Orbital Exenteration to Manage Infiltrative Sinonasal, Orbital Adnexal, and Cutaneous Malignancies Provides Acceptable Survival Outcomes: An Institutional Review, Literature Review, and Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: Orbital exenteration (OE) is an aggressive operative undertaking that results in a disfiguring and dysfunctional outcome for patients. The purpose of our study was to determine the survival outcome for patients who underwent OE for malignant disease that had invaded the orbit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an ambispective cohort study based on a review of the records of 31 consecutive patients who had undergone OE within John Hunter Hospital. The study period was 2006 to 2013. The predictor variables were the demographic, tumor site, and clinicopathologic characteristics that might influence survival. The secondary outcome variable was survival. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the categorical and continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the survival distribution were plotted. We also performed a review of published studies and a meta-analysis to investigate the nature of OE performed by various surgical disciplines. RESULTS: Of the 31 patients included in the present study, 24 were men and 7 were women. The mean age was 65 years. Of the 31 cases, 15 were squamous cell carcinoma, 8 were basal cell carcinoma, and 8 were a mixture of other pathologic types. The time to median (50%) survival for all patients was 78.4 months. The 1-year survival rate was 93.4% and the 5-year survival rate was 54.1%. Although not statistically significant, notable differences were found in the interval to death with respect to the identification of perineural invasion, lymphovascular invasion, and histopathologic features. The review of published studies suggested a difference in the histologic features and location of the disorder treated, the extent of OE undertaken, and the method of reconstruction between the ophthalmology and nonophthalmology surgical disciplines. CONCLUSIONS: Although OE results in significant disfigurement and dysfunction, it does provide good survival outcomes, given the extent of disease at presentation, evident in our group of patients. Continuation of the study, with greater numbers of patients, will serve to increase the statistical power of our observations.

Elective neck dissection for primary oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma involving the tongue should include sublevel IIb.

PURPOSE: The surgical clearance of sublevel IIb lymph nodes, facilitated by neck dissection, increases the risk of postoperative shoulder dysfunction. Our study purpose was to determine the value of including sublevel IIb in elective neck dissections for primary oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study based on a review of the pathology records accumulated by 1 head and neck surgeon was conducted for 71 patients with clinically node-negative, primary OCSCC treated from 2006 to June 2013. The predictor variables were the oral cavity subsite and tumor clinicopathologic characteristics (ie, perineural, perivascular, and perilymphatic invasion, tumor depth, and T stage). The primary outcome variable was the presence of sublevel IIb metastasis. The secondary outcome variables were the survival and tumor recurrence rates and metastases to any cervical level. Descriptive statistics were calculated for the categorical and continuous variables. A comparison of categorical variables was performed using Fisher's exact test; for continuous variables, t tests or the Mann-Whitney U test were used for 2 groups and analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests (with Bonferroni's correction) were used for more than 2 groups, depending on the distribution. Disease-specific survival (DSS) analyses were plotted for the predictor variables and patients with sublevel IIb metastasis. Competing risks models were created using the Fine and Gray method (SAS macro %PSHREG) to provide estimates of the crude and adjusted subhazard ratios for DSS for all variables. RESULTS: A total of 71 patients were included in the present study, of whom 69% were male. The greatest proportion of oral cavity subsites was from the tongue and floor of mouth. The overall frequency of sublevel IIb lymphatic metastases at neck dissection was 5.6% of the patient cohort. Sublevel IIb metastases occurred from the primary sites involving the tongue (n = 3) and retromolar trigone (n = 1). The incidence of perilymphatic and perivascular invasion was significantly associated with sublevel IIb lymphatic metastases (P < .02). CONCLUSIONS: Sublevel IIb is likely to be an important region to incorporate in elective neck dissections for primary OCSCC involving the tongue. More studies are needed, with greater numbers, to clarify the risk of metastasis to sublevel IIb from oral cavity subsites in primary OCSCC with clinically node-negative necks.

Head and neck cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma metastatic to cervical sublevel IIb lymph nodes occurred from primary sites involving the auricle and adjacent neck.

PURPOSE: Neck dissections that include sublevel IIb increase the risk of postoperative shoulder dysfunction. The purpose of this investigation was to document the incidence of level IIb metastatic lymphatic spread in a group of patients undergoing neck dissection as part of the surgical management of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of the pathology records taken from 1 surgeon from June 2006 through June 2013 was carried out. The predictor variable was the primary tumor site. The outcome variable was the metastatic nodal involvement according to neck level and sublevel. Secondary variables included T stage, pathologist, tumor depth, and the presence of perineural, perilymphatic, and perivascular invasion. Data analyses were by descriptive statistics. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with a total of 40 neck dissections met the inclusion criteria. The average primary site tumor depth was 14.7 mm, and there were 16 cases of poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma. Sublevel IIb was involved in 7.5% of cases, all of which occurred from lateralized primary sites of the head and neck. CONCLUSIONS: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma arising from the auricle and neck sites adjacent to sublevel IIb may have increased risk of metastatic involvement of sublevel IIb nodes. Further studies with larger numbers are required to determine the risk of metastasis to sublevel IIb from midline sites of the face.

Early screening in patients with head and neck cancer identified high levels of pain and distress.

PURPOSE: Pain and distress are recognized as the fifth and sixth vital signs in cancer care, respectively, as debilitating symptoms that are frequently under-recognized. The aim of this study was to document, using touch-screen technology, levels of pain and distress in patients with head and neck cancer before their assessment at a head and neck multidisciplinary referral clinic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study over a 4-year period (2008 through 2011) was conducted for patients attending a head and neck oncology multidisciplinary team clinic in the Hunter New England referral district of Australia. Predictor variables were cancer stage and site. Cancer sites divided into 8 different regions, with distinction made for cutaneous versus noncutaneous sites. Outcome variables consisted of pain and distress levels. Pain was assessed using a Numerical Rating Scale of 0 to 10, and distress was assessed using the Distress Thermometer and PSYCH-6 scales. In the context of a screening study and for statistically comparing pain with other variables, pain was regarded as any score higher than 0. Clinically significant distress represented a Distress Thermometer score higher than 3 and a PSYCH-6 score of at least 3. Data analysis consisted of descriptive statistics, variance contrasts, and 2-tailed Pearson correlations. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-six patients were included in the study, with an equal number of cutaneous and noncutaneous cancer sites. Thirty-four percent of patients reported having pain, and 13% had clinically significant distress. Tumor stage did not significantly affect pain or distress scores. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high level of pain and distress reported by patients with head and neck cancer before their assessment and management is discussed.