Clinical Outcomes and Complication Rates for Noncontiguous Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion, Cervical Disc Arthroplasty, and Hybrid Cervical Surgery: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined clinical outcomes associated with 3 types of noncontiguous cervical surgeries - anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA), and hybrid cervical surgery (HCS) - to improve surgeon decision-making. METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from database inception until June 6th, 2023. Inclusion criteria were studies that reported any type of clinical outcome, examined noncontiguous ACDF, noncontiguous CDA, and/or noncontiguous HCS. RESULTS: Ten articles out of 523 articles initially retrieved were included. Patients (n = 388) had a mean age of 52 ± 5.1 years and a mean follow up time of 33 ± 6.0 months. Overall, 119 patients underwent non-contiguous HCS, 65 underwent non-contiguous CDA, and 204 underwent non-contiguous ACDF. There appears to be no clinically meaningful difference in Neck Disability Index (NDI) score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and improvement in pain based on surgery type. There was a total of 83 complications (21% of cases) with non-contiguous ACDF having a higher absolute rate of dysphagia (20%) as compared to non-contiguous HCS (6.7%) or non-contiguous CDA (6.2%). Non-contiguous ACDF had a higher absolute rate of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) as a reported complication (6.4%) as compared to non-contiguous HCS (1.7%) and non-contiguous CDA (0.0%). CONCLUSIONS: There may be no clinically meaningful difference in many clinical outcomes for different non-contiguous surgical interventions for non-contiguous cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). However, complication rates, such as dysphagia and ASD, appear higher for non-contiguous ACDF as compared to non-contiguous CDA or HCS.

The Impact of Ketorolac Utilization on Outcomes for Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: Ketorolac is one of the most potent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs commonly used in spine surgery. The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of ketorolac utilization with or without other medications on a patient's postoperative course after lumbar surgery. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, and Web of Science in July 2023. Inclusion criteria were RCTs that used ketorolac for lumbar surgery. RESULTS: Thirteen RCTs were included (N = 997; mean age, 54.6 ± 7.8 years; n = 535 in the ketorolac group) in this systematic review. There was no significant difference in the 24-hour and total postoperative morphine utilization (P = 0.185 and P = 0.109, respectively), 24-hour and final postoperative pain scores (0-10 scale) (P = 0.065 and P = 0.582, respectively), and length of stay at the hospital (P = 0.990) between patients in the ketorolac group and patients in the non-ketorolac group who underwent lumbar surgery. Overall, patients had similar rates of major complications (3.7% vs. 5.4%) and minor complications (42.1% vs. 51.7%) between groups after lumbar surgery. However, patients in the ketorolac group had a significantly lower rate of nausea and/or vomiting compared with the non-ketorolac group after lumbar surgery (21.6% vs. 37.1%, respectively; P = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant difference in 24-hour and total postoperative morphine utilization, pain scores, or length of stay, with similar complication rates after lumbar surgery between patients receiving ketorolac and patients not receiving ketorolac via meta-analysis of RCTs.

Preservation of Motion in Spine Surgery.

The number of spinal procedures and spinal fusions continues to grow. Although fusion procedures have a high success rate, they have inherent risks such as pseudarthrosis and adjacent segment disease. New innovations in spine techniques have sought to eliminate these complications by preserving motion in the spinal column. Several techniques and devices have been developed in the cervical and lumbar spine including cervical laminoplasty, cervical disk ADA, posterior lumbar motion preservation devices, and lumbar disk ADA. In this review, advantages and disadvantages of each technique will be discussed.

Vertebral Augmentation in Spine Surgery.

Vertebral augmentation has been a well-studied adjunct percutaneous procedure in spine surgery. Cement augmentation has been used in the treatment of compression fractures through kyphoplasties or vertebroplasties. Historically, data have shown no difference between treating compression fractures conservatively versus with percutaneous cement augmentation procedures. Recent literature has shown improvement in patient outcomes and increase in mobility with percutaneous cement augmentation procedures. Cement augmentation has been used in treating patients with spinal column fractures in higher energy trauma. Cement augmentation has shown to have a reduction in local kyphosis, improved pain, and significant height restoration of the anterior column in patients with burst fractures. Augmentation has been used in spinal deformity surgery, specifically to attempt to reduce the risk of proximal junctional kyphosis and to decrease the risk of screw pullout with cement augmented fenestrated screws in patients with osteoporosis. In pathologic compression fractures, cement augmentation is a safe, viable intervention to improve pain control in these patients. This review will go into the new advances of vertebral augmentation and indications for use in treatment today.

Differences among reciprocal hybrids of Labeotropheus.

Current evidence suggests that hybridization played a crucial role in the early evolution and diversification of the species flocks of cichlid fishes in the African Great Lakes. Nonetheless, evidence for hybridization in the extant cichlid fauna is scant, suggesting that hybridization is rare in the modern era, perhaps enforced by natural or sexual selection acting against F1 hybrids. Additionally, most experimental studies of hybridization perform a hybrid cross in one direction, ignoring the reciprocal hybrid. In this study, we perform reciprocal crosses between sympatric congeners from Lake Malawi, Labeotropheus fuelleborni and L. trewavasae, in order to compare the body shape and coloration of males of both of these hybrids, as well as to examine how these hybrids fare during both inter- and intrasexual interactions. We found that L. trewavasae-sired hybrid males are intermediate to the parental species both morphologically and chromatically, while the reciprocal L. fuelleborni-sired hybrids are likely transgressive hybrids. Males of these transgressive hybrids also fare poorly during our mate choice experiments. While female L. trewavasae reject them as possible mates, male L. trewavasae do not make a distinction between them and conspecific males. Selection against transgressive F1 hybrids as observed in our crossing experiments may help explain why contemporary hybridization in Lake Malawi cichlids appears to be rare. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10750-022-05092-4.

Freehand Pre-drilling Technique for Lateral Mass Screw Fixation Is More Efficient and Reliable Versus Sequential Drilling Technique: A Sawbone Analysis.

Background Since posterior cervical fixation with lateral mass screws was introduced in 1979, multiple techniques have been described in the literature. However, no study to date has determined whether pre-drilling all lateral masses prior to screw insertion has a benefit over the traditional sequential drilling and screw insertion on the alignment of the screw-rod construct. This study sought to determine the efficacy and efficiency in achieving alignment with a novel pre-drilling technique compared to the traditional sequential drilling technique. The authors hypothesized that the novel pre-drilling technique could be applied more quickly and precisely than the traditional sequential drilling technique. Methods Eight cervical spine sawbones models were utilized to place 64 lateral mass screws by two surgeons. The pre-drilling technique was utilized to place 32 screws in four models, and the sequential drilling technique was utilized to place the 32 screws in the remaining four models. In the traditional sequential drilling technique, each lateral mass underwent screw tract preparation and insertion before proceeding to the subsequent vertebra. In the pre-drilling technique, all lateral masses were marked and drilled sequentially before screw placement. CT imaging with 3D reconstructions was generated for all models. Variability in screw placement and time taken to fully instrument the models were compared.  Results The mean time to completion of the pre-drilling technique was 337 ± 22 seconds compared to 490 ± 22 seconds with the traditional technique (p<0.01). There was a significantly higher variability in the coronal plane within the traditional group between C5 and C6 compared to other adjacent vertebrae (p<0.05). There was no significant difference in the start point variability and the overall tightness of line fit between the techniques. Conclusions Our study suggests that a novel pre-drilling technique for lateral mass screw insertion may be more efficient and reliable than the traditional sequential drilling technique. In addition, this technique may reduce the need for rod contouring or additional implants to optimize the alignment of cervical instrumentation. However, further clinical studies are necessary to validate the potential clinical and radiologic benefits of this described technique.

Is the Cranial and Posterior Screw of the "Inverted Triangle" Configuration for Femoral Neck Fractures Safe?

OBJECTIVES: To determine the frequency where a posterior and cranial screw in a femoral neck that appeared contained on fluoroscopy violates the cortex. METHODS: Ten specimens including the hemipelvis with the proximal femur were obtained from unidentified embalmed specimens that were to be cremated after an institutional review board waiver was granted. Under fluoroscopy, the posterior and cranial screw of the inverted triangle configuration for the femoral neck was placed using standard technique with a cannulated 6.5-mm screw. Anterior-posterior and lateral images of the final screw placement were blinded to 2 orthopaedic traumatologists and 1 musculoskeletal radiologist who were asked to determine whether the screw radiographically breached the posterior and cranial cortex. Cadavers were stripped of soft tissues and inspected for screw perforation. Screws were grouped as contained, thread extrusion, or core extrusion. RESULTS: Reviewers classified all 10 screws as radiographically contained within the femoral neck. Cadavers were inspected and found to show: 4 of 10 with core extrusion, 3 of 10 with thread extrusion, and 3 of 10 screws contained within the femoral neck. CONCLUSIONS: Seventy percent of screws that were judged to be radiographically contained had cortical breach near the area where the lateral epiphyseal vessels enter the femoral neck. We urge caution against placement of posterior-cranial implants with fluoroscopy alone even if they appear radiographically contained.