Comparison of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Urine Culture in the Evaluation of Patients with Complex Urinary Tract Infections.

To compare organism identification using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and urine culture (UC) in patients with complex urinary tract infections (cUTIs), we reviewed the results of 3395 patients seen during 2022 with cUTI who underwent concomitant PCR and UC testing. We compared the overall positivity rates as well as the ability of each test to identify fastidious organisms (FOs) and the presence of polymicrobial infections (PMOs) and conducted concordance analysis between the tests. PCR detected 36.4% more organisms than UC and was 20 and nearly 36 times more likely to detect PMOs and FOs, respectively. PCR identified 90.6% of organisms found in UC, whereas UC identified 40.7% of organisms found in PCR testing. We found that 62.4% of organisms found in PCR were not found in urine culture, while UC found 9.4% of organisms not identified in polymerase chain reaction. All these differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Although we found that PCR was superior to UC in overall pathogen detection, and detection of both PMOs and FOs, both identified potentially pathogenic organisms not found in the corresponding test. Our data strongly suggest that the evaluation of patients with cUTI is best accomplished using PCR in conjunction with UC.

The Essential Role of PCR and PCR Panel Size in Comparison with Urine Culture in Identification of Polymicrobial and Fastidious Organisms in Patients with Complicated Urinary Tract Infections.

Complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) are difficult to treat, consume substantial resources, and cause increased patient morbidity. Data suggest that cUTI may be caused by polymicrobial and fastidious organisms (PMOs and FOs, respectively); as such, urine culture (UC) may be an unreliable diagnostic tool for detecting cUTIs. We sought to determine the utility of PCR testing for patients presumed to have a cUTI and determine the impact of PCR panel size on organism detection. We reviewed 36,586 specimens from patients with presumptive cUTIs who received both UC and PCR testing. Overall positivity rate for PCR and UC was 52.3% and 33.9%, respectively (p < 0.01). PCR detected more PMO and FO than UC (PMO: 46.2% vs. 3.6%; FO: 31.3% vs. 0.7%, respectively, both p < 0.01). Line-item concordance showed that PCR detected 90.2% of organisms identified by UC whereas UC discovered 31.9% of organisms detected by PCR (p < 0.01). Organism detection increased with expansion in PCR panel size from 5-25 organisms (p < 0.01). Our data show that overall positivity rate and the detection of individual organisms, PMO and FO are significantly with PCR testing and that these advantages are ideally realized with a PCR panel size of 25 or greater.

Women in Urology.

The presence of women in genitourinary (GU) specialty training and practice has lagged significantly behind other fields. Current challenges include maternity leave, sexual harassment, and pay disparities. Despite these obstacles, the prevalence of women in GU specialty training has risen rapidly. One consequence of retiring male providers and higher numbers of female graduates will be a notable demographic shift in the percentage of GU care provided by these younger women. It will be essential to anticipate and acknowledge the unique concerns of this workforce, particularly in light of the concomitant aging of the US population and the associated increase in demand for GU care.

Complete urinary tract extirpation: the University of Maryland experience.

OBJECTIVES: Complete urinary tract extirpation (CUTE) involves simultaneous bilateral nephroureterectomy, cystectomy or cystoprostatectomy, and the creation of a urinary diversion, if needed. Case reports of this operation have been published, but to our knowledge, this is the largest case series yet reported. We sought to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent CUTE. METHODS: From 1994 to 2005, 9 patients underwent CUTE at our institution. We performed a retrospective chart review of these patients. The data reviewed included demographics, operative time, length of stay, complications, recurrences, and overall survival. RESULTS: Nine patients who underwent CUTE were identified. The mean patient age at the operation was 61 years. Five patients were men. The mean operative time was 356 minutes. Two patients required a blood transfusion. The length of stay averaged 10.8 days (range 6 to 47). Four patients had functioning renal allografts before and after surgery. Three patients needing dialysis received renal allografts postoperatively. The overall survival rate at a mean follow-up of 31 months was 86%. CONCLUSIONS: Although this report presented a small number of patients, it has illustrated that CUTE can be performed safely and allow definitive surgical treatment of patients with complex genitourinary pathologic findings.