Comparative Analysis of META and SALT Disaster Triage in an Adult Trauma Population: A Retrospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Medical professionals can use mass-casualty triage systems to assist them in prioritizing patients from mass-casualty incidents (MCIs). Correct triaging of victims will increase their chances of survival. Determining the triage system that has the best performance has proven to be a difficult question to answer. The Advanced Prehospital Triage Model (Modelo Extrahospitalario de Triaje Avanzado; META) and Sort, Assess, Lifesaving Interventions, Treatment/Transport (SALT) algorithms are the most recent triage techniques to be published. The present study aimed to evaluate the META and SALT algorithms' performance and statistical agreement with various standards. The secondary objective was to determine whether these two MCI triage systems predicted patient outcomes, such as mortality, length-of-stay, and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. METHODS: This retrospective study used patient data from the trauma registry of an American College of Surgeons Level 1 trauma center, from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2020. The sensitivity, specificity, and statistical agreement of the META and SALT triage systems to various standards (Revised Trauma Score [RTS]/Sort Triage, Injury Severity Score [ISS], and Lerner criteria) when applied using trauma patients. Statistical analysis was used to assess the relationship between each triage category and the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 3,097 cases were included in the study. Using Sort triage as the standard, SALT and META showed much higher sensitivity and specificity in the Immediate category than for Delayed (Immediate sensitivity META 91.5%, SALT 94.9%; specificity 60.8%, 72.7% versus Delayed sensitivity 28.9%, 1.3%; specificity 42.4%, 28.9%). With the Lerner criteria, in the Immediate category, META had higher sensitivity (77.1%, SALT 68.6%) but lower specificity (61.1%) than SALT (71.8%). For the Delayed category, SALT showed higher sensitivity (META 61.4%, SALT 72.2%), but lower specificity (META 75.1%, SALT 67.2%). Both systems showed a positive, though modest, correlation with ISS. For SALT and META, triaged Immediate patients tended to have higher mortality and longer ICU and hospital lengths-of-stay. CONCLUSION: Both META and SALT triage appear to be more accurate with Immediate category patients, as opposed to Delayed category patients. With both systems, patients triaged as Immediate have higher mortality and longer lengths-of-stay when compared to Delayed patients. Further research can help refine MCI triage systems and improve accuracy.

Effects of the Hazardous Area Response Team Training Program on the Knowledge and Confidence in Operational Skills of Prehospital Emergency Medical Personnel in Thailand: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Background: Hazardous areas are places emitting hazardous materials, terrorist- or war-related, which lead to public health risks in developed and developing countries globally. Hence, prehospital emergency medical personnel who work as frontliners should be trained. Patients and Methods: Data via pretest, posttest, and questionnaire surveys regarding the HART's knowledge of and confidence in operational skills were collected using the 5-point Likert scale. The cohort included prehospital emergency medical personnel aged >18 years. The training program comprised lectures, practicals, and examinations and included three subcourses: emergency medicine in the chemical, biological, radiation, and nuclear hazardous area (EM-CBRN) course; Thailand Tactical Emergency Medical Service (TTEMS) course; and cooperation and preparation for disaster (CPD) course. Results: The HART's mean multiple choice question (MCQ) posttest knowledge score (12.80±3.11) was significantly higher (p<0.001) than the mean pretest knowledge score (7.74±3.71) for the EM-CBRN course. The HART's mean MCQ posttest knowledge score (24.04±2.79) was significantly higher (p<0.001) than the mean pretest knowledge score (14.34±3.92) for the TTEMS course. Further, the HART's mean MCQ posttest knowledge score (21.03±3.49) was significantly higher (p<0.001) than the mean pretest knowledge score (14.40±5.08) for the CPD course. The HART's mean confidence in operational skill score for the EM-CBRN course was significantly higher (p<0.001) after training (4.45±0.59) than before training (2.77±0.90). The HART's mean confidence in operational skill score for the TTEMS course was significantly higher (p<0.001) after training (4.55±0.59) than before training (2.78±0.98). The HART's mean confidence in operational skill score for the CPD course was significantly higher (p<0.001) after training (4.70±0.41) than before training (3.03±0.90). Conclusion: The HART training program significantly affected the HART's knowledge development and confidence in operational skills, particularly the frontline prehospital emergency medical personnel. Therefore, prehospital emergency medical personnel should undergo training, and learning activities must be developed to reinforce capacity and improve knowledge and confidence.

Associated Factors of Under and Over-Triage Based on The Emergency Severity Index; a Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction: Under-triage increases patients' risks for morbidity and mortality, whereas over-triage limits the resources available to sicker patients. This study aimed to determine the rates as well as associated factors of under-triage and over-triage in emergency department (ED), based on Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage system. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study, triage level of ED patients based on the ESI version 4, was studied during a 9-month period in 2019. Patients' ESI level, which were examined by triage nurses were reevaluated by 3 emergency physicians and the rate of correct, under-, and over-triage as well as their associated factors were analyzed. Results: 1000 cases of triage were evaluated. Triage was correct in 69.1% of cases. The rate of under-triage was 4.9%, and that of over-triage was 26.0%. Over-triage was significantly more common among patients aged 18-30 years than for those aged ≥65 years (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.73; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-2.81; p = 0.026); those with traumatic injuries (adjusted OR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.29-2.52; p = 0.001); those arriving at the hospital during the evening shift (adjusted OR = 1.42; 95% CI: 1.01-2.0; p = 0.046); patients who were hospitalized (adjusted OR = 0.35; 95% CI: 0.22-0.54; p < 0.001); and those with severe pain (adjusted OR = 0.28; 95% CI: 0.10-0.84; p = 0.023). Younger age was also significantly associated with under-triage. Patients aged 18-30 years were under-triaged more often than those aged ≥65 years (adjusted OR = 3.05; 95% CI: 1.16-8.00; p = 0.023). Conclusions: Over-triage was substantially more common than under-triage in Vajira Hospital. Factors associated with over-triage were younger age, traumatic injury, arrival time, hospital admission, and severe pain. Younger age was the only factor related to under-triage.

Effects of Pre-Hospital Dexamethasone Administration on Outcomes of Patients with COPD and Asthma Exacerbation; a Cross-Sectional Study.

Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma exacerbation are two common emergency situations. This study aimed to investigate the impact of pre-hospital dexamethasone initiation on treatment outcomes of these patients. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional and comparative study, data from the emergency medical service (EMS) care report of patients with a final diagnosis of asthma or COPD, coded with Thailand's emergency medical triage protocol, collected between January 1, 2021, and October 31, 2022, were used. Data on baseline characteristics, emergency department length of stay (ED-LOS), and hospital admission rates were collected from electronic medical records and compared between cases with and without pre-hospital dexamethasone administration by EMS. Results: 200 patients with COPD (n = 93) and asthma (n = 107) exacerbation were enrolled. The dexamethasone-treated group had a lower but statistically non-significant hospital admission rate (71.0% versus 81.0%, absolute difference: -10%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -21.76, 1.76; p = 0.100). In patients with asthma, the dexamethasone-treated had lower median ED-LOS time (235 (IQR: 165.5-349.5) versus 322 (IQR: 238-404) minutes; p = 0.003). Dexamethasone-treated asthma patients had lower but statistically non-significant hospital admission rates (60.4% versus 78.0%, absolute difference: -17.55%, 95% CI: -34.96, -0.14; p = 0.510). In COPD patients the dexamethasone-treated and untreated groups had non-significantly lower hospital admission rates (80.8% versus 85.40%, absolute difference: -4.60%, 95% CI: -19.82, 10.63; p = 0.561) and non-significantly lower ED-LOS (232 (IQR: 150 - 346) versus 296 (IQR: 212 - 330) minutes, absolute difference: -59 (-130.81, 12.81); p = 0.106). Conclusion: The dexamethasone administration by EMS in pre-hospital setting for management of asthma and COPD patients is beneficial in reducing the ED-LOS and need for hospital admission but its effects are not statistically significant, except regarding the ED-LOS of asthma exacerbation cases.

Pre-hospital Prognostic Factors of 30-Day Survival in Sepsis Patients; a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Introduction: According to excising findings, if the emergency management system (EMS) operation will be developed, the survival outcome of sepsis patients might improve. This study aimed to evaluate the pre-hospital associated factors of survival in sepsis patients. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients diagnosed with sepsis, coded with the Thailand emergency medical triage protocol and criteria-based dispatch symptom group 17. Information on the 30-day survival rate of patients was obtained from the electronic medical records. Pre-hospital factors associated with 30-day survival were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses and were reported using odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: 300 patients diagnosed with sepsis were enrolled. Among them, 232 (77.3%) survived within 30 days. Non-survived cases had significantly older age (p = 0.019), lower oxygen saturations (92.5% vs. 95.0%; p = 0.003), higher heart rate (p = 0.001), higher respiratory rate (p < 0.001), lower level of consciousness (p < 0.001), higher disease severity based on qSOFA score (p = 0.001), and higher need for invasive airway management (p = 0.001) and supplementary oxygen (p = 0.001). The survival rate improved by 3.5% with every 1% increase in pre-hospital oxygen saturation (adjusted OR = 1.035, 95% CI: 1.005-1.066, p = 0.020) and the survival probabilities of patients who responded to voice (adjusted OR = 0.170, 95% CI: 0.050-0.579, p = 0.005), those who responded to pain (adjusted OR = 0.130, 95% CI: 0.036-0.475, p = 0.002), and those who were unresponsive (adjusted OR = 0.086, 95% CI: 0.026-0.278, p-value < 0.001) were lower than patients who were alert. Conclusion: The 30-day survival rate of patients with sepsis managed by the EMS team was 77.3%. Pre-hospital oxygen saturation and level of consciousness were associated with the survival of patients with sepsis who were managed in the pre-hospital setting.

Using Sodium Bicarbonate During Prolonged Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Prehospital Setting; a Retrospective Cross-sectional Study.

Introduction: Although the 2020 American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines recommend that sodium bicarbonate (SB) be avoided during routine cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) a limited number of studies have examined the effects of SB injection during prolonged CPR (>15 min) in prehospital setting. The present study aimed to examine the effects of prehospital SB use during prolonged CPR on patients' outcome. Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study adult patients aged >18 years who experienced a non-traumatic, out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) were compared regarding three outcomes, namely return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), ROSC > 20 minute, and survival to discharge, based on receiving or not-receiving SB during CPR. Results: 330 patients were divided into two equal groups of 165. The two groups had similar conditions regarding gender distribution (p = 0.729); mean age (p = 0.741); underlying diseases (p = 0.027); etiology of arrest (p = 0.135); the initial rhythm (p = 0.324); receiving normal saline solution (p = 1.000), epinephrine (p = 0.848), and atropine during CPR (p = 0.054); and using defibrillation (p = 0.324). Those who received SB had 0.80 times greater likelihood for sustained ROSC (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.47-1.37, p = 0.415), 0.93 times greater likelihood for ROSC at the scene (adjusted OR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.55-1.59, p = 0.798), and 0.34 times greater likelihood for survival to discharge (adjusted OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.10-1.17, p = 0.087). Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that prehospital SB use by EMS during prolonged CPR did not improve ROSC rate at the scene, sustained ROSC, and survival to discharge.

Sustained Return of Spontaneous Circulation Following Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest; Developing a Predictive Model Based on Multivariate Analysis.

Introduction: Identifying the predictive factors of sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) will be helpful in management of these patients. This study aimed to develop a predictive model in this regard. Methods: In a retrospective observational study, data of adult patients with OHCA, were collected from Vajira emergency medical services patient care report. Multiple logistic regression analysis with a regression coefficient was used to develop a predictive score for a sustained ROSC at the scene. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to validate the accuracy of the predictive score for a sustained ROSC. Results: Independent factors associated with a sustained ROSC included cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) duration < 30 min (adjusted odds ratio (AOR)= 5.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.34-7.65; p < 0.001); advanced airway management with an endotracheal tube (AOR= 3.06, 95% CI: 1.77-5.31; p < 0.001); advanced airway management with laryngeal mask airway (AOR= 3.42, 95% CI: 1.02-11.46; p = 0.046); defibrillation (AOR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.31-3.2; p = 0.002); Capillary blood glucose (CBG) level < 150 mg% (AOR= 1.95, 95% CI: 1.05-3.65; p = 0.035); CBG at least 150 mg% (AOR= 2.87, 95% CI: 1.56-5.29; p = 0.001); pupil reflex (AOR = 2.96, 95% CI: 1.1-7.96; p = 0.032); and response time at most 8 min (AOR= 1.66, 95% CI: 1.07-2.57; p = 0.023). These were developed into the pupil reflex, response time, advanced airway management, defibrillation, CBG, and CPR duration (PRAD-CCPR) score. The most accurate cutoff point of score using Youden's index was ≥ 6 with AUC of 0.759 (95% CI: 0.715-0.802; p < 0.001), sensitivity of 62.0% (95% CI: 51.2-71.9%), specificity of 75.7% (95% CI: 69.4-81.2%), positive predictive value of 51.8% (95% CI: 40.9-62.3%), and negative predictive value of 79.5% (95% CI: 73.5-84.6%). Conclusion: An optimal PRAD-CCPR score of ≥ 6 provides an acceptable accuracy of 0.759 with sensitivity of 62.0% and specificity of 75.7% in prediction of sustained ROSC following OHCA. This predictive score might help CPR commanders to prognosticate the outcome of patients with OHCA at the scene.

The comparison of emergency medical service responses to and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the format of patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) management was modified. Therefore, this study compared the response time and survival at the scene of patients with OHCA managed by emergency medical services (EMS) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Thailand. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study used EMS patient care reports to collect data on adult patients with OHCA coded with cardiac arrest. Before and during the COVID-19 pandemic was defined as the periods of January 1, 2018-December 31, 2019, and January 1, 2020-December 31, 2021, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 513 and 482 patients were treated for OHCA before and during the COVID-19 pandemic, respectively, showing a decrease of 6% (% change difference =- 6.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 4.1, - 8.5). However, the average number of patients treated per week did not differ (4.83 ± 2.49 vs. 4.65 ± 2.06; p value = 0.700). While the mean response times did not significantly differ (11.87 ± 6.31 vs. 12.21 ± 6.50 min; p value = 0.400), the mean on-scene and hospital arrival times were significantly higher during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with before by 6.32 min (95% CI 4.36-8.27; p value < 0.001), and 6.88 min (95% CI 4.55-9.22; p value < 0.001), respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that patients with OHCA had a 2.27 times higher rate of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) (adjusted odds ratio = 2.27, 95% CI 1.50-3.42, p value < 0.001), and a 0.84 times lower mortality rate (adjusted odds ratio = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.58-1.22, p value = 0.362) during the COVID-19 pandemic period compared with that before the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, there was no significant difference between the response time of patients with OHCA managed by EMS before and during COVID-19 pandemic period; however, markedly longer on-scene and hospital arrival times and higher ROSC rates were observed during the COVID-19 pandemic than those in the period before the pandemic.

Comparing Emergency Medical Services Processing Times for Stroke Patients Before and During COVID-19 Pandemic; A Cross-sectional Study.

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has directly affected global healthcare, especially the front-line of healthcare provision, including emergency medical services (EMS). The present study aimed to compare EMS processing times and the number of acute stroke patients serviced by EMS before and during COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This is a retrospective observational review of Bangkok Surgico Medical Ambulance and Rescue Team (S.M.A.R.T.) EMS data from 2018 to 2021. The EMS processing times and the number of acute strokes were compared between pre-COVID-19 era (January 1st, 2018, and December 31st, 2019) and during COVID-19 pandemic (January 1st, 2020, and December 31st, 2021). Results: The number of stroke patients transported by EMS in one year, before and during COVID-19 pandemic was 128 and 150 cases, respectively (Change difference = 17.2%, 95% CI: 11.1-24.9). However, the average number of acute stroke patients per week was not significantly different (p = 0.386). The mean total EMS processing times before and during COVID-19 era were 25.59 ± 11.12 and 45.47 ± 14.61 minutes, respectively (mean difference of 19.88 (95% CI: 16.77-22.99) minutes; p < 0.001). The mean time from symptom onset to EMS arrival (p < 0.001), the mean call time (p < 0.001), the mean response time (p < 0.001), and the mean scene time (p < 0.001) were significantly higher during COVID-19 period. The mean transportation times for stroke patients was similar before and during COVID-19 pandemic (10.14 ± 6.28 and 9.41 ± 6.31 minutes, respectively; p = 0.338). Conclusions: During COVID-19 pandemic, the number of acute stroke patients serviced by EMS increased substantially, but there was no difference in the average number of patients per week. During the pandemic, EMS processing times markedly increased.

Predictive Factors of Outcome in Cases of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Due to Traffic Accident Injuries in Thailand; a National Database Study.

Introduction: Traffic accident injury is one of the global leading causes of death and an important public health problem. This study aimed to evaluate the predictive factors of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) at the scene in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) due to traffic accidents. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted on cases of OHCA due to traffic accident, who were resuscitated at the scene by emergency medical services (EMS) in Bankok, Thiland, from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020 (1 year). Patients were divided into two groups of with and without ROSC and independent predictive factors of outcome were evaluated. Results: 2400 OHCA cases met the inclusion criteria, among them, 1728 (72.0%) achieved ROSC at the scene. Facial injury (adjusted OR = 2.17, 95%CI: 1.37-3.44, p = 0.001); prehospital airway management using bag valve mask (adjusted OR = 1.69, 95%CI: 1.21-2.34, p = 0.002), and endotracheal tube (adjusted OR = 3.88, 95%CI: 1.84-8.18, p <0.001); and prehospital fluid therapy using normal saline (adjusted OR = 4.24, 95%CI: 3.12-5.77, p <0.001), ringer lactate (adjusted OR = 5.13, 95%CI: 3.47-7.61, p <0.001), and other solutions (adjusted OR = 5.25, 95%CI: 2.16-12.8, p <0.001) were independent predictive factors of ROSC at the scene in OHCA due to traffic accidents. Conclusion: Based on the findings, the rate of ROSC at the scene for cases with OHCA due to traffic accidents, serviced by EMS was high, i.e., 72%, and three independent predictive factors of ROSC at the scene were facial injury, prehospital airway management, and prehospital fluid management.

The Impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Pandemic on the Use of Emergency Medical Services System in Bangkok, Thailand.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has widely affected the global public health system, especially the emergency medical service (EMS), which has been the first responders since 2020. However, this pandemic persists with still limited studies on its impact on EMS. This study aimed to compare the number of EMS patients and the operation periods of Bangkok EMS in Thailand between 2020 (severe COVID-19 pandemic) and 2019 (prepandemic). Patients and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of patients with severe COVID-19 were collected from the emergency medical information system of Bangkok EMS center. Data were compared between the two periods. The COVID-19 pandemic period (study period) spanned from January 01, 2020 to December 31, 2020, whereas the control period referred to the same period in the previous year (January 01, 2019 to December 31, 2019). Results: A total of 178,594 patients were serviced by EMS, with 93,288 during the study period and 85,306 during the control period. The study period had more EMS patients overall by 9.36% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.16-9.55) and significantly more EMS patients per day, with a mean difference of 21.19 (254.90 ± 25.55 vs 233.71 ± 23.49; 95% CI: 17.63-24.76, p < 0.001), than the control period. Furthermore, all EMS operation periods studied were significantly longer during the study period. Conclusion: During COVID-19 pandemic period, a significantly increased number of EMS patients compared to one during non-COVID-19 pandemic period for both traumatic and non-traumatic patients, as well as remarkably increased every EMS operation period of both groups during COVID-19 pandemic period were found in the present study. From this knowledge, provision of necessary EMS resources and preparation of emergency staff to be ready for management of future pandemics should be obtained to reduce EMS operation period in the future pandemics.

Perception and Satisfaction of Patients' Relatives Regarding Emergency Medical Service Response Times: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Purpose: Delays in emergency medical service (EMS) directly affect life-threatening emergencies. Delays also indirectly affect the perception and satisfaction of patients and their relatives, which are important qualitative EMS indicators. Patients and Methods: For this cross-sectional study, data was collected from May 1 to July 31, 2021, through questionnaires developed by the authors. The study sample consisted of relatives of EMS patients. The primary objective was the perceived EMS response time, which was compared to the actual EMS response time. The secondary objective was the relatives' perceptions and feelings regarding the waiting time. Results: During study period, the sample was 165 relatives of patients managed by EMS. The mean perceived EMS response time of 18.28 ± 8.10 min was significantly longer than the mean actual response time of 14.44 ± 4.86 min (p < 0.001). The positive correlation between the perceived and actual times was low but statistically significant (p < 0.001) with a correlation coefficient of 0.315 (95% CI 0.170-0.446). The overall satisfaction level was high (, standard deviation 0.63). The mean perceived EMS response time compares with the high-to-highest satisfaction levels of relatives was significantly lower than the mean perceived EMS response time compares with the lowest-to-middle satisfaction levels of relatives (17.83 ± 8.05 and 22.50 ± 7.47 min, respectively; p = 0.028). Conclusion: The perceived EMS response time was longer than the actual response time, with a low correlation. However, the relatives' overall satisfaction level was high.

Survival Rates and Factors Related to the Survival of Traffic Accident Patients Transported by Emergency Medical Services.

BACKGROUND: Traffic accident patients place a tremendous burden on health care services because they require substantial, rapid, and effective evaluation, management, and treatment by emergency medical services (EMS) to decrease morbidity and mortality rates. This study investigated the 1-month survival rate and factors related to the survival of traffic accident patients managed by EMS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data of traffic accident patients serviced by the Surgico Medical Ambulance and Rescue Team (SMART) at Vajira Hospital, Bangkok, from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2020. The data were collected from EMS patient care reports recorded using the emergency medical triage protocol as well as the criteria-based dispatch response codes in Thailand. Survival data at 1 month were obtained from electronic medical records. RESULTS: Of the 340 traffic accident patients who fulfilled the study criteria, 314 (92.35%) were alive at 1 month. A multivariable analysis using multiple logistic regression identified prehospital level of consciousness, airway management, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation as factors associated with survival. Unresponsive patients had a lower survival rate than responsive patients (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj] = 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.05-0.56, p = 0.004). Prehospital airway management and cardiopulmonary resuscitation reduced the survival rate by 0.30 and 0.10 times, respectively (ORadj = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.09-0.97, p = 0.045 and ORadj = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.02-0.47, p = 0.004, respectively). CONCLUSION: Traffic accident patients had a high survival rate at 1 month. We identified three factors regarding EMS treatment which were related to increased survival: a prehospital responsive level of consciousness, no prehospital airway management, and no prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Therefore, the development of standard guidelines for the management of traffic accident patients by EMS is crucial to increase the survival rate of traffic accident patients.