High-intensity functional exercise in older adults with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of high-intensity functional exercise among older adults with dementia. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, we collected articles published before August 2020 from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to evaluate the effect of high-intensity functional exercise on older adults with dementia. Primary outcomes included improvements in balance function and gait performance (speed, cadence, and stride length). The secondary outcomes included lower limb strength, activities of daily living, psychiatric well-being, depression, and cognition. Furthermore, we performed subgroup analysis with two high-intensity functional exercise programs: the Umeå program and Hauer's program. RESULTS: We identified 15 articles describing six trials including older adults with dementia undergoing high-intensity functional exercise or control activity. The meta-analysis indicated that high-intensity functional exercise, both in Hauer's program and in the Umeå program, significantly improved balance function (pooled standardized mean difference 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.31-0.83). Hauer's program significantly improved gait speed, cadence, stride length, and lower limb strength. Beneficial effects on speed, cadence, and lower limb strength were retained for several months. The Umeå program facilitated activities of daily living and psychiatric well-being, with effects on activities of daily living lasting several months. In the only eligible trial, no effects on cognition were observed. Adverse effects of high-intensity functional exercise were minimal to none. CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity functional exercise is generally safe and is recommended for older individuals with mild or moderate dementia to provide benefits in motor performance and daily functioning.

Efficacy of robot-assisted gait training in multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis is a progressive disease responsible for gait disabilities and cognitive impairment, which affect functional performance. Robot-assisted gait training is an emerging training method to facilitate body-weight-supported treadmill training in many neurologic diseases. Through this study, we aimed to determine the efficacy of robot-assisted gait training in patients with multiple sclerosis. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating the effect of robot-assisted gait training for multiple sclerosis. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov registry for articles published before May 2019. The primary outcome was walking performance (gait parameters, balance, and ambulation capability). The secondary outcomes were changes in perceived fatigue, severity of spasticity, global mobility, physical and mental quality of life, severity of pain, activities of daily living, and treatment acceptance. RESULTS: We identified 10 studies (9 different trials) that included patients with multiple sclerosis undergoing robot-assisted gait training or conventional walk training. The meta-analysis showed comparable effectiveness between robot-assisted gait training and conventional walking therapy in walking performance, quality of life, pain, or activities of daily living. The robot-assisted gait training was even statistically superior to conventional walking therapy in improving perceived fatigue (pooled SMD: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.02-0.67), spasticity (pooled SMD: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.08-1.33, I² = 53%), and global mobility (borderline) after the intervention. CONCLUSION: Our results provide the most up-to-date evidence regarding the robot-assisted gait training on multiple sclerosis. In addition to the safety and good tolerance, its efficacy on multiple sclerosis is comparable to that of conventional walking training and is even superior in improving fatigue and spasticity.

Low-Level Laser Therapy for Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia is a chronic disorder characterized by widespread pain and tenderness. Low-level laser therapy (LLLT), an emerging nonpharmacological treatment, has been used for relieving musculoskeletal or neuropathic pain. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this review and meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy of LLLT on patients with fibromyalgia. STUDY DESIGN: This study involved systematic review and quantitative meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). SETTING: This study examined all RCTs evaluating the effect of LLLT on fibromyalgia. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs evaluating the effect of LLLT on patients with fibromyalgia. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published before August 2018. RCTs meeting our selection criteria were included. The methodological quality of the RCTs was evaluated according to the Cochrane risk-for-bias method. Review Manager version 5.3 was used to perform the meta-analysis. The primary outcomes were the total scores on the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), pain severity, and number of tender points. The secondary outcomes were changes in fatigue, stiffness, anxiety, and depression. Standardized mean difference (SMD), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and P values were calculated for outcome analysis. RESULTS: We identified 9 RCTs that included 325 fibromyalgia patients undergoing LLLT or placebo laser treatment with or without an exercise program. The meta-analysis showed that patients receiving LLLT demonstrated significantly greater improvement in their FIQ scores (SMD: 1.16; 95% CI, 0.64-1.69), pain severity (SMD: 1.18; 95% CI, 0.82-1.54), number of tender points (SMD: 1.01; 95% CI, 0.49-1.52), fatigue (SMD: 1.4; 95% CI, 0.96-1.84), stiffness (SMD: 0.92; 95% CI, 0.36-1.48), depression (SMD: 1.46; 95% CI, 0.93-2.00), and anxiety (SMD: 1.46; 95% CI, 0.45-2.47) than those receiving placebo laser. Furthermore, when compared with the standardized exercise program alone, LLLT plus the standardized exercise program provided no extra advantage in the relief of symptoms. On the other hand, the results of the only RCT using combined LLLT/LED phototherapy showed significant improvement in most outcomes except for depression when compared to placebo. When compared with pure exercise therapy, combined LLLT/LED phototherapy plus exercise therapy had additional benefits in reducing the severity of pain, number of tender points, and fatigue. LIMITATIONS: There were some limitations in this review, mostly because of the low-to-middle methodological quality of the selected studies; for example, there was no clear allocation process and only patients were blinded in most studies. In addition, one study used per-protocol analysis with a 20% loss to follow-up. On the other hand, the differences in laser types, energy sources, exposure times, and associated medication status in these studies may have resulted in some heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results provided the most up-to-date and relevant evidence regarding the effects of LLLT in fibromyalgia. LLLT is an effective, safe, and well-tolerated treatment for fibromyalgia. KEY WORDS: Low-level laser therapy, fibromyalgia, meta-analysis, FIQ, pain, tender points,exercise.