Leucovorin and Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin as First-Line Treatment in Advanced Colorectal Cancer.

PURPOSE: In a previous study of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, the LV5FU2 regimen, comprising leucovorin (LV) plus bolus and infusional fluorouracil (5FU) every 2 weeks, was superior to the standard North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Mayo Clinic 5-day bolus 5FU/LV regimen. This phase III study investigated the effect of combining oxaliplatin with LV5FU2, with progression-free survival as the primary end point. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty previously untreated patients with measurable disease were randomized to receive a 2-hour infusion of LV (200 mg/m2/d) followed by a 5FU bolus (400 mg/m2/d) and 22-hour infusion (600 mg/m2/d) for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks, either alone or together with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 as a 2-hour infusion on day 1. RESULTS: Patients allocated to oxaliplatin plus LV5FU2 had significantly longer progression-free survival (median, 9.0 v 6.2 months; P = .0003) and better response rate (50.7% v 22.3%; P = .0001) when compared with the control arm. The improvement in overall survival did not reach significance (median, 16.2 v 14.7 months; P = .12). LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin gave higher frequencies of National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 neutropenia (41.7% v 5.3% of patients), grade 3/4 diarrhea (11.9% v 5.3%), and grade 3 neurosensory toxicity (18.2% v 0%), but this did not result in impairment of quality of life (QoL). Survival without disease progression or deterioration in global health status was longer in patients allocated to oxaliplatin treatment (P = .004). CONCLUSION: The LV5FU2-oxaliplatin combination seems beneficial as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer, demonstrating a prolonged progression-free survival with acceptable tolerability and maintenance of QoL.

Vaccinia-based oncolytic immunotherapy Pexastimogene Devacirepvec in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after sorafenib failure: a randomized multicenter Phase IIb trial (TRAVERSE).

Pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa-Vec) is a vaccinia virus-based oncolytic immunotherapy designed to preferentially replicate in and destroy tumor cells while stimulating anti-tumor immunity by expressing GM-CSF. An earlier randomized Phase IIa trial in predominantly sorafenib-naïve hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) demonstrated an overall survival (OS) benefit. This randomized, open-label Phase IIb trial investigated whether Pexa-Vec plus Best Supportive Care (BSC) improved OS over BSC alone in HCC patients who failed sorafenib therapy (TRAVERSE). 129 patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to Pexa-Vec plus BSC vs. BSC alone. Pexa-Vec was given as a single intravenous (IV) infusion followed by up to 5 IT injections. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP) and safety. A high drop-out rate in the control arm (63%) confounded assessment of response-based endpoints. Median OS (ITT) for Pexa-Vec plus BSC vs. BSC alone was 4.2 and 4.4 months, respectively (HR, 1.19, 95% CI: 0.78-1.80; p = .428). There was no difference between the two treatment arms in RR or TTP. Pexa-Vec was generally well-tolerated. The most frequent Grade 3 included pyrexia (8%) and hypotension (8%). Induction of immune responses to vaccinia antigens and HCC associated antigens were observed. Despite a tolerable safety profile and induction of T cell responses, Pexa-Vec did not improve OS as second-line therapy after sorafenib failure. The true potential of oncolytic viruses may lie in the treatment of patients with earlier disease stages which should be addressed in future studies. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01387555.

Vectorized gene therapy of liver tumors: proof-of-concept of TG4023 (MVA-FCU1) in combination with flucytosine.

Background: TG4023 is a modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) containing the yeast-originated transgene FCU1, expressing cytosine deaminase and uracil phosphoribosyltransferase enzymes that transform the prodrug flucytosine (5-FC) into cytotoxic 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 5-fluorouridine-5'-monophosphate, respectively. This first-in-human study aimed to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of intratumoral (IT) TG4023 and the safety, feasibility, and proof-of-concept (PoC) of TG4023/5-FC combination to deliver high 5-FU concentrations in tumors. Patients and Methods: Cancer patients without further therapeutic option and with at least one injectable primary or metastatic liver tumor underwent on day 1 a percutaneous IT injection of TG4023 at doses of 107, 108, or 4.108 plaque forming units (p.f.u.) using ultrasound imaging guidance, after a dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs)-driven 3 + 3 dose-escalating design. On day 2, patients were given intravenous and/or oral 5-FC at a dose of 200 mg/kg/day for 14 days and were followed for safety through day 43. Tumor response was assessed at week 6, according to RECIST. Plasma and tumor 5-FU concentrations were measured to establish the PoC. Results: In total, 16 patients completed treatment with TG4023 and 5-FC. One DLT/7 patients (ALT/aspartate aminotransferase transient increase) was observed at 4 × 108 p.f.u.; MTD was therefore not reached. The most frequent adverse events were pyrexia, asthenia, vomiting, and decreased appetite. Eight of 16 patients had stable disease. Mean 5-FU concentrations in plasma were 1.9 ± 2.6 ng/ml and 56 ± 30 ng/g in tumors. Seroconversion for anti-FCU1 antibodies was found for one patient from each cohort (16%, overall). Conclusions: This phase I study demonstrated that IT injections of TG4023 were feasible and well tolerated; MTD was defined as 4 × 108 p.f.u. Therapeutic 5-FU concentrations in tumors established the virus-directed enzyme-prodrug therapy PoC. Clinicaltrials.gov Number: NCT00978107.

Comparison of the effects of fasting morning, fasting evening and fed bedtime administration of tenatoprazole on intragastric pH in healthy volunteers: a randomized three-way crossover study.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors is influenced by meals and administration time. AIM: To compare the effects on intragastric acidity of times of dosing of tenatoprazole, a novel imidazopyridine-based proton pump inhibitor with a prolonged plasma half-life. METHODS: This randomized three-period crossover study included 12 Helicobacter pylori-negative healthy subjects, who received tenatoprazole 40 mg either fasting at 7.00 AM, fasting at 7.00 PM or fed at 9.30 PM for 7 days, with a 2-week washout between periods. Twenty-four hour intragastric pH was monitored on day 7 of each period. RESULTS: On day 7, median 24-h pH was 4.7, 5.1 and 4.7 after breakfast, dinner and bedtime dosing, respectively (P = 0.11), whereas night-time pH was 4.2, 5.0 and 4.4 (P = 0.13). The mean 24-h percentage of time over pH 4 was 62, 72 and 64 after breakfast, dinner and bedtime dosing, respectively (N.S.), and 54, 68 and 56 during night-time (P = 0.06). Nocturnal acid breakthrough incidence decreased from 100% at baseline to 83%, 55% and 75% after 7.00 AM, 7.00 PM and 9.30 PM dosing, respectively (P = 0.18), and its mean duration dropped from 6.2 to 2.8, 1.0 and 2.2 h, respectively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Seven-day administration of tenatoprazole provides a prolonged duration of acid suppression, especially during the night-time, with little effect of food or time of dosing.

A comparative study of the early effects of tenatoprazole 40 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg on intragastric pH in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Tenatoprazole is a novel proton pump inhibitor with a seven-hour plasma half-life. AIM: To compare the effects of tenatoprazole 40 mg and esomeprazole 40 mg on intragastric acidity during the first 48 h in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This randomized two-period crossover study included 24 Helicobacter Pylori-negative subjects; tenatoprazole 40 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg daily were given before breakfast for two consecutive days, with a 2-week wash-out between the administration periods. Intragastric pH was monitored for 48 h. RESULTS: Over 48 h, tenatoprazole 40 mg exerted a more potent acid inhibition than esomeprazole 40 mg (median pH: 4.3 vs. 3.9, P < 0.08; per cent of time above pH 4: 57% vs. 49%, P < 0.03; proportion of subjects with at least half of the time above pH 4: 71% vs. 46%). These differences resulted from better night-time acid control with tenatoprazole 40 mg than esomeprazole 40 mg (first night median pH: 4.2 vs. 2.9, P < 0.0001; second night: 4.5 vs. 3.2, P < 0.0001). The duration of nocturnal acid breakthroughs was significantly reduced during both nights. In contrast, no significant difference was detected during the daytime periods between both regimens. CONCLUSION: Over the first 48 h, tenatoprazole 40 mg achieves a better overall and night-time control of gastric pH than esomeprazole 40 mg. The translation of better early control of acidity into clinical benefits deserves further studies.

Tenatoprazole, a novel proton pump inhibitor with a prolonged plasma half-life: effects on intragastric pH and comparison with esomeprazole in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors control gastric acidity better during the day than at night, when nocturnal acid breakthrough can occur. Tenatoprazole is a novel proton pump inhibitor with a seven-fold longer plasma half-life. Aim : To compare the effects of tenatoprazole 20 mg (T20), tenatoprazole 40 mg (T40) and esomeprazole 40 mg (E40) on intragastric acidity in healthy volunteers. METHODS: This randomized, three-period, cross-over study enrolled 18 Helicobacter pylori-negative volunteers, who received E40, T20 and T40 once daily for 7 days with a 14-day washout between periods. Twenty-four-hour gastric pH monitoring was performed on day 7. Serum gastrin was assessed on day 8. RESULTS: T40 induced a more potent acid inhibition than T20 (24-h median pH: 4.6 vs. 4.0, P < 0.01; daytime: 4.5 vs. 3.9, P < 0.01; night-time: 4.7 vs. 4.1, P < 0.05). T40 was more potent than E40 (24-h median pH: 4.6 vs. 4.2, P < 0.05; night-time: 4.7 vs. 3.6, P < 0.01); the pH > 4 holding time was higher during the night for T40 than for E40: 64.3% vs. 46.8%, P < 0.01; the nocturnal acid breakthrough duration was significantly shorter for T40 than for E40. No significant gastrin increase was observed and all drugs were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: T40 is significantly more potent than T20 and E40 during the night. The therapeutic relevance of this pharmacological advantage deserves further study.

Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: In a previous study of treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, the LV5FU2 regimen, comprising leucovorin (LV) plus bolus and infusional fluorouracil (5FU) every 2 weeks, was superior to the standard North Central Cancer Treatment Group/Mayo Clinic 5-day bolus 5FU/LV regimen. This phase III study investigated the effect of combining oxaliplatin with LV5FU2, with progression-free survival as the primary end point. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred twenty previously untreated patients with measurable disease were randomized to receive a 2-hour infusion of LV (200 mg/m(2)/d) followed by a 5FU bolus (400 mg/m(2)/d) and 22-hour infusion (600 mg/m(2)/d) for 2 consecutive days every 2 weeks, either alone or together with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m(2) as a 2-hour infusion on day 1. RESULTS: Patients allocated to oxaliplatin plus LV5FU2 had significantly longer progression-free survival (median, 9.0 v 6.2 months; P =.0003) and better response rate (50.7% v 22.3%; P =.0001) when compared with the control arm. The improvement in overall survival did not reach significance (median, 16.2 v 14.7 months; P =. 12). LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin gave higher frequencies of National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 neutropenia (41. 7% v 5.3% of patients), grade 3/4 diarrhea (11.9% v 5.3%), and grade 3 neurosensory toxicity (18.2% v 0%), but this did not result in impairment of quality of life (QoL). Survival without disease progression or deterioration in global health status was longer in patients allocated to oxaliplatin treatment (P =.004). CONCLUSION: The LV5FU2-oxaliplatin combination seems beneficial as first-line therapy in advanced colorectal cancer, demonstrating a prolonged progression-free survival with acceptable tolerability and maintenance of QoL.

Oxaliplatin as single agent in previously untreated colorectal carcinoma patients: a phase II multicentric study.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin is a new cytotoxic agent from the diaminocyclohexane family with proven antitumor activity against colon cancer cell lines. Activity in patients with colorectal carcinoma previously treated with 5-fluorouracil has been studied in three single-agent phase II trials, showing a reproducible response rate of 10%. Here we report a phase II trial with oxaliplatin as a first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients were entered in the study. All of them had metastatic disease without previous chemotherapy, and at least one lesion had to be measurable by computed tomography (CT). Therapy consisted of a two-hour infusion of oxaliplatin at a dose of 130 mg/m2 every 21 days. RESULTS: The overall response rate determined by investigators was 20% (95% CI, 6.8%-40.7%). Eight patients (32%) had stable disease. The median time to disease progression in responders was six months (range four to nine). The median progression-free survival was four months and median overall survival 14.5 months (95% CI, 10-20 months). The main toxic effects were peripheral neuropathy (92%) and laryngopharyngeal dysesthesia (75%). No severe grade 3-4 neurotoxicities (NCI-CTC) were found. Gastrointestinal and hematological toxicities were mild. CONCLUSIONS: Oxaliplatin is an active agent in first-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer. It was well tolerated, caused no toxic deaths, had low hematotoxicity, well controlled gastrointestinal toxicity, and frequent but mild peripheral neurological symptoms. Therefore, it is of interest to associate oxaliplatin with other active compounds.

Double-blind dose-response multicenter comparison of fedotozine and placebo in treatment of nonulcer dyspepsia.

The efficacy and safety of the peripheral kappa-receptor agonist fedotozine was investigated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study involving 146 patients with nonulcer dyspepsia (NUD). After a two-week washout, patients were assigned to one of four groups to receive either placebo or fedotozine three times a day at doses of 10, 30, or 70 mg for six weeks. Analysis of mean symptom intensity scores showed that the 30-and 70-mg doses of fedotozine were superior to placebo in relieving postprandial fullness, bloating, abdominal pain, and nausea. Eructation and early satiety were marginally affected. The 30-mg dose was significantly more effective than placebo in reducing the total symptom score. Eight-two mostly minor adverse effects were recorded, but no significant differences in distribution emerged between placebo and treatment groups. The number of withdrawals declined significantly as a function of increasing dose. These results indicate that 30 mg three times a day is the minimal effective dose of fedotozine in the treatment of NUD symptoms and that this treatment is safe.

[Comparative effects of ricinoleic acid and senna on orocecal and oroanal transit time in healthy subjects. Application of the salacylazosulfapyridine method]. / Effets comparés de l'acide ricinoléique et d'un sennoside sur le temps de transit oro-caecal et oro-anal chez l'homme sain. Application de la méthode de la salacylazosulphapyridine.

The appearance in plasma of sulphapyridine after oral administration of salicylazosulphapyridine (Salazopyrin) was shown to be useful for measuring the orocecal transit time in normal subjects. The purpose of this study was to use this method in diarrhea with accelerated intestinal transit time. A two-step study was performed in 12 healthy volunteers: a) under resting conditions; b) 2 weeks later with ricinoleic acid 40 ml (n = 6) or senna 19 mg (X-Prep = 1.2 g; n = 6) administration. In each step, Salazopyrin (2 g) and 20 radiopaque markers were ingested with a 200 kcal meal (Polydiet TCM = 200 ml). The following parameters were determined: a) plasmatic level of sulphapyridine (spectrophotometry) at 30 min intervals during 12 h; b) 2-day stool frequency and weight; c) oro-anal transit time (passage of the first marker and half of the markers in stools). In one subject, no sulphapyridine level was detected after administration of ricinoleic acid. With senna, 2 day stool frequency and weight increased by 80 and 131 percent respectively: orocecal transit time decreased from 6.1 +/- 1.3 to 4.8 +/- 1.2 h (m +/- SD; P less than 0.01) and oro-anal transit time (first marker) decreased from 31.8 +/- 9.6 to 20.7 +/- 8.9 (P less than 0.05). With ricinoleic acid, 2 day stool frequency and weight increased by 212 and 350 percent respectively; orocecal transit time decreased from 5.8 +/- 1.8 to 2.2 +/- 0.7 (P less than 0.01) and oroanal transit time (first marker) decreased from 25.3 +/- 7.1 to 8.0 +/- 6.8 h (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)