Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 93(7): 1311-1314, 2019 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30920716

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the transpedal approach to established femoral approach for endovascular treatment of infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease. BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of infrainguinal peripheral arterial disease is on the rise. Femoral approach is widely used but has significant complications. Recently the primary transpedal approach has been described for endovascular interventions. We hypothesized that transpedal approach could reduce access site related complications. We compared the two approaches in a retrospective cross-sectional study at a single center. METHODS: We analyzed demographics, procedural parameters, and complications in patients who underwent a primary transpedal approach for infrainguinal intervention and compared to patients with a traditional femoral approach in our outpatient based endovascular lab. RESULTS: The success rate for access was lower in transpedal group compared to femoral (94% vs. 100%, p = .0002). The contrast dose (44 ± 11 mL vs. 68 ± 13 mL, p < .0001), radiation dose (25 mGy [16-43] vs. 48 mGy [36-67], p < .0001) and fluoroscopy time (5.48 min [3.48-11.71] vs. 9.35 min [6.63-14.11], p < .0001) were significantly lower in transpedal group. CONCLUSION: The transpedal approach for infrainguinal revascularization appears to be a reasonable primary approach with high success and low complication rate with significant reduction in radiation and contrast dose. These findings should be further studied in a randomized controlled trial.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Artéria Femoral , Pé/irrigação sanguínea , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Radiografia Intervencionista , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Artéria Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Cidade de Nova Iorque , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença Arterial Periférica/fisiopatologia , Punções , Doses de Radiação , Exposição à Radiação , Radiografia Intervencionista/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Future Cardiol ; 13(3): 211-217, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28326804

RESUMO

The AngioVac is a vacuum-based device introduced in 2012 to percutaneously remove undesirable material from the intravascular system. In scattered reports, the AngioVac has been used for removal of device-led vegetations and right-sided thrombi. In this article, we describe three cases of right-sided endocarditis treated with AngioVac: a mobile mass extending from the vena cava into the right atrium, large native tricuspid vegetations, and bioprosthetic tricuspid vegetations. This device shows benefit in reducing vegetation load, decreasing septic lung embolization, and reducing reinfection in active intravenous drug users. These cases exhibit the AngioVac's arrival as a new and exciting tool in endocarditis treatment, providing an alternative to open surgery and accessorizing antimicrobial treatment.


Assuntos
Cânula , Endocardite Bacteriana/terapia , Cardiopatias/terapia , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/terapia , Trombose/terapia , Adulto , Endocardite Bacteriana/patologia , Feminino , Átrios do Coração , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/patologia , Próteses Valvulares Cardíacas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valva Tricúspide , Vácuo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...