Personalized, parcel-guided non-invasive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of post-concussive syndrome: safety and proof of concept.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and proof of concept of a parcel-guided, repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in patients who develop a heterogeneous array of symptoms, known collectively as post-concussive syndrome (PCS), following traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of off-label, individualized, parcel-guided rTMS in 19 patients from December 2020 to May 2023. Patients had at least one instance of mild, moderate, or severe TBI and developed symptoms not present prior to injury. rTMS targets were identified based on machine learning connectomic software using functional connectivity anomaly matrices compared to healthy controls. EuroQol (EQ-5D), as a measurement of quality of life, and additional questionnaires dependent on individual's symptoms were submitted prior to, after, and during follow-up from rTMS. RESULTS: Nineteen patients showed improvement in EQ-5D and Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaires - 3 after treatment and follow-up. For nine patients who developed depression, five (55%) attained response and remission based on the Beck Depression Inventory after treatment. Eight of ten patients with anxiety had a clinically significant reduction in Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 scores during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Parcel-guided rTMS is safe and may be effective in reducing PCS symptoms following TBI and should incite further controlled studies.

Personalized, parcel-guided rTMS for the treatment of major depressive disorder: Safety and proof of concept.

BACKGROUND: Not all patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) benefit from the US Food and Drug Administration-approved use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. We may be undertreating depression with this one-size-fits-all rTMS strategy. METHODS: We present a retrospective review of targeted and connectome-guided rTMS in 26 patients from Cingulum Health from 2020 to 2023 with MDD or MDD with associated symptoms. rTMS was conducted by identifying multiple cortical targets based on anomalies in individual functional connectivity networks as determined by machine learning connectomic software. Quality of life assessed by the EuroQol (EQ-5D) score and depression symptoms assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were administered prior to treatment, directly after, and at a follow-up consultation. RESULTS: Of the 26 patients treated with rTMS, 16 (62%) attained remission after treatment. Of the 19 patients who completed follow-up assessments after an average interval of 2.6 months, 11 (58%) responded to treatment and 13 (68%) showed significant remission. Between patients classified with or without treatment-resistant depression, there was no difference in BDI improvement. Additionally, there was significant improvement in quality of life after treatment and during follow-up compared to baseline. LIMITATIONS: This review is retrospective in nature, so there is no control group to assess the placebo effect on patient outcomes. CONCLUSION: The personalized, connectome-guided approach of rTMS is safe and may be effective for depression. This personalized rTMS treatment allows for co-treatment of multiple disorders, such as the comorbidity of depression and anxiety.

Improving quality of life post-tumor craniotomy using personalized, parcel-guided TMS: safety and proof of concept.

PURPOSE: Deficits in neuro-cognitive function are not uncommon for patients who have undergone surgical removal of brain tumors. Our goal is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) as a non-invasive tool for the treatment of neuro-cognitive dysfunctions following craniotomy. METHODS: We present a retrospective review of individualized rTMS in twelve patients from Cingulum Health from December 2019 to July 2021 who presented with neuro-cognitive deficits following craniotomy. Multiple cortical targets were selected based on the patient's neurological disorder, associated networks, and anomalies in the functional connectivity of the brain as determined by machine-learning. TMS treatment was performed for five consecutive days. EuroQol quality of life (EQ-5D), functional extremity scales, and neuropsychiatric questionnaires related to the patient's deficit were assessed prior to, after, and during two-month follow-up of rTMS treatment. RESULTS: Nine patients had unilateral functional deficits in either upper, lower, or both limbs. One patient reported post-operative depression, another experienced short term memory difficulties, and a third reported hypobulia. All twelve patients reported significantly improved EQ5D after rTMS treatment and during follow-up. More than half of the patients with lower and upper functional deficits had a 9-point improvement during follow-up. In the patient who developed depression, an 88% reduction in depressive symptoms based on the Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI) was observed during follow-up. No adverse events, such as seizures, occurred. CONCLUSION: The personalized functional connectivity approach to rTMS treatment may be effective and safe for patients with post-craniotomy neuro-cognitive dysfunction.