Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate: linear dose-proportionality, low intersubject and intrasubject variability, and safety in an open-label single-dose pharmacokinetic study in healthy adult volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, a long-acting prodrug stimulant, and its active moiety, d-amphetamine, including dose-proportionality and variability, were assessed in 20 healthy adults. Subjects received a single dose, sequentially, of 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mg of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate. Plasma lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and d-amphetamine were measured before dosing and 0.25 to 96 hours postdose. Dose-proportionality and intersubject and intrasubject variability of pharmacokinetic parameters were examined. Safety assessments included adverse events. All 20 subjects received 50 and 100 mg while 18, 12, and 9 subjects received 150, 200, and 250 mg of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, respectively. Ten subjects were discontinued during the study for prespecified stopping rules (2 consecutive hourly readings of blood pressure: systolic >160 mm Hg or diastolic >100 mm Hg). Mean maximum observed plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0-∞)) increased linearly and dose-dependently for d-amphetamine. Median time to C(max) ranged from 4 to 6 hours for d-amphetamine and 1.0 to 1.5 hours for lisdexamfetamine dimesylate. Intersubject and intrasubject variability over doses from 50 to 150 mg was low (<20%) for both C(max) and AUC(0-∞). Adverse events included nausea, dizziness, headache, psychomotor hyperactivity, and dysuria. These findings indicate that the pharmacokinetic parameters of d-amphetamine were dose-proportional and predictable over a wide range of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate doses.

Effects of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetic profiles of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate and extended-release mixed amphetamine salts in adults.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX), a long-acting prodrug stimulant, and mixed amphetamine salts extended-release (MAS XR), alone or with omeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI). METHODS: This open-label, randomized, 4-period crossover study enrolled healthy adults (18-45 years). Subjects alternately received single doses of LDX 50 mg and MAS XR 20 mg at 4-day intervals. Following washout, subjects received omeprazole (40 mg/day x 14 days), with alternate single doses of LDX 50 mg or MAS XR 20 mg added on days 7 and 11. Blood samples were collected predose and 0 to 96 hours postdose for pharmacokinetic analysis. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: Overall, 24 subjects were randomized; 21 completed the study. For LDX monotherapy, d-amphetamine mean (SD) exposure was 45.0 (13.97) ng/mL and 713.0 (134.75) ng . h/mL; when coadministered with omeprazole it was 46.3 (9.71) ng/mL and 761.6 (191.13) ng . h/mL, for Cmax and AUCinf, respectively. The median Tmax was 3 hours with and without omeprazole. For MAS XR monotherapy, total amphetamine mean (SD) exposure was 36.6 (9.19) ng/mL and 640.8 (95.66) ng . h/mL; when coadministered with omeprazole it was 38.1 (7.35) ng/mL and 643.9 (143.16) ng . h/mL, for Cmax and AUCinf, respectively. The median Tmax was 5 hours and 2.75 hours without and with omeprazole, respectively; 57.1% to 61.9% of subjects receiving MAS XR and 25% receiving LDX showed an earlier (>or= 1 hour) Tmax with omeprazole. Both medications had AEs consistent with amphetamine use. CONCLUSIONS: Total exposure was unaffected by omeprazole for both compounds. However, approximately 50% of subjects receiving MAS XR showed an earlier Tmax while on omeprazole, indicating unpredictable release of active drug by the second bead of MAS XR, most likely related to reduced stomach acid while on a PPI compromising the pulsed delivery of MAS XR. No clear trend was observed for LDX.

No influence of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran, the active form of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran.

BACKGROUND: Ximelagatran, an oral direct thrombin inhibitor, is currently in clinical development for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disease. Following oral administration, ximelagatran undergoes rapid bioconversion to its active form, melagatran, via two minor intermediates. Obesity, defined as body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m(2), is a recognised risk factor for thrombosis. There is potential for differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs administered to obese versus non-obese patients, and some drugs may require alternative administration strategies in obese patients. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of obesity on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of melagatran after oral administration of ximelagatran. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: This was an open-label, single-dose, group-matched study in which obese subjects (BMI 32-39 kg/m(2); six male and six female; age 21-40 years) were matched by sex and age (+/-2 years) with non-obese subjects (BMI 21-26 kg/m(2); six male and six female; aged 21-39 years). Each subject received a single oral dose of ximelagatran 24mg. Blood samples for determination of plasma concentrations of melagatran and activated partial thromboplastin times (APTT; a marker of melagatran pharmacodynamics) were collected up to 12 hours after administration. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in the pharmacokinetic properties of melagatran between obese and non-obese subjects. Values of area under the melagatran plasma concentration-time curve, maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), time at which C(max) occurred and terminal elimination half-life were approximately 1 micromol. h/L, 0.2 micromol/L, 2 hours and 3 hours in both obese and non-obese subjects, respectively. In addition, there was no statistically significant difference between the obese and non-obese subjects in the amount of ximelagatran, melagatran or the minor intermediates ethyl-melagatran and melagatran hydroxyamidine excreted in urine. When relating the prolongation of APTT ratio to the square root of plasma concentration of melagatran and obesity status (no/yes), no statistically significant interaction between plasma concentration and obesity status was observed. Ximelagatran was well tolerated in both obese and non-obese subjects, and no bleeding events or serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: No differences in the pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of melagatran were detected between obese and non-obese subjects after oral administration of ximelagatran, suggesting that dose adjustment of ximelagatran in obesity (BMI up to 39 kg/m(2)) is not necessary.