Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery of the entire gland: initial experience.

Many pancreatic cancer surgeons have been slow to adopt minimally invasive pancreatic surgery (MIPS) due a lack of formalized minimally invasive training and the perceived difficulty in dissecting pancreatic tumors and tissue away from the superior mesenteric vessels and consequent concerns for adequacy of oncologic margins and lymph node retrieval. A review of the first 29 MIPS procedures for malignant and premalignant tumors of the pancreas with the aid of a sterilizeable robotically-controlled camera holder was undertaken. As opposed to other robots currently available, this device allows for hand-assistance by the operating surgeon. Fourteen minimally invasive distal pancreatectomies (MIDP) (10 laparoscopic, 3 hand-assisted, 1 converted to open), 13 MIPDs (6 laparoscopic, 5 hand-assisted, 2 converted to open), and 2 laparoscopic central pancreatectomies have been performed. Seventeen (59%) of these patients were treated for cancer. Of these, 11 underwent a MIPD and 6 a MIDP. There were postoperative complications in seven patients (24%) at 30 days. Thirty and 90 day mortality was 3%. A sterilizeable robotically-controlled laparoscope holder that enables the operating surgeon to remain in contact with the patient and have the option of a hand-assisted approach may be particularly helpful for minimally invasive approaches to malignant and premalignant pancreatic tumors.

Local recurrence of breast cancer in the stereotactic core needle biopsy site: case reports and review of the literature.

Early mammographic detection of nonpalpable breast lesions has led to the increasing use of stereotactic core biopsies for tissue diagnosis. Tumor seeding the needle tract is a theorectical concern; the incidence and clinical significance of this potential complication are unknown. We report three cases of subcutaneous breast cancer recurrence at the stereotactic biopsy site after definitive treatment of the primary breast tumor. Two cases were clinically evident and relevant; the third was detected in the preclinical, microscopic state. All three patients underwent multiple passes during stereotactic large-core biopsies (14 gauge needle) followed by modified radical mastectomy. Two patients developed a subcutaneous recurrence at the site of the previous biopsy 12 and 17 months later; one had excision of the skin and dermis at the time of mastectomy revealing tumor cells locally. In summary, clinically relevant recurrence from tumor cells seeding the needle tract is reported in two patients after definitive surgical therapy (without adjuvant radiation therapy). Often, the biopsy site is outside the boundaries of surgical resection. Since the core needle biopsy exit site represents a potential area of malignant seeding and subsequent tumor recurrence, we recommend excising the stereotactic core biopsy tract at the time of definitive surgical resection of the primary tumor.

Lobular carcinoma in situ increases the risk of local recurrence in selected patients with stages I and II breast carcinoma treated with conservative surgery and radiation.

BACKGROUND: Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is a known risk factor for the development of invasive breast carcinoma. However, little is known regarding the impact of LCIS in association with an invasive carcinoma on the risk of an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) in patients who are treated with conservative surgery (CS) and radiation therapy (RT). The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of LCIS on the local recurrence rate in patients with early stage breast carcinoma after breast-conserving therapy. METHODS: Between 1979 and 1995, 1274 patients with Stage I or Stage II invasive breast carcinoma were treated with CS and RT. The median follow-up time was 6.3 years. RESULTS: LCIS was present in 65 of 1274 patients (5%) in the study population. LCIS was more likely to be associated with an invasive lobular carcinoma (30 of 59 patients; 51%) than with invasive ductal carcinoma (26 of 1125 patients; 2%). Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) occurred in 57 of 1209 patients (5%) without LCIS compared with 10 of 65 patients (15%) with LCIS (P = 0.001). The 10-year cumulative incidence rate of IBTR was 6% in women without LCIS compared with 29% in women with LCIS (P = 0.0003). In both groups, the majority of recurrences were invasive. The 10-year cumulative incidence rate of IBTR in patients who received tamoxifen was 8% when LCIS was present compared with 6% when LCIS was absent (P = 0.46). Subsets of patients in which the presence of LCIS was associated with an increased risk of breast recurrence included tumor size < 2 cm (T1), age < 50 years, invasive ductal carcinoma, negative lymph node status, and the absence of any adjuvant systemic treatment (chemotherapy or hormonal therapy) (P < 0.001). LCIS margin status, invasive lobular carcinoma histology, T2 tumor size, and positive axillary lymph nodes were not associated with an increased risk of breast recurrence in these women. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that the presence of LCIS significantly increases the risk of an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence in certain subsets of patients who are treated with breast-conserving therapy. The risk of local recurrence appears to be modified by the use of tamoxifen. Further studies are needed to address this issue.

Effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on surgical margin status of resected adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas.

We examined the effect of preoperative chemoradiotherapy on the ability to obtain pathologically negative resection margins in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Between 1987 and 2000, 100 patients underwent Whipple resection with curative intent for primary adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Pathologic assessment of six margins (proximal and distal superior mesenteric artery, proximal and distal superior mesenteric vein, pancreas, retroperitoneum, common bile duct, and hepatic artery) was undertaken by either frozen section (pancreas and common duct) or permanent section. A margin was considered positive if tumor was present less than 1 mm from the inked specimen. Margins noted to be positive on frozen section were resected whenever possible. Of the 100 patients treated, 47 (47%) underwent postoperative radiation and chemotherapy (group I) and 53 (53%) received preoperative chemoradiotherapy (group II) with either 5-fluorouracil (32 patients) or gemcitabine (21 patients). Patient demographics and operative parameters were similar in the two groups, with the exception of preoperative tumor size (CT scan), which was greater in group II (P < 0.001), and number of previous operations, which was greater in group II (P < 0.0001). Statistical analysis of the number of negative surgical margins clear of tumor was performed using Fisher's exact test. All patients (100%) had six margins assessed for microscopic involvement with tumor. In the preoperative therapy group, 5 (7.5%) of 53 patients had more than one positive margin, whereas 21 (44.7%) of 47 patients without preoperative therapy had more than one margin with disease extension (P < 0.001). Additionally, only 11 (25.6%) of the 47 patients without preoperative therapy had six negative margins vs. 27 (50.9%) of 53 in the group receiving preoperative therapy (P = 0.013). Survival analysis reveals a significant increase in survival in margin-negative patients (P = 0.02). Similarly, a strong trend toward improved disease-free and overall survival is seen in patients with a single positive margin vs. multiple margins. Overall, we find a negative impact on survival with an increasing number of positive margins (P = 0.025, hazard ratio 1.3). When stratified for individual margin status, survival was decreased in patients with positive superior mesenteric artery (P = 0.06) and vein (P = 0.04) margins. However, this has not yet resulted in a significant increase in disease-free or overall survival for patients receiving preoperative therapy (P = 0.07).

Trimodality therapy for advanced gallbladder cancer.

We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent surgical extirpation for stage III, stage IV, or recurrent carcinoma of the gallbladder. Between 1991 and 1999 ten patients underwent surgical resection for advanced gallbladder cancer. All patients received adjuvant therapy either pre- or postoperatively. Radiotherapy was used in all patients and chemotherapy in 90 per cent of patients. Two patients subsequently underwent resection for locally recurrent disease. An additional patient with stage II disease initially was also treated surgically for a local recurrence. Surgical management involved cholecystectomy and resection of various amounts of liver surrounding the gallbladder bed and regional lymphadenectomy. Contiguously involved structures were resected en bloc. Resection of recurrent disease included excision of all gross tumor. The median overall survival excluding the one 30-day mortality was 53.6 months (range 8-73 months). Four patients have survived 4 or more years, and currently four patients are alive and disease free at 73, 49, 33, and 8 months. Median disease-free interval after each resection of recurrent disease was 13.8 months (range 4-28 months). We conclude that trimodality therapy in selected patients with stage III, IV, or recurrent carcinoma of the gallbladder is possible and may result in prolonged survival.

Placental transfer and decay of maternally acquired antimeasles antibodies in Nigerian children.

BACKGROUND: In developing countries vaccination against measles virus (MV) is generally administered at 9 months of age, although it is well-documented that protection of most infants by passively acquired maternal MV antibodies is waning before immunization is given. The purpose of this study was to investigate the decay of maternally derived MV antibodies in Nigerian infants as well as to compare a German and Nigerian cohort of paired mothers and newborns regarding the placental transfer efficiency of MV-specific IgG and total IgG antibodies. METHODS: MV-specific IgG antibodies were measured with a commercially available MV-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, a recombinant hemagglutinin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as well as a neutralization assay. Total IgG values were determined with a standard immunoturbidimetric test. RESULTS: Anti-MV IgG titers were twice as high in German newborns as in Nigerian newborns. An increased concentration of immunoglobulins transferred via the placenta was found only in the German cohort. High concentrations of total maternal IgG reduced the concentration of MV-specific as well as total IgG that crossed the placenta. Furthermore only 17% of the 4-month-old Nigerian infants were still protected against measles. Antibodies had a biologic half-life of 33 days and a biochemical half-life of 48 days. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that the decay of passively acquired MV antibodies occurred even more rapidly than expected resulting in susceptibility to MV in most of the 4-month-old infants in Nigeria. Furthermore transfer of maternal anti-MV IgG and total IgG antibodies to the newborn was more efficient in the German cohort compared with the Nigerian group. These findings suggest the use of alternative vaccination strategies in developing countries to possibly reduce the window of susceptibility against measles.

Surgical salvage therapy: abdominoperineal resection for recurrent anal carcinoma, metastasectomy of recurrent colorectal cancer, and esophagectomy after combined chemoradiation.

This review highlights the advances in the salvage surgical therapies for recurrent disease after definitive therapy of anal carcinoma, colorectal cancer, including liver metastasectomy, and esophageal carcinoma treated primarily with chemoradiation. New diagnostic modalities, advances in neoadjuvant therapies for unresectable liver metastases, and, in addition, the importance of adjuvant hepatic arterial chemotherapy after curative liver resections are reviewed. Although chemoradiation is not the standard of care for esophageal cancer, salvage esophagectomy after such treatment is discussed. Definitive chemoradiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the anus has altered the role of surgical intervention to a salvage option instead of primary treatment. Although this is not yet the case for esophageal carcinoma, recent improved chemoradiation regimens have been reported by the French and Japanese, who use surgery for nonresponders. For recurrent colorectal carcinoma, including liver-only metastases, patients can be rendered disease free after surgical extirpation with evidence of improved survival. Appropriate surveillance in these patients may identify subsets of patients with disease amenable to resection.

Pancreatic carcinoma deemed unresectable at exploration may be resected for cure: an institutional experience.

Only a minority of patients with a diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) have disease amenable to curative resection. Between April 1987 and March 1999, 40 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma deemed unresectable at exploration at other institutions were considered for neoadjuvant treatments and then re-evaluated for possible re-exploration. We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), among three groups: Group A, 22 previously unresectable patients who were subsequently successfully resected, 20 after induction therapy; Group B, 31 patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy before their only operation; and Group C, 33 patients who were primarily resected, 27 of whom were then treated with adjuvant therapy. Of those resectable from Group A, 5 required portal venorrhaphy and 3 had hepatic artery reconstruction. Eighteen of the 40 patients were unresectable because of progression of disease with a mean OS of 8 months; 12 were assessed at second laparotomy; 6 were excluded from second operation on the basis of preoperative imaging studies. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no differences in OS among the three groups: OS in Group A was 34 months; Group B, 21; and Group C, 13 (P = 0.15). Margin status was comparable in all three groups (P = 0.52). As expected, nodal positivity was greatest in Group C (P = 0.001). There were no operative mortalities in Group A, and the morbidity rate was comparable with that of Groups B and C. Upon re-evaluation, many tumors (54%) previously deemed "unresectable" were surgically extirpated for cure with a median survival comparable with that of patients who did not undergo previous exploration.

Should internal mammary lymph nodes in breast cancer be a target for the radiation oncologist?

PURPOSE: The elective treatment of internal mammary lymph nodes (++IMNs) in breast cancer is controversial. Previous randomized trials have not shown a benefit to the extended radical mastectomy or elective IMN irradiation overall, but a survival benefit has been suggested by some for subgroups of patients with medial tumors and positive axillary lymph nodes. The advent of effective systemic chemotherapy and potential for serious cardiac morbidity have also been factors leading to the decreased use of IMN irradiation during the past decade. The recent publishing of positive trials testing postmastectomy radiation that had included regional IMN irradiation has renewed interest in their elective treatment. The purpose of this study is to critically review historical and new data regarding IMNs in breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The historical incidence of occult IMN positivity in operable breast cancer is reviewed, and the new information provided by sentinel lymph node studies also discussed. The results of published randomized prospective trials testing the value of elective IMN dissection and/or radiation are analyzed. The data regarding patterns of failure following elective IMN treatment is studied to determine its impact on local-regional control, distant metastases, and survival. A conclusion is drawn regarding the merits of elective IMN treatment based on this review of the literature. RESULTS: Although controversial, the existing data from prospective, randomized trials of IMN treatment do not seem to support their elective dissection or irradiation. While it has not been shown to contribute to a survival benefit, the IMN irradiation increases the risk of cardiac toxicity that has effaced the value of radiation of the chest wall in reducing breast cancer deaths in previous randomized studies and meta-analyses. Sentinel lymph node mapping provides an opportunity to further evaluate the IMN chain in early stage breast cancer. Biopsy of "hot" nodes may be considered in the future to select patients who are most likely to benefit from additional regional therapy to these nodes. CONCLUSIONS: Irradiation of the IMN chain in conjunction with the chest wall and supraclavicular region should be considered only for those with pathologically proven IMNs with the goal of improving tumor regional control.

Outcome of patients receiving radiation for cancer of the esophagus: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care Study.

PURPOSE: A Patterns of Care Study examined the records of patients with esophageal cancer (EC) treated with radiation in 1992 through 1994 to determine the national practice processes of care and outcomes and to compare the results with those of clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A national survey of 63 institutions was conducted using two-stage cluster sampling, and specific information was collected on 400 patients with squamous cell (62%) or adenocarcinoma (37%) of the thoracic esophagus who received radiation therapy (RT) as part of primary or adjuvant treatment. Patients were staged according to a modified 1983 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Fifteen percent of patients had clinical stage (CS) I disease, 40% had CS II disease, and 30% had CS III disease. Twenty-six percent of patients underwent esophagectomy. Seventy-five percent of patients received chemotherapy; 84% of these received concurrent chemotherapy and radiation (CRT). RESULTS: Significant variables for overall survival in multivariate analysis include the use of esophagectomy (risk ratio [RR] = 0.62), the use of chemotherapy (RR = 0.63), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) greater than 80 (RR = 0.61), CS I or II disease (RR = 0.66), and facility type (RR = 0.72). Age, sex, and histology were not significant. Preoperative CRT resulted in a nonsignificantly higher 2-year survival rate compared with definitive CRT alone (63% v 39%; P =.11), whereas 2-year survival by planned treatment rather than treatment given was 47.7% for preoperative CRT and 35.4% for definitive CRT (P =.23). Definitive CRT compared with definitive RT alone resulted in significantly higher 2-year survival (39% v 20.6%; P =.027) and lower 2-year local regional failure (30% v 57.9%; P =. 0031). CONCLUSION: This study confirms the value of CRT in EC treatment. It indicates that the results obtained in practice settings nationwide are similar to those obtained in clinical trials and that KPS and the 1983 clinical staging system are useful prognostic indicators. The suggested value of esophagectomy and superiority of preoperative CRT over CRT alone in this study should be tested in a randomized trial.

Anal sphincter conservation for patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal rectum: long-term results of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 89-02.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcome of a multi-institutional, national cooperative group study attempting functional preservation of the anorectum for patients with limited, distal rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between September 21, 1989 and November 1, 1992, a Phase II trial of sphincter-sparing therapy was conducted for patients with clinically mobile rectal cancers located below the pelvic peritoneal reflection. Protocol treatment was designed for patients who were, in the judgement of their attending surgeon, unsuitable for anal sphincter conservation in the context of anterior resection, and would have required abdominoperineal resection (APR) as conventional surgical therapy. Primary cancers were estimated to be 4 cm or less in largest clinical diameter, and occupied 40% or less of the rectal circumference. Chest radiography and computerized axial tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis excluded patients with overt lymphatic or hematogenous metastases. Protocol surgery was intended to remove the primary cancer by en-bloc, transmural excision of an ellipse of rectal wall by transanal, transcoccygeal, or trans-sacral technique, while conserving the anal sphincter. Based on tumor size, T classification, grade, and adequacy of surgical margins, patients were allocated to one of three treatment assignments: observation, or adjuvant treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and one of two different dose levels of local-regional radiation. After completion of protocol therapy, patients were observed with follow-up that included periodic general physical and rectal examination, determinations of CEA, abdominopelvic CT, chest radiography, and surveillance endoscopy. Sixty-five eligible and analyzable patients were registered. RESULTS: With minimum follow-up of 5 years and median follow-up of 6.1 years, 11 patients have failed: 3 patients recurred local-regionally only, 3 patients had distant failure alone, and 5 patients manifested local-regional and distant failure. Eight patients died of intercurrent illness. Local-regional failure correlated with T-category revealed: T1 1/27 (4%), T2 4/25 (16%), and T3 3/13 (23%). Local-regional failure escalated with percentage involvement of the rectal circumference: 2/31 (6%) among patients with cancers involving 20% or less of the rectal circumference, and 6/34 (18%) among patients with cancers involving 21-40% of the circumference. Distant dissemination rose with T-category with 1/27 (4%) T1, 3/25 (12%) T2, and 4/13 (31%) T3 patients manifesting hematogenous spread. Eight patients (12%) required temporary or permanent colostomy. Five of 8 patients with local-regional recurrence achieved local-regional control with management including surgery, although 4 of these patients subsequently developed distant dissemination. Three patients (5%) had persistent, uncontrolled, local disease. Actuarial freedom from pelvic relapse at 5 years is 88% based on the entire study population, and 86% for the less favorable patients treated with adjuvant radiation and 5-FU. CONCLUSION: Conservative, sphincter-sparing therapy is a feasible alternative treatment for selected patients with limited cancer involving the middle and lower rectum. Risk of both local and distant failure appears to escalate with increasing T-category (depth of invasion). Results achieved in the multi-institutional, cooperative group setting approximate results reported from single institutions.

Local excision and chemoradiation for low rectal T1 and T2 cancers is an effective treatment.

Lesions located in the distal third of the rectum are usually treated with abdominoperineal resection or a low anterior resection with a coloanal anastomosis. However, in a select group of patients with favorable histology and a low probability of lymphatic spread, sphincter-sparing procedures will afford long-term disease-free survival and cure without the need for extensive, complicated surgery. We performed a 10-year retrospective review, including pathologic examination of specimens by a single pathologist, in an attempt to identify factors associated with a decreased disease-free survival. Thirty-five patients (median age, 71 years; range, 48-88) with low rectal carcinomas were treated with full-thickness disc excision (with or without chemoradiation), with curative intent. Median follow-up was 46 months (range, 8-120). There were 15 T1, 16 T2, and 4 T3 lesions. Tumors with poor histologic factors or greater than T1 received adjuvant radiation (with or without 5-fluorouracil). Four patients developed a local failure at a median of 21.5 months (range, 9-30) and were salvaged with abdominoperineal resection. The 5-year cancer-specific survival was 91 per cent. Negative margins approached statistical significance (P < 0.07) in influencing local control. We conclude that, when combined with chemoradiation for lesions deeper than submucosa or with adverse histologic factors, local resection of rectal cancer is an effective treatment in selected patients.

The evaluation and treatment of patients receiving radiation therapy for carcinoma of the esophagus: results of the 1992-1994 Patterns of Care Study.

BACKGROUND: For the first time, a Patterns of Care Study (PCS) was conducted in 1992-1994 to determine the national practice standards in evaluating and treating patients with esophageal carcinoma and to determine the degree to which clinical trials have been incorporated into national practice. METHODS: A national survey of 61 institutions using 2-stage cluster sampling was conducted, and specific information was collected on 400 patients with squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the thoracic esophagus who received radiation therapy (RT) as part of definitive or adjuvant management of their disease. Patients were staged according to a modified 1983 American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Chi-square tests for significant differences between academic and nonacademic institutions for a particular variable were performed. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 66.7 years (range, 26-89 years); 76.5% were male and 23.5% were female. Karnofsky performance status was > or = 80 for 88.3% of patients. Squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed in 61.5% and adenocarcinoma in 36.8%. Fifteen percent were Clinical Stage (CS) I, 39.5% CS II, and 29.5% CS III. Evaluative procedures included endoscopy (>93%), computed tomography (CT) of the chest (86%), CT of the abdomen (75%), esophagography (68.5%), and endoscopic ultrasound (3.5%). Endoscopic ultrasound and CT of the chest were performed significantly more frequently at academic than nonacademic facilities (6.1% vs. 1.0% and 91.9% vs. 81.3%, respectively). Three-quarters of all patients received chemotherapy and RT and 62.5% received concurrent chemotherapy and RT as part of their treatment. Treatments included chemotherapy plus RT (54.0%), RT alone (20.3%), preoperative chemotherapy + RT (13.3%), postoperative chemotherapy + RT (7.7%), postoperative RT (3.5%), and preoperative RT (1.2%). The chemotherapeutic agents most frequently used were 5-fluorouracil (84%), cisplatin (64%), and mitomycin (9%); academic instututions used cisplatin significantly more often and mitomycin significantly less often than nonacademic institutions. Brachytherapy was used in 8.5% of cases. The median total dose of external beam radiation was 50.4 gray and the median dose per fraction was 1.8 gray. CONCLUSIONS: This study establishes the national benchmarks for the evaluation and treatment of patients with esophageal carcinoma at radiation facilities in the U.S. It also indicates that the majority of patients given RT as a component of treatment for esophageal carcinoma receive chemoradiation rather than RT alone, as supported by clinical trials. Although some differences in the evaluation of esophageal carcinoma were noted between academic and nonacademic facilities, there was no difference in the frequency of use of chemoradiation versus RT by facility type.

Phase I dose escalating trial of hyperfractionated pre-operative chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the acute toxicity, post-operative complications, pathologic response and extent of downstaging to high dose pre-operative radiation using a hyperfractionated radiation boost and concurrent chemotherapy in a prospective Phase I trial. MATERIALS & METHODS: To be eligible for this study, patients had to have adenocarcinoma of the rectum less than 12 cm from the anal verge with either Stage T4 or T3 but greater than 4 cm or greater than 40% of the bowel circumference. All patients received 45 Gy pelvic radiation (1.8 Gy per fraction). Subsequent radiation was given to the region of the gross tumor with a 2 cm margin. This "boost" treatment was given at 1.2 Gy twice daily to a total dose of 54.6 Gy for Level I, 57 Gy for Level II, and 61.8 Gy for Level III. 5-FU was given at 1g/m2 over 24 hours for a four day infusion during the first and sixth weeks of radiation, with the second course concurrent with the hyperfractionated radiation. Surgical resection was carried out 4-6 weeks following completion of chemoradiation (in curative cases) and additional adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of 5-FU and Leucovorin was given for an additional 4 monthly cycles Days 1 through 5 beginning four weeks post surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients, age 40-82 (median 61), completed the initial course of chemoradiation and are included in the analysis of toxicity. The median follow-up is 27 months (range 8-68). Eleven patients were treated to a dose of 54.6 Gy, nine patients to 57 Gy, and seven patients to 61.8 Gy. Twenty-one patients had T3 tumors, and six patients T4 tumors. Grade III acute toxicity from chemoradiation included proctitis (5 patients), dermatitis (9), diarrhea (five), leukopenia (1), cardiac (1). Grade IV toxicities included one patient with diarrhea (on dose Level I) and one patient (on dose Level III) with cardiac toxicity (unrelated to radiation). Surgical resection consisted of abdominal perineal resection in 16 and low anterior resection in 7. Four patients did not undergo a curative resection; three initially presented with metastases and one developed metastasis during the pre-operative regimen. Post-operative complications included pelvic or perineal abscess in two (on dose Levels I & II), and delayed wound healing in two (one of whom, on dose Level III, developed perineal wound dehiscence requiring surgical reconstruction). Of the 23 patients who had a curative resection, four manifested pathologic complete responses (17.4%). Thirteen of 23 patients (57%) had evidence of pathologic downstaging and only 1/23 patients (on dose Level I) had a positive resection margin. Of these 23 patients (with a minimum follow-up of 8 months), the patient with positive margins was the only one who developed a local failure (Fisher's Exact p=.04). The 3-year actuarial OS, DFS and LC rates are 82%, 72% and 96%, respectively. Twelve of 13 patients (92% at 3 years) > or = 61 years vs. 5/10 patients (45% at 3 years) < 61 years remained disease-free (log-rank p=0.017). CONCLUSION: This regimen of high dose pre-operative chemoradiation employing a hyperfractionated radiation boost is feasible and tolerable and results in significant downstaging in locally advanced rectal cancer. The vast majority of patients (96%) achieved negative margins, which appears to be a prerequisite for local control (p= 0.04). Older age (> or =61 years) was a significant predictor for improved DFS. This regimen (at dose Level III, 61.8 Gy) is currently being tested in a Phase II setting.

The presence of proliferative breast disease with atypia does not significantly influence outcome in early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the benign background breast-tissue change of atypical hyperplasia (AH) on outcome in patients with early-stage invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred and sixty women with Stage I--II breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation from 1982-1994 had pathologic assessment of their background adjacent benign breast tissue. The median follow-up was 5.6 years (range 0.1-15). The median age was 55 years (range 24-88). Of these, 23% had positive axillary nodes; 25% received adjuvant chemotherapy (CMF or CAF) with (9%) or without (17%) tamoxifen. Of the total, 24% received adjuvant tamoxifen alone. The patients were divided into 2 groups: 131 patients with atypical hyperplasia (ductal, 99 patients; lobular, 20 pts; and type not specified, 12 pts), and 329 patients with no proliferative changes or proliferative changes without atypia. RESULT: A statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups for method of detection, primary tumor size, presence of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS), pathologic nodal status, region(s) treated with radiation, and type of adjuvant therapy. Patients with atypical hyperplasia (AH) had smaller primary tumors (T1 80% vs. 70%) more often detected solely by mammography (51% vs. 36%) with negative axillary nodes (87% vs. 73%) and radiation treatment to the breast only (93% vs. 78%). LCIS was observed in 9% of the patients with AH and 3% of those without AH. Patients with AH more often received tamoxifen alone (32% vs. 21%), rather than chemotherapy (15% vs. 29%). There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups for race, age, menopausal status, family history, histology, histologic subtype DCIS when present, the presence or absence of an extensive intraductal component, final margin status, estrogen or progesterone receptor status, use of re-excision, or total radiation dose to the primary. The 5- and 10-year actuarial ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rates were 2% and 12% for patients with AH and 4% and 8% for those without AH (p=0.44). Younger women or those with a positive family history of breast cancer with AH did not have an increased rate of breast failure when compared to similar patients without AH. There were no significant differences in the 5- and 10-year actuarial rates of distant metastases (AH 5- and 10-year 7% and 7%, no AH 5- and 10-year 8% and 16%,p=0.31), regional node recurrence (AH 1% and 1%, no AH 1% and 1%,p=0.71), contralateral breast cancer (AH 3% and 3%, no AH 3% and 8%,p=0.71), overall survival (AH 95% and 86%, no AH 95% and 89%, p=0.79), or cause-specific survival (AH 98% and 95%, no AH 96% and 91%,p=0.27). Subset analysis for ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence, distant metastases, overall, and cause-specific survival for T1 vs. T2 tumors and path node-negative vs. path node-positive patients revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: AH was not associated with an increased risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence or contralateral breast cancer in this study of patients with invasive breast cancer treated with conservative surgery and radiation. Therefore, the presence of proliferative changes with atypia in background benign breast tissue should not be a contraindication to breast-conservation therapy.

Preoperative radiation therapy and chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreas.

Since preoperative radiation therapy combined with chemotherapy (CTRT) was first performed in 1986 for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, there have been several reported experiences with varying drugs and radiotherapy regimens. We describe those experiences and contrast them to a series of patients treated at our institution with resectional surgery before CTRT. Finally, the current role of preoperative CTRT in the therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is proposed.

Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiation for patients with resected pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Two groups of patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with either preoperative chemoradiation (preop CTRT) or postoperative chemoradiation (postop CTRT) were retrospectively analyzed for various treatment-related parameters. Between November 1986 and October 1996, a total of 70 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were enrolled into preop CTRT protocols at our institution. Twenty-five patients with adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy with curative intent. After the closure of the preop CTRT protocols, we had the opportunity to perform 23 pancreatic resections without preop CTRT. After surgery, these patients were advised to undergo CTRT. These two groups of patients were therefore selected consecutively, dependent only on the time of referral and no other bias. These two cohorts of patients are compared for various intraoperative parameters, length of hospital stay, pathologic findings, time to recurrence, and survival. Mean age was 65 and 66 years in the preop and postop CTRT groups, respectively. Sex distribution was almost equal. Treatment breaks resulting in greater than 1 week delay in the radiotherapy occurred in 2 (8%) of 25 patients in the preop CTRT group (myelotoxicity in 1 case and biliary sepsis in 1 case), whereas no treatment breaks >1 week occurred in those receiving postop CTRT. Eleven patients in preop CTRT had grade 3 or 4 toxicity, whereas none was noted in those with postop CTRT. There was one postoperative death in the preop CTRT group and none in the postop CTRT group. Mean time to the start of CTRT was 45 days (range, 20-66 days) after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Delay of >60 days to the onset of CTRT occurred in 2 (22%) patients and was attributable to patient delays in time to recover from surgery or patient noncompliance. Furthermore, 5 of 23 patients (22%) in the postop CTRT group did not receive treatment for various reasons. Average estimated operative blood loss was 1933 mL (median 1550) and 1060 mL (median 1000) for preop and postop CTRT groups, respectively. Mean length of operation was 488 minutes (median 480) and 486 minutes (median 480). Median length of postoperative stay was 22 and 20 days (ranges, 9-144 and 10-38). Pathological findings in the resected specimens showed significantly fewer involved nodes in the preop CTRT group (28 vs 87%; P = 0.0006), whereas similar numbers of nodes/patient were counted in each group (14 vs 22, P = 0.11). More negative resection margins were observed in the preop CTRT group (28 vs 56%; P = not significant). A significantly greater amount of fibrosis replacing the tumor was observed in the preop CTRT group (70 vs 40%; P = 0.0001). There were no significant survival differences observed (median 20 months vs 25 months; P = 0.48), in follow-up that ranged from 4 to 76 months (median 44 months for surviving patients) for the preop group and 4 to 40 months (median 16 months for surviving patients) for those with postop CTRT. Local failure either alone or as a component of distant failure occurred in 16 per cent (4 of 25 patients) with preop CTRT and 16.6 per cent (3 of 18) with postop CTRT. Analysis of differences between those treated with preoperative and postoperative CTRT demonstrates similarity in toxicity and effects. However, 22 per cent of patients intended for postoperative therapy did not receive treatment.