Combination of calcium channel blockers and beta-blockers for patients with exercise-induced angina pectoris: beneficial effect of calcium channel blockers largely determined by their effect on heart rate.

The combination of calcium channel blockers and beta-blockers is more effective for the treatment of exercise-induced angina pectoris than beta-blocker monotherapy. As ischemia in exercise-induced angina is essentially preceded by an increase in heart rate, calcium channel blockers with a negative chronotropic property may perform better for this purpose than nonchronotropic compounds. A 335-patient, 10-week, double-blind, parallel-group comparison of amlodipine 5 mg and 10 mg, diltiazem 200 mg and 300 mg, and mibefradil 50 mg and 100 mg treatment added to baseline beta-blocker treatment was performed. Exercise testing (ETT) was performed by bicycle ergometry. All of the calcium channels blockers significantly delayed the onset of 1 mm ST-segment depression on ETT (p < 0.001 for any treatment vs. baseline). In addition, mibefradil, in both low- and high-dose treatments, produced the largest delays (low dose: different from diltiazem and amlodipine by 24.1 and 29.8 seconds, respectively, p < 0.003 and < 0.001; high dose: different from diltiazem and amlodipine by 33.7 and 37.0 seconds, respectively, p < 0.001 and < 0.001). A stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that this beneficial effect of calcium channel blockers was largely dependent on their effect on heart rate. Serious symptoms of dizziness likewise occurred significantly more frequently on mibefradil (p < 0.05 vs. diltiazem) and urged no fewer than 19 patients on mibefradil to withdraw from the trial. The authors conclude that calcium channel blockers with a negative chronotropic property provide a better delay of ischemia in patients with exercise-induced angina, but the concomitant risk of intolerable dizziness may reduce this benefit.

Value of the addition of amlodipine to atenolol in patients with angina pectoris despite adequate beta blockade.

Anginal patients who remain symptomatic despite optimally dosed beta blockade may also be given dihydropyridine calcium antagonists. This treatment regimen was examined in a double-blind parallel, randomized, controlled study in 147 patients with angina and positive bicycle exercise tests despite optimal beta blockade with atenolol (heart rate at rest <60 beats/min). Patients were randomized to atenolol and/or placebo (control), and atenolol and/or amlodipine. The main outcome measurement was exercise tolerance after 8 weeks compared with baseline. After 8 weeks, no significant differences in time to 0.1-mV ST-segment depression, time to chest pain, and time to end of exercise were observed. The number of patients with chest pain during exercise decreased significantly in the amlodipine group (p = 0.04 vs controls). The subgroup of patients with an early (<6 minutes) onset of chest pain at baseline showed a significant increase in time to chest pain after amlodipine (p = 0.0001 vs controls). In the amlodipine group, ST depression and rate-pressure product at submaximum comparable workload decreased to 0.4 mm (0.56) (p = 0.03 vs controls) and 1.223 (2.652) beats/ min x mm Hg (p = 0.01 vs controls). The number of patients in each group with adverse events was not different. The addition of amlodipine to the treatment of patients with myocardial ischemia, despite optimal beta blockade, is well tolerated and may lead to improvement in symptomatic anginal patients, who have a rapid onset of exercise-induced ischemia.

Anti-ischaemic efficacy of L-propionylcarnitine--a promising novel metabolic approach to ischaemia?

L-propionylcarnitine, a naturally occurring derivative of L-carnitine, essential for mitochondrial fatty acid transport and high-energy phosphate exchange, acutely reduces myocardial ischaemia and improves ischaemia-induced cardiac dysfunction following intravenous administration. This randomized, crossover study was designed to compare the long-term anti-ischaemic effects of oral L-propionylcarnitine with diltiazem in patients with stable, exercise-induced angina. After a 2-week washout phase of anti-anginal medication and a 2-week single-blind placebo period, 46 patients were included in the study, 23 of whom received 1500 mg L-propionylcarnitine daily for 6 weeks, and 23 diltiazem (180 mg daily for 3 weeks, followed by 360 mg daily for 3 weeks), crossing over to the other treatment after a 1-week washout period. Three patients on L-propionylcarnitine and two on diltiazem discontinued. Both treatments resulted in comparable exercise duration (582 +/- 35 s and 588 +/- 33 s, mean +/- SEM), time to 0.1 mV ST depression (436 +/- 38 s and 465 +/- 36 s), and increase in time to 0.1 mV ST depression from baseline (20% and 28%), L-propionylcarnitine and diltiazem, respectively. Diltiazem decreased the rate-pressure product at rest and exercise, L-propionylcarnitine did not. Both compounds significantly reduced ST depression at maximal exercise [23% (L-propionylcarnitine) vs 35% (diltiazem), P < 0.05 diltiazem vs L-propionylcarnitine]. Diltiazem increased the time to onset of angina by 22%. In contrast, no significant changes occurred with L-propionylcarnitine. During the study, anginal attacks were reduced by 70% and 57%, and nitroglycerin consumption decreased by 57% and 70%, L-propionylcarnitine and diltiazem, respectively. Thus, both L-propionylcarnitine and (high-dose) diltiazem result in anti-ischaemic effects and decrease anginal attacks in daily life. Although the effect of diltiazem on exercise-induced ischaemia appears more pronounced than that of L-propionylcarnitine, this novel metabolic approach to ischaemia warrants further development.