Postpartum Care Visit Attendance Within 60 Days of Delivery Among Women With and Without Opioid Use During Pregnancy: An Analysis of Commercial Insurance Data.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum care (PPC) is a key component of maternal health, particularly for people who use opioids during pregnancy. Little is known about the prevalence and correlates of PPC visit attendance among those using opioids compared with nonusers in a privately insured population. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using nationwide private insurance claims between 2011 and 2017 (N = 1,291,352 women) comparing the following opioid use groups: nonusers, nonchronic prescription users, chronic prescription users, and women with opioid use disorder (OUD). Multivariable logistic and linear regressions evaluated the odds of PPC attendance and the mean time to an initial PPC visit for each user group. Stratified models identified factors associated with PPC attendance by opioid use type. RESULTS: Overall, 45% of the cohort attended a PPC visit and nearly 10% had any opioid use during pregnancy. More women in the three opioid use categories attended PPC than nonusers (50-56% vs. 45%). Opioid use regardless of type was associated with higher odds and earlier PPC visitation than women with no opioid use; nonchronic and chronic users had 17% and 40% greater odds of PPC than nonusers (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.19; aOR: 1.40, 95% CI: 1.34-1.46), whereas women with OUD had 7% higher odds (aOR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.00-1.13). Antenatal care and psychiatric, hypertensive, and pain conditions were most strongly associated with higher odds of attending PPC; older maternal age was negatively associated with PPC. Stratified analysis showed opioid correlates varied similarly across user groups. CONCLUSIONS: PPC use was generally low in this study cohort of privately insured women. Women who used opioids and those with chronic conditions had greater odds of attending PPC. Improved efforts are needed to engage people in PPC, as well as service integration and coordination for people who use opioids during pregnancy.

U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016.

The 2016 U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (U.S. MEC) comprises recommendations for the use of specific contraceptive methods by women and men who have certain characteristics or medical conditions. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and consultation with national experts who met in Atlanta, Georgia, during August 26-28, 2015. The information in this report updates the 2010 U.S. MEC (CDC. U.S. medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010. MMWR 2010:59 [No. RR-4]). Notable updates include the addition of recommendations for women with cystic fibrosis, women with multiple sclerosis, and women receiving certain psychotropic drugs or St. John's wort; revisions to the recommendations for emergency contraception, including the addition of ulipristal acetate; and revisions to the recommendations for postpartum women; women who are breastfeeding; women with known dyslipidemias, migraine headaches, superficial venous disease, gestational trophoblastic disease, sexually transmitted diseases, and human immunodeficiency virus; and women who are receiving antiretroviral therapy. The recommendations in this report are intended to assist health care providers when they counsel women, men, and couples about contraceptive method choice. Although these recommendations are meant to serve as a source of clinical guidance, health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking family planning services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients. Persons should seek advice from their health care providers when considering family planning options.

U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use, 2016.

The 2016 U.S. Selected Practice Recommendations for Contraceptive Use (U.S. SPR) addresses a select group of common, yet sometimes controversial or complex, issues regarding initiation and use of specific contraceptive methods. These recommendations for health care providers were updated by CDC after review of the scientific evidence and consultation with national experts who met in Atlanta, Georgia, during August 26-28, 2015. The information in this report updates the 2013 U.S. SPR (CDC. U.S. selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2013. MMWR 2013;62[No. RR-5]). Major updates include 1) revised recommendations for starting regular contraception after the use of emergency contraceptive pills and 2) new recommendations for the use of medications to ease insertion of intrauterine devices. The recommendations in this report are intended to serve as a source of clinical guidance for health care providers and provide evidence-based guidance to reduce medical barriers to contraception access and use. Health care providers should always consider the individual clinical circumstances of each person seeking family planning services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice for individual patients. Persons should seek advice from their health care providers when considering family planning options.

Combined hormonal contraceptive use among obese women and risk for cardiovascular events: A systematic review.

CONTEXT: Combined hormonal contraceptive (CHC) use may modify the risk of cardiovascular events in obese [body mass index (BMI) ≥30kg/m2] women. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate from the literature whether CHC use modifies the risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) in obese women and to evaluate evidence for a dose-response relationship between BMI and VTE. METHODS: We searched PubMed for all articles published between database inception and February 2016 providing direct evidence on BMI, CHCs, and cardiovascular outcomes. We also searched for indirect evidence related to a dose-response relationship between BMI and risk of VTE in the general population, as these data were lacking for CHC users. The quality of each individual study was assessed using the system for grading evidence developed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force. RESULTS: The direct evidence search yielded 3 pooled analyses, 11 case-control studies and 1 cohort study. There was conflicting evidence about the risk of AMI or stroke among obese combined oral contraceptive (COC) users compared to obese nonusers, with one study finding no increased risk for AMI or stroke for COC users overall or stratified by BMI. A second study found significantly increased risk of AMI and stroke for COC users, with the highest risk estimates for high-BMI COC users. A single study suggested that obese COC users may be at higher risk for CVT compared with normal-weight nonusers. For VTE, obese COC users consistently had a risk that was 5 to 8 times that of obese nonusers and approximately 10 times that of nonobese nonusers. Five prospective cohort studies were identified as indirect evidence, and all found increased risk for VTE as BMI increased, suggesting a dose-response relationship between BMI and risk for VTE. No studies on the contraceptive patch or vaginal ring were identified that met the inclusion criteria. CONCLUSION: Limited evidence of Level II-2, fair quality, concerning whether CHC use modifies the risk of AMI and stroke in obese women is inconclusive, while a single study of Level II-2, poor quality, found that obese COC users may be at higher risk for CVT compared with normal-weight nonusers. Both COC use and higher BMI increase risk for VTE, and the greatest relative risks are for those with both risk factors based on a body of evidence graded as Level II-2, fair to poor quality. It is not possible to estimate absolute risk of VTE among women with both of these risk factors; however, the absolute risk of VTE in healthy women of reproductive age is small.