Reduced Chance of Hearing Loss Associated with Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Aminoglycosides in the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis.

Hearing loss and nephrotoxicity are associated with prolonged treatment duration and higher dosage of amikacin and kanamycin. In our tuberculosis center, we used therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) targeting preset pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) surrogate endpoints in an attempt to maintain efficacy while preventing (oto)toxicity. To evaluate this strategy, we retrospectively evaluated medical charts of tuberculosis (TB) patients treated with amikacin or kanamycin in the period from 2000 to 2012. Patients with culture-confirmed multiresistant or extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/XDR-TB) receiving amikacin or kanamycin as part of their TB treatment for at least 3 days were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. Clinical data, including maximum concentration (Cmax), Cmin, and audiometry data, were extracted from the patients' medical charts. A total of 80 patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean weighted Cmax/MIC ratios obtained from 57 patients were 31.2 for amikacin and 12.3 for kanamycin. The extent of hearing loss was limited and correlated with the cumulative drug dose per kg of body weight during daily administration. At follow-up, 35 (67.3%) of all patients had successful outcome; there were no relapses. At a median dose of 6.5 mg/kg, a correlation was found between the dose per kg of body weight during daily dosing and the extent of hearing loss in dB at 8,000 Hz. These findings suggest that the efficacy at this lower dosage is maintained with limited toxicity. A randomized controlled trial should provide final proof of the safety and efficacy of TDM-guided use of aminoglycosides in MDR-TB treatment.

Venous thrombotic events in patients admitted to a tuberculosis centre.

BACKGROUND: Considering the relationship between inflammation and thrombosis, patients with tuberculosis (TB) patients might be at high risk of venous thrombosis. AIM: To evaluate the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to the Beatrixoord Tuberculosis Centre (BTBC), a tertiary centre for TB. We specifically explored which cofactors elevate the risk of venous thrombosis (VTE), and whether the timing of venous thrombotic events would justify extended primary prophylaxis. DESIGN: retrospective cohort study. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with TB discharged from BTBC between 2000 and 2010. We excluded patients who were already on therapeutic anticoagulation before their TB episode, below the age of 18 years and patients in which TB diagnosis was withdrawn. For evaluating the timing of venous thrombosis, we calculated the time between commencement of anti TB therapy and the VTE. RESULTS: Of 750 included in the final analysis, 18 (2.4%) suffered a venous thrombotic event. 3 of these events were not related to classic risk factors or hospitalization. Most (13/18) VTE's occurred in the time window of two weeks before starting TB medication.In the multivariate analysis, only Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection was strongly associated with risk of VTE (adjusted Odds ratio 8.2 (95% confidence interval: 2.9-22.7)). CONCLUSIONS: This high risk in HIV co-infected TB patients suggests that standard thrombo-prophylaxis should be routinely considered in this group. However, our findings might not be generalizable due to referral bias. Further prospective studies in unselected HIV co-infected TB patients are needed to corroborate our findings.

Practice parameter: the evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of laboratory and genetic testing (an evidence-based review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of laboratory and genetic tests for the assessment of DSP. METHODS: A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based upon the level of evidence. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. Screening laboratory tests may be considered for all patients with polyneuropathy (Level C). Those tests that provide the highest yield of abnormality are blood glucose, serum B12 with metabolites (methylmalonic acid with or without homocysteine) and serum protein immunofixation electrophoresis (Level C). If there is no definite evidence of diabetes mellitus by routine testing of blood glucose, testing for impaired glucose tolerance may be considered in distal symmetric sensory polyneuropathy (Level C). 2. Genetic testing is established as useful for the accurate diagnosis and classification of hereditary neuropathies (Level A). Genetic testing may be considered in patients with cryptogenic polyneuropathy who exhibit a hereditary neuropathy phenotype (Level C). Initial genetic testing should be guided by the clinical phenotype, inheritance pattern, and electrodiagnostic (EDX) features and should focus on the most common abnormalities which are CMT1A duplication/HNPP deletion, Cx32 (GJB1), and MFN2 mutation screening. There is insufficient evidence to determine the usefulness of routine genetic testing in patients with cryptogenic polyneuropathy who do not exhibit a hereditary neuropathy phenotype (Level U).

Practice parameter: the evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy (an evidence-based review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy and skin biopsy for the assessment of polyneuropathy. METHODS: A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based upon the level of evidence. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. Autonomic testing may be considered in the evaluation of patients with polyneuropathy to document autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Level B). Such testing should be considered especially for the evaluation of suspected autonomic neuropathy (Level B) and distal small fiber sensory polyneuropathy (SFSN) (Level C). A battery of validated tests is recommended to achieve the highest diagnostic accuracy (Level B). 2. Nerve biopsy is generally accepted as useful in the evaluation of certain neuropathies as in patients with suspected amyloid neuropathy, mononeuropathy multiplex due to vasculitis, or with atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, the literature is insufficient to provide a recommendation regarding when a nerve biopsy may be useful in the evaluation of DSP (Level U). 3. Skin biopsy is a validated technique for determining intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and may be considered for the diagnosis of DSP, particularly SFSN (Level C). There is a need for additional prospective studies to define more exact guidelines for the evaluation of polyneuropathy.

Evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of laboratory and genetic testing (an evidence-based review).

Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of laboratory and genetic tests for the assessment of DSP. A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based on the level of evidence. (1) Screening laboratory tests may be considered for all patients with polyneuropathy (Level C). Those tests that provide the highest yield of abnormality are blood glucose, serum B(12) with metabolites (methylmalonic acid with or without homocysteine), and serum protein immunofixation electrophoresis (Level C). If there is no definite evidence of diabetes mellitus by routine testing of blood glucose, testing for impaired glucose tolerance may be considered in distal symmetric sensory polyneuropathy (Level C). (2) Genetic testing is established as useful for the accurate diagnosis and classification of hereditary neuropathies (Level A). Genetic testing may be considered in patients with cryptogenic polyneuropathy who exhibit a hereditary neuropathy phenotype (Level C). Initial genetic testing should be guided by the clinical phenotype, inheritance pattern, and electrodiagnostic (EDX) features and should focus on the most common abnormalities, which are CMT1A duplication/HNPP deletion, Cx32 (GJB1), and MFN2 mutation screening. There is insufficient evidence to determine the usefulness of routine genetic testing in patients with cryptogenic polyneuropathy who do not exhibit a hereditary neuropathy phenotype (Level U).

Evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy (an evidence-based review).

Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy for the assessment of polyneuropathy. A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index, and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based on the level of evidence. (1) Autonomic testing may be considered in the evaluation of patients with polyneuropathy to document autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Level B). Such testing should be considered especially for the evaluation of suspected autonomic neuropathy (Level B) and distal small fiber sensory polyneuropathy (SFSN) (Level C). A battery of validated tests is recommended to achieve the highest diagnostic accuracy (Level B). (2) Nerve biopsy is generally accepted as useful in the evaluation of certain neuropathies as in patients with suspected amyloid neuropathy, mononeuropathy multiplex due to vasculitis, or with atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, the literature is insufficient to provide a recommendation regarding when a nerve biopsy may be useful in the evaluation of DSP (Level U). (3) Skin biopsy is a validated technique for determining intraepidermal nerve fiber (IENF) density and may be considered for the diagnosis of DSP, particularly SFSN (Level C). There is a need for additional prospective studies to define more exact guidelines for the evaluation of polyneuropathy.

Practice Parameter: evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: role of laboratory and genetic testing (an evidence-based review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of laboratory and genetic tests for the assessment of DSP. METHODS: A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based upon the level of evidence. RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) Screening laboratory tests may be considered for all patients with polyneuropathy (Level C). Those tests that provide the highest yield of abnormality are blood glucose, serum B12 with metabolites (methylmalonic acid with or without homocysteine), and serum protein immunofixation electrophoresis (Level C). If there is no definite evidence of diabetes mellitus by routine testing of blood glucose, testing for impaired glucose tolerance may be considered in distal symmetric sensory polyneuropathy (Level C). 2) Genetic testing should be conducted for the accurate diagnosis and classification of hereditary neuropathies (Level A). Genetic testing may be considered in patients with cryptogenic polyneuropathy who exhibit a hereditary neuropathy phenotype (Level C). Initial genetic testing should be guided by the clinical phenotype, inheritance pattern, and electrodiagnostic features and should focus on the most common abnormalities which are CMT1A duplication/HNPP deletion, Cx32 (GJB1), and MFN2 mutation screening. There is insufficient evidence to determine the usefulness of routine genetic testing in patients with cryptogenic polyneuropathy who do not exhibit a hereditary neuropathy phenotype (Level U).

Practice Parameter: evaluation of distal symmetric polyneuropathy: role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy (an evidence-based review). Report of the American Academy of Neurology, American Association of Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

BACKGROUND: Distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DSP) is the most common variety of neuropathy. Since the evaluation of this disorder is not standardized, the available literature was reviewed to provide evidence-based guidelines regarding the role of autonomic testing, nerve biopsy, and skin biopsy for the assessment of polyneuropathy. METHODS: A literature review using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Current Contents was performed to identify the best evidence regarding the evaluation of polyneuropathy published between 1980 and March 2007. Articles were classified according to a four-tiered level of evidence scheme and recommendations were based upon the level of evidence. RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 1) Autonomic testing should be considered in the evaluation of patients with polyneuropathy to document autonomic nervous system dysfunction (Level B). Such testing should be considered especially for the evaluation of suspected autonomic neuropathy (Level B) and distal small fiber sensory polyneuropathy (SFSN) (Level C). A battery of validated tests is recommended to achieve the highest diagnostic accuracy (Level B). 2) Nerve biopsy is generally accepted as useful in the evaluation of certain neuropathies as in patients with suspected amyloid neuropathy, mononeuropathy multiplex due to vasculitis, or with atypical forms of chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). However, the literature is insufficient to provide a recommendation regarding when a nerve biopsy may be useful in the evaluation of DSP (Level U). 3) Skin biopsy is a validated technique for determining intraepidermal nerve fiber density and may be considered for the diagnosis of DSP, particularly SFSN (Level C). There is a need for additional prospective studies to define more exact guidelines for the evaluation of polyneuropathy.

Distal symmetric polyneuropathy: a definition for clinical research: report of the American Academy of Neurology, the American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine, and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

The objective of this report was to develop a case definition of distal symmetric polyneuropathy to standardize and facilitate clinical research and epidemiologic studies. A formalized consensus process was employed to reach agreement after a systematic review and classification of evidence from the literature. The literature indicates that symptoms alone have relatively poor diagnostic accuracy in predicting the presence of polyneuropathy; signs are better predictors of polyneuropathy than symptoms; and single abnormalities on examination are less sensitive than multiple abnormalities in predicting the presence of polyneuropathy. The combination of neuropathic symptoms, signs, and electrodiagnostic findings provides the most accurate diagnosis of distal symmetric polyneuropathy. A set of case definitions was rank ordered by likelihood of disease. The highest likelihood of polyneuropathy (useful for clinical trials) occurs with a combination of multiple symptoms, multiple signs, and abnormal electrodiagnostic studies. A modest likelihood of polyneuropathy (useful for field or epidemiologic studies) occurs with a combination of multiple symptoms and multiple signs when the results of electrodiagnostic studies are not available. A lower likelihood of polyneuropathy occurs when electrodiagnostic studies and signs are discordant. For research purposes, the best approach to defining distal symmetric polyneuropathy is a set of case definitions rank ordered by estimated likelihood of disease. The inclusion of this formalized case definition in clinical and epidemiologic research studies will ensure greater consistency of case selection.

Distal symmetrical polyneuropathy: definition for clinical research.

The objective of this report was to develop a case definition of "distal symmetrical polyneuropathy" to standardize and facilitate clinical research and epidemiological studies. A formalized consensus process was employed to reach agreement after a systematic review and classification of evidence from the literature. The literature indicates that symptoms alone have relatively poor diagnostic accuracy in predicting the presence of polyneuropathy; signs are better predictors of polyneuropathy than symptoms; and single abnormalities on examination are less sensitive than multiple abnormalities in predicting the presence of polyneuropathy. The combination of neuropathic symptoms, signs, and electrodiagnostic findings provides the most accurate diagnosis of distal symmetrical polyneuropathy. A set of case definitions was rank ordered by likelihood of disease. The highest likelihood of polyneuropathy (useful for clinical trials) occurs with a combination of multiple symptoms, multiple signs, and abnormal electrodiagnostic studies. A modest likelihood of polyneuropathy (useful for field or epidemiological studies) occurs with a combination of multiple symptoms and multiple signs when the results of electrodiagnostic studies are not available. A lower likelihood of polyneuropathy occurs when electrodiagnostic studies and signs are discordant. For research purposes, the best approach for defining distal symmetrical polyneuropathy is a set of case definitions rank ordered by estimated likelihood of disease. The inclusion of this formalized case definition in clinical and epidemiological research studies will ensure greater consistency of case selection.

Use of intravenous gamma globulins in neuroimmunologic diseases.

Intravenous gamma globulin (IVIg) is used in the treatment of immunologic diseases that affect the entire neuroaxis, including the brain, spinal cord, peripheral nerves, muscles, and neuromuscular junction. The panel reviewed the available literature on the use of IVIg in order to evaluate the efficacy of this therapy in neuroimmunologic diseases. In prospective, rigorously controlled, double-blinded clinical trials, IVIg was found to have proven efficacy in the Guillain-Barré syndrome, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, multifocal motor neuropathy, dermatomyositis, and Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome. It was found to be probably effective in myasthenia gravis and polymyositis, and possibly effective in several other neuroimmunologic diseases. Further studies are needed to evaluate the use of IVIg for neuroimmunologic diseases in which its efficacy is suspected but not proven and to elucidate its mechanisms of action.

Human thymuses express incomplete sets of muscle acetylcholine receptor subunit transcripts that seldom include the delta subunit.

In myasthenia gravis (MG) the muscle acetylcholine receptor (AChR) is the target of an immune response that might begin in the thymus. The thymus expresses binding sites for specific ligands of muscle AChR, a complex protein composed of alpha, beta, gamma (or epsilon) and delta subunits. The thymus expresses the AChR alpha subunit, but there is controversy regarding the expression in the thymus of the gamma, epsilon and delta subunits. We investigated the presence of messenger RNA (mRNA) for the different muscle AChR subunits in thymus tissue from 20 healthy subjects and 13 myasthenic patients. We detected mRNA for the alpha and epsilon subunits in all samples, for the beta subunit in all but one sample and for the gamma subunit in most samples although at lower levels than the epsilon subunit. Myasthenic thymuses expressed levels of gamma subunit mRNA similar to control thymuses but more abundant epsilon subunit mRNA. None of the myasthenic thymuses and only two control thymuses expressed detectable delta subunit mRNA. This supports the hypothesis that human thymus may express AChR proteins that do not include the delta subunit. Such receptors, which would have different antigenic structure than the muscle AChRs, might have a role in triggering the autoimmune response that causes MG.

T cell recognition of muscle acetylcholine receptor in ocular myasthenia gravis.

We examined the proliferative response of blood CD4(+) cells to muscle acetylcholine receptor (AChR) subunits and the epitope repertoire of the epsilon and gamma subunits, in ocular myasthenia gravis (oMG) patients and healthy subjects. oMG patients seldom recognized all subunits. The frequency and intensity of recognition was the same for all subunits, irrespective of the disease duration. The responses in oMG were lower than in generalized myasthenia gravis. Healthy subjects had frequent, low responses to one or more subunits. oMG patients recognized several epitopes on the gamma and epsilon subunits, that partially overlapped those recognized in gMG. The subunits and epitopes recognized by individual oMG patients changed over time. Thus, oMG patients have minimal and unstable sensitization of anti-AChR CD4(+) cells, in agreement with their low and inconsistent synthesis of anti-AChR antibody.

Myasthenia in SCID mice grafted with myasthenic patient lymphocytes: role of CD4+ and CD8+ cells.

OBJECTIVES: Acetylcholine receptor (AChR)-specific CD4+ cells are present in MG patients, and synthesis of the high-affinity immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies (autoAb) against the muscle AChR that causes MG symptoms requires intervention of CD4+ cells. The role of CD4+ cells in MG pathogenesis has been postulated but never proven. MG patients do not have anti-AChR cytotoxic phenomena, and it has been assumed that CD8+ cells do not have a pathogenic role in MG. However, CD8+ cells may facilitate rodent experimental MG, raising the possibility that CD8+ cells might be necessary also in MG. In this study we examined whether CD4+ and CD8+ cells play a role in the pathogenesis of MG and whether CD4+ cells specific for AChR epitope sequences recognized by most MG patients ("universal" epitopes) drive the synthesis of pathogenic antibodies. METHODS: First we characterized a chimeric human-mouse model of MG in severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice engrafted with blood lymphocytes (BL) from MG patients. We used that model to determine whether CD4+ and CD8+ cells are necessary for transfer of MG symptoms. We engrafted SCID mice intraperitoneum with BL from 19 MG patients and 5 healthy controls. We engrafted some mice with either BL, BL depleted in CD4+ or CD8+ cells from the same patient, or CD4+ depleted BL reconstituted with CD4+ T cells from the same patient, specific for "universal" AChR epitopes or for two unrelated antigens, tetanus and diphtheria toxoids. We tested the mice for myasthenic symptoms for 7 to 18 weeks. RESULTS: Mice transplanted with BL, or CD8+ depleted BL, or CD4+-depleted BL reconstituted with anti-AChR CD4+ cells from MG patients frequently developed myasthenic weakness. The mice had human anti-AChR Ab in the serum and bound to muscle AChR. Mice transplanted with BL from controls, or CD4+-depleted BL from MG patients, or CD4+-depleted BL from an MG patient reconstituted with CD4+ cells specific for tetanus or diphtheria toxoids did not develop myasthenic weakness or anti-AChR Ab. CONCLUSIONS: CD4+ cells are necessary for MG pathogenesis; CD8+ cells may not be. CD4+ cells specific for "universal" AChR epitopes help the synthesis of pathogenic Ab.

Intravenous immunoglobulin for the treatment of acquired myasthenia gravis.

Acquired myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by exertional fatigue and weakness that is made worse with activity and improved with rest, only to recur with the resumption of activity. The pathology results from an antibody-mediated attack to several different epitopes of the acetylcholine receptor (AChR) complex. The consensus of an expert panel is that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is effective in reversing myasthenic weakness. Although the mechanism of action is not known, it is likely that there is a downregulation of antibody production. IVIg appears to have a role as an acute treatment intervention in rapidly progressive weakness or as a chronic maintenance therapy when all other treatment modalities have failed. Its response is similar to but slower than the response of plasma exchange (PE), but it offers advantages when therapeutic apheresis is not available or when vascular access is problematic.

CD4+ T cell repertoire on the epsilon subunit of muscle acetylcholine receptor in myasthenia gravis.

We have identified sequence regions of the human muscle acetylcholine receptor epsilon subunit recognized by CD4+ T cells from myasthenia gravis patients. We tested the proliferative response in vitro of blood CD4+ cells from 18 myasthenic patients and 5 controls, to individual overlapping synthetic peptides spanning the epsilon subunit sequence. All patients recognized a complex epitope repertoire. The peptides recognized by the CD4+ cells included sequence regions of the epsilon subunit that were diverged as compared to the homologous sequences of the other receptor subunits. Recognition of epitopes formed by sequence regions unique to the epsilon subunit suggests a direct role of this subunit in sensitizing the CD4+ cells. Several epsilon subunit peptides were recognized by many patients. Thus the epsilon subunit, like other acetylcholine receptor subunits, forms 'universal' CD4+ epitopes. The healthy subjects recognized some epsilon subunit peptides sporadically and at a low level.