Factors Associated With Consenting to Receive an Automated Email Summary After a Sexual Health Clinic Visit.

BACKGROUND: Electronic health records allow for inexpensive communication with patients. In March 2021, the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre implemented an automated email summary ("Sexual Health Automated Visit Email" [SHAVE]) of a client's visit. This study evaluates the proportion of attendees at a sexual health service who opted in or out of SHAVE. METHODS: This study was conducted at the Melbourne Sexual Health Centre in Australia between March 2021 and June 2022. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine the client characteristics associated with consenting to SHAVE. RESULTS: There were 18,528 clients (men, 12,700; women, 5828) included in the final analysis and 55.2% (n = 10,233) consented to receiving SHAVE. Comparing with those who did not have a new sexually transmitted infection diagnosis, clients with a new diagnosis of a sexually transmitted infection, but not HIV, had lower odds of consenting to receiving SHAVE (chlamydia: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.64 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.57-0.72]; gonorrhea: aOR, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.62-0.82]; syphilis: aOR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.59-0.96]). Men had lower odds of consenting when compared with women (men who have sex with women only: aOR, 0.77 [95% CI, 0.71-0.84]; men who have sex with men: aOR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.62-0.75]). Comparing with those born in Australia or Oceania, clients born in Europe had lower odds of consenting (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.70-0.94), whereas those born in Latin America or Caribbean had higher odds of consenting (aOR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.04-1.51). CONCLUSIONS: Email summaries may serve as a valuable strategy to improve health communication and record keeping for clients. Understanding the client characteristics associated with consenting SHAVE will allow for the implementation of strategies to better communicate with clients.

The Melbourne epidemic thunderstorm asthma event 2016: a 5-year longitudinal study.

Background: In 2016, Melbourne was struck by the world's largest and most devastating epidemic thunderstorm asthma (ETSA) episode. While affected individuals displayed worsened short-term asthma control, little is known about their longer-term natural history, nor about interventions that restore control. Objective: We assessed the asthma symptomatology and related behaviours of ETSA-affected individuals through a single-centre prospective 5-year longitudinal study. We embedded an open-label observational trial investigating the role of grass pollen sublingual tablet (Oralair) allergen immunotherapy in improving asthma and allergic rhinitis symptoms. Methods: Allergic rhinitis symptom severity, frequency of asthma symptoms and inhaled corticosteroid usage were assessed via questionnaire yearly. In 2018, a subgroup of participants was enrolled in an observational study of Oralair treatment compared to control. The active group received Oralair from 2019 to 2021; both groups were followed-up for 5 years. Subgroup analyses were performed for participants with complete datasets, and who completed the trial per-protocol. Results: Year-on-year data across 5 years was available for 30 participants. The rate of persistent asthma symptoms declined from 37% to 7% in 2016 to 2021. Only 10%-27% of participants reported being completely asymptomatic in any given year. The inhaled preventer prescription rate was 67%, with only 35% being adherent. Twenty-seven participants with available data completed the Oralair trial per-protocol. No significant difference was noted between control and active groups for allergic rhinitis symptoms or asthma control, although the Oralair group saw a significant improvement in asthma control comparing 2019 with 2021. Conclusion: This is the longest documented follow-up of ETSA-affected individuals. Five years following sentinel event, there was progressive reduction but some persistence in asthma symptoms. Oralair allergen immunotherapy did not further improve allergic rhinitis or asthma symptoms compared to control, but there were no further ETSA events to test a protective effect during the study period.