A Quality Education: A Comprehensive Review of a Combined Longitudinal and Specialty Track Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Medical School Curriculum.

Structured quality improvement and patient safety (QI/PS) education has increased at every level of medical education; however, great variability exists in the content taught. Here, the authors present a longitudinal model for medical student QI/PS education that is currently implemented at the University of Florida College of Medicine. The curriculum is taught with a variety of teaching methods incorporated into each year with increasing levels of clinical implementation. This curriculum is multimodal and introduces students to QI/PS concepts, presents mock scenarios, and eventually encourages clinical application to situations students experience during their own clinical practice. Additionally, a specialized track for students to have further immersion into this field of medicine is described, which involves specialized training, expanded educational opportunities, and a capstone project. Both the curriculum and specialized track contain explicit clinical integration to ensure students are prepared to enter the medical profession to engage in QI/PS endeavors.

Transforming the Culture of Peer Review: Implementation Across Three Departments in an Academic Health Center.

OBJECTIVES: Although many health care institutions believe that clinical peer review is vital for identifying and improving quality of care, peer review is perceived by many clinicians as variable and inherently punitive. Successful peer review requires institutional leadership and adoption of a just culture approach to investigating and determining accountability for medical errors that result in harm. METHODS: We describe how an academic medical center implemented and adapted its clinical peer review processes to be consistent with just culture theory and provide a roadmap that other institutions may follow. Specific examples of peer review are highlighted to show how the process improved patient safety in the departments of emergency medicine, internal medicine, and pediatrics. RESULTS: The most significant process improvement was shifting from a tradition of assigning letter grades of "A," "B," or "C" to determine whether preventable adverse events were caused by "human error," "at-risk behavior," or "reckless behavior." This categorization of human behaviors enabled patient safety officers within 3 departments to develop specific interventions to protect patients and enlist physician support for improving clinical systems. CONCLUSIONS: Each department's success was due to recognition of different patient and provider cultures that offer unique challenges. The transformation of peer review was a crucial first step to shift perceptions of peer review from a punitive to a constructive process intended to improve patient safety. Our experience with reengineering clinical peer review shows the importance of focusing on just culture as a key method to prevent patient harm.

Opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis in a pediatric ED.

OBJECTIVES: Emergency department (ED) HIV screening is recommended but challenging to implement and of uncertain effectiveness in pediatric EDs (PEDs). We sought to determine whether there were opportunities for earlier HIV diagnosis in the PED for a cohort of young adults diagnosed with HIV. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study reviewed PED records of a group of young adults receiving HIV care in an urban hospital setting. Pediatric ED visits were selected for review if they took place after the patient's estimated time of HIV acquisition and before their eventual diagnosis. Charts were reviewed to determine whether HIV infection was suspected and whether testing was offered. RESULTS: Among a cohort of HIV-positive young adults, only 3 (3.6%; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-10.8) of 84 were seen in the PED during the time they were undiagnosed but likely to be infected with HIV. Among these subjects, there was no documentation that HIV testing was offered or refused nor was there documented suspicion of HIV. CONCLUSIONS: There are opportunities for earlier diagnosis of HIV in PEDs, affirming the importance of HIV screening implementation in these settings. However, PEDs are unlikely to have the same frequency of contact with undiagnosed individuals as do adult EDs. Alternative methods of accessing at-risk adolescent populations must be identified.

Adolescent patient preferences surrounding partner notification and treatment for sexually transmitted infections.

OBJECTIVES: Important barriers to addressing the sexually transmitted infection (STI) epidemic among adolescents are the inadequate partner notification of positive STI results and insufficient rates of partner testing and treatment. However, adolescent attitudes regarding partner notification and treatment are not well understood. The aim was to qualitatively explore the barriers to and preferences for partner notification and treatment among adolescent males and females tested for STIs in an emergency department (ED) setting and to explore the acceptability of ED personnel notifying their sexual partners. METHODS: This was a descriptive, qualitative study in which a convenience sample of 40 adolescents (18 females, 22 males) 14 to 21 years of age who presented to either adult or pediatric EDs with STI-related complaints participated. Individualized, semistructured, confidential interviews were administered to each participant. Interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim by an independent transcriptionist. Data were analyzed using framework analysis. RESULTS: Barriers to partner notification included fear of retaliation or loss of the relationship, lack of understanding of or concern for the consequences associated with an STI, and social stigma and embarrassment. Participants reported two primary barriers to their partners obtaining STI testing and treatment: lack of transportation to the health care site and the partner's fear of STI positive test results. Most participants preferred to notify their main sexual partners of an STI exposure via a face-to-face interaction or a phone call. Most participants were agreeable with a health care provider (HCP) notifying their main sexual partners of STI exposure and preferred that the HCP notify the partner by phone call. CONCLUSIONS: There are several adolescent preferences and barriers for partner notification and treatment. To be most effective, future interventions to prevent adolescent STIs should incorporate these preferences and address the barriers to partner notification. In an ED setting, using HCPs to provide partner notification of STI exposures is acceptable to adolescent patients; however, the feasibility of this type of program needs further exploration.

Pediatric emergency department provider perceptions of universal sexually transmitted infection screening.

The purpose of this study was to describe the perceptions of pediatric emergency care providers in relation to implementing a universal sexually transmitted infection screening process for adolescent female patients in a pediatric emergency department. A descriptive qualitative design was used with a convenience sample of pediatric emergency physicians and nurses working in a large urban, pediatric teaching hospital. Participants were individually interviewed using a standard interview guide. Verbatim transcripts were analyzed using a modified constant comparative analysis method. Three overriding themes were identified that describe the perceptions of providers in relation to a universal screening process in a pediatric emergency department: Attitudes, Barriers, and Solutions. Universal sexually transmitted infection screening is one strategy that may help with early identification and treatment of adolescent female patients with undiagnosed sexually transmitted infections, and the pediatric emergency department is a potential site for such screening.