Technical note: 3D-printed MRI-compatible syringe pump.

BACKGROUND: A power injector is typically employed to deliver a contrast agent to a subject (e.g., humans, animals, phantoms) during MRI, but it is costly and cannot inject more than one subject at a time. Conventional syringe pumps housing multiple syringes are typically non-MRI compatible and, thus, should be placed outside the MRI room. PURPOSE: To develop the prototype of a cost-effective, easy-to-use, reliable syringe pump that could be deployed inside a clinical MRI bore and operated on during a scan. METHODS: The MRI-compatible syringe pump (MSP) was designed using Solidworks 3D modeling software and fabricated using a Raise3D Pro2 Printer. The MSP was designed to infuse up to three syringes simultaneously. The injection speed was mainly controlled with different gear sets in the escapement unit and further adjusted by changing the effective hairspring length via a pinch pin. The MSP was evaluated with three gear sets (gear ratios: 0.20:1, 0.56:1, and 1.09:1) and 10 different effective hairspring lengths at each gear ratio. A video was recorded while operating MSP at each injection speed to calculate the volume injection rate of a 5-mL syringe (mL/s). The MSP was operated five times repeatedly at each injection speed, and the mean and standard deviation of the volume injection rate were calculated. RESULTS: The volume injection rates produced by three gear ratios (0.20:1, 0.56:1, and 1.09:1) were 0.209 ± 0.003 mL/s, 0.411 ± 0.002 mL/s, and 0.625 ± 0.006 mL/s, respectively, at the full hairspring length. The injection rates of gear set 1 (gear ratio: 0.20:1) decreased from 0.273 ± 0.001 mL/s to 0.245 ± 0.001 mL/s with a decrement of 0.003 mL/s for 10 different effective hairspring lengths (r = 0.997, p < 0.001). The injection rates of gear set 2 (gear ratio: 0.56:1) decreased from 0.519 ± 0.003 mL/s to 0.469 ± 0.003 mL/s with a decrement of 0.006 mL/s (r = 0.987, p < 0.001), and that of gear set 3 (gear ratio: 1.09:1) decreased from 0.779 ± 0.012 mL/s to 0.709 ± 0.005 mL/s with a decrement of 0.007 mL/s (r = 0.963, p < 0.001). The coefficient of variation in the injection rate measurement was 0.727 ± 0.346%. CONCLUSIONS: The MSP is a portable device that can reliably deliver a liquid agent to multiple subjects inside a clinical MRI bore during a scan.

Disposable point-of-care portable perfusion phantom for quantitative DCE-MRI.

PURPOSE: To develop a disposable point-of-care portable perfusion phantom (DP4) and validate its clinical utility in a multi-institutional setting for quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (qDCE-MRI). METHODS: The DP4 phantom was designed for single-use and imaged concurrently with a human subject so that the phantom data can be utilized as the reference to detect errors in qDCE-MRI measurement of human tissues. The change of contrast-agent concentration in the phantom was measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The repeatability of the contrast enhancement curve (CEC) was assessed with five phantoms in a single MRI scanner. Five healthy human subjects were recruited to evaluate the reproducibility of qDCE-MRI measurements. Each subject was imaged concurrently with the DP4 phantom at two institutes using three 3T MRI scanners from three different vendors. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters in the regions of liver, spleen, pancreas, and paravertebral muscle were calculated based on the Tofts model (TM), extended Tofts model (ETM), and shutter speed model (SSM). The reproducibility of each PK parameter over three measurements was evaluated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and compared before and after DP4-based error correction. RESULTS: The contrast-agent concentration in the DP4 phantom was linearly increased over 10 min (0.17 mM/min, measurement accuracy: 96%) after injecting gadoteridol (100 mM) at a constant rate (0.24 ml/s, 4 ml). The repeatability of the CEC within the phantom was 0.997 when assessed by the ICC. The reproducibility of the volume transfer constant, Ktrans , was the highest of the PK parameters regardless of the PK models. The ICCs of Ktrans in the TM, ETM, and SSM before DP4-based error correction were 0.34, 0.39, and 0.72, respectively, while those increased to 0.93, 0.98, and 0.86, respectively, after correction. CONCLUSIONS: The DP4 phantom is reliable, portable, and capable of significantly improving the reproducibility of qDCE-MRI measurements.