Preoperative factors affecting the two-year postoperative patient-reported outcome in single-level lumbar grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Background: The choice of operative method for lumbar spinal stenosis with Meyerding grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify the preoperative factors affecting the 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcome in Meyerding grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. Methods: Seventy-two consecutive patients who had minimally invasive decompression alone (D group; 28) or with fusion (DF group; 44) were enrolled. The parameters investigated were the Japanese Orthopaedic Association back pain evaluation questionnaire as patient-reported assessment, and L4 slippage (L4S), lumbar lordosis (LL), and lumbar axis sacral distance (LASD) as an index of sagittal alignment for radiological evaluation. Data collected prospectively at 2 years postoperatively were examined by statistical analysis. Results: Sixty-two cases (D group; 25, DF group; 37) were finally evaluated. In multiple logistic regression analysis, preoperative L4S and LASD were extracted as significant preoperative factors affecting the 2-year postoperative outcome. Patients with preoperative L4S of 6 mm or more have a lower rate of improvement in lumbar spine dysfunction due to low back pain (risk ratio=0.188, p=.043). Patients with a preoperative LASD of 30 mm or more have a higher rate of improvement in lumbar dysfunction due to low back pain (risk ratio=11.48, p=.021). The results of multiple logistic analysis by operative method showed that there was a higher rate of improvement in lumbar spine dysfunction due to low back pain in patients with preoperative LASD of 30 mm or more in DF group (risk ratio=172.028, p=.01). Conclusions: Preoperative L4S and LASD were extracted as significant preoperative factors affecting patient-reported outcomes at 2 years postoperatively. Multiple logistic analyses by the operative method suggested that DF may be advantageous in improving lumbar dysfunction due to low back pain in patients with preoperative LASD of 30 mm or more.

Does Atherosclerosis Have Negative Impacts on Early Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether atherosclerosis has negative impacts on early adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional trajectory pedicle screw fixation (TT-PLIF). METHODS: The subjects were 77 patients who underwent single-level TT-PLIF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Using dynamic lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine before surgery and at 3 years postoperatively, early radiological ASD (R-ASD) was examined. Early symptomatic ASD (S-ASD) was diagnosed when neurologic symptoms deteriorated during postoperative 3-year follow-up and the responsible lesions adjacent to the fused segment were also confirmed on magnetic resonance imaging. According to the scoring system by Kauppila et al, the abdominal aortic calcification score (AAC score: a surrogate marker of systemic atherosclerosis) was assessed using preoperative lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine. RESULTS: The incidence of early R-ASD was 41.6% at the suprajacent segment and 8.3% at the subjacent segment, respectively. Patients with R-ASD had significantly higher AAC score than those without R-ASD. The incidence of early S-ASD was 3.9% at the suprajacent segment and 1.4% at the subjacent segment, respectively. Patients with S-ASD had higher AAC score than those without S-ASD, although there was no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: At 3 years after surgery, the advanced AAC had significantly negative impacts on early R-ASD after TT-PLIF. This result indicates that impaired blood flow due to atherosclerosis can aggravate degenerative changes at the adjacent segments of the lumbar spine after PLIF.

Amelioration in Ankle Pain and Improvement in Function After Total Knee Arthroplasty for Ipsilateral Knee and Ankle Osteoarthritis: A Report of Two Cases.

We report 2 cases of ipsilateral ankle and knee osteoarthritis (OA), with the chief complaint being chronic ankle and knee pain. In the first patient, the ankle pain was more severe than the knee pain, whereas the second patient had more severe pain in the knee than in the ankle. In both cases, varus malalignment of the knee and varus tilt of the ankle joint were detected on standing radiographs. The severity of OA was found to be grade 4 in the knee, according to the Kellgren-Lawrence grading system, and stage IIIa in the ankle, according to the modified Takakura ankle OA classification system. Navigation-assisted total knee arthroplasty was performed in both cases, leading to a decreased degree of varus malalignment in the knee and ankle, as well as a significantly improved patient-based outcome in both joints. Correction of malalignment of the ankle by total knee arthroplasty relieved the severe pain and restored optimal function in the ankle without surgical intervention.

Two-level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at the Lumbosacral Segment has a High Risk of Pseudarthrosis and Poor Clinical Outcomes: Comparison Between the Lumbar and Lumbosacral Segments.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective study. OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to investigate the fusion rate and clinical outcomes of 2-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PLIF provides favorable clinical outcomes and a high fusion rate. However, most extant studies have been limited to the results of single-level PLIF. Clinical outcomes and fusion rate of 2-level PLIF are unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 73 patients who underwent 2-level PLIF below L3 between 2008 and 2016 (follow-up period >2 y) were included. Patients were divided into the 2 groups on the basis of surgical level. The lumbar group included 48 patients who underwent L3/4/5 PLIF, and the lumbosacral group included 25 patients who underwent L4/5/S PLIF. Fusion rate and clinical outcomes were compared. The Japanese Orthopedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and a visual analog scale were used for evaluation. RESULTS: Fusion rate was significantly lower in the lumbosacral group (lumbar 96% vs. lumbosacral 64%; P<0.001). Eight of 9 cases of pseudarthrosis occurred at the lumbosacral segment. Improvement in the mental health domain of the JOAPEQ was significantly lower in the lumbosacral group (lumbar 16 vs. lumbosacral 10; P=0.02). The VAS data showed that improvements in the following variables were significantly lower in the lumbosacral group than in the lumbar group: pain in low back (lumbar -38 vs. lumbosacral -23; P=0.004), pain in buttocks or lower leg (lumbar -48 vs. lumbosacral -29; P=0.04), and numbness in buttocks or lower leg (lumbar -44 vs. lumbosacral -33; P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Two-level PLIF at the lumbosacral segment demonstrated a significantly lower fusion rate and poorer clinical outcomes than that at the lumbar-only segments. Some reinforcement for the sacral anchor is recommended to improve fusion rate, even for short fusion like 2-level PLIF, if the lumbosacral segment is included. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Early cephalad adjacent segment degeneration after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative study between cortical bone trajectory screw fixation and traditional trajectory screw fixation.

OBJECTIVE: Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screw insertion through a caudomedial starting point provides advantages in limiting dissection of the superior facet joints and reducing muscle dissection and the risk of superior-segment facet violation by the screw. These advantages of the cephalad CBT screw can result in lower rates of early cephalad adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with CBT screw fixation (CBT-PLIF) than those after PLIF using traditional trajectory screw fixation (TT-PLIF). Here, the authors investigated early cephalad ASD after CBT-PLIF and compared these results with those after TT-PLIF. METHODS: The medical records of all patients who had undergone single-level CBT-PLIF or single-level TT-PLIF for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and with at least 3 years of postsurgical follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. At 3 years postoperatively, early cephalad radiological ASD changes (R-ASD) such as narrowing of disc height (> 3 mm), anterior or posterior slippage (> 3 mm), and posterior opening (> 5°) were examined using lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine. Early cephalad symptomatic adjacent segment disease (S-ASD) was diagnosed when clinical symptoms such as leg pain deteriorated during postoperative follow-up and the responsible lesion suprajacent to the fused segment was confirmed on MRI. RESULTS: One hundred two patients underwent single-level CBT-PLIF for DLS and were followed up for at least 3 years (CBT group). As a control group, age- and sex-matched patients (77) underwent single-level TT-PLIF for DLS and were followed up for at least 3 years (TT group). The total incidence of early cephalad R-ASD was 12.7% in the CBT group and 41.6% in the TT group (p < 0.0001). The incidence of narrowing of disc height, anterior slippage, and posterior slippage was significantly lower in the CBT group (5.9%, 2.0%, and 4.9%) than in the TT group (16.9%, 13.0%, and 14.3%; p < 0.05). Early cephalad S-ASD developed in 1 patient (1.0%) in the CBT group and 3 patients (3.9%) in the TT group; although the incidence was lower in the CBT group than in the TT group, no significant difference was found between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: CBT-PLIF, as compared with TT-PLIF, significantly reduced the incidence of early cephalad R-ASD. One of the main reasons may be that cephalad CBT screws reduced the risk of proximal facet violation by the screw, which reportedly can increase biomechanical stress and lead to destabilization at the suprajacent segment to the fused segment.

Japanese orthopaedic association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire (JOACMEQ): Part 5. Determination of responsiveness.

BACKGROUND: In 1999, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association decided to develop a new Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ). The final version of the JOACMEQ, comprising 24 questions and five domains (cervical spine function (CF); upper extremity function (UF); lower extremity function (LF); bladder function (BF); and quality of life (QOL)), was established after three nationwide investigations. The fourth investigation, reported in this paper, was performed to confirm the responsiveness of the questionnaire. METHODS: A total of 137 patients with cervical myelopathy were included in the study. Each patient was interviewed twice using the JOACMEQ before and after treatment. At the second interview, the patients self-rated their condition in five domains for "worse," "somewhat worse," "no change," "somewhat better," or "better," and these scores were defined as the external assessment rating. The difference of the points in five domains between the first and the second interview was calculated against each external assessment. Based on the results, substantial clinical benefit (SCB) thresholds for the JOACMEQ were determined. RESULTS: The statistically significant median values of the acquired points were 17.5 for CF, 16.0 and 21.0 for UF, 27.0 and 20.5 for LF, 13.0 for BF, and 29.0 for QOL. After consideration of the results, the committee decided that an acquired point ≥20 could be interpreted as representing an SCB threshold for the JOACMEQ. CONCLUSION: We have concluded that a treatment can be judged to be effective for a patient if 1) The patient give all answers for the questions necessary to calculate the functional score of a domain and an increase of ≥20 points is obtained for that score, or 2) The functional score after treatment is > 90 points even if the answer for the unanswered questions was supposed to be the worst possible choice.

Improvement of thoracic myelopathy following bariatric surgery in an obese patient.

Revision spine surgery is extremely challenging in super-super obese patients (body mass index (BMI) ≥60 kg/m2). This is the first report describing how bariatric surgery was useful for a super-super obese patient with progressing myelopathy. A 44-year-old man with a BMI of 62.9 kg/m2 presented with an ambulatory disorder caused by thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (T7-8). Before this paraparesis, he had undergone four spinal operations, and was not considered a good candidate for a fifth spine surgery. At the time of the fourth operation, he had reached a maximum weight of 205 kg (BMI 69.3 kg/m2). Instead, he underwent a laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Sixteen months later, his body weight had decreased to BMI 35.2 kg/m2, and he could walk without a walker. In addition to reducing our patient's load, a 'non-operative' form of dekyphosis due to altered thoracic spinal alignment secondary to weight loss may explain the improvement in his myelopathy.

Conventional JOA score for cervical myelopathy has a rater's bias -In comparison with JOACMEQ.

BACKGROUND: The JOA (Japan Orthopaedic Association) score has been a standard outcome measure to evaluate cervical myelopathy in Japan. Despite its reliability and convenience, there can be a rating bias in the JOA score. The current study was conducted to delineate the rater's bias of the JOA score by comparing it with a new objective outcome measure. METHODS: Two hundred and thirty four operative candidates with cervical myelopathy were included in the study. The patients were divided into four groups according to the surgeon (92 patients in group A, 60 patients in group B, 38 patients in group C and 44 patients in group D). Each patient's preoperative JOA score was exclusively recorded by the surgeon himself, while JOACMEQ (Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire) was recorded by each patient. Disease severity, the most important prognostic factor, was equalized between patient groups by a special statistical method called inverse-probability weighting (IPW). To define similarity of the two groups, Cohen's d was used. RESULTS: After the adjustment, the differences of the JOA score were only 0.1 between groups A and D and 0 between groups B and C. The values of Cohen's d were also very small both between groups A and D (3%), and between groups B and C (0.3%). The averaged JOA scores of groups A and D were higher by 0.4-0.8 than those of groups B and C, while the averaged JOA scores were almost the same both between groups A and D, and between groups B and C. Surgeons A and D had the same tendency to give higher JOA scores than surgeons B and C did. CONCLUSIONS: The current study confirmed there is a definite rater's bias in the JOA score. JOACMEQ is to be applied as a more reliable outcome measure to evaluate myelopathy patients.

Verification of the sensitivity of functional scores for treatment results - Substantial clinical benefit thresholds for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ).

BACKGROUND: Validity and reliability of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) had already been verified as the patients' self-rating assessment of low back pain and lumbar spinal disease and, the present study demonstrated the responsiveness of this measure. METHODS: 192 subjects who were determined by medical instructors of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research were analyzed. They had completed a series of treatment and both surveys before and after the treatment. Authors investigated rates of concordance between assessment by physicians and subjective assessment by patients. The mean, standard deviation, minimum, 25th percentile, median, 75th percentile and maximum values for pre-treatment, post-treatment, and acquired points were calculated, and then, we also investigated the trend between subjective assessment by patients and mean acquired points for each JOABPEQ domain and substantial clinical benefit thresholds for the JOABPEQ. RESULTS: Symptom changes as assessed by physicians did not coincide with those by patients, and acquired points in each JOABPEQ domain were significantly increased with improved self-rating by patients. In addition, patients who rated symptom changes as "slightly improved" showed a mean acquired points of ≥20, and those reporting "improved" showed a 25th percentile points of the acquired points of ≥20 approximately. CONCLUSION: A significant correlation was noted between the self-rating of patients and acquired points JOABPEQ, suggesting that ≥20 acquired points can be interpreted as substantial clinical benefit thresholds for the JOABPEQ.

Clinical Outcomes After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Comparison of Cortical Bone Trajectory and Conventional Pedicle Screw Insertion.

STUDY DESIGN: This study is a retrospective cohort study using prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) using the cortical bone trajectory (CBT) and conventional pedicle screw (PS) techniques. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There are few published studies to date comparing PLIF using CBT technique with PLIF using the conventional PS technique. METHODS: We studied 119 consecutive patients who underwent single-level PLIF between 2010 and 2014 with a minimum 12-month follow-up. Forty-two patients underwent CBT-PLIF (the CBT group) and 77 underwent conventional PS-PLIF (the PS group). Clinical outcomes were assessed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) and visual analog scale (VAS). To assess perioperative pain, a 6-point Numeric Rating Scale score and the total amount of diclofenac sodium suppositories used were recorded. The operative time and blood loss were recorded. Muscle damage was evaluated by serum creatine kinase concentrations. Fusion status was evaluated using 3-dimensional computed tomography 12 months postoperatively. We used inverse probability of treatment weighting based on the propensity score to reduce confounding factors. RESULTS: There were no significant between-group differences in operative time or fusion rates, whereas the CBT group experienced significantly less blood loss, lower postoperative creatine kinase levels, less diclofenac sodium suppositories, and lower Numeric Rating Scale scores than the PS group did. The change in the JOABPEQ subdomain score for social life function 1 month postoperatively was the only significantly different factor among the JOABPEQ and VAS scores. CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures were comparable in terms of clinical outcomes and fusion rates, but CBT-PLIF provided the additional benefits of less blood loss, less intraoperative muscle damage, less perioperative pain, and earlier recovery to normal activities.

Preoperative retrolisthesis as a predictive risk factor of reoperation due to delayed-onset symptomatic foraminal stenosis after central decompression for lumbar canal stenosis without fusion.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: For patients diagnosed with lumbar central canal stenosis with asymptomatic foraminal stenosis (FS), surgeons occasionally only decompress central stenosis and preserve asymptomatic FS. These surgeries have the potential risk of converting preoperative asymptomatic FS into symptomatic FS postoperatively by accelerating spinal degeneration, which requires reoperation. However, little is known about delayed-onset symptomatic FS postoperatively. PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the rate of reoperation for delayed-onset symptomatic FS after lumbar central canal decompression in patients with preoperative asymptomatic FS, and determine the predictive risk factors of those reoperations. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Two hundred eight consecutive patients undergoing posterior central decompression for lumbar canal stenosis between January 2009 and June 2014 were included in this study. OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of patients who had preoperative FS and the reoperation rate for delayed-onset symptomatic FS at the index levels were the outcome measures. METHODS: Patients were divided into two groups with and without preoperative asymptomatic FS at the decompressed levels. The baseline characteristics and revision rates for delayed-onset symptomatic FS were compared between the two groups. Predictive risk factors for such reoperations were determined using multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics analyses. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 118 patients (56.7%) had asymptomatic FS. Of those, 18 patients (15.3%) underwent reoperation for delayed-onset symptomatic FS at a mean of 1.9 years after the initial surgery. Posterior slip in neutral position and posterior extension-neutral translation were significant risk factors for reoperation due to FS. The optimal cutoff values of posterior slip in neutral position and posterior extension-neutral translation for predicting the occurrence of such reoperations were both 1 mm; 66.7% of patients who met both of these cutoff values had undergone reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that 15.3% of patients with preoperative asymptomatic FS underwent reoperation for delayed-onset symptomatic FS at the index levels at a mean of 1.9 years after central decompression, and preoperative retrolisthesis was a predictive risk factor for such a reoperation. These findings are valuable for establishing standards of appropriate treatment strategies in patients with lumbar central canal stenosis with asymptomatic FS.

Differences in the time of onset of postoperative upper limb palsy among surgical procedures: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The time of onset of postoperative upper limb palsy (ULP), also referred to as C5 palsy, varies among patients. Although some studies addressed the relationship between the time of onset of ULP and the potential etiologies, no meta-analysis has been conducted regarding the association between the time of onset of ULP and other factors such as surgical procedure type and treated diseases. PURPOSE: This study aimed to elucidate differences in the time of onset of ULP among spinal surgical procedures and treated diseases to understand its etiology. STUDY DESIGN: This is a meta-analysis. OUTCOME MEASURES: The time of onset of ULP after cervical decompression surgery. METHODS: We conducted a meta-analysis via searches of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases. Upper limb palsy within 2 days postoperatively or at 3 days or more postoperatively was defined as early- and late-onset, respectively. We calculated the pooled prevalence of early- and late-onset ULP with regard to surgical procedures and diseases using a random effects model. The proportion of early-onset ULP relative to all ULP was also determined. Surgical procedures were categorized into four procedures: (1) anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF); (2) anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF); (3) laminoplasty or laminectomy (LPN); and (4) posterior spinal fusion with decompression (PSF). Treated diseases were classified as ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) and non-OPLL. RESULTS: The pooled prevalence of early-onset ULP was significantly stratified across three groups of surgical procedures (PSF [9.0%]>ACCF [3.7%] and LPN [2.5%]>ACDF [0.6%]). In the pooled analysis of late-onset ULP prevalence, three procedures (PSF [4.3%], ACCF [2.8%], and LPN [2.9%]) were similar, but ACDF (1.0%) was associated with a significantly lower prevalence than LPN. The prevalence of both early- and late-onset ULP was significantly higher with OPLL than without OPLL. However, the proportion of early-onset ULP relative to all ULP was similar between non-OPLL and OPLL (50.8% vs. 49.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of early-onset ULP in PSF is attributable to a lag correction effect, which is triggered by posterior correction and fusion through comparison with LPN. The combination of our meta-analysis results and previous knowledge facilitates our understanding of the etiology of ULP.

Preoperative retrolisthesis as a risk factor of postdecompression lumbar disc herniation.

OBJECT: In this study, the authors aimed to identify specific risk factors for postdecompression lumbar disc herniation (PDLDH) in patients who have not undergone discectomy and/or fusion. METHODS: Between 2007 and 2012, 493 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis underwent bilateral partial laminectomy without discectomy and/or fusion in a single hospital. Eighteen patients (herniation group [H group]: 15 men, 3 women; mean age 65.1 years) developed acute sciatica as a result of PDLDH within 2 years after surgery. Ninety patients who did not develop postoperative acute sciatica were selected as a control group (C group: 75 men, 15 women; mean age 65.4 years). Patients in the C group were age and sex matched with those in the H group. The patients in the groups were also matched for decompression level, number of decompression levels, and surgery date. The radiographic variables measured included percentage of slippage, intervertebral angle, range of motion, lumbar lordosis, disc height, facet angle, extent of facet removal, facet degeneration, disc degeneration, and vertebral endplate degeneration. The threshold for PDLDH risk factors was evaluated using a continuous numerical variable and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The area under the curve was used to determine the diagnostic performance, and values greater than 0.75 were considered to represent good performance. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis revealed that preoperative retrolisthesis during extension was the sole significant independent risk factor for PDLDH. The area under the curve for preoperative retrolisthesis during extension was 0.849; the cutoff value was estimated to be a retrolisthesis of 7.2% during extension. CONCLUSIONS: The authors observed that bilateral partial laminectomy, performed along with the removal of the posterior support ligament, may not be suitable for lumbar spinal stenosis patients with preoperative retrolisthesis greater than 7.2% during extension.

Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) as an outcome measure for patients with low back pain: reference values in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: In 2007, the Japanese orthopaedic association back pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ) was established to overcome the limitations of the original JOA scoring system developed in 1986. Although this new self-administered questionnaire is a more accurate outcome measure for evaluating patients with low back pain, physicians were unable to as certain the exact status of a patient at a single time point because of a lack of reference values. This study aimed to establish the reference values of JOABPEQ in different age and gender groups using data obtained from healthy volunteers. METHODS: This study was conducted in 21 university hospitals and affiliated hospitals from October 2012 to July 2013. The JOABPEQ includes 25 questions that yield five domains to evaluate individuals with low back pain from five different perspectives. A total of 1,456 healthy volunteers (719 men, 737 women; age range, 20-89 years) answered the questionnaire. The differences in scores according to age and gender were examined by non-parametric tests. RESULTS: The JOABPEQ scores significantly decreased with age in the domains of lumbar spine dysfunction, gait disturbance, and social life dysfunction. In these three domains, the median scores approached the 100 possible points in individuals aged 20-70 for both genders. However, the median scores for lumbar spine dysfunction and social life dysfunction decreased to 83.0 and 65.0-78.0 points, respectively, in individuals in their 80 s and 70-80 s, respectively; and the scores for gait disturbance decreased to 93.0 and 71.0 points for males and females in their 80 s. Overall, the median scores for pain-related and psychological disorders were 100 and 60.0-72.0 points, respectively. CONCLUSION: The reference values for JOABPEQ according to age and gender were established herein. Patients with low back pain should be evaluated with this new self-administered questionnaire taking these reference values into account.

Vertebral osteolytic defect due to cellulose particles derived from gauze fibers after posterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Vertebral cystic lesions may be observed in pseudarthroses after lumbar fusion surgery. The authors report a rare case of pseudarthrosis after spinal fusion, accompanied by an expanding vertebral osteolytic defect induced by cellulose particles. A male patient originally presented at the age of 69 years with leg and low-back pain caused by a lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis. He underwent a posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and his neurological symptoms and pain resolved within a year but recurred 14 months after surgery. Radiological imaging demonstrated a cystic lesion on the inferior endplate of L-5 and the superior endplate of S-1, which rapidly enlarged into a vertebral osteolytic defect. The patient underwent revision surgery, and his low-back pain resolved. A histopathological examination demonstrated foreign body-type multinucleated giant cells, containing 10-µm particles, in the sample collected just below the defect. Micro-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy revealed that the foreign particles were cellulosic, presumably originating from cotton gauze fibers that had contaminated the interbody cages used during the initial surgery. Vertebral osteolytic defects that occur after interbody fusion are generally presumed to be the result of infection. This case suggests that some instances of vertebral osteolytic defects may be aseptically induced by foreign particles. Hence, this possibility should be carefully considered in such cases, to help prevent contamination of the morselized bone used for autologous grafts by foreign materials, such as gauze fibers.

C3-6 laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy maintains satisfactory long-term surgical outcomes.

Study Design Prospective cohort study. Objective To clarify long-term surgical outcomes of C3-6 laminoplasty preserving muscles attached to the C2 and C7 spinous processes in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods Twenty patients who underwent C3-6 open-door laminoplasty for CSM and who were followed for 8 to 10 years were included in this study. Myelopathic symptoms were assessed using Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Axial neck pain was graded as severe, moderate, or mild. C2-7 angle was measured using lateral radiographs of the cervical spine before surgery and at final follow-up. Results Mean JOA score before surgery (11.7) was significantly improved to 15.2 at the time of maximum recovery (1 year after surgery), declining slightly to 14.9 by the latest follow-up. Late deterioration of JOA score developed in eight patients, but was unrelated to the cervical spine lesions in each case. No patient suffered from prolonged postoperative axial neck pain at final follow-up. The mean C2-7 angle before surgery (13.8 degrees) significantly increased to 19.2 degrees at final follow-up. Conclusions C3-6 laminoplasty preserving muscles attached to the C2 and C7 spinous processes in patients with CSM maintained satisfactory long-term neurologic improvement with significantly reduced frequencies of prolonged postoperative axial neck pain and loss of C2-7 angle after surgery.

Major surgical treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures in the elderly: a comparison of anterior spinal fusion, anterior-posterior combined surgery and posterior closing wedge osteotomy.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. PURPOSE: To clarify the differences among the three major surgeries for osteoporotic vertebral fractures based on the clinical and radiological results. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Minimally invasive surgery like balloon kyphoplasty has been used to treat osteoporotic vertebral fractures, but major surgery is necessary for severely impaired patients. However, there are controversies on the surgical procedures. METHODS: The clinical and radiographic results of patients who underwent major surgery for osteoporotic vertebral fracture were retrospectively compared, among anterior spinal fusion (group A, 9 patients), single-stage combined anterior-posterior procedure (group AP, 8 patients) and posterior closing wedge osteotomy (group P, 9 patients). Patients who underwent revision surgery were evaluated just before the revision surgery, and the other patients were evaluated at the final follow-up examination, which was defined as the end point of the evaluations for the comparison. RESULTS: The operation time was significantly longer in group AP than in the other two groups. The postoperative correction of kyphosis was significantly greater in group P than in group A. Although the differences were not significant, better outcomes were obtained in group P in: back pain relief at the end point; ambulatory ability at the end point; and average loss of correction. CONCLUSIONS: The posterior closing wedge osteotomy demonstrated better surgical results than the anterior spinal fusion procedure and the single-stage combined anterior-posterior procedure.

Neurological manifestations of thoracic myelopathy.

INTRODUCTION: Investigation of preoperative manifestations of thoracic myelopathy in a large population has not been reported. The aim of this study was to identify symptoms specific to anatomical pathology or compressed segments in thoracic myelopathy through investigation of preoperative manifestations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were 205 patients [143 men, 62 women; mean age, 62.2 (range 21-87 years)] with thoracic myelopathy who underwent surgery at our affiliate institutions from 2000 to 2011. The disease distribution included ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) in 106 patients, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in 17, OLF with OPLL in 17, intervertebral disc herniation (IDH) in 23, OLF with IDH in 3, and spondylosis in 39. We assessed (1) initial and preoperative complaints, (2) neurological findings, (3) Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores (JOA, full score, 11 points), (4) the compressed segments, and (5) preoperative duration. Multivariate analyses were performed to examine potential relationships between preoperative manifestations and anatomical pathology or compressed segments. RESULTS: The multivariate analyses revealed relationships between lower limb muscle weakness and T10/11 anterior compression; lower limb pain and T11/12 anterior compression; low back pain and T11/12 compression; and hyporeflexia in the patellar tendon reflex/foot drop and T12/L1 anterior compression. CONCLUSION: This study elucidated symptoms specific to anatomical pathology or compressed segments in thoracic myelopathy. These relationships can be helpful in the initial investigation of thoracic diseases, although additional measures such as MRI or CT are necessary for definitive diagnosis.

An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): an average score of healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND: An outcome measure to evaluate the neurological function of patients with cervical myelopathy was proposed by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA score) and has been widely used in Japan. However, the JOA score does not include patients' satisfaction, disability, handicaps, or general health, which can be affected by cervical myelopathy. In 2007, a new outcome measure, the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ), which is a self-administered questionnaire, was developed. However, the influence of age and gender on the scores has not been fully examined. The purpose of this study was to establish the standard value of the JOACMEQ by age using healthy volunteers. METHODS: This study was conducted in 23 university hospitals and their affiliated hospitals from September to December 2011. The questionnaire included 24 questions for evaluation of physical function of the cervical spine and spinal cord. A total of 1,629 healthy volunteers were recruited for the study. The ages ranged from 20 to 89 years old. RESULTS: The volunteers comprised 798 men and 831 women. In the elderly healthy volunteers, the JOACMEQ scores decreased with age. In general, the scores for cervical spine function and upper/lower extremity function were retained up to the 60s, then decreased in the 70s and 80s. The scores for quality of life were retained up to the 70s; however, the score for bladder function was retained up to the 40s, then declined with age from the 50s to 80s. CONCLUSION: The standard values of the JOACMEQ by age were established. Differences in the scores were found among different generations. Patients with cervical myelopathy should be evaluated with this new self-administered questionnaire taking into account the standard values according to different ages.

Intramuscular pressure of the multifidus muscle and low-back pain after posterior lumbar interbody fusion: comparison of mini-open and conventional approaches.

OBJECT: This randomized study was designed to elucidate the time course of the perioperative development of intramuscular multifidus muscle pressure after posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and to investigate whether the route of pedicle screw insertion affects this pressure and resultant low-back pain. Although several studies have focused on intramuscular pressure associated with posterior lumbar surgery, those studies examined intramuscular pressure generated by the muscle retractors during surgery. No study has investigated the intramuscular pressure after PLIF. METHODS: Forty patients with L4-5 degenerative spondylolisthesis were randomly assigned to undergo either the mini-open PLIF procedure with pedicle screw insertion between the multifidus and longissimus muscles (n = 20) or the conventional PLIF procedure via a midline approach only (n = 20). Intramuscular pressure was measured 5 times (at 30 minutes and at 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery) with an intraoperatively installed sensor. Concurrently, the FACES Pain Rating Scale score for low-back pain and the total dose of postoperative analgesics were recorded. RESULTS: With the patients in the supine position, for both groups the mean pressure values were consistently 40-50 mm Hg, which exceeded the critical capillary pressure of the muscle. With the patients in the lateral decubitus position, the pressure decreased over time (from 14 to 9 mm Hg in the mini-open group and from 20 to 10 mm Hg in the conventional group). Among patients in the mini-open group, the pressure was lower, but the difference was not statistically significant. Postoperative pain and postoperative analgesic dosages were also lower. CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to evaluate postoperative intramuscular pressure after PLIF. Although the results did not demonstrate a significant difference in the intramuscular pressure between the 2 types of PLIF, mini-open PLIF was associated with less pain after surgery.