The smear layer in endodontics.

With the cascade of new restorative products being unveiled almost monthly, dentists incorporating endodontics into their practices must be able to evaluate the potential of these products for successful integration into their procedures. This evaluation should be based on a knowledge of how the new products relate to the smear layer formed along the root canal walls. Rather than relying on information supplied by the dental manufacturers, the aware dentist should regularly resort to the most current research reports available in journal or abstract form. With the use of certain products in some clinical situations, other branches of restorative dentistry may suggest retention of the smear layer. Although pulpally infected teeth have been successfully treated for generations in the presence of the smear layer, it has become accepted practice now in endodontics to remove the smear layer. Different quantities and qualities of smear layer can be produced by various techniques of instrumentation. However, they all present a barrier to intimate contact between obturating materials and the canal wall. Various types of solvents will produce different results in smear layer removal. One ideal endodontic irrigant follows the use of the antimicrobial 5.25 per cent sodium hypochlorite solution with the equally antimicrobial 6 per cent citric acid solution or 17 per cent EDTA. Chelating agents are effective in that they remove the smear layer, open the dentinal tubules, and produce a clean surface for closer obturation. Removal of the smear layer encourages the creation of a good apical plug to prevent over filling, post-filling sensitivity, and possible microleakage. The use of glass ionomer cements and unfilled resin as a cementing medium following smear layer removal shows promising results in both strength of cementation and the possibility of reducing post lengths. Controversies will always arise in dentistry with the advent of new information and the discovery of new clinical techniques. But a total awareness of both sides of a controversy will enable the practitioner to find a way through the confusion.

Scanning electron microscope study of the junction between restorations and gingival cavosurface margins.

This study demonstrates a definite interfacial void between the cervical margins of the tooth preparation and gold inlay, composite resin, and amalgam restorations. In addition, these marginal defects permit plaque formation within them. Furthermore, microleakage may be a complicating factor in this lack of fit. Restorations which may be "clinically acceptable" may not, in fact, be ideal because of the properties of the restorative materials. It would seem desirable, therefore, to encourage the development of new restorative materials that will bond to the tooth surface.