A Cohort Study of Strabismus Rates Following Correction of the Unicoronal Craniosynostosis Deformity: Conventional Bilateral Fronto-Orbital Advancement Versus Fronto-Orbital Distraction Osteogenesis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this prospective study is to compare perioperative morbidity and strabismus rates between traditional fronto-orbital advancement reconstruction (FOAR) and fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis (FODO) in unicoronal craniosynostosis (UCS). METHOD: A consecutive group of 15 patients undergoing FODO for isolated UCS were compared to a contemporaneous group of 15 patients undergoing traditional FOAR for UCS. Patient age, operative time, blood loss, blood replacement, technical details of the surgery, length of stay, complications, and strabismus rates were documented and compared statistically using chi-square and Student t test with a significance value of 0.05. RESULTS: The 15 patients undergoing FODO were younger (6.3 and 9.8 months, P < 0.05), experienced less operative time for the initial procedure (111 versus 190 minutes, P < 0.01), less blood loss (26% versus 50% of total blood volume, P < 0.01), and less blood replacement (40% versus 60% of total blood volume, P < 0.05). One patient in the FODO group experienced a new-onset strabismus postoperatively compared with 5 in the FOAR group (P < 0.05). There were no complications requiring a return to the operating room in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Fronto-orbital distraction osteogenesis for the treatment of isolated UCS is associated with a favorable perioperative morbidity profile and a decreased incidence of postoperative strabismus compared with traditional FOAR. These positive factors are tempered by the need for an additional procedure for removal of the device and lack of long-term outcomes data on the technique.

How to Treat a Tongue-tie: An Evidence-based Algorithm of Care.

Ankyloglossia, or tongue-tie, is characterized by a short or thickened lingual frenulum; this can be associated with impaired breastfeeding, speech, and dentofacial growth. The indications for performing frenotomy, frenuloplasty, or other operative interventions are unclear. METHODS: A meta-analysis was performed to identify the extent of the benefit from frenotomy in breastfeeding measures, degree of tongue-tie, and maternal pain during feeding in randomized controlled trials. A structured literature review analyzed the optimal type and timing of repair. An algorithm was developed to incorporate this evidence into a management pathway. RESULTS: Among 424 studies reviewed, 5 randomized controlled trials met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Frenotomy significantly improved the degree of tongue-tie, with a 4.5-point decrease in Hazelbaker Assessment Tool for Lingual Frenulum Function score compared with a decrease of 0 in those who did not undergo frenotomy (P < 0.00001). This was associated with improved self-reported breastfeeding (relative risk [RR] = 3.48, P < 0.00001) and decreased pain (Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire, P < 0.00001); however, Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy-Short Form and Latch, Audible Swallowing, Type of Nipple, Comfort, Hold scores did not significantly improve. Multiple studies demonstrated significant improvements following frenuloplasty when compared with frenotomy but demonstrated mixed results as to the effect of timing of tongue-tie division. CONCLUSIONS: Frenotomy is associated with breastfeeding improvements that vary individually but trend toward significance collectively during a critical time in infant development. Among patients with a severe Hazelbaker Assessment Tool for Lingual Frenulum Function score or difficulty breastfeeding, we conclude that simple frenotomy without anesthetic is generally indicated in infancy and frenuloplasty under general anesthesia for older children.

Perioperative Outcomes of Secondary Frontal Orbital Advancement After Posterior Vault Distraction Osteogenesis.

BACKGROUND: Posterior cranial vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) has gained popularity as the initial intervention in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis. Patients may require secondary frontal orbital advancement (FOA) following PVDO, but little is known about the perioperative risks associated with this staged management. The purpose of this study is to compare the perioperative morbidity profile of secondary FOA (study) to that of primary FOA (control). METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted for patients with syndromic or complex craniosynostosis undergoing FOA between 2004 and 2017. Univariate and multivariate analysis of demographic and perioperative data were performed. RESULTS: Forty-three subjects met inclusion criteria, 17 in the study cohort and 26 in the control cohort. The 2 cohorts were similar with regards to diagnosis and suture involvement, as well as weight-adjusted estimated blood loss, blood transfusion volume, and length of hospital stay (P > 0.050). Secondary FOA procedures required longer operating time (231 ±â€Š58 versus 264 ±â€Š62 min, P = 0.031) and anesthesia time (341 ±â€Š60 versus 403 ±â€Š56 min, P = 0.002). The secondary FOA cohort had a significantly greater proportion of procedures with difficult wound closure (19% versus 59%, P = 0.008). Two subjects in the study cohort developed a wound dehiscence, compared with 1 subject in the control cohort (P = 0.552). Frontal orbital advancement as a secondary procedure after PVDO was a predictor variable in multivariate analysis for wound difficulties (odds ratio 8.6, P = 0.038). CONCLUSION: Syndromic and complex craniosynostosis may safely be managed with initial PVDO followed by FOA, with some increased wound closure difficulty.

A Standardized Perioperative Clinical Pathway for Uncomplicated Craniosynostosis Repair Is Associated With Reduced Hospital Resource Utilization.

BACKGROUND: Hospital resource overutilization can significantly disrupt patient treatment such as cancelling surgical patients due to a lack of intensive care unit (ICU) space. The authors describe a clinical pathway (CP) designed to reduce ICU length of stay (LOS) for nonsyndromic single-suture craniosynostosis (nsSSC) patients undergoing cranial vault reconstruction (CVR) in order to minimize surgical disruptions and improve patient outcomes. METHODS: A multidisciplinary team implemented a perioperative CP including scheduled laboratory testing to decrease ICU LOS. Hospital and ICU LOS, interventions, and perioperative morbidity-infection rate, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks, and unplanned return to the operating room (OR)-were compared using Mann-Whitney U, Fisher exact, and t tests. RESULTS: Fifty-one ICU admissions were managed with the standardized CP and compared to 49 admissions in the 12 months prior to pathway implementation. There was a significant reduction in ICU LOS (control: mean 1.84 ±â€Š0.93, median 1.89 ±â€Š0.94; CP: mean 1.15 ±â€Š0.34, median 1.03 ±â€Š0.34 days; P < 0.001 for both). There were similar rates of hypotension requiring intervention (CP: 2, control: 1; P = 0.999), postoperative transfusion (CP: 3, control: 0; P = 0.243), and artificial ventilation (CP: 1, control: 0; P = 0.999). Perioperative morbidity such as infection (CP: 1, control: 0; P = 0.999), return to the OR (CP: 1, control: 0; P = 0.999), and CSF leak (no leaks; P = 0.999) was also similar. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a standardized perioperative CP for nsSSC patients resulted in a significantly shorter ICU LOS without a measured change in perioperative morbidity. Pathways such as the one described that improve patient throughput and decrease resource utilization benefit craniofacial teams in conducting an efficient service while providing high-quality care.

Posterior Vault Distraction Osteogenesis in Nonsyndromic Patients: An Evaluation of Indications and Safety.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the indications, safety, and short-term outcomes of posterior vault distraction osteogenesis (PVDO) in patients with no identified acrocephalosyndactyly syndrome (study) and to compare those to a syndromic cohort (controls). METHODS: Demographic and perioperative data were recorded and compared across the study and control groups for those who underwent PVDO between January 2009 and December 2016. Univariate analysis was conducted using χ and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables, and Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. RESULTS: Sixty-three subjects were included: 19 in the nonsyndromic cohort, 44 in the syndromic cohort. The cohorts had similar proportion of subjects exhibiting pansynostosis (42.1% of nonsyndromic versus 36.4% of syndromic, P = 0.667). The nonsyndromic cohort was significantly older (4.04 ±â€Š3.66 years versus 2.55 ±â€Š3.34 years, P = 0.046) and had higher rate of signs of raised intracranial pressure (68.4% versus 25.0%, P = 0.001) than the syndromic cohort. There was no significant difference in perioperative variables or rate of complications (P > 0.05). The mean total advancement distance achieved was similar, 27 ±â€Š6 mm in the nonsyndromic versus 28 ±â€Š8 mm in the syndromic cohort (P = 0.964). All nonsyndromic subjects with signs of raised intracranial pressure demonstrated improvement at an average follow-up of 22 months. CONCLUSION: As in the syndromic patient, PVDO is a safe and, in the short-term, effective modality for cranial vault expansion in the nonsyndromic patient. The benefits and favorable perioperative profile of PVDO may therefore be extended to patient populations other than those with syndromic craniosynostosis.