Pre-medication to improve esophagogastroduodenoscopic visibility: a meta-analysis and systemic review.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The use of pre-medication to improve visibility in gastrointestinal endoscopy has not been well addressed and remains controversial. The aim is to evaluate the effects of current pre-medication on endoscopic visualization. METHODOLOGY: We made the overall strategies to search the different databases and assessed the quality of included studies according to the included and excluded standard. 1541 patients were treated with pre-medication. RESULT: Ten prospective studies involving 1541 patients were included. There was improved visibility in patients treated with Simethicone (weighted mean difference -4.3; 95% confidence interval (CI), -4.94 to -3.67), compared to those who did not use Simethicone. In the Simethicone based regiment, administration of Pronase was noted with significantly improved visibility in the location of antrum and fundus, compared to those who did not use; however, administration of N-acetyl-L-cysteine could not lead to significantly improved visibility. Simethicone offered better visibility than N-acetyl-L-cysteine and Pronase alone. CONCLUSIONS: There is improved visibility with pre-medication using Simethicone before esophagogastroduodenoscopy. In the Simethicone based regimen, administration of Pronase or N-acetyl-Lcysteine may be of little use in improving visibility. Based on the literature review, Simethicone dissolved in the water with the acceptably lowest ratio of 0.7 can still offer the good visibility but 30 mL of water should be avoided.

Efficacy of simethicone and N-acetylcysteine as premedication in improving visibility during upper endoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Simethicone and N-acetylcysteine have been widely used in improving endoscopic visibility. However, the optimal dose, volume, and dosing time for the premedication regimen are still unclear. AIM: Our aim was to assess the efficacy of premedication in improving endoscopic visibility and determine the contributions of dose, volume, and premedication time. METHODS: A total of 1849 patients were prospectively treated in three groups: group A: 100-mg simethicone suspension in 5 mL water; group B: 100-mg simethicone suspension in 100 mL water; and group C: 100-mg simethicone suspension in 100 mL water containing 200 mg N-acetylcysteine. Mucosa visibility was assessed at seven sites of upper gastrointestinal tract. The sum of scores was considered as total mucosal visibility score (TMVS). RESULTS: The upper body of stomach had the worst visibility score for all groups. TMVS of groups B and C were significantly lower than those of group A. Group C had a significantly fewer patients requiring endoscopic flushing than groups A and B. The TMVS for groups B and C were significantly lower than for group A within 30 min of beginning premedication. Beyond 30 min of premedication, there was no significant difference in the TMVS among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Premedication using 100 mg simethicone in 100 mL of water improves endoscopic visibility. Addition of N-acetylcysteine to simethicone in 100 mL of water reduces the need for endoscopic flushing. For patients unable to tolerate a large fluid volume, a 5-mL simethicone suspension administered more than 30 min prior to upper endoscopy is suggested.