A Nationwide survey of safety protocols and chemosensory assessments by Japanese clinicians pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVE: There has been an increase of attention and awareness of smell and taste loss due to the impact of COVID-19. However, little is known about the influence of COVID-19 on the number of psychophysical tests performed, the timing of these tests, or the protection protocols employed to protect against virus transmission. This study aimed to explore the changes in examination approaches, types of tests employed, and safety measures adopted by clinicians before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A survey was distributed to 404 institutes of the Oto-Rhino Laryngological Society of Japan, consisting of otolaryngologists working in university hospitals, general hospitals, and private clinics. The anonymous online survey contained questions related to safety measures and chemosensory assessments performed before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, participants were queried on the number and types of examinations conducted, the type of examiners who performed them, the timing of tests in suspected and non-suspected COVID-19 cases, modifications made due to the pandemic, and the protective measures adopted during chemosensory examinations. RESULTS: Of the 201 respondents, representing a 50 % response rate, 49 % were from general hospitals, 48 % from university hospitals, and 3 % from private clinics. The study found a slight decrease in the overall number of chemosensory tests conducted post-COVID-19. In terms of who performed the test, there were no differences pre- and post- COVID-19. Most examinations (52-68 %) for suspected COVID-19 cases were performed 1-2 months after the onset of symptoms. Modifications in testing rooms and personal protective equipment (PPE) were reported by the majority of institutions post-pandemic. While different examination rooms or PPE were not commonly used based on a patient's previous COVID-19 diagnosis, changes were observed in testing practices. Most examinations were conducted in rooms with windows or fans, and PPE usage was high; surgical masks, eye visors or face shields, and disposable gloves being commonly used. Virus transmission from patient to examiner was reported in only one case during T&T olfactometer examination. CONCLUSION: We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of olfactory and gustatory tests performed, the type of examiner, the examination room, and the use of PPE and found no significant difference before and after the COVID-19 pandemic on these factors. Adherence to a protection protocol involving the proper use of PPE in controlled environments enabled the continuation of olfactory and gustatory tests during the pandemic.

Evaluation of odor recognition threshold measurement methods in T&T olfactometry: A survey study.

OBJECTIVE: The odor recognition thresholds in T&T olfactometry are measured by either the examiner's judgment of the patients' odor expression for each standard odor or by the patient's choice of the correct response from an olfactory term table. This study aimed to clarify the correct odor expressions and use of the olfactory term table. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to otolaryngologists or medical staff in charge of testing at facilities where T&T olfactometry is performed. The questionnaire consisted of the facility's background, environment and procedures of T&T olfactometry, choice of the correct answer with five different standard odors, and use of the olfactory term table. For the choices, the expressions used were those considered correct at Nippon Medical School Tama Nagayama Hospital and the Kyoto Nose and Allergy Clinic. RESULTS: A total of 81 valid responses were obtained. Most respondents belonged to medical and educational institutions (59.3%, 48/81). The laboratories in the respondents' institutions were completely ventilated using various methods. Clinical laboratory technicians inspected 51.7% (45/81) of the facilities. The order of standard odors in the odor recognition threshold test differs depending on the facility. When the examiner was unsure about the answer given by the patient in the odor recognition threshold test, 16.1% (9/56) of the respondents chose "present the olfactory term table," 33.9% (19/56) chose "increase the concentration," and 37.5% (21/56) chose "present the olfactory term table" or "increase the concentration," depending on the situation. A total of 96.4% (54/56) of the facilities treated odor expressions other than those in the olfactory term table as correct, and the odor expressions that were considered correct differed from facility to facility. Of the respondents, 80.2% (65/81) answered "I know the olfactory term table," and the mean value of satisfaction with the current olfactory term table was 4.4 ± 3.0. Of the respondents, 81.5% (53/65) answered that "the timing of presenting the olfactory term table should be standardized in all facilities." CONCLUSION: In the odor recognition threshold test by T&T olfactometry, this study revealed that the odor expressions considered as correct answers for the standard odors and the use of the olfactory term table differed among facilities.

AQUACEL® Ag Advantage reduces the stress of postoperative packing removal after endoscopic sinus surgery

Abstract Objective: After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (ESS), packing plays an important role in wound healing and hemostasis. However, the effect of the packing removal procedure on physician stress has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate physician stress during packing removal for patients treated with AQUACEL® Ag Advantage versus KALTOSTAT®. Methods: This retrospective study included 15 patients who underwent packing with ESS for chronic rhinosinusitis performed at two centers; 9 were treated with AQUACEL® Ag Advantage and 6 were treated with KALTOSTAT®. Physician stress during packing removal was evaluated with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). The time required to remove the packing and the number of instruments used in the procedure were recorded. Postoperative bleeding (Boezaart bleeding score) and wound healing were graded. Patient symptoms on the day after surgery and pain during packing removal were assessed using a visual analog scale. Results: Computed tomography scores, asthma complications, and blood eosinophil counts were significantly higher in the AQUACEL® Ag Advantage group. Patient symptoms on the day after surgery were not significantly different between the two groups. Physician stress during the task of packing removal was significantly lower in the AQUACEL® Ag Advantage group than in the KALTOSTAT® group (35.5 vs. 81.0, p = 0.016) according to the NASA-TLX scores. The number of instruments used in the procedure was significantly lower in the AQUACEL® Ag Advantage group than in the KALTOSTAT® group (3.0 vs. 6.0, p = 0.015). There were no significant differences in procedure time for packing removal, postoperative bleeding, wound healing, or patient pain at the time of packing removal between the groups. Conclusion: Physicians feel stressed about packing removal. In addition, AQUACEL® Ag Advantage is useful for packing after ESS, requiring fewer instruments for the procedure than KALTOSTAT® and reducing physician stress about the procedure. Level of evidence: Level 3.

AQUACEL® Ag Advantage reduces the stress of postoperative packing removal after endoscopic sinus surgery.

OBJECTIVE: After Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (ESS), packing plays an important role in wound healing and hemostasis. However, the effect of the packing removal procedure on physician stress has not been evaluated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate physician stress during packing removal for patients treated with AQUACEL® Ag Advantage versus KALTOSTAT®. METHODS: This retrospective study included 15 patients who underwent packing with ESS for chronic rhinosinusitis performed at two centers; 9 were treated with AQUACEL® Ag Advantage and 6 were treated with KALTOSTAT®. Physician stress during packing removal was evaluated with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). The time required to remove the packing and the number of instruments used in the procedure were recorded. Postoperative bleeding (Boezaart bleeding score) and wound healing were graded. Patient symptoms on the day after surgery and pain during packing removal were assessed using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: Computed tomography scores, asthma complications, and blood eosinophil counts were significantly higher in the AQUACEL® Ag Advantage group. Patient symptoms on the day after surgery were not significantly different between the two groups. Physician stress during the task of packing removal was significantly lower in the AQUACEL® Ag Advantage group than in the KALTOSTAT® group (35.5 vs. 81.0, p=0.016) according to the NASA-TLX scores. The number of instruments used in the procedure was significantly lower in the AQUACEL® Ag Advantage group than in the KALTOSTAT® group (3.0 vs. 6.0, p=0.015). There were no significant differences in procedure time for packing removal, postoperative bleeding, wound healing, or patient pain at the time of packing removal between the groups. CONCLUSION: Physicians feel stressed about packing removal. In addition, AQUACEL® Ag Advantage is useful for packing after ESS, requiring fewer instruments for the procedure than KALTOSTAT® and reducing physician stress about the procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3.

Barrier Factors of Adherence to Dupilumab Self-Injection for Severe Allergic Disease: A Non-Interventional Open-Label Study.

Purpose: The status of dupilumab self-injection at home is not well understood. We therefore aimed to identify the barriers to adherence to dupilumab self-injection. Patients and Methods: This non-interventional open-label study was conducted between March 2021 and July 2021. Patients with atopic dermatitis, bronchial asthma, and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps receiving dupilumab, from 15 sites, were requested to complete a self-administered questionnaire regarding the frequency and effectiveness of dosing as well as their use and satisfaction with dupilumab. Barriers to adherence were assessed using the Adherence Starts with Knowledge-12. Results: We included 331 patients who used dupilumab for atopic dermatitis (n = 164), chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (n = 102), and bronchial asthma (n = 65). The median efficacy of dupilumab scored 9.3 on the visual analog scale. Overall, 85.5% of the patients self-injected dupilumab, and 70.7% perfectly complied with the established injection dates. The pre-filled pen was significantly superior to the conventional syringe in terms of usability, operability, ease of pushing the plunger, and patient satisfaction. However, the pre-filled pen caused more pain during self-injection than did the syringe. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that adherence decreased with longer dupilumab treatment duration (p = 0.017) and was not associated with age, sex, underlying disease, or device type. There was a difference in responses related to "inconvenience/forgetfulness" between the good and poor adherence groups. Conclusion: The pre-filled dupilumab pen was superior to the syringe in terms of usability, operability, ease of pushing the plunger, and satisfaction. Repetitive instructions are recommended for preventing poor adherence to dupilumab self-injection.

Impact of infectious disease pandemics on individual lifetime consumption: An endogenous time preference approach.

This paper considers the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on long-term individual lifetime consumption profiles. The framework for the analysis is a model that extends Strulik (2021) to include the government sector, where time preference is determined by individual health damage (deficit) distinct from normal aging. Thus, the health damage caused by COVID-19 changes the rate of time preference and consequently affects the Euler equation for consumption. Our theoretical contribution is the consistent incorporation of public health investment into the existing model to understand the effect of government measures against a pandemic. Numerical analysis based on this model is used to estimate changes in health status over time, trends in the rate of time preference, and individual lifetime consumption profiles, taking into account differences in age at the time of the pandemic and the nature of the government responses. Because the long-term negative economic impact would be enormous, we should avoid advocating for "living with COVID-19" without due consideration. The reopening of the economy must be accompanied by a commitment to the containment and elimination of infections with future novel coronaviruses.

Convergent movement of COVID-19 outbreak in Japan based on SIR model.

The infection dynamics of COVID-19 show frequent phases in which the infection spreads rapidly, resembling explosive infection. However, despite the repeated increases and decreases, there is a process of convergence even within a relatively short period of time. While it is obvious that the growth rate of the cumulative number of infected people slows down as it increases, considering the infectious disease process, we also observe a slowdown in the growth rate of the net number of infected people. Moreover, there exists a special type of convergence whereby areas with initially many infected people exhibit low rates of increase in the numbers of infected people subsequently. This paper uses prefectural panel data from Japan through March 2021 to confirm the convergence process.

Placebo-controlled study with OHIO chamber of prophylactic pranlukast for children with Japanese cedar pollinosis: TOPIC-J III study.

OBJECTIVE: This double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative study was designed to investigate whether pranlukast dry syrup, a leukotriene receptor antagonist, has a protective effect against priming, controlled pollen exposure, and natural pollen exposure in children with Japanese cedar pollinosis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty children aged 12-15 years with Japanese cedar pollinosis (positive skin test for Japanese cedar pollen), who had suffered from pollinosis for at least 2 years and developed severe nasal obstruction when exposed to Japanese cedar pollen, were enrolled in this study. They were randomly allocated to treatment with pranlukast or placebo orally after breakfast and dinner for 8 weeks during the Japanese cedar pollen season. Soon after the start of the pollen season, all subjects underwent a challenge by exposure for 3 h to Japanese cedar pollen (8000 grains/m(3)) in an artificial exposure chamber (OHIO chamber). CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The University Hospital Medical Information Network in Japan (UMIN000009840). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effect of pranlukast was evaluated using self-rating of nasal symptoms by the subjects and measurement of eosinophil cationic protein in nasal discharge specimens. RESULTS: Scores for the symptoms of pollinosis were lower in the pranlukast group than in the placebo group during treatment in the priming state, as well as after controlled pollen exposure and natural pollen exposure. Pranlukast significantly improved the score for nasal obstruction, compared with placebo. A correlation was found between changes of the scores for symptoms of pollinosis and changes of the eosinophil cationic protein level. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm a protective effect of pranlukast against both priming and challenge (controlled and natural) with Japanese cedar pollen. The present findings suggested that pranlukast dry syrup may be useful for prophylaxis against pollinosis in children.