Efficacy and Safety of Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Treatment of High-Risk Pulmonary Embolism: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Objectives: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly used to treat high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE). However, its efficacy and safety remain uncertain. This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine whether ECMO could improve the clinical outcomes of patients with high-risk PE. Methods: Forty patients with high-risk PE, who were admitted to Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between January 2012 and December 2019, were included in this study. Demographic data and clinical outcomes were compared between patients treated without ECMO (non-ECMO group) and those treated with ECMO (ECMO group). Appropriate statistical tools were used to compare variables between groups and the survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 55%, in which 65% (26/40) of patients presented with cardiac arrest with a mortality rate of 77%, which was higher than that of patients without cardiac arrest (14%). There was no significant difference in major complications and in-hospital mortality between the non-ECMO and ECMO groups. However, in subgroup analysis, compared with patients treated without ECMO, earlier ECMO treatment was associated with a reduced risk of cardiac arrest (P = 0.023) and lower in-hospital mortality (P = 0.036). A log-rank test showed a significantly higher cumulative overall survival in the earlier ECMO treatment group (P = 0.033). Conclusions: In this retrospective cohort study, earlier ECMO treatment was associated with lower in-hospital mortality among unstable patients without cardiac arrest. Our findings suggest that ECMO can be considered as an initial treatment option for patients with high-risk PE in higher-volume hospitals.

Aortic Thrombus in a Nonaneurysmal Ascending Aorta.

BACKGROUND: Ascending aortic thrombus (AAT) in a nonaneurysmal aorta is an extremely rare event and has potentially catastrophic complications, with a life-threatening risk of myocardial infarction and cerebral embolization. This systematic review aims to elucidate the clinical manifestations and to compare the outcomes of anticoagulation therapy versus open aortic surgery for AAT. METHODS: The MEDLINE/PubMed databases were extensively searched between 1995 and 2019. All relevant publications on AAT in adults were reviewed, and individual patient data were pooled in this meta-analysis. The primary outcome was AAT resolution. The adverse outcome variables were recurrent arterial embolic events, complications related to open aortic surgery, and mortality during the study period. Chi-squared test and logistic regression analysis were used to compare groups and identify any predictors of mortality. RESULTS: Overall, 107 patients from 101 articles were included, of whom 29 patients who received anticoagulation therapy and 59 who underwent open aortic surgery were included in the outcome analysis. Among 29 patients treated with initial anticoagulation therapy, the persistence of AAT was observed in 11 patients (38%) and recurrent arterial embolization was developed in 6 patients (21%). All 11 patients in the anticoagulation group underwent secondary aortic surgery for the persistence of AAT with uneventful postoperative course. Compared with patients treated with primary aortic surgery, patients treated with initial anticoagulation therapy had higher risk of recurrent embolization (P = 0.002). No significant difference existed in the mortality rates between the groups (P = 0.106). Hemodynamic instability was an independent predictor of mortality (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation therapy and open aortic surgery for AAT show similar results; however, open aortic surgery reliably removes AAT and reduces the risk of recurrent embolization compared with anticoagulation therapy. Furthermore, the preoperative hemodynamic status significantly influences the clinical outcome and is a strong predictor of prognosis.

Clinical course and outcome of patients with acute pulmonary embolism rescued by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective review of 21 cases.

BACKGROUND: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly being utilized in patients with massive pulmonary embolism (PE). However, the efficacy and the safety remain uncertain. This study aimed to investigate clinical courses and outcomes in ECMO-treated patients with acute PE. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with acute PE rescued by ECMO from January 2012 to December 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Clinical features, laboratory biomarkers, and imaging findings of these patients were reviewed, and the relationship with immediate outcome and clinical course was investigated. RESULTS: Sixteen patients (76.2%) experienced refractory circulatory collapse requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or ECMO support within 2 h after the onset of cardiogenic shock, and none could receive definitive reperfusion therapy before ECMO initiation. Before or during ECMO support, more than 90% of patients had imaging signs of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. In normotension patients, the computed tomography (CT) value was a valuable predictor of rapid disease progression compared with cardiac troponin I level. Ultimately, in-hospital death occurred in ten patients (47.6%) and 90% of them died of prolonged CPR-related brain death. Cardiac arrest was a significant predictor of poor prognosis (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ECMO appears to be a safe and effective circulatory support in patients with massive PE. Close monitoring in intensive care unit is recommended in patients with RV dysfunction and aggressive use of ECMO may reduce the risk of sudden cardiac arrest and improve clinical outcome.