Does surgical reconstruction of the distal oblique bundle (DOB) provide similar stability as the intact bundle or Adams procedure? A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this review was to summarize the available evidence for biomechanical stability following surgical DOB reconstruction, and to determine whether distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) stability with a reconstructed DOB was similar to the native intact condition or that after the Adams procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines was performed using the databases PubMed and Embase. The following search algorithm was used: ("DOB" OR "Distal Oblique Bundle") AND "Reconstruction". Biomechanical or human cadaveric studies that measured stability of the DRUJ after reconstruction of the DOB were included. RESULTS: Four articles were included in the final analysis. DOB incidence was reported to be between 50% and 70%. Two studies observed no differences between the intact situation and the reconstructed DOB, respectively the Adams procedure. A further author group found no signs of major instability after the Adams reconstruction or after DOB reconstruction, except for decreased stability during supination in the DOB sample. In another study, similar results could be shown for the Adams and DOB reconstruction groups; however, the DOB sample showed decreased dorsal translation of the radius during forearm supination. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, DOB reconstruction was proven to stabilize the DRUJ adequately. Moreover, the reconstructed DOB showed the same stability as the native DOB, except for one study, in which stability following reconstruction was reduced during supination. No significant difference between the DOB and the Adams reconstruction could be observed.

Two fingerbreadths, one finger's width: on the proximity of the radial nerve to the deltoid tuberosity.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to find a convenient technique to evaluate the location of the radial nerve (RN) with reference to the deltoid tuberosity (DT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-eight upper extremities, embalmed using a modified version of Thiel's method, were included in the study. The interval between the tip of the greater tubercle of the humerus and the distal tip of the lateral humeral epicondyle (LE) was defined as humeral length (HL). The most prominent point of the DT was used as the point of reference. Through this point, a horizontal reference line which met the humeral axis at the dorsal side of the humeral shaft was simulated. The longitudinal distance between the crossing point of the horizontal line and the humeral axis and the RN was measured (distance 1). The interval between the intersection point and the reference point at the DT was measured (distance 2). Data were evaluated in centimeters. RESULTS: For the whole sample, the HL averaged 31.0 cm (SD: 2.3; range 26.2-36.9). Distance 1 averaged 2.2 cm (SD: 0.3; range 1.6-3.1), and distance 2 averaged 1.2 cm (SD: 1.0; range 0-2.8). The HL was larger in the male group when compared to females (p < 0.001; males mean: 32.2 cm; females mean 29.5 cm). There was no difference regarding distance 2 (p = 0.59; males mean: 1.2 cm; females mean: 1.3 cm) between the sexes. Distance 1 was significantly (p = 0.02) larger in the male group (mean: 2.3 cm) when compared to females (mean: 2.1 cm). Concerning sides, there were no differences regarding all evaluated parameters (HL: p = 0.6; Distance 1: p = 0.6; distance 2: p = 0.8). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides an easily applicable technique to localize the RN with reference to the DT.

Proportional localisation of the entry point of the coracobrachialis muscle by the musculocutaneous nerve along the humerus.

PURPOSE: To project the distance between the tip of the greater tubercle (GT), respectively, the proximal border of the tip of the coracoid process (CP) and the entry point of the coracobrachialis by the musculocutaneous nerve (MCN) proportionally onto the humeral length. METHODS: Sixty-six upper extremities were included in the study. The distance between the tip of the GT and the distal tip of the lateral humeral epicondyle (LE) was evaluated as the humeral length (HL). The interval between the tip of the GT and the entry point of the coracobrachialis muscle by the MCN was measured. The distance between the proximal border of the tip of the CP and the distal portion of the medial humeral epicondyle (ME) and the entry point of the MCN into the coracobrachialis were evaluated. Proportions were used to project the entry point of the coracobrachialis by the MCN along the HL, respectively, the interval between the proximal border of the tip of the CP and the distal tip of the ME. RESULTS: The entry point of the MCN into the coracobrachialis muscle can be expected at an interval between 14.9 and 33.9% of the HL (between the tip of the GT and the LE), starting from the tip of the GT. Regarding the reference line between the proximal border of the CP and the ME, the nerve's entry point was located between 14.2 and 34.4%, starting from the CP. CONCLUSION: Results represent easily applicable intervals for intraoperative localisation of the MCN.

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of the humeral shaft with regard to adjacent anatomical characteristics.

The study goal was to evaluate the distances from the radial (RN), the musculocutaneous (MN) and axillary nerves (AN) and the medial neurovascular bundle of the upper arm to a minimally invasive applied plate and to define its relation to the RN during different degrees of malrotation during MIPO. The sample involved ten upper extremities. Application of a PHILOS plate was performed through a Delta-split. Intervals between the AN, MN, RN and the medial vascular bundle were defined at various positions. The humeral shaft was artificially fractured at a height of about the mean of the plate. The distal fragment was brought into 15° and 30° internal (IR) as well as external rotation (ER) and here, the plate's relation to the RN was evaluated. The medial neurovascular bundle intersected the plate at its distal part in two specimens. Regarding the distances from the RN to the plate during different rotation positions the distances became significantly longer during ER, respectively shorter during IR. The medial neurovascular bundle and the RN were identified as the main structures at risk. Care must be taken during distal screw placement and malrotation exceeding 15° must be avoided during MIPO.

Projection of the A1-Pulley of the Thumb onto Superficial Anatomical Landmarks: An Anatomical Study and a Useful Guide to Surgeons.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to project the A1-pulley of the thumb onto the total thumb length to enable its complete division with and without direct sight. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study involved 50 hands from adult human cadavers. The proximal and distal borders of the A1-pulley were measured with reference to the first metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ). The length of the thumb was defined as the interval between the first carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) and the apex of the thumb. The length of the pulley is calculated proportionally with reference to the line between the first CMCJ and apex of the thumb. RESULTS: Approximated by computing 95% confidence intervals, the pulley can be expected to lie in an area between 34.0% (proximal border) and 57.8% (distal border) alongside this line. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous and minimally-invasive division of the A1-pulley needs to be performed between 34.0 and 57.8% of the length between the first CMCJ and apex of the thumb.

A novel method of clinical first tarsometatarsal joint hypermobility testing and radiologic verification.

BACKGROUND: First tarsometatarsal joint (TMT-1) hypermobility might cause hallux valgus deformity (HV), and recurrence following surgical correction. Anatomic findings, indicating tibialis anterior tendon (TAT) involvement in TMT­1 stabilization, led to the development of cross-glide test allowing clinical TMT­1 stability testing. Cross-glide test function was evaluated in anatomical specimens and in the clinical setting, compared to simulated weight-bearing computer tomography (CT) analysis. METHODS: Cross-glide test was evaluated in 6 healthy lower leg specimens before and after TAT transection. Clinical testing was performed prospectively in 36 feet (6 controls, 21 HV, 9 recurrent HV); consecutive weight-bearing CT analysis was performed. Results from clinical testing were compared to CT analysis. RESULTS: TMT­1 instability significantly increased in anatomic specimens following TAT transection (p = 0.009). In the clinical setting, all healthy feet were cross-glide test negative, 62% of HV cases and all recurrent HV feet were positive. In the CT analysis- Compared to controls the HV cases revealed significantly increased MT­1 internal rotation (p = 0.003) and decreased dorsal angle (p = 0.002), considered as collapsing forefoot signs; HV recurrent cases revealed similar results. Positive cross-glide tested cases revealed increased MT­1 internal rotation values (p < 0.001) and dorsal angle values (p < 0.001) in CT analysis. Strikingly, cross-glide test positive HV cases revealed significantly increased internal TMT­1 rotation (p = 0.043) in CT analysis, and HV and IMT (intermetatarsal) angle were significantly higher (p = 0.005, p = 0.006). 15 HV recurrence cases, treated with TMT­1 arthrodesis, revealed no recurrence during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Cross-glide test allows reliable clinical TMT­1 instability testing, via TAT tension, and is less laborious than CT analysis. We recommend TMT­1 arthrodesis in cases with instability in clinical testing, to avoid HV recurrence.

Evaluation of screw placement in proximal humerus fractures regarding drilling manoeuvre and surgeon's experience.

INTRODUCTION: Following proximal humeral plate osteosynthesis, mechanical complication rates ranging up to 40% have been reported. The study aims to determine the influence of surgeons' experience and the technique of drilling on the complication rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The sample involved 45 cadaveric humeri. Six orthopaedic surgeons were divided into two groups with regard to their level of experience (novice versus expert group). On each humerus two different proximal humerus plates were applied. Drillings were performed either with a sharp or worn drill bit (to simulate either sharp or blunt drilling). The respective holes were drilled until the respective participant thought to have placed the drill bit subchondrally, followed by perforation of the cartilage of the humeral head. Both these values and cases of unintended penetration of the articular cavity were evaluated. RESULTS: Fourteen holes (3.6%) were primary penetrated in the joint cavity in the worn-drill-bit-subgroup and 19 holes (5%) in the sharp-drill-bit-group. The latter had an average distance between the chosen subchondral position and the humeral articular surface of 8.3 mm and the worn-drill-bit-subgroup was at 10.6 mm. In the novice group 20 perforations (5.2%) of the joint space occurred and the mean interval between the chosen subchondral point and the humeral articular surface was 4.0 mm. The experienced surgeons showed a perforation rate of 3.4% and were at a mean of 14.9 mm. There were no significant differences regarding drilling manoeuvres and experience. CONCLUSION: Although our results are satisfactory, they can be traced back to the relatively high interval between the respective chosen position of the drill bit and the humeral articular surface which may not guarantee screw stability during ORIF of all fracture patterns.

Morphology of the Posterior Interosseous Nerve with Regard to Entrapment Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) entrapment syndrome is a rare condition and is predisposed by anatomical factors such as narrow passages through fibrous arcades; whereas, the Arcade of Frohse (AF) is the most common entrapment point. The aim of this study was to evaluate the entrance and exit points of the PIN into the supinator in detail. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred unpaired upper extremities underwent dissection. The PIN's entrance and exit points from the supinator were depicted. The distances between the tip of the radial head (RH) and the AF and the exit point of the PIN from the supinator were measured. Further, it was checked if the borders of the AF and the exit point were muscular, tendinous or a combination of these. RESULTS: The interval between the PIN's entry into the supinator and the tip of the RH was at a mean of 28.9 mm. Concerning the border of the AF, in 54 cases a muscular and in 46 specimens a tendinous version could be observed. The interval between the exit point of the PIN and the tip of the RH proved to be at a mean of 64.2 mm. Further, the exit's border was muscular in 65 specimens and tendinous in 35 cases. CONCLUSION: During surgical treatment of the PIN syndrome, it needs to be kept in mind that approximately one-third of all patients might also suffer from entrapment at the exit point of the PIN.

Traumatic upper extremity injuries: Analysis of correlation of mangled extremity severity score and disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score.

BACKGROUND: The Mangled Extremity Severity Score is a decision-making tool for limb amputation after trauma. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire was developed to quantify posttraumatic functional deficits of the upper extremity. This study aims to determine the correlation between these two assessments. METHODS: In this study, a retrospective review of all patients with upper extremity injuries who had been treated with vascular reconstruction at two centres between 2005 and 2014 was performed. The respective Mangled Extremity Severity Score was calculated for each participant. Patients were recalled for follow-up examination and assessment of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score. RESULTS: In this study, 14 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean total Mangled Extremity Severity Score was 5.9 and the mean total Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score was 30 points. There was no statistically significant correlation between these assessments (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient: 0.49, p=0.075). CONCLUSION: The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score did not correlate significantly with the Mangled Extremity Severity Score.

Success Rate in Puncture of the Temporomandibular Joint.

Puncture of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) is a minimally invasive treatment for various jaw disorders. This study used a cadaveric model to evaluate the procedure from two entrance points with respect to hit ratio and possible complications, such as extraarticular extrusion of injection fluid. Ten heads, embalmed with Thiel's method, were investigated. A straight line drawn with a colored pen connected the center of the tragus and the lateral canthus. The first portal "A" was located at a distance of 1 cm anterior and 2 mm caudal from the center of the tragus. Portal "B" was located 2 cm anterior and 1 cm caudal starting from the same reference point. Punctures "A" and "B" were performed alternately on the right and left sides. Specimens were dissected and the local distribution of the injected latex was recorded. With Approach A, four punctures (40%; 4/10) reached the TMJ, whereas with Approach B, six injections (60%; 6/10) entered the TMJ. There were no statistically significant differences between the tested puncture methods (P = 0.0317) and body sides (P = 1). With each method, for example, 35% (7/20) each, the injected latex was either periarticular or retromandibular. In a further 20% (4/20), it was located subperiosteally alongside the ramus of mandible. The latex was injected into the infratemporal fossa and the external acoustic meatus in one case each (each 5%). There was no statistically significant difference between the techniques. The adjacent anatomy has to be kept in mind during TMJ puncture as the complication rate was remarkably high, suggesting that ultrasound guided intraarticular injection could improve the hit rate. Clin. Anat., 33:683-688, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The Important Relationship Between the Radial Artery's Course and the Radius during Henry's Anterior Forearm Surgical Exposure.

The aim of this study was to investigate the intersection point of the radial artery (RA) with Henry's approach. Ninety forearms from adult human cadavers which had been embalmed using Thiel's method underwent dissection. Henry's approach was performed alongside the whole length of the forearm, and the RAs course was investigated. Its crossing point with the approach was identified, and the distance from this point to the radial styloid process was determined. In addition, the total radial length (RL) was measured from the radial styloid process to the proximal margin of the radial head. The former measurements were analyzed as proportions with regard to the total RLs. Concerning right radii, the intersection point was, on average, at a proportion of 56.2% of the radius, starting from the tip of the radial styloid process. In left radii, this was located at a mean proportion of 61.2%. In cases of multiply fractured radii, care must be taken at the interval between 40% and 80% to avoid RA lesions during dissection from distal to proximal. Clin. Anat., 33:983-987, 2020. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

The Mangled Extremity Severity Score Fails to be a Good Predictor for Secondary Limb Amputation After Trauma with Vascular Injury in Central Europe.

BACKGROUND: The Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) was constructed as an objective quantification criterion for limb trauma. A MESS of or greater than 7 was proposed as a cut-off point for primary limb amputation. Opinions concerning the predictive value of the MESS vary broadly in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the MESS in a contemporary civilian Central European cohort. METHODS: All patients treated for extremity injuries with arterial reconstruction at two centres between January 2005 and December 2014 were assessed. The MESS and the amputation rate were determined. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients met the inclusion criteria and could be evaluated for trauma mechanism and injury patterns. The mean MESS was 4.97 (CI 4.4-5.6). Seventy-three per cent of all patients (52/71) had a MESS < 7 and 27% (19/71) of ≥7. Eight patients (11%) underwent secondary amputation. Patients with a MESS ≥ 7 showed a higher, but statistically not significant secondary amputation rate (21.1%; 4/19) than those with a MESS < 7 (7.7%; 4/52; p = 0.20). The area under the ROC curve was 0.57 (95% CI 0.41; 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, the MESS appears to be an inappropriate predictor for amputation in civilian settings in Central Europe possibly due to therapeutic advances in the treatment of orthopaedic, vascular, neurologic and soft-tissue traumas.

Talocalcaneal Coalition Including Open Comminuted Calcaneal Fracture; A Case Report and Literature Review.

Tarsal coalition is an often unrecognised cause of foot and ankle pain and represents a congenital osseous, cartilaginous or fibrous connection between two or more tarsal bones. Fractures in combination with tarsal coalitions are rarely described in the literature. We report the case of a 43-year-old male patient with a talocalcaneal coalition who sustained an open comminuted calcaneal fracture and a closed transverse cuboid fracture. Due to the asymptomatic tarsal coalition and the already firmly fixed subtalar joint, the patient was treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with satisfactory outcomes instead of ORIF in combination with subtalar arthrodesis. Ten months after the trauma, the patient was satisfactory and could return to his regular work. There is currently no evidence for the gold standard treatment of calcaneal fractures with combined tarsal coalitions. Due to the satisfactory results of this case, authors conclude that in case with prior asymptomatic coalitions, singular ORIF without subtalar arthrodesis may be performed.

Safe zone for the posterior interosseous nerve with regard to the lateral and posterior approaches to the proximal radius.

PURPOSE: The posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) is at risk during the posterior and lateral approaches to the proximal radius. We aimed to define a safe zone for these approaches to avoid injury of the PIN and to evaluate their close and changing relationship to the nerve during forearm rotation. METHODS: The study collective consisted of 50 upper limbs. After performance of the lateral approach, the distance between the tip of the radial head and the PIN's exit point from the supinator (= distance 1) and the shortest interval between the nerve's exit to the radial margin of the ulna (= distance 2) were measured in maximum pronation and supination. Then, the dorsal approach was conducted and again distance 1 and the interval between the distal margin of the anconeus and the nerve's exit point (distance 2) were evaluated (pronation and supination). RESULTS: There were significantly shorter distances during supination in comparison to pronation. Regarding the lateral approach, distance 1 changed from a mean of 60.3 mm (supination) to 62.7 mm in pronation (p < 0.001). For the dorsal approach, distance 1 decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from 62.9 mm (pronation) to 60.2 mm (supination). CONCLUSION: Supination during the lateral and dorsal approaches to the proximal radius needs to be avoided to protect the PIN. Furthermore, the nerve appeared at an interval between 45 and 84.1 mm (lateral approach) and 47.5-93.8 mm (dorsal approach), respectively. Therefore, care must be taken at this height during extension of the approaches in a distal direction.

Prevalence of the distal oblique bundle of the interosseous membrane of the forearm: an anatomical study.

A study was undertaken to examine the presence of the distal oblique bundle of the forearm in a large sample in order to describe its true prevalence. The study sample consisted of 200 cadaveric forearms. Fifteen were excluded due to defects in the distal interosseous membrane. In the remaining 185 specimens, the distal interosseous membrane was examined following removal of soft tissue, to determine whether a distal oblique bundle was present and whether there were connecting fibres to the distal radio-ulnar joint. The distal oblique bundle was observed in 53 specimens (29%). In 45 of these forearms (85%), one or more connecting fibres to the distal radio-ulnar joint were identified. The presence of a distal oblique bundle in 29% is less frequent than that reported in previous literature. The presence of the distal oblique bundle should be noted and may be of importance in the management of disorders of the distal radio-ulnar joint.