Alar Crease Creation Suture in Nasal Reconstruction.

SUMMARY: The crescentic alar groove serves as a topographic landmark that frames the ala and separates this convex structure from the surrounding cosmetic subunits. This aesthetic landmark can be attenuated or even obliterated during wound repair in this area. Flaps spanning the alar crease are often noticeably bulky with a pin-cushioned appearance in nasal reconstruction, and it is challenging to reproduce a natural-appearing alar groove. The authors proposed a novel technique with a modified, interrupted inverted horizontal mattress suture to create an alar groove. From March of 2016 to May of 2021, 22 consecutive patients with alar defects who underwent nasal reconstruction with the paramedian forehead flap were identified. All patients underwent the authors' novel technique for the creation of the alar groove. The mean follow-up time was 3 years 7 months (range, 14 months to 5 years). A total of 32 alar crease creation suture operations were performed. All uneven wounds healed uneventfully within 2 weeks. Two cases of postoperative fading alar grooves required alar crease creation sutures to be redone. The authors' novel alar crease creation suture is a safe, straightforward, and reliable technique to create an aesthetic alar groove in forehead flap nasal reconstruction. It can create a medially shallow and laterally deep alar crease without apparent complications. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Machine learning approach for predicting inhalation injury in patients with burns.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease pandemic has had a tangible impact on bronchoscopy for burn inpatients due to isolation and triage measures. We utilised the machine-learning approach to identify risk factors for predicting mild and severe inhalation injury and whether patients with burns experienced inhalation injury. We also examined the ability of two dichotomous models to predict clinical outcomes including mortality, pneumonia, and duration of hospitalisation. METHODS: A retrospective 14-year single-centre dataset of 341 intubated patients with burns with suspected inhalation injury was established. The medical data on day one of admission and bronchoscopy-diagnosed inhalation injury grade were compiled using a gradient boosting-based machine-learning algorithm to create two prediction models: model 1, mild vs. severe inhalation injury; and model 2, no inhalation injury vs. inhalation injury. RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) for model 1 was 0·883, indicating excellent discrimination. The AUC for model 2 was 0·862, indicating acceptable discrimination. In model 1, the incidence of pneumonia (P < 0·001) and mortality rate (P < 0·001), but not duration of hospitalisation (P = 0·1052), were significantly higher in patients with severe inhalation injury. In model 2, the incidence of pneumonia (P < 0·001), mortality (P < 0·001), and duration of hospitalisation (P = 0·021) were significantly higher in patients with inhalation injury. CONCLUSIONS: We developed the first machine-learning tool for differentiating between mild and severe inhalation injury, and the absence/presence of inhalation injury in patients with burns, which is helpful when bronchoscopy is not available immediately. The dichotomous classification predicted by both models was associated with the clinical outcomes.

Simultaneous free flap and forehead flap for nasal reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of total or near-total nasal defects is challenging and requires the re-creation of three nasal layers. Fasciocutaneous free flaps have been used effectively for restoring the vascularized nasal lining and staged forehead flap for nasal skin replacement, which is a long process. The aim of this study is to share our experience of combination of preliminary free tissue transfer with paramedian forehead flap reconstruction in the same stage of complex nasal reconstruction. METHODS: From December 2015 to July 2021, 10 patients underwent nasal reconstruction with free flaps including 4 medial sural artery perforator (MSAP) flaps, 5 anterolateral thigh (ALT) flaps and 1 radial forearm flap for lining and forehead flaps for skin coverage simultaneously for total or subtotal nasal defects. Nasal obstruction symptoms evaluation (NOSE) score was utilized to evaluate the functional outcome and the aesthetic results were evaluated with the last follow-up photos with score 1-5 by 5 plastic surgeon and 5 laypersons. RESULTS: The size of the free flaps ranged from 3 cm x 6 cm to 6 cm x 13 cm. After excluding one patient who expired before forehead flap division due to comorbidities, the average duration between combination surgery and the division of the forehead flap pedicle of the remaining patients was 5.7 months (range, 2-12). For patients without any postoperative events, the duration was 2.2 months (range, 2-3). One free flap had partial necrosis due to infection. The average follow-up duration was 29.6 months (range, 12-64). The NOSE score was 5.9 (range, 0-10) and the aesthetic score is 4.1 (range, 3-5) in average. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of preliminary free tissue transfer for nasal lining restoration with a paramedian forehead flap for nasal skin replacement in the same stage may shorten the long process and achieve satisfactory reconstruction in complex nasal reconstruction.

The Relationship Between Inter-canthal Distance and Implant Height in Asian Rhinoplasty.

Augmentation rhinoplasty is one of the top three anesthetic surgeries in Asia. I-shaped silicone-polytetrafluoroethylene composite implants are feasible for both primary and secondary augmentation rhinoplasty in Asians. This series was to analyze and evaluated the effect of the rhinoplasty to the intercanthal distance and to compare the height of the implantation with those differences in ICD before and after rhinoplasty. We retrospectively reviewed data from a single medical center via a single surgeon (Hsiao YC), at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, between 2011 and 2017 with follow-up through 2018. There were 223 patients who received augmentation rhinoplasty with an I-shaped composite silicone-polytetrafluoroethylene ePTFE-lined silicone dorsal composite implant (Implantech, Ventura, CA) with a glabellar component (chimeric technique) or without a glabellar component. There were 169 patients with the height of the I-shaped composite implant over 3 mm, and 15 patients were less than 3 mm. There was no distribution significance between two groups even in gender, age, type of surgery, or indication. The paired difference of ICD/IPD ratio was statistically significant in the group with the height of composite implant over 3 mm (1.04% ± 0.11, p < 0.005, 95%). The normalized ratio of the ICD to IPD is estimated to decrease by 1-2%. Appropriate candidates including those with a wide ICD should be informed about these data during preoperative decision-making.Level of Evidence V This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Onlay Fascial Grafts to Silicone-Polytetrafluorethylene Composite Implants in Augmentation Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Study of 241 Cases.

BACKGROUND: Silicone-polytetrafluoroethylene composite implants are fast gaining popularity in Asian rhinoplasty. Nonetheless, implant displacement, erythematous reactions, and infections still occur in the authors' patient group during long-term follow-up. OBJECTIVES: The authors reported successful experience of combining the utilization of silicone-polytetrafluoroethylene composite implants with onlay temporal fascial grafts to circumvent these complications. METHODS: Sixty-four patients of Asian ethnicity underwent augmentation rhinoplasty utilizing an I-shaped composite implant with an onlay fascial graft from January 2015 to June 2018, with a mean follow-up period of 13.5 months. This patient group was compared with a control group of 177 Asian patients who underwent augmentation rhinoplasty utilizing the same composite implant but without the addition of a fascial graft; the control group was treated from February 2012 to June 2015, with a mean follow-up of 42.0 months. Complications were compared between these 2 patient groups, specifically focusing on malposition/deviations, erythema, and infections. RESULTS: There was a marked decrease in complication rates with the addition of an onlay temporal fascial graft to cover the composite implant in augmentation rhinoplasty (7.8% vs 14.7%) as well as the rate of erythematous reactions (0% vs 6.2%, P = 0.04), infection (1.6% vs 1.1%), and implant malposition/deviation (0% vs 4.5%). Harvesting the temporal fascia and fashioning the onlay graft added an additional 33 minutes on average per procedure. No donor site morbidity was encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Although the operative time increased, the benefits of adding onlay fascial grafts to silicone-polytetrafluoroethylene implants in alloplastic augmentation rhinoplasty outweigh the drawbacks, as evidenced by the decrease in erythematous reactions.