Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infection in children with low grade vesicoureteral reflux: results from a prospective randomized study.

PURPOSE: Antibiotic prophylaxis is given to children at risk for urinary tract infection. However, evidence concerning its effectiveness in grade I to III vesicoureteral reflux is lacking. The objective of this study was to determine whether antibiotic prophylaxis reduces the incidence of urinary tract infection in young children with low grade vesicoureteral reflux. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Children 1 month to 3 years old with grade I to III vesicoureteral reflux were assigned randomly to receive daily cotrimoxazole or no treatment, and followed for 18 months. A urinary tract infection constituted an exit criterion. Infection-free survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. RESULTS: A total of 225 children were enrolled in the study. Distribution of gender, age at inclusion and reflux grade were similar between the 2 groups. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of urinary tract infection between the 2 groups (17% vs 26%, p = 0.2). However, a significant association was found between treatment and patient gender (p = 0.017). Prophylaxis significantly reduced urinary tract infection in boys (p = 0.013), most notably in boys with grade III vesicoureteral reflux (p = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that antibiotic prophylaxis does not reduce the overall incidence of urinary tract infection in children with low grade vesicoureteral reflux. However, such a strategy may prevent further urinary tract infection in boys with grade III reflux.

[Severe hypercalcemia due to vitamin D intoxication]. / Hypercalcémie majeure secondaire à une intoxication par la vitamine D.

UNLABELLED: We report on a case of severe hypercalcemia due to vitamin D intoxication in a 4-month-old infant, CASE REPORT: A 4-month-old boy was admitted for anorexia, weakness, hypotonia, constipation and lethargy. Initial physical examination evidenced a severe axial hypotonia, signs of moderate intracellular dehydration, polyuria and leucocyturia. Hemodynamic parameters were normal. The infant's origin was Turkish. Basic blood chemistry showed a high serum calcium concentration of 4.28 and 4.55 mmol/l on a second control. The EKG showed a short QTc interval calculated at 0.34 s. Due to worsening neurological condition, the infant was referred to the pediatric intensive care unit. Because of the association of neurological impairment, EKG abnormality and high serum calcium level, haemodialysis was performed. Treatment included hyperhydration, high doses of intravenous of loop diuretics and sodium pamidronate infusion. Hormonal, radiological, abdominal and cardiac investigations combined with a new parental interview led to the diagnosis of vitamin D intoxication due to excessive daily administration. We were unable to determine the exact total amount because of the language barrier. Clinical outcome was marked by nephrocalcinosis without renal function impairment, iliac venous thrombosis secondary to the dialysis catheter and a full neurological recovery without sequelae after 3 months. DISCUSSION: Fear of rickets, especially in Turkish families residing in France, can lead some parents to administer massive daily quantities of vitamin D. This practice is facilitated by the possibility of purchasing high dosage forms of vitamin D via the Internet. When faced with an infant presenting with digestive disorders such as vomiting and constipation, associated with neurological troubles (lethargy, hypotonia) and hypercalcemia, vitamin D intoxication should be considered after tumoral, hormonal or malformative (Williams-Beuren syndrome) causes have been eliminated. Combined with hyperhydration and loop diuretics, biphosphonate infusion often allows to control hypercalcemia. Nephrocalcinosis seems correlated to chronic administration while cardiovascular disorders are more likely associated with massive acute vitamin D administration, severe dysrhythmia being rare in children in this context.

Drug utilisation in outpatient children. A comparison among Tenerife, Valencia, and Barcelona (Spain), Toulouse (France), Sofia (Bulgaria), Bratislava (Slovakia) and Smolensk (Russia).

INTRODUCTION: Scarce information about comparative diagnostic and therapeutic patterns in paediatric outpatients of different countries is found in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To describe the similarities and differences observed in diagnosis and therapeutic patterns of paediatric patients of seven locations in different countries. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, prospective, international comparative, descriptive study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomly selected sample of 12,264 paediatric outpatients seen in consultation rooms of urban and rural areas and attended by paediatricians or general practitioners of the participating locations. Data on patient demographic information, diagnosis and pharmacological treatment were collected using pre-designed forms. Diagnoses were coded using the ICD-9 and drugs according to the ATC classification. RESULTS: Among the ten most common diagnoses, upper respiratory tract infections are in the first position in all locations; asthma prevalence is highest in Tenerife (8.4%). Tonsillitis, otitis, bronchitis and dermatological affections are the most common diagnoses in all locations. Pneumonia is only reported in Sofia (3.8%) and Smolensk (2.3%). The average number of drugs prescribed per child varied from 1.3 in Barcelona to 2.9 in Smolensk. There are no great differences in the profile of pharmacological groups prescribed, but a considerable range of variations in antibiotic therapy is observed: prescription of cephalosporins is low in Smolensk (0.7%) and higher in the other locations, from 16.5% (Bratislava) to 28% (Tenerife). Macrolides prescriptions range from 12.6% (Toulouse) to 24.7% (Smolensk), except in Sofia where they drop to 5.6%. Trimethoprim and its combinations are used in Smolensk (23.3%), Sofia (11.8%) and Bratislava (8.7%). Check-up consultations are not recorded in Smolensk and Bratislava, whereas in Toulouse these visits account for 16.2% of all consultations and in the other locations the percentage varies from 6.1% (Tenerife) to 1.9% (Sofia). Homeopathic treatments are registered only in Toulouse. CONCLUSION: Except in asthma prevalence, there are no great differences in diagnostic maps among locations. Significant variations in the number of drugs prescribed per child and antibiotic therapies are observed. Areas for improvement have been identified.

Pharmacological treatment of acute otitis media in children. A comparison among seven locations: Tenerife, Barcelona and Valencia (Spain), Toulouse (France), Smolensk (Russia), Bratislava (Slovakia) and Sofia (Bulgaria).

OBJECTIVE: To describe patterns observed in the treatment of acute otitis media (AOM) in several locations of five countries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Cross-sectional, descriptive study. Random sample of 12,264 paediatric outpatients seen by paediatricians or general practitioners (GPs). Data on patient demographics, diagnoses and treatment were collected. Diagnoses were coded by ICD-9 and drugs by ATC classification. Patients diagnosed with AOM (ICD-9 codes: 381 and 382) were selected for analysis. RESULTS: Cases of AOM (873) accounted for 7.1% of the sample. There is a clear variation in the percentage of children diagnosed with AOM and treated with antibiotics in the different locations, antibiotic prescriptions being higher in Barcelona (93% of children), and lowest in Smolensk (56.4 % of children were treated without antibiotics). The antibiotics used varied widely: ampicillin use is almost limited to Smolensk (26.7%) and Bratislava (13.8%), whereas amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid is the choice in Toulouse (33.8%), Valencia (30.2%) and Barcelona (28.9%), and cephalosporins are more frequently prescribed in Tenerife (51.7%). Finally, macrolides are used in Barcelona (18.3%), Valencia (17.5%) and Tenerife (13.6%), but not prescribed in Toulouse or Sofia. Prescriptions of anti-inflammatory drugs were only relevant in Valencia (31.7%), Tenerife (27.2%) and Toulouse (17.4%) and of otological preparations in Sofia, where almost each child received ear drops (91.9%). Nasal preparations are commonly used only in Sofia (41.9%), Bratislava (65.5%) and Smolensk (68.6%). CONCLUSION: Despite the general agreement of most guidelines, wide differences in the treatment of uncomplicated AOM in children are observed. Non-antibiotic therapy for AOM and the use of first-choice antibiotics should be more actively encouraged in the primary care centres. Studies to measure prevailing rates of antibiotic resistance in these populations are needed.

Multiple-family groups and psychoeducation in the treatment of schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes in psychoeducational multiple-family group treatment vs psychoeducational single-family treatment. METHOD: A total of 172 acutely psychotic patients, aged 18 to 45 years, with DSM-III-R schizophrenic disorders were randomly assigned to single- or multiple-family psychoeducational treatment at six public hospitals in the state of New York. Psychotic relapse, symptom status, medication compliance, rehospitalization, and employment were assessed independently during 2 years of supervised treatment. RESULTS: The multiple-family groups yielded significantly lower 2-year cumulative relapse rates than did the single-family modality (16% vs 27%) and achieved markedly lower rates in patients whose conditions had not remitted at index hospital discharge (13% vs 33%). The relapse hazard ratio between treatments was 1:3. The relapse rate for both modalities was less than half the expected rate (65% to 80% for 2 years) for patients receiving individual treatment and medication. Rehospitalization rates and psychotic symptoms decreased significantly, and medication compliance was high, to an equal degree in both modalities. CONCLUSION: Psychoeducational multiple-family groups were more effective than single-family treatment in extending remission, especially in patients at higher risk for relapse, with a cost-benefit ratio of up to 1:34.

From research to clinical practice: dissemination of New York State's family psychoeducation project.

The New York Family Support Demonstration Project was begun in 1984 to translate the results of research on family psychoeducation in the treatment of schizophrenia into general practice. Goals were to compare experimentally a single-family psychoeducation model with a multiple-family group format, to replicate successful outcomes in ordinary clinical settings, and to train agency clinicians in the model. A total of 172 schizophrenic patients and their families from six sites across the state were followed for two years. Relapse rates comparable to those in more narrowly focused research studies were obtained in ordinary clinical settings. Patients in the multiple-family format had substantially lower risk of relapse than patients in single-family treatment. Over the next three years, the multiple-family approach was successfully disseminated across the state using a strategy based on five central assumptions of the psychoeducational model.

Creating a supportive environment using staff psychoeducation in a supervised residence.

The prevailing approach to rehabilitation in residential care emphasizes goal attainment. This approach often produces considerable stress for residents, most of whom have schizophrenia. Based on the view that low-demand environments, incorporating graduated expectations, may be more appropriate for this patient population, a three-component model for creating and maintaining a calm, supportive environment in a supervised residence was developed. The model utilizes staff psychoeducation, which is based on the principles of family psychoeducation, a highly effective intervention for patients with schizophrenia. The three components of the model are training in supportive interaction, a medication-monitoring program, and a behavioral approach to problem solving. Resident groups promote each of these components. The groups' goals are encouragement of positive, low-key interactions, compliance with medications, and slow, steady rehabilitation.