Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence studies of fluvoxamine maleate tablets in healthy Chinese subjects.

Fluvoxamine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor commonly used for various types of depression. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence of fluvoxamine maleate tablets orally on an empty stomach and after a meal in healthy adult Chinese subjects and to preliminarily evaluate their safety. A single-center, randomized, open-label, two-drug, two-period, crossover, single-dose trial protocol was designed. Sixty healthy Chinese participants were enrolled and randomly classified into fasting (n = 30) and fed groups (n = 30). Each week, subjects took fluvoxamine maleate tablets 50 mg orally once as a test preparation or as a reference preparation on an empty stomach/after meals. To evaluate the bioequivalence of test and reference tables, the concentration of fluvoxamine maleate in the plasma of the subjects at different time points after administration was detected by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and pharmacokinetic parameters including the maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax ), the time to reach maximum concentration (Tmax ), the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t ) and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞ ) were calculated. Our data revealed that the 90% confidence intervals of the geometric mean ratio of the test or reference drugs for the Cmax , AUC0-t and AUC0-∞ fell within the acceptance range for bioequivalence (92.30-102.77%). The absorption, measured by AUC, did not show a significant difference between the two groups. There were no suspected serious adverse reactions or serious adverse events over the entire trial. Our results demonstrated that the test and reference tablets were bioequivalent under fasting and fed conditions.

Effects of ilaprazole on the steady-state pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel in healthy volunteers: An open-label randomized crossover study.

Background: Previous studies have suggested that proton pump inhibitors could impair the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. It is uncertain whether ilaprazole affects the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel. This study aimed to determine the drug-drug interaction between ilaprazole and clopidogrel. Methods: A randomized crossover trial of 40 healthy subjects was performed. Clopidogrel was administered alone or in combination with ilaprazole for 7 days. The maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) to 5 µmol/L adenosine diphosphate was measured by light transmission aggregometry and the platelet reactivity index (PRI) was determined by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein P2Y12 assay. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HOPR) was defined as a MPA of >40%. The inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) and PRI in the two phases were compared between two regimens after the last dosing. Results: IPA was comparable between the two regimens at 0, 10 and 24 h (p > 0.05), but higher at 4 h in the clopidogrel alone regimen compared with that in the combined treatment regimen (75.66 ± 18.44% vs. 70.18 ± 17.67%, p = 0.031). The inhibition of PRI was comparable between the two regimens at 0 and 24 h. There were no significant differences in the area under the time-IPA% curve (AUC) or the incidence of HOPR at all time-points between the two regimens. Conclusion: In healthy subjects, ilaprazole has limited effect on the pharmacodynamics of clopidogrel and it may not be clinically relevant. Clinical Trial Registration: [www.chictr.org.cn], identifier [ChiCTR2000031482].

In silico prediction of bioequivalence of Isosorbide Mononitrate tablets with different dissolution profiles using PBPK modeling and simulation.

AIM: The waiver of bioequivalence (BE) studies is well accepted for Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class I drugs in form of immediate-release solid oral products. This study aimed to assess whether the rapid dissolution profiles (≥85% in 30 min) was crucial to guarantee bioequivalence of isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) and then established a clinically relevant dissolution specification (CRDS) for screening BE or non-BE batches. METHOD: A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was constructed by integrating clinical and non-clinical data by B2O simulator. The model was verified by an actual clinical study (NMPA registration number: CTR20191360) with 28 healthy Chinese subjects. Then a virtual BE study was simulated to evaluate the bioequivalence of 7 virtual batches of ISMN tablets with different dissolution profiles, and the CRDS was established by integrating the results. RESULT: The simulated PK behavior of ISMN was comparable to the observed. Even though the batches with slower dissolution were not equivalent to a rapid dissolution profile (≥85% in 30 min), it was demonstrated these batches would exhibit the similar in vivo performance. Meanwhile, the in vitro dissolution specification time point and the percentage of drug release (75% in 45 min) proved to have clinical relevance. CONCLUSION: The virtual BE simulation by integrating in vitro dissolution profiles into the PBPK model provided a powerful tool for screening formulations, contributing to gaining time and reducing costs in BE evaluations.

Determination of Isosorbide-5-Mononitrate in Human Plasma by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Its Application to a Bioequivalence Study.

Isosorbide-5-mononitrate (5-ISMN), an organic nitrate vasodilator, has been widely used worldwide to prevent angina pectoris for more than two decades. A simple and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method was developed and validated for the determination of 5-ISMN in human plasma. 13C6-5-ISMN is an internal standard, and 5-ISMN was extracted from human plasma (50 µL) with ethyl acetate (200 µL) by a simple liquid-liquid extraction method. The chromatographic separation was carried out on LC-20A (Shimadzu, Japan) using an analytical column ZORBAX XDB-C18 (4.6 × 50 mm, 5 µm), coupled with API 4000 tandem mass spectrometers in a multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The mobile phase was composed of acetonitrile (organic phase A) and 2 mM ammonium acetate in water (aqueous phase B) with an isocratic elution of A/B = 90 : 10 (v/v). The total run time was 3.5 min with a small injection volume (5 µL). This method was fully validated in every aspect of selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, matrix effect, extraction recovery, and different stabilities. It was proved that the calibration standards within the 5.00-1000 ng/mL concentration range were linear. The lower limit of quantification was 5.00 ng/mL for 5-ISMN. The intrabatch and interbatch accuracy (RE) ranged from -8.8% to 7.1% with precision between 2.4% and 6.6%. The mean values of 5-ISMN extraction recovery and matrix effect were 87.0% and 102.0%, respectively. The fully validated method was successfully applied for a bioequivalence clinical trial of oral 20 mg 5-ISMN tablets in healthy Chinese subjects.

Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of ilaprazole infusion in healthy subjects and patients with esomeprazole as positive control.

AIMS: The objectives were to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of ilaprazole infusion in healthy subjects and patients with esomeprazole as positive control, and then recommend the dosage regimen for Phase 2b/3 studies. METHODS: Three clinical studies were performed. First, 16 healthy subjects received infusion of ilaprazole 30 mg or esomeprazole 80 mg. Second, 12 healthy subjects received ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg once daily for 2 days. Finally, 20 patients with duodenal ulcers received ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg for 2 days or esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily for 3 days. Serial blood samples were collected and intragastric pH was recorded. RESULTS: The mean percentages time of intragastric pH >6 was 63.6 and 51.7% for healthy subjects after receiving ilaprazole 30 mg and esomeprazole 80 mg. Linear pharmacokinetics was observed when the dose was increased to 30 mg but the effect was saturated. Ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg for 2 days provided higher plasma exposure in healthy subjects than patients, but the effect was comparable. After multiple administrations, ilaprazole provided similar effect to esomeprazole. Ilaprazole infusion was safe and well tolerated without serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Ilaprazole provided comparable effect of pH control to esomeprazole, with lower dose and fewer times of administration. There was no significant difference of ilaprazole between healthy subjects and patients regarding intragastric acid inhibition. A loading dose of ilaprazole 20 mg followed by 10 mg once daily for 2 days was recommended for Phase 2b/3 studies.

[Value of serum alkaline phosphatase for predicting 2-year fracture in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the value of baseline serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) for predicting 2-year fracture in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on maintenance dialysis. METHODS: A total of 139 patients with CKD undergoing maintenance dialysis in our hospital were enrolled in this study. According to the median serum ALP level, the patients were divided into high ALP and low ALP groups. The demographic and clinical data of the patients including dialysis duration, serum calcium level, serum phosphorus level, and serum intact parathyroid hormone level were recorded, and their bone mineral density of the femur and the lumbar spine was measured using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. The patients were followed up for 2 years and fracture events were recorded. The risk factors of fracture were analyzed using logistic regression analysis, and their predictive value for fracture was analyzed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: The mean baseline serum ALP level was 132.55±167.68 U/L in these patients, significantly higher than that in the normal population (t=2.816, P=0.006). Baseline serum ALP level was negatively correlated with the bone mineral density of the lumbar spine (r=-0.203, P=0.006) and the femur (r=-0.196, P=0.021). Fractures occurred in 21 (15.1%) of the patients during the 2-year follow-up, and the fracture rate was significantly higher in patients with high ALP levels. Logistic regression analysis identified serum ALP level as an independent risk factor of fracture (OR: 1.010, P=0.001, 95%CI: 1.004-1.016). The areas under the ROC curve were 0.900 and 0.768 for serum ALP level and intact parathyroid hormone level in predicting 2-year fractures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Serum ALP may serve as a good indicator for predicting 2-year fractures in patients with CKD on maintenance dialysis.

A randomized, double blind, controlled, multi center study of Ilaparazole in the treatment of reflux esophagitis-Phase III clinical trial.

AIM AND BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the main drugs for the treatment of reflux esophagitis. Phase II clinical trials showed that, compared with Esomeprazole, the new PPI Ilaparazole is great in terms of efficacy for reflux symptoms relief and curling for esophagitis. The aim of this study was to confirm suitable dose of Ilaparazole in the treatment of reflux esophagitis. METHODS: This study used a randomized, double-blind, parallel positive drug control, multi-center design. A total of 537patients diagnosed as reflux esophagitis by gastroscopy were randomly divided into Ilaparazole group (n = 322, Ilaparazole 10 mg QD) and esomeprazole group (n = 215, Esomeprazole 40 mg QD). The patients in the two groups were treated for 8 weeks. Heartburn and reflux symptoms prior to treatment, and 2, 4 and 8 weeks after the treatment were assessed. Gastroscopy was performed after 4 weeks of treatment. Unhealed patients within 4 weeks underwent gastroscopy again at the end of 8 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 471 cases completed the treatment. In Esomeprazole and Ilaparazole groups. After 8 weeks treatment, the healing rate in Esomeprazole group and Ilaparazole group were 82.79% (94.94%) and 83.54% (92.50%), respectively. The corresponding rate difference [Ilaparazole-esomeprazole] was 0.75% (-2.44%) and the two-sided 95% CI was -5.72 to 7.22 (-6.90 to 2.01). The symptom disappearance rates for FAS (PPS) were 75.81% (82.02%) and 76.71% (80.36%) P = 0.8223 (0.7742). Adverse reactions related to the drugs were: 10.70% and 11.80%, (P = 0.7817). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of Ilaparazole (10 mg/day) in treating reflux esophagitis was similar to esomeprazole (40 mg/day). Ilaparazole (10 mg/day) can be used in the treatment of esophagitis. The clinical trial registration number of the study is NCT 02860624.

Effects of food and grapefruit juice on single-dose pharmacokinetics of blonanserin in healthy Chinese subjects.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential effects of a meal and grapefruit juice on the pharmacokinetics of blonanserin and its metabolite N-desethyl blonanserin in healthy Chinese volunteers. METHODS: This was a single-centre, open-label, fixed-sequence study, where 12 healthy Chinese volunteers received a single dose of 8 mg blonanserin after an overnight fast in period 1 (reference), a high-fat meal during period 2 and with co-administration of 250 mL of grapefruit juice in period 3. The washout period was 7 days. Series of plasma samples were collected after each dose to determine concentrations of blonanserin and its metabolite N-desethyl blonanserin using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by non-compartmental analysis and compared between periods by standard average bioequivalence ANOVA. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: All subjects completed the study. High-fat meals significantly increased blonanserin exposure (AUCt) 2.58-fold (90% CI 2.21, 3.02), relative to the reference period. Co-administration of blonanserin with grapefruit juice remarkably prolonged elimination half-life of blonanserin (from 9.7 to 21.4 h) and significantly increased exposures to blonanserin and N-desethyl blonanserin by 5.82-fold (90% CI 4.57, 7.42) and 1.81-fold (90% CI 1.65, 1.98), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggested that blonanserin was largely metabolised in the intestinal tract before becoming systemically available, and both food and grapefruit juice enhanced exposure to blonanserin and N-desethyl blonanserin. Grapefruit juice increased bioavailability and may have reduced systemic clearance of blonanserin. Further intestinal CYP3A4 and hepatic CYP3A4 might be postulated to explain the delayed elimination of blonanserin. Dose adjustment of blonanserin is needed on the basis of co-intake of known strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Patients taking high-dose blonanserin also need to be cautious about the ingestion of grapefruit juice.

Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Emplacement by Advanced Laparoscopy: 8-year Experience from a Medical Center of China.

Laparoscopic experience and relevant reports about PD catheter emplacement in Chinese patients are seldom. In this study, we described our experience with advanced laparoscopy for PD catheter implantation in Chinese patients. There were one hundred and thirty Chinese patients accepted advanced laparoscopic approach for PD catheter emplacement in this study. Six of 26 patients with prior abdominal operations had abdominal adhesion, while six of 104 patients without prior abdominal surgeries showed abdominal adhesion. Operation time required 10 to 180 minutes. During a mean follow-up time of 26.46 months, the catheter complications were shown as outflow obstruction (n = 6, 4.62%), pericatheter leaking (n = 3, 2.31%), hydrocele of tunica vaginalis (n = 1, 0.77% in all), and umbilical hernia (n = 2, 1.54%). Cumulative revision-free survival probability for catheter loss from mechanical complications at 8 years was 0.95. During the postoperative follow-up ranged between 6 and 106 months, 98 patients (75.38%) were still on CAPD, 17 patients (13.08%) died, 8 patients (6.15%) were transferred to hemodialysis, 6 patients (4.62%) received kidney transplantation, and 1 patient (0.77%) showed improved renal function. These results showed that PD catheter placement with advanced laparoscopy is a safe and effective approach in Chinese patients with or without prior abdominal surgeries.

A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-Controlled, Multi-center Study of Ilaprazole in the Treatment of Reflux Esophagitis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are the main drugs for the treatment of reflux esophagitis. Previous studies have indicated ilaprazole to be safer and more effective in treating duodenal ulcers as compared with omeprazole. Being a novel PPI, ilaprazole may be used in the treatment of reflux esophagitis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ilaprazole tablets in the treatment of reflux esophagitis. METHODS: This study used a randomized, double-blind, multi-center, active-comparison design. The patients were randomly divided into an ilaprazole group (10 mg once daily and 15 mg once daily) and an esomeprazole group (40 mg once daily). Both the groups were treated for 8 weeks. Heartburn and reflux symptoms prior to treatment, and 4 and 8 weeks after the treatment were assessed. Gastroscopy was performed after 4 and 8 weeks. The healing rate after 4 weeks treatment was compared. If esophagitis was healed at the end of 4 weeks, patients did not undergo gastroscopy at the end of 8 weeks. RESULTS: Three hundred and twenty-five patients were enrolled in this study. The 4-week full analysis set (per-protocol set) healing rates in the esomeprazole 40-mg group, the ilaprazole 10-mg group, and the ilaprazole 15-mg group were: 71.43 % (78.89 %), 81.31 % (86.73 %), and 71.70 % (81.40 %), respectively, p = 0.1595 (0.4122); the 8-week healing rates were 84.76 % (93.33 %), 88.79 % (94.90 %), and 85.85 % (97.67 %), respectively, p = 0.6689 (0.4049). Drug-related adverse events rate were 10.48 %, 14.02 %, and 15.09 %, respectively, in the three groups (p = 0.6114). CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of ilaprazole (10 mg/day, 15 mg/day) in treating reflux esophagitis was similar to esomeprazole (40 mg/day). Ilaprazole (10 mg/day) has a smaller dosage, hence it should be considered more in clinical uses. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01107938.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Safety of Multiple-Infusion Ilaprazole in Healthy Chinese Subjects.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ilaprazole is a novel proton pump inhibitor that provides effective and long lasting inhibition of intragastric acid secretion. The objectives of this study were to investigate the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of intravenous ilaprazole after multiple administrations in healthy Chinese subjects. METHODS: This was an open-label and multiple-dose clinical study. Ten healthy Chinese subjects received 10 mg ilaprazole infusion once daily for 5 days. Helicobacter pylori status was examined. Blood samples were collected and intragastric pH was recorded for 24 h. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: There was no accumulation after multiple administrations. The mean steady-state half-life and clearance were comparable to those following single administration. Ilaprazole provided sustainable and significant intragastric pH control in terms of percentage time at pH >4, pH >6 within 24 h and mean 24-h pH values. The pH value within 24 h was affected by Helicobacter pylori infection in subjects with continuous infusion. Intravenous ilaprazole was safe and there were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Intravenous ilaprazole provided stable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics at a dose of 10 mg once daily for 5 days, and was well tolerated in healthy subjects.

[Randomized, double-blind, multi-center, positive parallel control clinical trial of compound Wuzhigan capsules on anemopyretic cold].

Compound Wuzhigan capsules is a compound preparation composed of Wuzhigan, Shidagonglao, Gangmei, Shanzhima. A Randomized, double-blind, multi-center, positive parallel control designed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of compound Wuzhigan capsules on anemopyretic cold. One hundred and twenty anemopyretic cold patients were given compound Wuzhigan capsules (test group), 2 capsules one time, three times a day, 119 patients were given compound Wuzhigan tablets (control group) ,4 tablets one time, three times a day; three days of treatment The study showed, the markedly effective rate and total effective rate respectively were 63. 3% and 80% of the test group. For the control group, the markedly effective rate and total effective rate respectively were 72. 5% and 80. 7%. The difference was not statistically significant. Compound Wuzhigan capsules can reduce the dosage, and get better patient compliance.

Intravenous ilaprazole is more potent than oral ilaprazole against gastric lesions in rats.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Ilaprazole is a novel proton pump inhibitor that has been marketed as an oral therapy for acid-related diseases in China and Korea. This study aimed to compare the gastroprotective effects of intravenous and enteral ilaprazole in rat models. METHODS: The rats were divided into 7-8 groups receiving vehicle, esomeprazole, and different doses of intravenous and enteral ilaprazole. The rats were then exposed to indomethacin (30 mg/kg, i.g.), or water-immersion stress and gastric lesions were examined. The effects of different treatments on histamine (10 µmol/kg/h)-induced acid secretion were also observed. RESULTS: Intravenous ilaprazole exhibited high antiulcer activity in a dose-dependent manner. Ilaprazole at a dose of 3 mg/kg decreased ulcer number and index to the same extent as 20 mg/kg esomeprazole. Moreover, the potency of intravenous ilaprazole is superior to that of intragastric ilaprazole. In anesthetized rats, the inhibitory effect of intravenous ilaprazole on histamine-induced acid secretion is faster and longer-lasting than that of intraduodenal ilaprazole. CONCLUSION: Intravenous ilaprazole is more potent than oral ilaprazole against indomethacin- or stress-induced gastric lesions, with faster and longer inhibition of acid secretion.

Probucol combined with valsartan in immunoglobulin A nephropathy: a multi-centre, open labelled, randomized controlled study.

AIM: Angiotensin receptor antagonists (ARBs) and anti-oxidants reduce urinary protein excretion and delay progression of immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy. We investigated the efficacy and safety of probucol (an anti-oxidant) combined with valsartan (an ARB) on the progression of IgA nephropathy. METHODS: Patients with IgA nephropathy (n = 69) were recruited from five centres and randomly assigned to a treatment group (750 mg/day probucol plus 160 mg/day valsartan) or a control group (160 mg/day valsartan) and were followed for 3 years. RESULTS: At baseline, the two groups in any measured clinical information were comparable. The primary endpoint (doubling serum creatinine) showed no significant difference between the two groups during 3-year follow-up. The secondary endpoint (50% reduction in 24-h urinary protein) occurred in 23 patients in the treatment group and 20 patients in the control group. The time to the secondary end-point was shorter in the treatment group than the control group (8.13 months vs 19.63 months, P = 0.019). However, at the 3-year follow-up, the 24-h urinary protein levels were not significantly different from the baseline levels (P = 0.99 and P = 0.66, respectively). At the 1-year follow-up, plasma cholesterol in the treatment group was markedly lower than in the control group (4.12 ± 1.28 vs 5.03 ± 1.01, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Kidney function remained stable and there was no significant difference in two group patients. Probucol combined with valsartan led to a more rapid decrease of 24-h urinary protein excretion than valsartan alone. However, the long-term effect needs further investigation.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between ilaprazole and clarithromycin following ilaprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin triple therapy.

AIM: To investigate the drug interactions between ilaprazole, a new proton pump inhibitor, and clarithromycin following ilaprazole, clarithromycin and amoxicillin combination therapy. METHODS: Twelve healthy Chinese volunteers were recruited in a randomized, open-label, 3-period crossover study. All subjects were administered ilaprazole (5 mg), clarithromycin (500 mg) or a triple therapy, including ilaprazole (5 mg), clarithromycin (500 mg) and amoxicillin (1 g), twice daily for 6 consecutive days. On the 7th day, the drugs were given once, and blood samples were collected and analyzed using a well-validated HPLC/MS/MS method. RESULTS: Following the triple therapy, the peak concentration (C(max)) and the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 h to 12 h (AUC(0→12)) of ilaprazole were significantly decreased, as compared with the single medication group (C(max):1025.0±319.6 vs 1452.3±324.6 ng/mL; AUC(0→12): 9777.7±3789.8 vs 11363.1±3442.0 ng·h/mL). Similar changes were found for ilaprazole sulfone (C(max): 5.9±0.5 vs 9.3±1.7 ng/mL; AUC(0→12): 201.4±32.1 vs 277.1±66.2 ng·h/mL). The triple therapy significantly elevated the C(max) of clarithromycin (3161.5±702.2 vs 2541.9±476.2 ng/mL). CONCLUSION: The H pylori eradication therapy with clarithromycin, amoxicillin and ilaprazole may cause pharmacokinetic interactions that decrease the amount of ilaprazole and its metabolites and elevate that of clarithromycin.

Ilaprazole for the treatment of duodenal ulcer: a randomized, double-blind and controlled phase III trial.

OBJECTIVE: The new proton pump inhibitor (PPI), ilaprazole performed better at the dose of 10 mg/d relative to 5 or 20 mg/d in a previous phase II trial. A larger phase III trial was carried out to confirm the efficacy and safety of ilaprazole (10 mg/d) compared with omeprazole (20 mg/d) and provide some characteristics of the relationship between ilaprazole metabolism and CYP2C19 for later studies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with at least one endoscopically diagnosed active duodenal ulcer (DU) were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, positive controlled trial and then assigned randomly to the ilaprazole group (10 mg/d) or the omeprazole group (20 mg/d) with a sample allocation ratio 2:1. The course of treatment was 4 weeks. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00952978. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was endoscopically diagnosed ulcer healing rate at week 4. Symptom relief was evaluated as a secondary endpoint by graded scores. Safety and tolerability were evaluated on basis of clinical assessments. In addition, blood samples were collected at baseline for CYP2C19 genotypes identification. RESULTS: Efficacy analyses were based on 494 patients. At week 4, the ulcer healing rates were 93.0% in ilaprazole group and 90.8% in omeprazole group (rate difference: 2.2%; 95% confidence interval: -2.8% to 7.2%). No obvious variation of healing rate on different CYP2C19 genotypes was found in ilaprazole group. The majority of patients (>80%) became asymptomatic after treatment. Incidences of adverse drug reactions were similar between ilaprazole group and omeprazole group (8.5% vs. 11.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Ilaprazole (10 mg/d) is as effective as omeprazole (20 mg/d) in the treatment of DU with similar side effects. The efficacy of ilaprazole is not affected by CYP2C19 polymorphisms.

Concurrent nephrotic syndrome and acute renal failure caused by chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL): a case report and literature review.

Kidney injury associated with lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is typically caused by direct tumor infiltration which occasionally results in acute renal failure. Glomerular involvement presenting as proteinuria or even nephrotic syndrome is exceptionally rare. Here we report a case of 54-year-old male CLL patient with nephrotic syndrome and renal failure. The lymph node biopsy confirmed that the patients had CLL with remarkable immunoglobulin light chain amyloid deposition. The renal biopsy demonstrated the concurrence of AL amyloidosis and neoplastic infiltration. Combined treatment of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide and rituximab resulted in remission of CLL, as well as the renal disfunction and nephrotic syndrome, without recurrence during a 12-month follow-up. To our knowledge, this is the first case of CLL patient showing the nephrotic syndrome and acute renal failure caused by AL amyloidosis and neoplastic infiltration. Though AL amyloidosis caused by plasma cell dyscrasia usually responses poorly to chemotherapy, this patient exhibited a satisfactory clinical outcome due to successful inhibition of the production of amylodogenic light chains by combined chemotherapy.

A new PPI, ilaprazole compared with omeprazole in the treatment of duodenal ulcer: a randomized double-blind multicenter trial.

GOALS: To investigate the efficacy and safety of a new proton pump inhibitor (PPI), ilaprazole (IY-81149) in the treatment of duodenal ulcers and provide some characteristics of the dose-response relationship for later studies. BACKGROUND: PPIs have been used therapeutically for many years, and shown great efficacy in accelerating ulcer healing. Currently researches are focused on more potent PPIs. Some preclinical studies have shown that ilaprazole might be such a new substitute. STUDY: 235 patients with at least 1 endoscopically diagnosed active duodenal ulcer were enrolled in a randomized trial. Patients were randomized into 4 groups (5, 10, and 20 mg/d ilaprazole, with 20 mg/d omeprazole as positive control) and treated for up to 4 weeks. Forty patients accepted continuous 24-hour pH measurements after the fifth dose. The primary endpoint was ulcer healing rate at week 4. RESULTS: The efficacy analyses were based on 235 patients. At week 4, 86.4%, 93.1%, 86.4%, and 89.8% patients treated with 5 mg ilaprazole, 10 mg ilaprazole, 20 mg ilaprazole, and 20 mg omeprazole once daily, respectively had ulcers healed (P=0.59). The majority of patients (>70%) became asymptomatic after 4 weeks treatment. Both drugs with stipulated dosages exhibited similar efficacy and safety profiles. Gastric acid suppression increased with increasing dose of ilaprazole in pH study. CONCLUSIONS: Ilaprazole is as tolerable, safe, and efficacious as omeprazole in the treatment of duodenal ulcers, especially at a lower dose (10 mg/d ilaprazole vs. 20 mg/d omeprazole). (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT00953381).

[Evaluation of the effect of ilaprazole on intragastric pH in patients with duodenal ulcer].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of ilaprazole enteric tablets on intragastric pH in duodenal ulcer patients. METHODS: A randomized, double blind, positive controlled clinical trial was carried out. A total of forty-two patients with duodenal ulcer were randomized into low dose ilaprazole group (5 mg/d), medium dose ilaprazole group (10 mg/d), high dose ilaprazole group (20 mg/d) and omeprazole group (20 mg/d). An ambulatory 24 hour intragastric pH study was performed at the fifth treatment day. Fraction time pH above 3, 4 or 5, median values of 24 hour diurnal pH and 12 hour nocturnal pH, the percentage of patients with total time pH above 3, 4 or 5 at least for 18 hours were evaluated. RESULTS: There were no significant differences of fraction time pH above 3 or 4, median values of 24 hour diurnal pH and 12 hour nocturnal pH and the percentage of patients with total time pH above 3, 4 or 5 at least for 18 hours among all the groups with different doses of ilaprazole and the omeprazole group. The fraction time pH above 5 in medium and high dose ilaprazole groups were (87.96 + or - 12.29)% and (89.86 + or - 15.18)% respectively, which was higher than that in low dose ilaprazole group [(67.17 + or - 30.16)%] and omeprazole group [(76.14 + or - 16.75)%], P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: Ilaprazole has a strong effect on intragastric acid control with a dose dependent trend.

Identification of ilaprazole metabolites in human urine by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS and HPLC-NMR experiments.

Ilaprazole is a new proton pump inhibitor designed for the treatment of gastric ulcers, and limited data is available on the metabolism of the drug. In this article, the structural elucidation of urinary metabolites of ilaprazole in human was described by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS and stopped-flow HPLC-NMR experiments. Urinary samples were precipitated by sodium carbonate solution, and then extracted by liquid-liquid extraction after adding ammonium acetate buffer solution. The enriched sample was separated using a C(18) reversed-phase column with the mobile phase composed of acetonitrile and 0.05 mol/L ammonium acetate buffer solution in a gradient solution, and then directly coupled to ESI-MS/MS detection in an on-line mode or (1)H-NMR (500 MHz) spectroscopic detection in a stopped-flow mode. As a result, four sulfide metabolites, ilaprazole sulfide (M1), 12-hydroxy-ilaprazole sulfide (M2), 11,12-dihydroxy-ilaprazole sulfide (M3) and ilaprazole sulfide A (M4), were identified by comparing their MS/MS and NMR data with those of the parent drug and available standard compounds. The main biotransformation reactions of ilaprazole were reduction and the aromatic hydroxylation of the parent drug and its relative metabolites. The result testified that HPLC-ESI-MS/MS and HPLC-NMR could be widely applied in detection and identification of novel metabolites.