Importance of chewing, saliva, and swallowing function in patients with advanced oral cancer undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy: a prospective study of quality of life.

The primary objective of this study was to investigate the quality of life (QOL) of patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) undergoing curative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by radical tumour resection and simultaneous oral cavity reconstruction, using two validated questionnaires. A secondary objective was to assess clinical variables predicting post-treatment dysfunction in chewing, saliva, and swallowing. Thirty-five patients with locally advanced OSCC who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy were recruited prospectively. All patients completed both the University of Washington Quality of Life version 4 questionnaire (UW-QOL) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head & Neck version 4 questionnaire (FACT-H&N). UW-QOL and FACT-H&N items were associated with clinical variables. Nearly three-quarters of OSCC patients perceived good to excellent levels of overall QOL after preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Chewing difficulties, decreased salivary function, and swallowing dysfunction were the most frequent complaints of OSCC patients. Items related to food intake were significantly worse in OSCC patients older than 60 years and those with T4 tumours, as well as those without alcohol intake. Chewing, saliva, and swallowing are the most significant issues in patients with OSCC undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy. The results of this study may help guide treatment decisions for OSCC patients based on more accurate expectations of adverse effects of cancer treatment.

Is failure of condylar neck osteosynthesis predictable based on orthopantomography?

BACKGROUND: Osteosynthesis failure rates of 11.3% with 1 miniplate, 6.7% with 2 miniplates, and 4.4% with a single Medartis condyle plate were reported in previous studies of our clinic. Current science is still focused on the osteosynthesis material. Besides clinical parameters, conventional radiographs are still the first choice to detect osteosynthesis failures. This study scrutinized several factors assessable in postoperative orthopantomographs which might elevate the risk of osteosynthesis failure. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 136 patients (22 with osteosynthesis failure, 114 without) with 151 mandibular condyle fractures were included in this study. Eight parameters were assessed in postoperative orthopantomographs. RESULTS: The best predictor of osteosynthesis failure was a simplified concept of ramus height. In cases of reduced or normal ramus height, the odds of osteosynthesis failure was significantly (P = .000001) reduced to a 10th. Isolated fractures were significantly more error prone (P = .0009). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative orthopantomographs depict factors which increase the risk of osteosynthesis failure.