Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 38
Filtrar
1.
Neth Heart J ; 30(12): 567-571, 2022 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36112340

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although the short-term benefit of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been demonstrated, the final long-term survival benefit is as yet unknown. AIM: To assess the final survival benefit of primary PCI as compared to thrombolytic therapy in patients over 75 years of age. METHODS: Patients > 75 years with STEMI were randomised to either primary PCI or thrombolysis. Long-term data on survival were available for all patients. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were randomised to primary PCI, 41 to thrombolysis. There were no significant differences in baseline variables. After a maximum of 20 years' follow-up, all patients had passed away. The patients randomised to thrombolysis died after a mean follow-up duration of 5.2 years (SD 4.9) compared to 6.7 years (SD 4.8) in patients randomised to primary PCI (p = 0.15). Thus, the mean final survival benefit of primary PCI was 1.5 years. CONCLUSION: The final survival benefit of primary PCI as compared to thrombolysis in elderly patients with STEMI is 1.5 years and their life expectancy increases by 28.8%.

2.
Neth Heart J ; 26(7-8): 385-392, 2018 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29923057

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare fractional flow reserve (FFR) and instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) measurements in an all-comer patient population with moderate coronary artery stenoses. BACKGROUND: Visual assessment of the severity of coronary artery stenoses is often discordant in moderate lesions. FFR allows reliable functional severity assessment in these cases but requires adenosine-induced hyperaemia with associated additional time, costs and side effects. The iFR is a hyperaemia-independent index. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between November 2015 and February 2017, 356 consecutive patients were included in whom 515 coronary stenoses were measured using both iFR and FFR. Mean iFR and FFR were 0.90 ± 0.09 and 0.86 ± 0.08, respectively. iFR correlated well with FFR [r = 0.75; p < 0.001]. Receiver operating characteristic analysis identified an area under the curve of 0.92. An iFR-only strategy with a treatment cut-off ≤0.89 revealed a diagnostic classification agreement with the FFR-only strategy in 420 lesions (82%) with a sensitivity of 87%, a specificity of 80%, a positive predictive value of 56% and a negative predictive value of 96%. CONCLUSIONS: Real-time iFR measurements have good negative predictive value compared to FFR, but moderate diagnostic accuracy (82%). It exposes fewer patients to adenosine, reduces procedure time and costs. Further prospective trials are needed to evaluate specific clinical settings, cut-off values and endpoints.

3.
Neth Heart J ; 25(1): 4-13, 2017 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27878548

RESUMO

Although the benefits of using the left internal mammary artery to bypass the left anterior descending artery (LAD) have been extensively ascertained, freedom from major cardiovascular events and survival after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) also correlate with the completeness of revascularisation. Hence, careful selection of the second-best graft conduit is crucial for CABG success. The more widespread use of saphenous vein grafts contrasts with the well-known long-term efficacy of multiple arterial grafting, which struggles to emerge as the procedure of choice due to concerns over increased technical difficulties and higher risk of postoperative complications. Conduit choice is at the discretion of the operator instead of being discussed by the heart team, where cardiologists are not usually engaged in such decisions due to a hypothetical lack of technical knowledge. Furthermore, according to the ESC/EACTS guidelines, traditional CABG remains the gold standard for multi-vessel coronary artery disease with complex LAD stenosis, but hybrid procedures using percutaneous coronary intervention for non-LAD targets could combine the best of two worlds. With the aim of raising the cardiologist's awareness of the surgical treatment options, we provide a comprehensive overview of the anatomical, functional and clinical aspects guiding the decision-making process in CABG strategy.

4.
Neth Heart J ; 24(5): 343-9, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26936156

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiac shockwave therapy (CSWT) might improve symptoms and decrease ischaemia burden by stimulating collateral growth in chronic ischaemic myocardium. This prospective study was performed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of CSWT. METHODS: We included 33 patients (mean age 70 ± 7 years, mean left ventricular ejection fraction 55 ± 12 %) with end-stage coronary artery disease, chronic angina pectoris and reversible ischaemia on myocardial scintigraphy. CSWT was applied to the ischaemic zones (3-7 spots/session, 100 impulses/spot, 0.09 mJ/mm(2)) in an echocardiography-guided and ECG-triggered fashion. The protocol included a total of 9 treatment sessions (3 treatment sessions within 1 week at baseline, and after 1 and 2 months). Clinical assessment was performed using exercise testing, angina score (CCS class), nitrate use, myocardial scintigraphy, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) 1 and 4 months after the last treatment session. RESULTS: One and 4 months after CSWT, sublingual nitrate use decreased from 10/week to 2/week (p < 0.01) and the angina symptoms diminished from CCS class III to CCS class II (p < 0.01). This clinical improvement was accompanied by an improved myocardial uptake on stress myocardial scintigraphy (54.2 ± 7.7 % to 56.4 ± 9.4 %, p = 0.016) and by increased exercise tolerance at 4-month follow-up (from 7.4 ± 2.8 to 8.8 ± 3.6 min p = 0.015). No clinically relevant side effects were observed. CONCLUSION: CSWT improved symptoms and reduced ischaemia burden in patients with end-stage coronary artery disease without relevant side effects. The study provides a solid basis for a randomised multicentre trial to establish CSWT as a new treatment option in end-stage coronary artery disease.

5.
Neth Heart J ; 24(2): 108-9, 2016 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26762358
6.
Neth Heart J ; 23(4): 224-31, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25884095

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are controversial data regarding infarct-related artery only (IRA-PCI) revascularisation versus multivessel revascularisation (MV-PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients with multivessel disease undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We performed a meta-analysis comparing outcome in same stage MV-PCI versus IRA-PCI in STEMI patients with multivessel disease. METHODS: Systematic searches of studies comparing MV-PCI with IRA-PCI in the MEDLINE and the Cochrane Database of systematic reviews were conducted. A meta-analysis was performed of all available studies. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were re-infarction, revascularisation, bleeding and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: A total of 15 studies were identified with a total number of 35,975 patients. Mortality rate was significantly higher in the MV-PCI group compared with the IRA-PCI group, odds ratio (OR): 1.64 (1.46-1.85). Both the incidence of re-infarction and re-PCI were significantly lower in the MV-PCI group compared with the IRA-PCI group: OR 0.54 (0.34-0.88) and OR 0.67 (0.48-0.93), respectively. Bleeding complications occurred more often in the MV-PCI group as compared with the IRA-PCI group: OR 1.24 (1.08-1.42). Rates of MACE were comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: MV-PCI during the index of primary PCI in STEMI patients is associated with a higher mortality rate, a higher risk of bleeding complications, but lower risk of re-intervention and re-infarction and comparable rates of MACE.

7.
Neth Heart J ; 20(9): 347-53, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22622701

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting data regarding optimal treatment of non-culprit lesions detected during primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multi-vessel disease (MVD). We aimed to investigate whether ischaemia-driven early invasive treatment improves the long-term outcome and prevents major adverse cardiac events (MACE). METHODS: 121 patients with at least one non-culprit lesion were randomised in a 2:1 manner, 80 were randomised to early fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided PCI (invasive group), and 41 to medical treatment (conservative group). The primary endpoint was MACE at 3 years. RESULTS: Three-year follow-up was available in 119 patients (98.3 %). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality between the invasive and conservative strategy, 4 patients (3.4 %) died, all in the invasive group (P = 0.29). Re-infarction occurred in 14 patients (11.8 %) in the invasive group versus none in the conservative group (p = 0.002). Re-PCI was performed in 7 patients (8.9 %) in the invasive group and in 13 patients (32.5 %) in the conservative group (P = 0.001). There was no difference in MACE between these two strategies (35.4 vs 35.0 %, p = 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: In STEMI patients with MVD, early FFR-guided additional revascularisation of the non-culprit lesion did not reduce MACE at three-year follow-up compared with a more conservative strategy. The rate of MACE in the invasive group was predominantly driven by death and re-infarction, whereas in the conservative group the rate of MACE was only driven by repeat interventions.

8.
Neth Heart J ; 20(4): 155-60, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22359247

RESUMO

AIM: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), it is uncertain whether atrial fibrillation has prognostic implications. There may be a difference between atrial fibrillation before and after reperfusion therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), ECGs were analysed before and after primary PCI. Of the 1623 patients with electrocardiographic data before primary PCI, 53 patients (3.3%) had atrial fibrillation. Patients with atrial fibrillation were older, were more often female, and less often had anterior MI location. Of the 1728 patients with electrocardiographic data after primary PCI, 52 patients (3.0%) had atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation was more common in older patients and in those with Killip class >1. Also patients with occlusion of the right coronary artery or TIMI flow 0 before primary PCI more commonly had AF after the procedure. Not successful reperfusion was also associated with a higher incidence of AF after primary PCI. Although both atrial fibrillation before and after primary PCI were associated with increased mortality, multivariable analyses, adjusting for differences in age, gender and Killip class on admission, revealed that atrial fibrillation after PCI (OR 3.69, 95% CI 1.87-7.29) but not before PCI (OR 1.86, 95% CI 0.89-3.90) was independent and statistically significantly associated with long-term mortality. CONCLUSION: In patients with STEMI, atrial fibrillation after but not before primary PCI has independent prognostic implications. Possibly, atrial fibrillation after the PCI is a symptom of failed reperfusion and a sign of heart failure.

9.
Neth Heart J ; 18(6): 307-13, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20657676

RESUMO

Background. In patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) who are eligible for PCI, routine stenting is the recommended treatment strategy, based on the opinion of experts. Provisional stenting may provide a viable alternative by retaining the early benefits of stenting without its potential late hazards.Method. Patients with NSTE-ACS were randomised to provisional or routine stenting after coronary angiography. Patients were followed for up to ten years. The occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was recorded.Results. 237 consecutive patients with NSTE-ACS were randomly assigned to routine stenting (n=116) or provisional stenting (n=121). No difference in the incidence of MACE at 30 days was observed. At six months, angiographic restenosis was lower in the routine stenting group (41 vs. 20%, p=0.02), paralleled by more MACE in the provisional stenting group at one year (40.5 vs. 27.6%, p=0.036). At complete follow-up the difference in MACE was not significant (61.2 vs. 50%, p=0.084) because of relatively more target lesion revascularisations in the routine stent group. There was no difference in the incidence of very late stent thrombosis (1.7 vs. 3.4%, p=0.439). The only independent predictor of MACE was beta-blocker use (RR 0.62 [0.431; 0.892] p=0.010).Conclusion. In selective patients with NSTE-ACS, routine stenting was more beneficial than provisional stenting for a period of up to five years, driven by a reduction in repeat revascularisation procedures. After this period, the benefit was no longer significant. Beta-blocker use was the only independent predictor of MACE throughout the complete follow-up period. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:307-13.).

10.
Neth Heart J ; 18(12): 592-7, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21301621

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the proven benefit of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), there is still debate on the timing of administration of these drugs and whether all or only a selection of patients should be treated. We evaluated the effect of routine upfront versus provisional use of high-dose tirofiban (HDT) in a large real-world population of non-selected STEMI patients. METHODS: Consecutive STEMI patients were registered in a single-centre dedicated database. Patients with upfront HDT therapy before first balloon inflation were compared with patients who received the drug on a provisional basis, after first balloon inflation. Initial TIMI flow of the infarct-related vessel and enzymatic infarct size and 30-day clinical outcome were assessed. RESULTS: Out of 2679 primary PCI patients HDT was given upfront in 885 (33.0%) and provisionally in 812 (45.3%). Upfront as compared with provisional HDT showed higher initial patency (22.3 vs. 17.9%, p=0.006), smaller infarct size (1401 IU/l (IQR 609 to 2948) vs. 1620 (753 to 3132), p=0.03) and a lower incidence of death or recurrent MI at 30 days (3.3 vs. 5.1%, p=0.04) without an increase in TIMI bleeding (p=0.24). Upfront HDT independently predicted initial patency (odds ratio (OR) 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15 to 1.88, p=0.02), enzymatic infarct size (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.86, p=0.001) and 30-day death or recurrent MI (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.95, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Our findings support the use of upfront potent antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy in STEMI patients and encourage further clinical investigations in this field. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:592-7.).

11.
J Thromb Haemost ; 7(10): 1612-8, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19682233

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: No randomized comparisons are yet available evaluating the effect of pre-hospital high dose tirofiban on the incidence of early stent thrombosis after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this analysis was to evaluate whether routine pre-hospital administration of high-dose tirofiban in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) decreases the incidence of early stent thrombosis after primary PCI. PATIENTS/METHODS: The Ongoing Tirofiban in Myocardial Evaluation (On-TIME) 2 trial was a prospective multicenter study of consecutive STEMI patients referred for primary PCI in which patients were randomized to pre-hospital no high-dose tirofiban/placebo. We examined the incidence of Academic Research Consortium definite and probable early stent thrombosis and determined predictors and outcome of early stent thrombosis. RESULTS: Primary PCI was performed in 1203 out of 1398 patients (86.1%). In 1073 patients (89.2%) a coronary stent was placed. Early stent thrombosis occurred in 39 patients (3.6%). Pre-hospital initiation of high-dose tirofiban significantly reduced early stent thrombosis (2.1% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.006) and was associated with a lower incidence of urgent repeat PCI (1.9% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.005). Early stent thrombosis, as well as pre-hospital initiation of high-dose tirofiban, was independently associated with 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-hospital initiation of high-dose tirofiban reduces the 30-day incidence of stent thrombosis in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI and stenting. Early stent thrombosis and pre-hospital initiation of high-dose tirofiban were independent predictors of 30-day mortality.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Trombose Coronária/prevenção & controle , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Stents , Terapia Trombolítica , Tirosina/análogos & derivados , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/administração & dosagem , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Aspirina/administração & dosagem , Aspirina/efeitos adversos , Aspirina/uso terapêutico , Clopidogrel , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Quimioterapia Combinada , Eletrocardiografia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Fibrinolíticos/administração & dosagem , Fibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiologia , Heparina/administração & dosagem , Heparina/efeitos adversos , Heparina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Recidiva , Terapia Trombolítica/efeitos adversos , Ticlopidina/administração & dosagem , Ticlopidina/efeitos adversos , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Ticlopidina/uso terapêutico , Tirofibana , Tirosina/administração & dosagem , Tirosina/efeitos adversos , Tirosina/uso terapêutico
12.
Heart ; 94(1): 44-7, 2008 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17449501

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic role of postprocedural single-lead residual ST-segment deviation for electrocardiographic evaluation of myocardial perfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by primary angioplasty. DESIGN: Prospective observational clinical cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PATIENTS: 1660 patients treated with primary angioplasty for STEMI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Mortality at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: Single-lead ST-segment deviation significantly correlated with infarct size, predischarge ejection fraction, distal embolisation and myocardial blush grade 3. At 1-year follow-up, 63 patients had died. The method correlated well with 1-year mortality. At multivariate analysis, after correction for baseline demographic, clinical and angiographic variables, postprocedural single-lead ST-segment deviation showed better accuracy than residual single-lead ST-segment elevation or resolution and residual 12-lead ST-segment deviation. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that maximal residual ST-segment deviation in a single lead at 3 hours after the procedure is an easy and accurate predictor of 1-year mortality after primary angioplasty for STEMI.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/efeitos adversos , Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/mortalidade , Eletrocardiografia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo
13.
Neth Heart J ; 15(9): 286-90, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18030315

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Circumflex (CX) artery-related myocardial infarction (MI) is less well represented in trials on ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI), most often due to the absence of significant ST-segment elevation, and therefore the outcome of these patients is less well known. We aimed to compare the outcome of patients with CX versus right coronary artery (RCA) related STEMI in a large cohort of patients treated with primary angioplasty. METHODS: A total of 1683 consecutive patients with STEMI were studied. Patients who lacked STsegment elevation were also included if they had persistent chest pain with signs of ischaemia or regional wall motion abnormalities on echocardiography. Coronary angioplasty was performed according to standard procedures. After the intervention, all patients received aspirin and clopidogrel or ticlopidine. RESULTS: The infarct-related vessel was the CX in 229 patients (14%) and the RCA in 600 patients (36%). No differences in baseline characteristics were present. Mean extent of ST-segment elevation or deviation was significantly higher in patients with the RCA as infarct-related vessel. Enzymatic infarct size was significantly higher in the CXrelated MI (1338+/-1117 IU/l vs. 1806+/-1498 IU/l, p<0.001). Left ventricular ejection fraction <45% was more often present in patients with CXrelated MI (37 vs. 26%, p<0.01). Both short- and long-term mortality were significantly higher in the CX-related MI. CONCLUSION: This study emphasises the fact that CX-related infarction has a worse prognosis compared with RCA-related infarction. (Neth Heart J 2007;15:286-90.).

14.
Neth Heart J ; 15(4): 151-5, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17612676

RESUMO

Brugada syndrome is an inherited cardiac disease and is associated with a peculiar pattern on the electrocardiogram and an increased risk of sudden death. Electrical storm is a malignant but rare phenomenon in symptomatic patients with Brugada syndrome. We describe a patient who presented with repetitive ICD discharges during two episodes of recurrent VF. After the initiation of isoproterenol infusion and oral quinidine, the ventricular tachyarrhythmias were successfully suppressed. (Neth Heart J 2007;15:151-4.).

15.
Neth Heart J ; 15(5): 178-83, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17612680

RESUMO

BACKGROUND.: Although techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have improved, patients with PCI of more vessels may still have an increased risk. We performed a prospective observational study evaluating the differences between multivessel and single-vessel procedures according to postprocedural troponin T (TnT) elevation and events during follow-up. METHODS.: The study included 713 patients without elevated TnT (<0.05 ng/ml) before PCI. Primary endpoint was the combined endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat coronary angiography and readmission for anginal symptoms during the mean follow-up of 10.9 months. RESULTS.: TnT after PCI was elevated in 150 patients (21%) and was significantly associated with an increased incidence of the primary endpoint (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.38). PCI of more than one vessel was performed in 146 patients (20%). These patients more often had increased TnT levels after the procedure (31.5 vs. 18.3%, p=0.001) and an increased incidence of the primary endpoint during follow-up (28 vs. 19%, p=0.01). After multivariable analysis, multivessel PCI was a statistically significant predictor of postprocedural TnT increase (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.17 to 3.06). Multivessel PCI was also associated with an increased risk of the primary endpoint (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.18 to 2.52), but after adjusting for multivessel disease this association was not statistically significant (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.19). CONCLUSION.: Elective PCI of more vessels in one session is, in comparison with single-vessel PCI, more often associated with postprocedural troponin T rise and a (nonsignificantly) higher incidence of cardiac events during follow-up. Whether staged PCI is associated with less morbidity has to be assessed. (Neth Heart J 2007;15:178-83.).

16.
Neth J Med ; 65(3): 95-100, 2007 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17387235

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Admission hyperglycaemia is associated with an increased risk of mortality after myocardial infarction. Whether long-term glucose dysregulation (assessed by HbA1c) is more important than acute hyperglycaemia is unknown. We evaluated the prognostic value of admission glucose and HbA1c levels in nondiabetic patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: In 504 unselected, consecutive patients with STEMI, glucose and HbA1c levels were measured on admission. Glucose was categorised as <11.1 mmol/l (n=422) and >or= 11.1 mmol/l (n=82). HbA1c levels were categorised as <6.0% (n=416) and >or=6.0% (n=88). Mean follow-up was 1.6+/-0.6 years. RESULTS: Patients with hyperglycaemia on admission were comparable with those with normoglycaemia. However,patients with HbA1c >or=6.0%, as compared with those with HbA1c <6%, were older, were more often on beta-blockers and more frequently had multivessel disease. Thirty-day mortality in the subsequent glucose categories (<11.1 mmol/l and >or=11.1 mmol/l) was 4% and 19% (p<0.001) and in the subsequent HbA1c categories (<6% and >or=6%) was 5% and 12% (p=0.03). After multivariable analyses, admission glucose (OR 4.91,95% CI 2.03 to 11.9, p< 0.001) but not HbA1c (OR 1.33, 95%CI 0.48 to 3.71, p=0.58) was significantly associated with 30-day mortality. Among 30-day survivors, neither admission glucose nor HbA1c were predictors of long-term mortality. CONCLUSION: Elevated admission glucose is an important predictor of 30-day outcome after STEMI, while prior long-term glucose dysregulation is a covariate of other high-risk clinical characteristics. Among 30-day survivors, neither admission blood glucose nor HbA1c were predictors of long-term outcome.


Assuntos
Glicemia/análise , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/sangue , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Tempo
17.
Heart ; 92(12): 1760-3, 2006 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16644856

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term impact of multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) on cause-specific mortality in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with reperfusion therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with STEMI (n = 395) treated with primary angioplasty or thrombolysis in the setting of a randomised clinical trial were enrolled in the study. Follow up was 8 (2) years. For patients who died all available records were reviewed to assess the specific cause of death. MVD was present in 57% of patients. Patients with MVD were older and more of them had diabetes and previous myocardial infarction. Compared with the non-MVD group, residual left ventricular ejection fraction was lower (45.9% v 49.6%, p = 0.001) and total mortality was higher in patients with MVD (32% v 19%, p = 0.002). After adjustment for potential confounders this association was not significant (hazard ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.9 to 2.2). When the specific cause of death was considered, sudden death was comparable between patients with and without MVD (10% v 8%, p = 0.49) but death caused by heart failure was significantly higher in patients with MVD (hazard ratio 7.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 32.2). CONCLUSION: Patients with STEMI and MVD have a higher long-term mortality than do patients with non-MVD. MVD is not an independent predictor of long-term total mortality or sudden death. However, MVD is a very strong and independent predictor of long-term death caused by heart failure.


Assuntos
Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Reperfusão Miocárdica/métodos , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/etiologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/etiologia , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/mortalidade , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/terapia
18.
QJM ; 99(4): 237-43, 2006 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16504985

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Admission hyperglycaemia is associated with poorer prognosis in patients with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Whether hyperglycaemia is more important than prior long-term glucose metabolism, is unknown. AIM: To investigate the prognostic value of admission glucose and HbA(1c) levels in patients with ACS. METHODS: We measured glucose and HbA(1c) at admission in 521 consecutive patients with suspected ACS. Glucose was categorized as <7.8 (n = 305), 7.8-11.0 (n = 138) or > or =11.1 mmol/l (n = 78); HbA(1c) as <6.2% (n = 420) or > or =6.2% (n = 101). Mean follow-up was 1.6 +/- 0.5 years. RESULTS: The diagnosis of ACS was confirmed in 332 patients (64%), leaving 189 (36%) with atypical chest pain. In ACS patients, mortality by glucose category (<7.8, 7.8-11.0 or > or =11.1 mmol) was 9%, 8% and 25%, respectively (p = 0.001); mortality by HbA(1c) category (<6.2% vs. > or =6.2%) was 10% vs. 17%, respectively (p = 0.14). On multivariate analysis, glucose category was significantly associated with mortality (HR 3.0, 95% CI 1.1-8.3), but HbA(1c) category was not (HR 1.5, 95%CI 0.6-4.2). DISCUSSION: Elevated admission glucose appears more important than prior long-term abnormal glucose metabolism in predicting mortality in patients with suspected ACS.


Assuntos
Glicemia/análise , Doença das Coronárias/sangue , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Idoso , Doença das Coronárias/mortalidade , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
19.
Heart ; 92(1): 75-9, 2006 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15831596

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To study the clinical significance of infarct location during long term follow up in a trial comparing thrombolysis with primary angioplasty. DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal cohort analysis of prospectively entered data. SETTING: Patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). PATIENTS: In the Zwolle trial 395 patients with acute STEMI were randomly assigned to intravenous streptokinase or PCI. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival according to infarct location and treatment after 8 (2) years of follow up. RESULTS: 105 patients died: 63 patients in the streptokinase group and 42 patients in the primary PCI group (relative risk (RR) 1.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.0 to 2.6; p = 0.03). In patients with non-anterior STEMI there was no difference in mortality between streptokinase and PCI treated patients (RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.6 to 2.1; p = 0.68) but the streptokinase group had significantly more major adverse cardiac events (MACE) than the PCI group (RR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2 to 3.6). The number needed to treat to prevent one MACE was four. In patients with anterior STEMI, mortality was higher in the streptokinase group than in the PCI group (RR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 5.5; p = 0.004). The number needed to treat to prevent one death was five. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed the benefits of primary angioplasty in the first year and showed additional benefit of PCI compared with streptokinase between 1-8 years after the acute event. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with anterior STEMI have better long term survival when treated with PCI than with streptokinase. In patients alive one year after the acute event, PCI confers a significant additional survival benefit, probably due to better preserved residual left ventricular function.


Assuntos
Angioplastia Coronária com Balão/métodos , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Estreptoquinase/uso terapêutico , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Idoso , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/fisiopatologia , Recidiva , Volume Sistólico/fisiologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia
20.
Neth Heart J ; 14(2): 55-61, 2006 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25696594

RESUMO

Primary coronary angioplasty has been shown to be an effective reperfusion therapy for patients with acute myocardial infarction, not only for those who present to PTCA centres but also for patients who present to hospitals without angioplasty facilities. With the increasing use of primary angioplasty more patients will be transferred to a (tertiary) PTCA centre. An increase in treatment delay is associated with a worse clinical outcome. The importance of an open infarct-related vessel at acute angiography is becoming clear. Pharmacological pretreatment of patients during transportation to a PTCA centre with the aim to open the infarct-related vessel in advance might be beneficial. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockers seem to be the agents of choice for facilitated PTCA. The safety and (cost) effectiveness of this pretreatment of patients transported to undergo primary angioplasty remain to be evaluated.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...