Complication rates of direct puncture and pull-through techniques for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Results from a large multicenter cohort.

Background and study aims Two different techniques for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) have been developed: classical pull-through and direct puncture techniques. This study compared the complication rate for both techniques in a large retrospective patient cohort. Patients and methods Clinical data from patients who received a PEG in four high-volume centers for endoscopy were included retrospectively between January 2016 and December 2018. Patient characteristics and complication rates were correlated in univariate and multivariate analyses. Results Data from 1014 patients undergoing a PEG insertion by the pull-through technique were compared to 183 patients for whom the direct puncture technique was used. The direct puncture technique was associated with a 50 % reduction in minor and 85.7 % reduction in major complications when compared to the pull-through technique. Multivariate analysis of these data revealed an odds ratio of 0.067 (0.02-0.226; P  < 0.001) for major complications in the direct puncture group. Conclusions Compared to the pull-through technique, the direct puncture technique resulted in a significant reduction in complications. Despite the retrospective design of this study, these results suggest that the direct puncture technique may be preferable to improve patient safety.

Correction: Complication rates of direct puncture and pull-through techniques for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: Results from a large multicenter cohort.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1055/a-1924-3525.].

[Results of motorized spiral enteroscopy in 83 consecutive patients]. / Ergebnisse der motorisierten Spiralenteroskopie des Dünndarms an 83 konsekutiven Patienten.

INTRODUCTION: For motorized spiral enteroscopy, only limited data are available. We report about our early experiences with the motorized spiral enteroscopy in a retrospective case series. The present worldwide study reported the results of motorized spiral enteroscopy in 68 patients with small bowel diseases and in 15 patients with ERCP and surgically altered anatomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective single-centre study was performed between 01/2020 and 09/2021 in 83 consecutive patients. Indications were known or suspected small bowel diseases or diseases of the bile or pancreatic duct after surgical altered anatomy with Roux-Y anastomosis. RESULTS: In 68 patients (38 m/30 f; mean age 66.4 years) with an indication for small bowel enteroscopy, diagnostic and therapeutic yield was 86.8% and 41.2%, respectfully. The average depth of maximum insertion was 279 cm with an average insertion time of 64.3 min. In 13 patients (19.7%), complete panenteroscopy was achieved. In patients without prior abdominal surgery, the rate of complete enteroscopy was 46.2%.In 15 patients (9 m; 6 f; mean age 61.8 years) with surgically altered anatomy and Roux-Y anastomosis (the papilla resp.), the biliodigestive anastomosis could be reached in 60%.In the entire case series, the total complication rate was 15.7%. There were no severe complications, such as perforation or major bleeding. DISCUSSION: The present case series shows a high rate of panenteroscopies with a short examination time. To confirm these data, further comparative studies for ERCPs in patients with surgically altered anatomy are necessary.

Hybrid resection of large colorectal adenomas combining EMR and FTRD.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of the full-thickness resection device (FTRD) allowed resection of difficult adenomas in the duodenum and colorectum with non-lifting. The main limitation of this endoscopic technique is the lesion size. We describe a hybrid approach combining endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and FTRD in a cohort of 17 patients to reduce tumor size and enable full-thickness resection. METHODS: Retrospective analysis from data of 17 patients who underwent hybrid EMR-FTRD for large adenomas in the colorectum at our institution. Technical success, histological confirmation of margin-free resection and adverse advents were studied. RESULTS: 16 of 17 (94.1%) lesions could be resected macroscopically complete with confirmed full-thickness resection. Histological work-up of the full-thickness specimens showed free lateral margins in 13 patients (76.4%), unclear margins in two patients (11.8%) and positive margins in two patients (11.8%). There were no immediate perforation or major bleeding, however one patient showed a stenosis after resection in the follow-up endoscopy. Follow-up endoscopy was available in 12 patients. In two of 12 patients a recurrent adenoma was detected. CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid EMR-EFTR in the colorectum seems to be a safe and effective technique for large non-lifting lesions with positive lifting signs in the margins. Further prospective evaluation of efficacy, safety and long-term outcome of this hybrid technique is necessary.