Fingertip Infections.

The fingertip is the interface between humans and the world, including the various thorns, dirty needles, and other hazards to be found there. It is unsurprising that this is the site where hand infections most frequently occur. Although commonly encountered by hand surgeons and other physicians, fingertip infections have several mimics, and diagnosis and management is not always straightforward. Early diagnosis and treatment are key to success. As with all infections, they are more common and are more aggressive in immunosuppressed patients. This article reviews fingertip anatomy, common and uncommon fingertip infections and their mimics, and recommendations for management.

Accuracy of MRI in Assessment of High-Grade Partial Distal Biceps Tears.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used to diagnose and assess the extent of partial distal biceps injuries. The aim of this study was to report on the accuracy of MRI and the effect of injury history and study timing on its performance. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent surgical treatment of partial thickness distal biceps tears at a single center by multiple surgeons was performed. Inclusion criteria consisted of the performance of a preoperative MRI and documentation of the intraoperatively visualized extent of the tear, and 68 patients met the criteria for inclusion. A chart review was completed to evaluate the symptom duration, injury history, and tear extent. RESULTS: All patients had distal biceps tears of greater than 50% intraoperatively. However, MRI did not indicate any tearing in 20 (29%) patients, and its sensitivity for high-grade tear was 44%. Magnetic resonance imaging was significantly less likely to be read as high-grade tears in patients with insidious onset of their symptoms in comparison with patients who reported a traumatic onset (27% vs 55%, P = .024). However, the time from symptom onset to MRI did not significantly correlate with diagnosis of a high-grade tear on MRI (r = -0.15, P = .21). CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that MRI can underreport partial distal biceps tear extent, and this more commonly occurs in patients with insidious onset of pain.

Short-Term Patient Outcomes after Placement of an Internal Joint Stabilizer for Terrible Triad Injuries: A Multicenter Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess the functional and patient-reported outcomes after the use of the internal joint stabilizer (IJS) for unstable terrible triad injuries. Specifically, we sought to determine our complication rate and the impact of complications on patient outcomes. METHODS: We identified all patients who had an IJS placed as a supplemental fixation for a terrible triad injury at two urban, level 1 academic medical centers. We reviewed these patients' charts for demographic information, complication profiles, postoperative range of motion (ROM), and pain-level data. We also collected the QuickDASH and Patient-Rated Elbow Evaluation (PREE) scores. Descriptive statistics were reported. Final visit data were compared between patients who returned to the OR for a complication and those who did not. RESULTS: From 2018 to 2020, 29 patients had an IJS placed for a terrible triad injury. The median final follow-up was 6.3 months after surgery (IQR: 6.2 months). There were 38 complications in 19 patients (65.5%) that required 12 patients to return to the OR (41.3%) for procedures beyond simple IJS removal. There were no significant differences in the ROM between patients who returned to the OR for a complication and those who did not. QuickDASH and PREE scores were greater (indicating more disability) in patients who had a complication that required a secondary surgical procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who receive an IJS incur a high rate of complications. When patients sustain complications that require secondary surgeries, their ultimate functional outcome scores worsen. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Repair for Partial Distal Biceps Tendon Tears.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes of patients treated with surgical repair of partial tears of the distal biceps tendon. METHODS: The study was a retrospective review of repairs of partial tears of the distal biceps tendon performed by multiple surgeons from January 1, 2015 to October 15, 2020. Inclusion criteria consisted of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging indicative of distal biceps pathology without a complete tear and surgical treatment with intraoperative confirmation of a partial tear. The presence of preceding trauma, duration of symptoms, and postoperative complications were documented. Patients were contacted for outcome assessment using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and Patient-Reported Elbow Evaluation outcome measures. Clinical outcomes were obtained from 56 of 74 (76%) eligible patients with an average follow-up of 46 months (range: 15-85 months). RESULTS: After surgery, the median QuickDASH was 2.3 (interquartile range, 0-9.7), and the median Patient-Reported Elbow Evaluation score was 1 (interquartile range, 0-12). Postoperative QuickDASH scores were significantly lower than the preoperative scores. Known traumas preceding the symptoms and duration of symptoms before surgery were not significantly associated with the outcome. Of all eligible patients, 30 complications were reported in 25 (34%) patients and included 2 reruptures, 2 cases of heterotopic ossification, 1 deep infection, 1 case of implant irritation, 21 neuropraxias, and 3 hematomas. Five (7%) patients underwent 6 reoperations including 1 revision for a rerupture, 1 irrigation and debridement, 2 heterotopic ossification excisions, 1 hematoma evacuation, and 1 implant removal. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the repair of partial distal biceps tendon tears is a viable treatment option with significant improvement in QuickDASH. There was no significant relationship between the postoperative outcome and duration of symptoms or known traumas preceding the symptoms. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Biomechanical Evaluation of 2 Common Approaches for Total Elbow Arthroplasty: Triceps Tongue Compared With Triceps Reflecting.

PURPOSE: We hypothesize that the triceps tongue approach will be equivalent in strength to the triceps reflecting approach in load to failure following a cyclic preload. METHODS: Seven paired fresh-frozen cadaveric arms were dissected using the triceps reflecting approach or triceps tongue approach to the posterior elbow. The triceps was then repaired in each specimen, and the elbows were placed in a testing jig. Elbows were preloaded in a cyclic fashion at 5 lbs (2.3 kgf) for 200 cycles in flexion/extension, followed by load to failure. The stiffness and ultimate failure strength for each specimen were determined. We defined ultimate failure as gapping in the suture construct of 4 mm or suture breakage. RESULTS: One of the triceps tongue specimens was excluded due to a testing error, resulting in 6 elbows in this group. There were no tendon repair failures during the cyclic preload. The median ultimate failure of the reflecting group occurred at 65 pounds, compared to 115 pounds in the tongue group. This was significantly different. The reflecting approach consistently failed along the entire bone-tendon interface. The tongue approach failed at the proximal repair site in 4 of 6 specimens, while the longitudinal aspect of the tendon repair remained intact. CONCLUSIONS: Following a cyclic preload of 5 lbs for 200 cycles, the triceps tongue repair is stronger than triceps reflecting in ultimate failure. The mode of failure of triceps tongue repair may be superior to that of triceps reflecting. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study may help guide surgeons when choosing a "triceps off" approach to total elbow arthroplasty.

Primary Repair of Chronic Distal Biceps Tendon Tears.

BACKGROUND: This study reports the clinical results following primary repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures more 6 weeks after injury. METHODS: A retrospective review of distal biceps tendon repairs performed by 8 different hand surgeons from January 1, 2015 to October 15, 2020 was performed. Patients with complete tears surgically treated ≥6 weeks after injury without tendon graft were included. Thirty patients qualified and underwent chart review for complication and range of motion (ROM) data. They were contacted for final patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) using Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) and Patient Reported Elbow Evaluation (PREE) scores. Final PROMs were obtained from 21 patients with an average follow-up of 31.3 months (range: 4-71 months). RESULTS: Average time from injury to repair was 71 days (range: 42-204). The average QuickDASH score was 6.6 (±6.2) and PREE score was 7.8 (±8.0). The amount of elbow flexion necessary to complete the repair was documented in 21 patients and averaged 64º (±10º). Postoperatively, patients achieved an average extension/flexion of 1º (±1º) to 138º (±2º) and pronation/supination of 76º (±4º) to 77º (±3º). Complications were reported in 14 patients (47%) and included 2 re-ruptures, 1 adhesive scar formation, 1 superficial infection, 1 intraoperative lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve laceration, 12 neuropraxias, and 1 case of heterotopic ossification (HO). CONCLUSIONS: Primary repair of chronic distal biceps tendon tears greater than 6 weeks from injury demonstrated excellent PROMs and elbow ROM. However, the complication rate may be higher than early repair.

A Cadaveric Comparison of Approaches for Exposure of the Volar Distal Radius: Is There a Utilitarian Approach?

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether exposure for planned fixation of distal radius fractrues is superior with any given approach, and whether a single utilitarian approach exists that permits reliable complete exposure of the volar distal radius. METHODS: A cadaveric study was performed using 10 matched specimens. Group 1 consisted of 3 radially based approaches (standard flexor carpi radialis [FCR], standard FCR with radial retraction of FCR and flexor pollicis longus [FPL] tendons, extended FCR). Group 2 consisted of 2 ulnarly based approaches (volar ulnar, extended carpal tunnel). The primary outcome was total width of exposed distal radius at the watershed line. Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon rank testing was used to identify differences. RESULTS: The standard FCR approach exposed 29 mm (90%), leaving on average 3 mm (10%) of the ulnar corner unexposed. Retracting the FCR and FPL tendons radially allows for an extra 1 mm of volar ulnar corner exposure. Finally, converting to an extended FCR approach provided 100% exposure in all specimens. The volar ulnar exposure however provided exposure to only 9 mm (37%), leaving 20 mm (62.5%) left unexposed radially. The extended carpal tunnel provided exposure to 21 mm (65%), leaving 11 mm (35%) radially unexposed. Differences between each group were statistically significant (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The extended FCR approach exposed 100% of the volar distal radius in our study and may serve as a utilitarian volar surgical approach for exposure and fixation of distal radius fractures. Additional knowledge of the limitations of alternative approaches can be helpful in surgical planning.

Internal joint stabilizer for varus posteromedial rotatory instability of the elbow.

BACKGROUND: Management of varus posteromedial rotatory instability (VPMRI) of the elbow presents a challenging problem, sometimes requiring supplemental external fixation or ulnohumeral cross-pinning. A relatively new treatment adjunct for posterolateral rotatory instability of the elbow has become available with the development of the internal joint stabilizer (IJS) implant. However, this has not been studied for VPMRI because the implant is thought to be ineffective at treating this instability when placed in the usual manner on the lateral side of the elbow. We hypothesize that modifying the IJS technique to place the implant medially will make it as effective as external fixation at preventing VPMRI. METHODS: Nine whole-arm cadaveric specimens were tested on a rig that allowed for gravity stress of the elbow at 60° of abduction. Intact specimens (INT) were tested to find the baseline stability with all structures intact. Then, O'Driscoll type 2-subtype III coronoid fractures were created with a microsagittal saw, and these same specimens were again tested without any fixation (WAF), with a static lateral external fixator (SLEF), and with a medially placed IJS (MIJS). The method for medial IJS placement is detailed within. RESULTS: The WAF specimens were significantly more unstable than the INT, SLEF, and MIJS groups (P < .001). There was no difference in stability between the INT and the SLEF (P = .59) or MIJS group (P = .21). CONCLUSION: In this cadaveric model, a medially placed IJS was as effective as an SLEF at maintaining elbow stability in a coronoid-deficient elbow. This technique allows for early elbow range of motion, with no external hardware, and may eliminate the complications associated with external fixation or ulnohumeral cross-pinning.

Efficacy of a single, image-guided corticosteroid injection for glenohumeral arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on the efficacy of cortisone injections for glenohumeral osteoarthritis (GHOA). The amount and longevity of pain relief provided by a single cortisone injection are unclear. Additionally, it remains uncertain how the severity of radiographic GHOA and patient-reported function and pain levels impact the efficacy of an injection. Therefore, we sought to describe the relief provided by a single, image-guided glenohumeral injection in patients with GHOA. We hypothesized that patients with more severe radiographic GHOA and poorer baseline shoulder function would require earlier secondary intervention. METHODS: Patients with symptomatic GHOA who elected to receive a corticosteroid injection for pain relief were prospectively enrolled. A phone interview was conducted to record the baseline Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and visual analog scale (VAS) score prior to the injection, as well as the OSS and VAS score at months 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, and 12 after the injection. The endpoint of the study occurred when patients required a second injection, progressed to surgery, or reached month 12. Patients were grouped by their respective baseline OSS (mild vs. moderate or severe) and Samilson-Prieto radiographic classification (mild, moderate, or severe) for analysis. RESULTS: We analyzed 30 shoulders (29 patients). Of the patients, 52% were men. The average age was 66.1 years. No significant difference in overall survival (defined as no additional intervention) was seen between groups based on either the OSS or Samilson-Prieto grade. Additionally, the OSS and VAS score at each follow-up were compared with baseline values. For the entire cohort, a clinically significant difference was seen between baseline and months 1-4 for the OSS and between baseline and months 1-4, 6, 9, and 12 for the VAS score. DISCUSSION: This study aimed to determine the efficacy of corticosteroid injections for GHOA. There were no differences in the need for secondary intervention in this population based on the severity of either the OSS or the Samilson-Prieto radiographic classification. However, patients with more severe shoulder dysfunction based on the OSS did experience statistically significantly greater symptomatic relief than patients with milder dysfunction. Additionally, following a single injection, patients in this cohort experienced statistically and clinically relevant improvements in shoulder function and pain up to 4 months after injection.