The Effectiveness of a Mindfulness Training Program on Selected Psychological Indices and Sports Performance of Sub-Elite Squash Athletes.

Mindfulness Acceptance Commitment (MAC) programs have garnered much support in enhancing sport performance through present-moment focus and non-judgmental thoughts. Expanding on previous studies conducted in collegiate and professional settings, the current study investigates the application of MAC amongst national sub-elite athletes. The study was conducted utilizing a single case A-B design, with a total of six sub-elite Malaysian Squash athletes (2 males, 3 females; Mage = 15 ± 2 years) purposively sampled from the Malaysian national squash team. Participants underwent 6 weeks of baseline testing, 7 weeks of program intervention, and a retention test 4 weeks post-intervention. The intervention consisted of psycho-education, centering and cognitive defusion among other aspects as purported in MAC programs. Changes in proficiency of mindful practice was observed through the Mindfulness Awareness Acceptance Scale (MAAS), experiential avoidance through the Acceptance Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II), stress levels through the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and sport performance through both coach- and self-rated scales. Overall, visual analysis revealed improvements in MAAS levels (M = 1.15 ± 0.15), with no marked changes in AAQ-II (M = -0.002 ± 1.12) and PSS (M = 0.7 ± 0.93) after 7 weeks of intervention. Coach-rated sport performance also improved across the phases (M = 0.86 ± 0.93), with mixed responses for self-rated improvements (M = 0.01 ± 1.19). Overall, the benefits of MAC program were well-maintained past the post-intervention phase. The current study supported the implementation of an MAC program for sub-elite athletes in real-world settings.

Insert devices for faecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Faecal incontinence (FI) affects 1-19% of the general population and carries significant physical and psychological morbidity. Treatment strategies vary greatly with respect to morbidity and efficacy and relatively little is known regarding the role of mechanical devices such as anal and vaginal inserts. This is an up-to-date systematic review of the use of these devices in the management of patients with FI. METHODS: A systematic electronic search was performed of the Medline, Pubmed and Embase databases using the key words and/or MeSH 'anal plug', 'anal insert', 'vaginal insert' and 'faecal incontinence'. Only articles that reported clinical outcomes for these devices for FI in the English language were included. Review articles were excluded to avoid duplication of data. RESULTS: Thirteen articles fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Two articles reported outcomes for the Eclipse vaginal insert and 11 articles reported on three types of anal inserts; the Coloplast 'Tulip' design (6), the Procon/ProTect device (2) and the Renew insert (3). When tolerated, both anal and vaginal inserts significantly improved continence, bowel function and quality of life where reported. Adverse effects included discomfort, leakage and slippage. Long-term compliance and benefit are yet to be determined. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal and anal inserts may be a useful treatment for FI. Better quality of evidence is needed to define its effectiveness.

A pictorial description of extralevator abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer.

AIM: Extralevator abdominoperineal excision in the prone position has been reported as a method to improve the poor outcome sometimes observed after abdominoperineal excision (APE) for low rectal cancer. In this paper a pictorial guide is presented describing the key anatomical steps and landmarks of the operation. METHOD: Intraoperative footage of five APE operations filmed in high definition was reviewed and key stages of the operation were identified. Still frames were captured from these sequences to illustrate this guide. An edited video sequence was produced from one of these operations to accompany this paper. CONCLUSION: The prone APE allows improved visualization of the perineal portion of the operation by the surgeon, assistants and observers. It permits clear demonstration for teaching. Prospective evaluation is still required to identify patients who would benefit from extralevator APE.

Comparative quality of life in patients following abdominoperineal excision and low anterior resection for low rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: It is widely believed that quality of life is worse after abdominoperineal excision then after low anterior resection. However, this view is not supported unequivocally. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare quality of life in patients 1 year following low anterior resection and abdominoperineal excision for low rectal cancer. DESIGN: Data were collected prospectively on 62 patients undergoing low anterior resection (32) and abdominoperineal excision (30) for low rectal adenocarcinoma within 6 cm of the anal verge. Patients with metastatic disease were excluded. Quality of life was assessed by the use of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer's QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 modules and Coloplast stoma quality-of-life questionnaire. Bowel function was assessed by using the St Mark's bowel function questionnaire. Quality of life in patients who had low anterior resection was compared with those who had abdominoperineal excision both preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at 3 centers in the United Kingdom and 1 center in Europe. PATIENTS: Included were consecutive patients with rectal cancer within 6 cm of the anal verge, all of whom provided written consent for participation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mann-Whitney U test comparisons of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR38 module scores for patients undergoing low anterior resection and abdominoperineal excision were the main outcomes measured. RESULTS: Patients undergoing low anterior resection were younger (median age, 59.5 vs 67, p = 0.03) with higher tumors (4 vs 3, p < 0.001) and less likely to receive neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.02). At 1 year postoperatively, global quality-of-life ratings were comparable, but patients undergoing abdominoperineal excision reported better cognitive (100 vs 83, p = 0.018) and social (100 vs 67, p = 0.012) function, and less symptomatology with respect to pain (0 vs 17, p = 0.027), sleep disturbance (0 vs 33, p = 0.013), diarrhea (0 vs 33, p = 0.017), and constipation (p = 0.021). Patients undergoing low anterior resection reported better sexual function (33 vs 0, p = 0.006), but 72% experienced a degree of fecal incontinence. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its relatively small sample size. CONCLUSION: Abdominoperineal excision should not be regarded as an operation that is inferior to low anterior resection in the management of low rectal cancer on the basis of quality of life alone.

Preoperative MRI sphincter morphology and anal manometry: can they be markers of functional outcome following anterior resection for rectal cancer?

AIM: Good functional outcome following anterior resection (AR) for rectal cancer is an important clinical goal, but its prediction has proven difficult. Assessments such as anal manometry have been advocated as a potential tool but functional anatomy as depicted on MRI has not been investigated. This study looked at whether sphincter complex measurements recorded from preoperative staging MRIs and preoperative anal manometry have any correlation with functional outcome. METHOD: Consecutive patients with rectal adenocarcinoma underwent preoperative manometric assessment and MRI staging. MRIs were assessed with regard to anorectal angle, puborectalis thickness, canal length and external and internal anal sphincter thickness. Functional outcome was categorized into three groups according to the number of adverse postoperative symptoms (frequency, urgency, leakage, diarrhoea, use of pads, use of antidiarrhoeal medication): 0, 1 and ≥ 2. This was evaluated 1 year following surgery and 6 months following stoma reversal where applicable. Univariate analysis of an ordinal regression model was performed with significance at the 5% level. RESULTS: Thirty patients were assessed. No single preoperative manometric parameter proved significant (P > 0.05). Only puborectalis thickness showed a significant (P = 0.01) relationship with the number of adverse symptoms suffered postoperatively. On receiver operating characteristics analysis, a cut-off value of 3.5 mm gave an optimal sensitivity of 0.5 (95% CI, 0.17-0.83) and specificity of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.64-0.96). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of the puborectalis thickness on preoperative staging MRIs for rectal cancer may help predict functional outcome following AR. Prospective assessment of larger numbers with a fully validated continence score are required to evaluate these findings further.

A systematic review of cancer related patient outcomes after anterior resection and abdominoperineal excision for rectal cancer in the total mesorectal excision era.

PURPOSE: It is a widely held view that anterior resection (AR) for rectal cancer is an oncologically superior operation to abdominoperineal excision (APE). However, some centres have demonstrated better outcomes with APE. We conducted a systematic review of high-quality studies within the total mesorectal excision (TME) era comparing outcomes of AR and APE. METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify studies within the TME era comparing AR and APE with regard to the following: circumferential resection margin (CRM) status, tumour perforation rates, specimen quality, local recurrence, overall survival (OS; 3 or 5 year), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Additional data regarding patient demographics and tumour characteristics was collected. RESULTS: Twenty four studies fulfilled the eligibility criteria with Newcastle-Ottawa scores of six or greater. Where a significant difference was found, all studies reported lower and more advanced tumours for APE and 4/5 studies observed more frequent use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies in APE patients. Tumour perforation rates and CRM involvement where reported, were significantly greater for APE. 8 out of 10 studies showing significant differences in local recurrence reported higher rates for APE but no differences were observed with distant recurrence. Where differences were noted, AR was reported to have increased DFS, CSS and OS compared to APE. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with AR have lower rates of tumour perforation and CRM involvement and tend to have better outcomes with regard to disease recurrence and survival. However, tumours treated by APE are lower and more locally advanced.

Efficacy of chewed vs. crushed lanthanum on phosphorus binding in healthy volunteers.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: For effective dietary phosphorous (P) binding, patients are recommended to chew lanthanum tablets completely before swallowing, with or immediately after meals. However, some patients are unable to chew the tablets. It is not known if crushing the tablets prior to taking them with food is as efficacious as chewing them. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of chewed vs. crushed lanthanum on P binding. METHODS: 12 healthy subjects were randomized and crossed-over to receive: (A) a standardized meal containing 1 g (32 mmol) of elemental P; (B) a single 1 g oral dose of lanthanum, chewed and taken with the standardized meal; (C) a single 1 g oral dose of lanthanum, crushed into a fine powder using a pestle and mortar, mixed with applesauce, and taken with the standardized meal. Blood and urine samples were collected from baseline to 8 hours after meal completion. The changes in serum P, urinary P excretion and fractional excretion of P (FePi) were compared among treatment arms using ANOVA. RESULTS: Co-administration of lanthanum with meal resulted in a smaller increase in serum P, compared with meal alone (p < 0.05). The smaller increase in serum P was similar for both chewed and crushed lanthanum. The amount of P excreted and FePi were also lower when chewed or crushed lanthanum was administered with meal, compared with meal alone (p = n.s. and p < 0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both chewed and crushed lanthanum are effective in lowering P absorption after a dietary P load.

Ruptured 'fem-pop' vein graft presenting as deep venous thrombosis.

The public is becoming increasingly aware of the symptoms of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) due to the so-called 'economy class' syndrome. However, arterial rupture can mimic these symptoms. We report of a misdiagnosis of a ruptured 'fem-pop' vein graft (previously unreported) presenting identically as a DVT. The patient received conventional anticoagulation treatment which could have resulted in disastrous consequences.