A novel technique for measurement of orthodontic mini-implant stability using the Osstell ISQ device.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a method for application of the Osstell ISQ device in the assessment of mini-implant stability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An adaptor was developed for attachment of Osstell's SmartPeg onto a variety of orthodontic mini-implants. For validation of the adaptor, Benefit mini-implants were inserted into bone blocks that mimicked different stability conditions. The Osstell device was used to assess mini-implant stability with the adaptor (test measurement) and conventional SmartPeg attachment (gold-standard measurement). Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were assessed for agreement, repeatability, and reproducibility. RESULTS: Strong positive correlations were found between ISQ values obtained using the novel adaptor and the conventional attachment. Repeatability and reproducibility of ISQ values with the adaptor were similar to those obtained with the conventional attachment. CONCLUSIONS: A method was developed and validated to assess the stability of orthodontic mini-implants using the Osstell system. The novel mini-implant adaptor provided repeatable and reproducible measurements of mini-implant stability, which agreed with those obtained using a conventional SmartPeg attachment. This adaptor permits noninvasive stability assessment of various designs of mini-implants, most of which are incompatible with the conventional SmartPeg attachment.

In-vitro comparison of different palatal sites for orthodontic miniscrew insertion: Effect of bone quality and quantity on primary stability.

INTRODUCTION: This experiment was undertaken to assess the primary stability of orthodontic miniscrews inserted at different sites in human cadaveric palatal bone for temporary skeletal anchorage, and to determine the effect of bone quality and quantity on their primary stability using microcomputed tomography imaging. METHODS: A total of 10 cadaveric maxillary hard palates were used for insertion of 130 orthodontic miniscrews (VectorTAS; Ormco, Orange, Calif; length, 6 mm; diameter, 1.4 mm). Upon insertion, maximal insertion torque (IT) was recorded. Imaging (microcomputed tomography) was performed before and after insertion for assessment of bone quality and quantity parameters (bone mineral density [BMD], bone thickness [BT], and length of screw engagement [LSE]). Differences in each parameter were assessed at the various insertion sites. Correlations between IT and measurements of BMD, BT, and LSE were evaluated. RESULTS: Significant differences (P < 0.001) were found among insertion sites for IT, BT, and LSE, but not for BMD (P = 0.004). Correlations were found between IT and BMD (rs = 0.42; P < 0.001), IT and BT (rs = 0.58; P < 0.001), and IT and LSE (rs = 0.58; P < 0.001). Most perforations of miniscrews into the nasal cavity occurred posterior to the permanent second premolars. CONCLUSIONS: The primary stability of orthodontic miniscrews in the palate is affected by bone quality and quantity, with higher primary stability obtained anterior to the second premolars and parasagittally at the level of the permanent first molars.

A Comparison of the Mechanical Measures Used for Assessing Orthodontic Mini-Implant Stability.

PURPOSE: Mechanical loosening remains a common complication associated with mini-implant failure. The purpose of this study was to compare common mechanical measures of mini-implant stability to determine their association and reliability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants from 6 manufacturers were inserted into artificial bone blocks. Insertion torques (ITs) and Periotest values (PVs) were measured. Subsequently, mini-implants underwent pull-out testing for measures of pull-out load (POL) and screw displacement (ScrD). Stability measurements were compared using one-way ANOVA, associations among them were assessed using correlation analyses, and reliability was evaluated using coefficients of variation (COVs). RESULTS: Variations in stability of mini-implants were found, specific to the mechanical measure used for assessment (P < 0.05). The strongest correlations were found between IT and PV (r = -0.68) and between IT and POL (r = 0.66). Overall, PV showed the greatest variability (COV: 11%-100%) compared with IT (≤11%), POL (≤4%), and ScrD (≤19%). CONCLUSIONS: IT, PV, and POLs only agreed moderately in their assessment of mini-implant stability, and Periotest showed the least reliability in predicting mini-implant stability. As such, independent and interchangeable use of these stability measures should be avoided.

Insertion Torques of Self-Drilling Mini-Implants in Simulated Mandibular Bone: Assessment of Potential for Implant Fracture.

PURPOSE: Fracture of orthodontic mini-implants during insertion is a limiting factor for their clinical success. The purpose of this study was to determine the fracture potential of commonly used self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants when placed into simulated thick, dense mandibular bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six mini-implant systems were assessed for the potential for fracture (Aarhus, Medicon; Dual-Top, Jeil Medical; OrthoEasy, Forestadent; tomas-pin, Dentaurum; Unitek, 3M; and VectorTAS, Ormco). First, mini-implants were inserted manually, without predrilling, into bone substitutes (Sawbones) with a 3-mm-thick, dense (1.64 g/cm(3)) cortical layer. A custom-made insertion device was used for placement of mini-implants. A sixaxis force/torque transducer was secured at the base of the bone blocks to measure the maximum torque experienced during insertion. Measured insertion torques were compared with previously reported fracture torques, yielding a torque ratio (insertion torque as a percentage of fracture torque), which was used as an indicator of the potential for mini-implant fracture. Mini-implants that experienced torque ratios ≥ 75% upon insertion underwent further testing, following the manufacturer's recommendations for predrilling in thick, dense bone conditions. RESULTS: Significant differences in torque ratios were found among all mini-implants, except between OrthoEasy and Dual-Top, and OrthoEasy and VectorTAS. Overall, Aarhus had the highest torque ratio (91% ± 3%), with Unitek showing the lowest ratio (37% ± 3%). Aarhus and tomas-pin mini-implants displayed torque ratios ≥ 75% and experienced fracture upon insertion. When the manufacturer's specific predrilling recommendations were followed, no changes in torque ratio were found for Aarhus and tomas-pin. However, while Aarhus continued to fracture upon insertion, all tomas-pin mini-implants were inserted fully without fracture following predrilling. CONCLUSION: These findings support the safe use of Unitek, VectorTAS, Dual-Top, and OrthoEasy self-drilling mini-implants in areas of 3-mm-thick, 1.64 g/cm(3) dense cortical bone without predrilling. Following predrilling, fractures did not occur with tomas-pin. For implants that continued to fracture after predrilling, other strategies may be required, such as the use of larger-diameter mini-implants in thick, dense bone conditions.

Fracture resistance of commonly used self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the fracture resistance of six commonly used self-drilling orthodontic mini-implants by comparing their respective fracture torques during insertion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety self-drilling mini-implants from six manufacturers (Aarhus, Dual-Top, OrthoEasy, Tomas-pin, Unitek, and VectorTAS), with diameters ranging from 1.4 to 1.8 mm, were inserted into acrylic blocks using a custom-made insertion device. Insertion torques were measured using a 6-degree-of-freedom load cell fixed to the base of the acrylic blocks, and peak torques experienced at the time of fracture for each of the mini-implants were recorded. One-way analysis of variance (α  =  .05) was used to compare the fracture torques among the six different groups. RESULTS: Statistical analysis revealed significant differences (P < .05) in the peak fracture torques among mini-implant groups. Mean fracture torques ranked as follows: Unitek (72 Ncm) > Tomas-pin (36 Ncm) > Dual-Top (32 Ncm) ≈ VectorTAS (31 Ncm) > OrthoEasy (28 Ncm) > Aarhus (25 Ncm), with significant differences found between all manufacturers, except for Dual-Top and VectorTAS. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-implants tested showed a wide range of torque at fracture depending on the manufacturer, with only a weak correlation between mini-implant diameter and fracture resistance. This torque should be considered at the time of mini-implant insertion to minimize the risk of implant fracture, especially in areas of high-density bone without predrilling.

The effect of stem material and surface treatment on the torsional stability at the metal-cement interface of upper limb joint replacement systems.

Stem surface treatment and material are two design factors that may affect the onset of implant loosening. For upper limb applications, no known in vitro studies have addressed the role of these two factors on cemented implant stability. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the torsional stability of cemented titanium and cobalt chrome stems with varying surface treatments in vitro. Thirty implant stems of circular cross-section (Ø = 8mm) were machined from cobalt chrome (n = 15) and titanium (n = 15). For each type, stems were subdivided into three groups for application of clinically relevant surface treatments: smooth, sintered beads, or plasma spray. Stems were potted in bone cement, allowed 24 h to cure, and placed in a materials testing machine. Stems were tested under cyclic torsion (1-30 Nm), using a staircase loading protocol. Failure was defined as either the first rapid increase in stem rotation without resistance, or attaining a maximum torque of 30 Nm. Implant stems with non-smooth surfaces offered greater resistance to torsion (p < 0.05), with the plasma spray treatment outlasting the beaded and smooth stems (p < 0.05). Titanium offered superior interface strength (p < 0.05) but reduced resistance to motion (p < 0.05) when compared to cobalt chrome. Therefore, these design features should be considered during upper limb implant design.

The effect of stem surface treatment and material on pistoning of ulnar components in linked cemented elbow prostheses.

BACKGROUND: The ulnar component of a total elbow replacement can fail by "pistoning." Stem surface treatments have improved stability at the stem-cement interface but with varied success. This study investigated the role of surface treatment and stem substrate material on implant stability under axial loading. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty circular stems (diameter, 8 mm) made of cobalt chrome (n = 30) or titanium (n = 30) had different surfaces: smooth, sintered beads, and plasma spray. The surface treatment length was either 10 mm or 20 mm. Stems were potted in bone cement, allowed to cure for 24 hours, and tested in a materials testing machine under a compressive staircase loading protocol. Failure was defined as 2 mm of push-out or completion of the protocol. Two-way analyses of variance compared the effects of surface treatment and substrate material on interface strength and motion. RESULTS: Significant interactions were found between surface treatment and substrate material for both interface strength and motion (P < .05). For titanium, the 20-mm beaded stems had greater interface strength than all other stems (P < .05) and had less motion than the 10-mm plasma-spray and smooth stems (P < .05). For cobalt chrome, the 20-mm beaded stems showed greater interface strength (P < .05) and similar motion (P > .05) to the 20-mm plasma-spray stems (P < .05), which outperformed all other stems (P < .05). Mechanisms of catastrophic failure varied: smooth stems debonded at the stem-cement interface, beaded stems experienced debonding of the beads from the stem, and plasma-spray stems showed loss of frictional force between the surface treatment and cement. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Stem surface treatment can enhance ulnar component stability but is dependent on substrate material.

The effect of stem curvature on torsional stability of a generalized cemented joint replacement system.

PURPOSE: Implant loosening is a common complication that compromises the stability of joint replacement systems. Stem geometry is particularly influential in the stability of cemented implants, both before and after debonding occurs at the stem-cement interface. There are few studies assessing the effect of stem longitudinal curvature as a geometric factor in cemented implant stability. The purpose of this study was to compare the torsional stability of four generalized cemented implant stems (i.e., non-specific to joint), with varying degrees of longitudinal curvatures--zero, two, four, and six degrees. METHODS: Twelve specimens of each curvature angle were potted to a depth of 20 mm using bone cement, given 24 hours to cure, and then tested in a materials testing machine. Torque was applied to the stems under monotonic loading at a rate of 2.5 degrees/min, until five degrees of rotation had occurred. RESULTS: There were no differences in torsional stability among the four stem curvature angles, when the magnitudes of peak torque (P=.72; 1-ß = 0.13), rotation of the stem at peak torque (P=0.23; 1-ß = 0.38) and work required for five degrees of stem rotation (P=.58; 1-ß = 0.07) were compared. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study demonstrate that for short stems, stem curvature angles up to six degrees does not improve torsional stability when compared to the straight stem design.