation of brain areas to painful esophageal stimulation were seen in this group of well characterized patients with FCP compared with sex- and age-matched HS. The mechanism of pain in FCP and whether it originates in the esophagus remains unsolved.

Validation of the GerdQ questionnaire for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains a challenge as both invasive methods and symptom-based strategies have limitations. The symptom-based management of GERD in primary care may be further optimised with the use of a questionnaire. AIM: To assess the diagnostic validity of the GerdQ questionnaire in patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD. METHODS: Patients with symptoms suggestive of GERD without alarm features, underwent upper endoscopy, and if normal, pH-metry. Patients were followed for 4 weeks and GerdQ was completed blinded to the investigator at both visits. Reflux oesophagitis or pathological acid exposure was used as diagnostic references for GERD. The diagnostic accuracy for GERD on symptom response to proton pump inhibitor (PPI) was assessed. RESULTS: Among the 169 patients, a GerdQ cutoff ≥9 gave the best balance with regard to sensitivity, 66% (95% CI: 58-74), and specificity, 64% (95% CI: 41-83), for GERD. The high prevalence of reflux oesophagitis (81%) resulted in a high proportion of true positives, but at the same time a high proportion of false-negatives. Consequently, GerdQ had a high positive predictive value, 92% (95% CI: 86-97), but a low negative predictive value, 22% (95% CI: 13-34), for GERD. Symptom resolution on PPI therapy had high sensitivity, 76% (95% CI: 66-84), but low specificity, 33% (95% CI: 17-53), for GERD. CONCLUSIONS: GerdQ is a useful complementary tool for the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in primary care. The implementation of GerdQ could reduce the need for upper endoscopy and improve resource utilisation. Symptom resolution on proton pump inhibitor did not predict gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Sensation evoked by esophageal distension in functional chest pain patients depends on mechanical stress rather than on ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Functional chest pain is commonly reproduced by bag distension in the esophageal body. It is unknown whether such pain is primarily associated with mechanical stress and strain (force-deformation) or with changes in mucosal perfusion. METHODS: Fourteen patients (6M, 8F, average age 55.9 years) underwent ramp bag distension before and after injection of 20 mg butylscopolamine bromide (BS) using a novel bag catheter incorporating endosonography and laser Doppler perfusion monitoring. Healthy subjects served as controls. Mucosal perfusion was evaluated and stress and strain were computed and related to the sensation. KEY RESULTS: The symptom score increased with bag volume (P < 0.001). Volume as a function of pressure was higher in patients than in controls (P < 0.001), both before and during BS. The stress-strain relationship was exponential and indicated a stiffer esophageal wall in patients especially before BS (P < 0.01). The stress-strain curves indicate increased muscle tone in the functional chest pain patients. The perfusion decreased with increasing symptom score from visual analog scale 1-7 during BS. The decrease was on average 18.9% in patients and 19.7% in controls (P = ns). Multiple regression analysis from distensions during BS showed that the discomfort/pain sensations depended on stress and strain (P < 0.001) and with stress as the largest contributor. Perfusion did not contribute. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Pain evoked by bag distension in patients with functional chest pain is stress-dependent rather than dependent on mucosal perfusion. Furthermore, the esophagus of the patients was characterized by more pronounced muscle tone during the distensions.

A multimodal laser Doppler and endosonographic distension device for studying mechanosensation and mucosal blood flow in the oesophagus.

We describe the development of a multimodal device combining bag distension, manometry, high frequency intraluminal ultrasound, laser Doppler flowmetry and symptom registration. Bench tests showed that the different modalities did not influence each other. During bag distension we obtained high quality images of the oesophageal wall for computing biomechanical parameters, and laser Doppler signals showing variation in mucosal perfusion. We conclude that the principle of measurement is sound and that the device can provide a basis for further studies.