Normalization of impaired glucose tolerance after kidney transplantation is associated with improved beta-cell function.

Our previous study revealed over 50% of recipients with pre-transplant impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) improved to normal glucose tolerance after kidney transplantation. However, the mechanism is unclear. We aimed to investigate whether the changes in glucose tolerance are associated with beta-cell function and insulin resistance in Japanese kidney transplant recipients with pre-transplant IGT. Of the 265 recipients who received kidney transplantation, 54 with pre-transplant IGT were included. We divided the recipients into improvement and non-improvement groups according to the change in the area under the curve for glucose obtained from the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Beta-cell function was estimated by the insulin secretion sensitivity index-2 (ISSI-2) and the disposition index (DI). Insulin resistance was estimated by the Matsuda index (MI) and the homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). ISSI-2, DI increased significantly after transplantation in the improved group (P<0.01, P<0.05, respectively), but not in the non-improved group. ΔISSI-2 and ΔDI were significantly and positively associated with pre-transplant 60-minute OGTT plasma glucose levels (both P<0.01). There were no differences in MI or HOMA-IR between these two groups after transplantation. In recipients not on pre-transplant dialysis, a significant negative association was found between Δblood urea nitrogen (BUN) and ΔDI (correlation coefficient: -0.48, P<0.05). In pre-transplant IGT recipients, improvements in glucose tolerance after kidney transplantation were linked to improvements in beta-cell function. The higher the 60-minute OGTT plasma glucose level, the greater the improvement in post-transplant beta-cell function. Improvements in BUN after transplantation were associated with improvements in beta-cell function.

Neutralizing antibody responses and cellular responses against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants after mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in kidney transplant recipients.

Although the mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine has improved the mortality rate in the general population, its efficacy against rapidly mutating virus strains, especially in kidney transplant recipients, remains unclear. We examined the anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein IgG antibody and neutralizing antibody titers and cellular immunity against B.1.1, BA.1, and BA.5 antigens in 73 uninfected kidney recipients and 16 uninfected healthy controls who received three doses of an mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. The IgG antibody titers were significantly lower in recipients than in healthy controls. Similarly, neutralizing antibody titers against three viral variants were significantly lower in recipients. When the virus was mutated, the neutralizing antibody titers decreased significantly in both groups. In cellular immunity analysis, the number of spike-specific CD8 + non-naïve T cells against three variants significantly decreased in recipients. Conversely, the frequency of spike-specific Th2 CD4 + T-cells in recipients was higher than that in healthy controls. Nineteen recipients and six healthy controls also received a bivalent omicron-containing booster vaccine, leading to increase IgG and neutralizing antibody titers in both groups. After that, eleven recipients and five healthy controls received XBB.1.5 monovalent vaccines, increasing the neutralizing antibody titers against not only XBB.1.5, but also EG.5.1 and BA.2.86 antigens in kidney recipients. Although kidney recipients did not gain sufficient immunity against Omicron BA.5 with the third dose of vaccine, humoral response against mutant SARS-CoV-2 lineages significantly increased after bivalent Omicron-containing booster vaccine and the XBB.1.5 monovalent vaccine. Therefore, it is important for kidney recipients to continue to administer updated vaccines.

The development of a rapid, high-throughput neutralization assay using a SARS-CoV-2 reporter.

Many methods have been developed to measure the neutralizing capacity of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2. However, these methods are low throughput and can be difficult to quickly modify in response to emerging variants. Therefore, an experimental system for rapid and easy measurement of the neutralizing capacity of antibodies against various variants is needed. In this study, we developed an experimental system that can efficiently measure the neutralizing capacity of sera by using a GFP-carrying recombinant SARS-CoV-2 with spike proteins of multiple variants (B.1.1, BA.5, or XBB.1.5). For all 3 recombinant chimeric genomes generated, neutralizing antibody titers determined by measuring GFP fluorescence intensity correlated significantly with those calculated from viral RNA levels measured by RT-qPCR in the supernatant of infected cells. Furthermore, neutralizing antibody titers determined by visually assessing GFP fluorescence using microscopy were also significantly correlated with those determined by RT-qPCR. By using this high-throughput method, it is now possible to quickly and easily determine the neutralizing capacity of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Longitudinal mortality risks and kidney functional outcomes in Japanese living kidney donors.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies suggested that living kidney donors do not have a higher risk of death or kidney failure than the general population. However, living kidney donor risk is controversial. Furthermore, only a few studies have evaluated long-term kidney function after kidney donation. METHODS: This study evaluated Japanese kidney donor' long-term outcomes, including mortality and kidney function. From 1965 to 2015, 230 donors (76 males, 154 females, and a median age of 54) were enrolled in this study. The median observation period was 11.0 (range, 0.3-41.0) years. RESULTS: In total, 215 donors were still alive, and 15 had died. Causes of death included malignancies, cardiovascular disease, pneumonia, suicide, gastrointestinal bleeding, and kidney failure. Actual donor survival rates at 10, 20, and 30 years were 95.3%, 90.7%, and 80.9%, respectively. These values were comparable to age- and gender-matched expected survival. Long-term kidney function after donation was evaluated in 211 donors with serum creatinine data. Two donors developed kidney failure 24 and 26 years post-donation, respectively. The percentage of donors whose estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remained ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 10, 20, and 30 years after donation were 84.2%, 73.0%, and 63.9%, respectively. Survival rates of donors with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 were comparable to those in persons with eGFR >45 mL/min/1.73 m2. CONCLUSION: Our findings revealed that kidney donors did not have a higher long-term risk of death than the general population. Although some donors showed decreased kidney function after donation, kidney function did not impact their survival.

Kidney donor age of 50 years or above is a risk factor for calcineurin inhibitor-induced nephrotoxicity.

INTRODUCTION: Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-induced nephrotoxicity (CNI-T) is a post-transplantation complication that leads to graft dysfunction. Older-donor kidney grafts may be susceptible to chronic CNI exposure because of long-term arteriolar damage. The primary aim of this study was to examine the CNI-T incidence and time-course changes in the graft function according to donor age. METHODS: We included 334 kidney transplant recipients. CNI-T was defined by Banff arteriolar hyaline thickening scores of ≥2 based on allograft protocol biopsy. Depending on donor age, participants were divided into the D > 70 (≥70 years), D60 (60-69 years), D50 (50-59 years), and D < 49: (≤49 years) groups. We investigated the extent to which CNI-T affected the transplanted kidney function. Patients who did not develop CNI-T during the study period were included in the non-CNI-T group; the remaining were grouped into the CNI-T group. RESULTS: The CNI-T incidence was higher in donors aged >50 years. Compared to D < 49, the CNI-T risk was 1.86 times higher in D50 and 2.9 times higher in D > 70. Furthermore, the CNI-T group exhibited a significantly lower graft function 10 years after transplantation. CONCLUSION: CNI-T incidence increases in donors aged ≥50 years and affects renal function after 10 years.

Prophylactic bilateral nephrectomy and preemptive kidney transplantation for Denys-Drash syndrome prior to development of kidney failure.

BACKGROUND  : Nephropathy in Denys-Drash syndrome (DDS) develops within a few months of birth, often progressing to kidney failure. Wilms tumors also develop at an early age with a high rate of incidence. When a patient does not have Wilms tumor but develops kidney failure, prophylactic bilateral nephrectomy, and kidney transplantation (KTX) is an optimal approach owing to the high risk of Wilms tumor development. In the case presented here, prophylactic bilateral nephrectomy and KTX were performed in a patient who had not developed Wilms tumor or kidney failure. However, the treatment option is controversial as it involves the removal of a tumor-free kidney and performing KTX in the absence of kidney failure. CASE DIAGNOSIS/TREATMENT: We present the case of a 7-year-old boy, born at 38 weeks gestation. Examinations at the age of 1 year revealed severe proteinuria and abnormal internal and external genitalia. Genetic testing identified a missense mutation in exon 9 of the WT1 gene, leading to the diagnosis of DDS. At the age of 6 years, he had not yet developed Wilms tumor and had grown to a size that allowed him to safely undergo a KTX. His kidney function was slowly deteriorating (chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3), but he had not yet developed kidney failure. Two treatment options were considered for this patient: observation until the development of kidney failure or prophylactic bilateral nephrectomy with KTX to avoid Wilms tumor development. After a detailed explanation of options to the patient and family, they decided to proceed with prophylactic bilateral nephrectomy and KTX. At the latest follow-up 4 months after KTX, the patient's kidney functioned well without proteinuria. CONCLUSION: We performed prophylactic bilateral nephrectomy with KTX on a DDS patient who had not developed kidney failure or Wilms tumor by the age of 7 years. Although the risk of development of Wilms tumor in such a patient is unclear, this treatment may be an optimal approach for patients who are physically able to undergo KTX, considering the potentially lethal nature of Wilms tumor in CKD patients.

A multi-institutional study found a possible role of anti-nephrin antibodies in post-transplant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis recurrence.

Possible roles of anti-nephrin antibodies in post-transplant recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) have been reported recently. To confirm these preliminary results, we performed a multi-institutional study of 22 Japanese pediatric kidney transplant recipients with FSGS including eight genetic FSGS and 14 non-genetic (presumed primary) FSGS. Eleven of the 14 non-genetic FSGS patients had post-transplant recurrent FSGS. Median (interquartile range) plasma levels of anti-nephrin antibodies in post-transplant recurrent FSGS measured using ELISA were markedly high at 899 (831, 1292) U/mL (cutoff 231 U/mL) before transplantation or during recurrence. Graft biopsies during recurrence showed punctate IgG deposition co-localized with nephrin that had altered localization with increased nephrin tyrosine phosphorylation and Src homology and collagen homology A expressions. Graft biopsies after remission showed no signals for IgG and a normal expression pattern of nephrin. Anti-nephrin antibody levels decreased to 155 (53, 367) U/mL in five patients with samples available after remission. In patients with genetic FSGS as in those with non-genetic FSGS without recurrence, anti-nephrin antibody levels were comparable to those of 30 control individuals, and graft biopsies had no signals for IgG and a normal expression pattern of nephrin. Thus, our results suggest that circulating anti-nephrin antibodies are a possible candidate for circulating factors involved in the pathogenesis of post-transplant recurrent FSGS and that this may be mediated by nephrin phosphorylation. Larger studies including other ethnicities are required to confirm this finding.

Immunological risk and complement genetic evaluations in early onset de novo thrombotic microangiopathy after living donor kidney transplantation: A Japanese multicenter registry.

BACKGROUND: Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) after kidney transplantation (KTx), particularly early onset de novo (dn) TMA, requires immediate interventions to prevent irreversible organ damage. This multicenter study was performed to investigate the allogeneic clinical factors and complement genetic background of dnTMA after KTx. METHODS: Perioperative dnTMA after KTx within 1 week after KTx were diagnosed based on pathological or/and hematological criteria at each center, and their immunological backgrounds were researched. Twelve aHUS-related gene variants were examined in dnTMA cases. RESULTS: Seventeen recipients (15 donors) were enrolled, and all dnTMA cases were onset within 72-h of KTx, and 16 of 17 cases were ABO incompatible. The implementation rate of pre-transplant plasmaphereses therapies were low, including cases with high titers of anti-A/anti-B antibodies. Examination of aHUS-related gene variants revealed some deletions and variants with minor allele frequency (MAF) in Japan or East Asian genome databases in genes encoding alternative pathways and complement regulatory factors. These variants was positive in 8 cases, 6 of which were positive in both recipient and donor, but only in one graft loss case. CONCLUSIONS: Although some immunological risks were found for dnTMA after KTx, only a few cases developed into TMA. The characteristic variations revealed in the present study may be novel candidates related to dnTMA in Japanese or Asian patients, but not pathogenic variants of aHUS. Future studies on genetic and antigenic factors are needed to identify factors contributing to dnTMA after KTx.

Differences of cerebral oxygen saturation in dialysis patients: a comparison of three principals of near infrared spectroscopy.

PURPOSE: It has been reported that cerebral oxygen saturation (rSO2) measured by near infrared spectroscopy is low in dialysis patients. We compared the rSO2 values of dialysis patients before living donor kidney transplantation and their donors as controls by using three spectroscopes that utilize different principals, the INVOS 5100C (spatially resolved spectroscopy), FORE-SIGHT ELITE (modified Beer-Lambert law) and tNIRS-1 (time-resolved spectroscopy). METHODS: Before induction of anesthesia, the sensors of one of the three spectroscopes were placed on the forehead and rSO2 values were recorded followed by the same measurement using the other two spectroscopes. The primary objective was to compare the rSO2 values of the dialysis patients and controls using the three spectroscopes by the unpaired t test. Then we compared the rSO2 values among the spectroscopes in both dialysis patients and controls by one-way ANOVA. Finally, we examined the relations between the rSO2 values and the physiological values by using the Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Fifteen pairs of dialysis patients and controls were studied. With the INVOS 5100 C, the values of the dialysis patients (59.7 ± 9.7% (mean ± standard deviation) were 13% lower than those of the controls (73.3 ± 6.9%) (P < 0.01). With the tNIRS-1, the values were 57.8 ± 4.8% in the dialysis patients and 63.3 ± 3.5% in the controls (P < 0.01). Almost no differences were observed with the FORE-SIGHT ELITE (71.6 ± 4.9% [dialysis patients] vs. 70.8 ± 4.3% [Controls]) (P = 0.62). Among the spectroscopes, the values were significantly different in both dialysis patients and controls. For the INVOS 5100C and tNIRS-1, correlation coefficients between rSO2 values and blood Hb and serum Alb were more than 0.5. CONCLUSIONS: The rSO2 values for comparisons between the dialysis patients and the controls were different according to differences of the principles of the near infrared spectroscopes. In the INVOS 5100C and tNIRS-1, rSO2 values may be related to blood Hb and serum Alb.

Development and nationwide validation of kidney graft injury markers using urinary exosomes and microvesicles (complete English translation of the Japanese version).

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive, prompt, and proper detection tools for kidney graft injuries (KGIs) are awaited to ensure graft longevity. We screened diagnostic biomarkers for KGIs following kidney transplantation using extracellular vesicles (EVs; exosomes and microvesicles) from the urine samples of patients. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-seven kidney recipients at 11 Japanese institutions were enrolled in this study; urine samples were obtained prior to protocol/episode biopsies. EVs were isolated from urine samples, and EV RNA markers were assayed using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Diagnostic performance of EV RNA markers and diagnostic formulas comprising these markers were evaluated by comparison with the corresponding pathological diagnoses. RESULTS: EV CXCL9, CXCL10, and UMOD were elevated in T-cell-mediated rejection samples compared with other KGI samples, while SPNS2 was elevated in chronic antibody-mediated rejection (cABMR) samples. A diagnostic formula developed through Sparse Logistic Regression analysis using EV RNA markers allowed us to accurately (with an area under the receiver operator characteristic curve [AUC] of 0.875) distinguish cABMR from other KGI samples. EV B4GALT1 and SPNS2 were also elevated in cABMR, and a diagnostic formula using these markers was able to distinguish between cABMR and chronic calcineurin toxicity accurately (AUC 0.886). In interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IFTA) urine samples and those with high Banff chronicity score sums (BChS), POTEM levels may reflect disease severity, and diagnostic formulas using POTEM detected IFTA (AUC 0.830) and high BChS (AUC 0.850). CONCLUSIONS: KGIs could be diagnosed with urinary EV mRNA analysis with relatively high accuracy.

Exacerbation of Intimal Fibrosis and Endarteritis in a Kidney Transplant Recipient with Chronic Active Antibody-Mediated Rejection and COVID-19: A Case Report.

Kidney transplant recipients are immunocompromised hosts at risk for comorbidity and mortality due to infection. Currently, there are no established guidelines for the management of immunosuppressed transplant recipients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The impact of COVID-19 and its therapeutic management on chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (CAAMR) are still unclear. Here, we report a case of CAAMR exacerbation with endarteritis and intimal fibrosis after COVID-19. A 41-year-old female kidney transplant recipient with CAAMR was admitted to a local hospital with moderately severe COVID-19. Her doses of tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were reduced, and she was administered methylprednisolone pulse and antiviral drugs. This resulted in a good clinical course and she was discharged in 15 days. During and after hospitalization, the immunosuppressants were gradually returned to the baseline levels. However, about 1.5 months after discharge, the serum creatinine level became elevated. An indication kidney biopsy showed CAAMR with intimal fibrosis and endarteritis in all interlobular arteries. An increase of immunosuppressant led to a decrease of the serum creatinine level. Factors contributing to CAAMR with intimal fibrosis and endarteritis may include (1) insufficient immunosuppression due to changes in the levels of immunosuppressive; (2) overlap with endothelial cell injury caused by COVID-19, and (3) an immune-activated state associated with COVID-19. COVID-19 is a life-threatening disease that can result in unexpected changes in immunological status. Possible allograft rejection should be carefully managed in such patients.

Mechanism and treatment for chronic antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients.

Chronic antibody-mediated rejection of kidney transplantation is a major cause of late-stage graft loss. Donor-specific antibodies are the main cause of antibody-mediated rejection; in particular, de novo donor-specific antibodies are a risk factor for chronic active antibody-mediated rejection. The level of de novo donor-specific antibodies tends to increase with time throughout long-term graft survival. Donor-specific antibodies induce humoral rejection through complement activation, which results in tissue injury and coagulation. Additionally, complement activation promotes the migration of inflammatory cells through the innate immune response, causing endothelial injury. This inflammatory response may cause persistent glomerulitis and peritubular capillaritis, leading to fixed pathological lesions that impair graft function. No treatment has been established for chronic antibody-mediated rejection, a condition in which antibody-mediated rejection becomes irreversible. Thus, antibody-mediated rejection must be detected and treated while it is still reversible. In this review, we discuss the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies and the mechanisms leading to chronic antibody-mediated rejection and summarize the current treatment options and the latest biomarkers for detecting chronic antibody-mediated rejection at an earlier stage.

Use of Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction Assay to Evaluate Immune Tolerance before Kidney Transplantation with an Immunosuppression-Free Protocol following Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation from the Same Donor.

Several cases of kidney transplantation after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from the same donor for end-stage renal disease have been reported. In those cases, immunosuppressive drugs were discontinued since immune tolerance was supposed to be induced. Theoretically, the recipient's immune system recognizes the kidney allograft as its own tissue with the same human leukocyte antigen (HLA) profile, and the kidney allograft will not be rejected, even without the use of immunosuppressive agents. However, almost all recipients receive immunosuppressants in the early stages after kidney transplantation owing to concerns of acute rejection. Here, we report a successful case of post-HSCT kidney transplantation without the use of immunosuppressive drugs, in which a mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assay was used to evaluate immune tolerance before kidney transplantation. The patient was a 25-year-old woman. Five years prior, she developed acute myeloid leukemia and underwent HLA-half-matched peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Thereafter, she was in remission of the acute myeloid leukemia, but 1 year later, she developed renal graft-versus-host disease. Subsequently, the patient's renal function gradually deteriorated to end-stage renal failure, and she underwent kidney transplantation with the previous stem cell donor: her mother. HLA typing of donor and recipient showed a complete chimerism in the peripheral blood. The pretransplantation complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch and flow cytometric T-cell crossmatch results were both negative, and HLA antibody measurements were all negative. The MLR assay revealed no T-lymphocyte reaction to the donor; therefore, immunosuppressants were not used. Two years after transplantation, the patient's serum creatinine concentration was around 0.8 mg/dL (down from 4 mg/dL before transplantation). No abnormalities were observed in a renal biopsy performed after 3 months. Our study, along with others, indicates that immune tolerance to a donor develops in post-HSCT kidney transplantation from the same donor.

Long-Term Results in Recipients of Late Conversion to a Calcineurin Inhibitor-Free Regimen with Everolimus After Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Conversion to a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-free regimen in cases of CNI nephrotoxicity (CNIT) is a strategy to improve the long-term outcomes of kidney transplantation. However, the long-term results of late conversion to a CNI-free regimen using everolimus (EVR) remain uncertain. METHODS: Nine kidney transplant recipients with biopsy-confirmed CNIT were enrolled. The median time of CNIT diagnosis was 9.0 years. All recipients underwent a conversion from CNI to EVR. We evaluated the clinical outcomes, development of donor-specific antibody (DSA), the incidence of rejection, alternative arteriolar hyalinosis (aah) scores, renal function changes, and T cell responses by mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR) assay after conversion. RESULTS: The median follow-up after conversion was 5.4 years. Currently, 7 of 9 recipients have received a CNI-free regimen for 1.6 to 9.5 years. In the other 2 recipients, one experienced graft loss due to CNIT 3.8 years after conversion, and the other had to resume CNI due to acute T cell-mediated rejection (ATMR) a year after conversion. None of the recipients developed DSA. No rejection was observed in the kidney allograft histology except for the ATMR case. Moreover, improvement in aah scores was noted in one patient. Furthermore, serum creatinine levels were stable in recipients without proteinuria before the EVR add-on. In the MLR analysis, low responses against donors were observed in stable patients. CONCLUSIONS: Late conversion to an EVR-based regimen without CNI may be a promising therapeutic strategy against CNIT, particularly for recipients without proteinuria before the EVR add-on.

Analysis of T-cell alloantigen response via a direct pathway in kidney transplant recipients with donor-specific antibodies.

Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are the main cause of graft loss over time. The direct pathway of alloantigen recognition is important in the pathogenesis of acute rejection. Recent studies have suggested that the direct pathway also contributes to the pathogenesis of chronic injury. Nevertheless, there are no reports on T-cell alloantigen response via the direct pathway in kidney recipients with DSAs. We analyzed the T-cell alloantigen response via the direct pathway in kidney recipients with DSAs (DSA+) or without DSAs (DSA-). A mixed lymphocyte reaction assay was implemented to assess the direct pathway response. DSA+ patients showed significantly higher CD8+ and CD4+ T cell responses to donor cells than DSA- patients. Furthermore, proliferating CD4+ T cells showed a marked increase in Th1 and Th17 responses in DSA+ patients than in DSA- patients. In a comparison between anti-donor and third-party responses, the anti-donor CD8+ and CD4+ T cell response was significantly lower than the anti-third-party response. In contrast, the donor-specific hyporesponsiveness was absent in DSA+ patients. Our study demonstrated that DSA+ recipients have a greater potential for developing immune responses against the donor tissues via the direct alloantigen recognition pathway. These data contribute to an understanding of DSAs pathogenicity during kidney transplantation.

A Case of Kidney Transplantation from a Deceased Donor with Acute Kidney Injury due to Rhabdomyolysis.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) due to rhabdomyolysis occurs because of renal ischemia or acute tubular necrosis due to the deposition of myoglobin casts in the renal tubules. Donors with AKI due to rhabdomyolysis are not contraindication for transplantation. However, the dark red kidney raises concerns about renal hypofunction or primary nonfunction after transplantation. We report the case of a 34-year-old man with a 15-year history of hemodialysis for chronic renal failure due to congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. The patient received a renal allograft from a young woman who suffered cardiac death. The serum creatinine (sCre) level of the donor at the time of transport was 0.6 mg/dL, and renal ultrasonography revealed no abnormalities in renal morphology or blood flow. Her serum creatinine kinase level increased to 57,000 IU/L 58 h after femoral artery cannulation and sCre level worsened to 1.4 mg/dL, suggesting AKI due to rhabdomyolysis. However, since the urine output of the donor was maintained, the sCre elevation was thought to be nonproblematic. The allograft had a dark red appearance at the time of procurement. The perfusion of the isolated kidney was good, but the dark red color did not improve. A 0-h biopsy showed flattening of the renal tubular epithelium and absence of the brush border and myoglobin casts in 30% of the renal tubules. Rhabdomyolysis-related tubular damage was diagnosed. Hemodialysis was discontinued on postoperative day 14. Twenty-four days after the operation, the transplanted kidney function progressed favorably (sCre 1.18 mg/dL), and the patient was discharged. Protocol biopsy 1 month after transplantation showed disappearance of myoglobin casts and improvement in renal tubular epithelial damage. The patient's sCre level was approximately 1.0 mg/dL 24 months after transplantation, and he is doing well without complications.

Utility of Banff Human Organ Transplant Gene Panel in Human Kidney Transplant Biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Microarray transcript analysis of human renal transplantation biopsies has successfully identified the many patterns of graft rejection. To evaluate an alternative, this report tests whether gene expression from the Banff Human Organ Transplant (B-HOT) probe set panel, derived from validated microarrays, can identify the relevant allograft diagnoses directly from archival human renal transplant formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded biopsies. To test this hypothesis, principal components (PCs) of gene expressions were used to identify allograft diagnoses, to classify diagnoses, and to determine whether the PC data were rich enough to identify diagnostic subtypes by clustering, which are all needed if the B-HOT panel can substitute for microarrays. METHODS: RNA was isolated from routine, archival formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue renal biopsy cores with both rejection and nonrejection diagnoses. The B-HOT panel expression of 770 genes was analyzed by PCs, which were then tested to determine their ability to identify diagnoses. RESULTS: PCs of microarray gene sets identified the Banff categories of renal allograft diagnoses, modeled well the aggregate diagnoses, showing a similar correspondence with the pathologic diagnoses as microarrays. Clustering of the PCs identified diagnostic subtypes including non-chronic antibody-mediated rejection with high endothelial expression. PCs of cell types and pathways identified new mechanistic patterns including differential expression of B and plasma cells. CONCLUSIONS: Using PCs of gene expression from the B-Hot panel confirms the utility of the B-HOT panel to identify allograft diagnoses and is similar to microarrays. The B-HOT panel will accelerate and expand transcript analysis and will be useful for longitudinal and outcome studies.

Banff Human Organ Transplant Transcripts Correlate with Renal Allograft Pathology and Outcome: Importance of Capillaritis and Subpathologic Rejection.

BACKGROUND: To seek insights into the pathogenesis of chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR), we performed mRNA analysis and correlated transcripts with pathologic component scores and graft outcomes. METHODS: We utilized the NanoString nCounter platform and the Banff Human Organ Transplant gene panel to quantify transcripts on 326 archived renal allograft biopsy samples. This system allowed correlation of transcripts with Banff pathology scores from the same tissue block and correlation with long-term outcomes. RESULTS: The only pathology score that correlated with AMR pathways in CAMR was peritubular capillaritis (ptc). C4d, cg, g, v, i, t, or ci scores did not correlate. DSA-negative CAMR had lower AMR pathway scores than DSA-positive CAMR. Transcript analysis in non-CAMR biopsies yielded evidence of increased risk of later CAMR. Among 108 patients without histologic CAMR, 23 developed overt biopsy-documented CAMR within 5 years and as a group had higher AMR pathway scores (P=3.4 × 10-5). Random forest analysis correlated 3-year graft loss with elevated damage, innate immunity, and macrophage pathway scores in CAMR and TCMR. Graft failure in CAMR was associated with TCMR transcripts but not with AMR transcripts, and graft failure in TCMR was associated with AMR transcripts but not with TCMR transcripts. CONCLUSIONS: Peritubular capillary inflammation and DSA are the primary drivers of AMR transcript elevation. Transcripts revealed subpathological evidence of AMR, which often preceded histologic CAMR and subpathological evidence of TCMR that predicted graft loss in CAMR.