On the Use of Buffy or Whole Blood for Obtaining DNA of High Quality and Functionality: What Is the Best Option?

Human biobanks are collections of biological samples and health information that allow the organization of biomedical research for upgrading the knowledge of human disorders from different diseases (cancer, allergies, rare diseases, etc.), and reach real answers for diagnosis and treatment. A wide range of samples can be stored in these biorepositories such as hair, nails, urine, tissue, whole blood, red blood cells, buffy coat, plasma, serum, DNA, and RNA. Among these, buffy coat and whole blood are widely used by researchers because they can obtain DNA and RNA from these matrices. Some preliminary studies have been performed on animals to evaluate the quality and functionality of the nucleic acids obtained from some of these matrices, although more in-depth studies are needed in this area. In this study, blood samples extracted by venipuncture from 30 healthy volunteers were used to obtain DNA from buffy coat and whole blood. The purity and integrity of the nucleic acids obtained were assessed by spectrophotometry, fluorimetry, and agarose electrophoresis, and functionality was assessed by PCR and real-time PCR. Another aspect tested in this study was based on the comparison between short-term and long-term storage at -80°C and fresh samples from both matrices to evaluate the storage conditions at the biobank. Results showed differences in the yield obtained from both matrices as a function of the storage time, although the functionality of all the obtained DNA remained intact.

Anticlusterin treatment of breast cancer cells increases the sensitivities of chemotherapy and tamoxifen and counteracts the inhibitory action of dexamethasone on chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity.

INTRODUCTION: Overexpression of the apoptosis-related protein clusterin is associated with breast cancer development and tumor progression. We describe the use of clusterin-specific antisense oligonucleotides and antibodies to sensitize breast carcinoma cells to anticancer drugs routinely used in breast cancer therapy. METHODS: MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells were treated with the oligonucleotide or antibody, chemotherapeutic agents (doxorubicin or paclitaxel), tamoxifen, or with combinations of these. RESULTS: Treatments that include antisense clusterin oligonucleotide or antibody to clusterin have been shown to reduce the number of viable cells more effectively than treatment with the drugs alone. We also demonstrate that dexamethasone pretreatment of breast cancer cell lines inhibits chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity and is associated with the transcriptional induction of clusterin. However, anticlusterin treatment increases chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity, even in the presence of glucocorticoids, suggesting a possible role for these proteins in glucocorticoid-mediated survival. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that combined treatment with antibodies to clusterin or antisense clusterin oligodeoxynucleotides and paclitaxel, doxorubicin, or tamoxifen could be a novel and attractive strategy to inhibit the progression of breast carcinoma by regulation of the clusterin function. Moreover, glucocorticoid activation in breast cancer cells regulates survival signaling by the direct transactivation of genes like clusterin which encode proteins that decrease susceptibility to apoptosis. Given the widespread clinical administration of dexamethasone before chemotherapy, understanding glucocorticoid-induced survival mechanisms is essential for achieving optimal therapeutic responses.