Evidence-based and Patient-centered Indication for Knee Arthroplasty - Update of the Guideline. / Evidenzbasierte und patientenorientierte Indikationsstellung zur Knieendoprothese ­ Update der Leitlinie.

Knee arthroplasty is one of the most frequently performed operations in Germany, with approximately 170000 procedures per year. It is therefore essential that physicians should adhere to an appropriate, and patient-centered indication process. The updated guideline indication criteria for knee arthroplasty (EKIT-Knee) contain recommendations, which are based on current evidence and agreed upon by a broad consensus panel. For practical use, the checklist has also been updated.For this guideline update, a systematic literature research was conducted in order to analyse (inter-)national guidelines and systematic reviews focusing on osteoarthritis of the knee and knee arthroplasty, to answer clinically relevant questions on diagnostic, predictors of outcome, risk factors and contraindications.Knee arthroplasty should solely be performed in patients with radiologically proven moderate or severe osteoarthritis of the knee (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3 or 4), after previous non-surgical treatment for at least three months, in patients with high subjective burden with regard to knee-related complaints and after exclusion of possible contraindications (infection, comorbidities, BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2). Modifiable risk factors (such as smoking, diabetes mellitus, anaemia) should be addressed and optimised in advance. After meeting current guideline indications, a shared decision-making process between patients and surgeons is recommended, in order to maintain high quality surgical management of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee.The update of the S2k-guideline was expanded to include unicondylar knee arthroplasty, the preoperative optimisation of modifiable risk factors was added and the main indication criteria were specified.

Reconstruction of Paprosky IIIB acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments using the footing technique.

Aims: The use of a porous metal shell supported by two augments with the 'footing' technique is one solution to manage Paprosky IIIB acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to assess the medium-term implant survival and radiological and clinical outcomes of this technique. Methods: We undertook a retrospective, two-centre series of 39 hips in 39 patients (15 male, 24 female) treated with the 'footing' technique for Paprosky IIIB acetabular defects between 2007 and 2020. The median age at the time of surgery was 64.4 years (interquartile range (IQR) 54.4 to 71.0). The median follow-up was 3.9 years (IQR 3.1 to 7.0). Results: The cumulative medium-term survival of the acetabular construct was 89%. Two hips (5.1%) required further revision due to shell loosening, one hip (2.6%) due to shell dislocation, and one hip (2.6%) due to infection. The median Harris Hip Score improved significantly from 47 points (IQR 41.5 to 54.9) preoperatively to 80 points (IQR 73.5 to 88.6) at the latest follow-up (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The reconstruction of Paprosky IIIB acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and two augments using the 'footing' technique showed excellent medium-term results. It is a viable option for treating these challenging defects.

Bilateral simultaneous knee arthroplasty shows comparable early outcome and complication rate as staged bilateral knee arthroplasty for patients scored ASA 1-3 if performed by a high-volume surgeon: a retrospective cohort study of 127 cases.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The study compares early outcomes after simultaneous and staged knee arthroplasty in patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis (OA) to evaluate whether simultaneous bilateral TKA shows comparable early outcomes and complication rates to staged bilateral TKA. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including all patients scheduled for primary TKA for bilateral knee OA (n = 127) was conducted. Patients received either simultaneous (n = 53, 41.7%) or staged (n = 74, 58.3%) bilateral TKA by a single, high-volume surgeon-depending on their individual preference. Demographic data, haemoglobin drop (Hb), length of stay (LOS), operation time, 30-day complication rate and achievement of rehabilitation key points were evaluated. RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups concerning age, sex, BMI or complication rate. ASA scoring was better in the simultaneous group [2.2, (15.1% ASA 1, 49.1% ASA 2, 35.8% ASA 3) vs. 2.4 (2.7% ASA 1, 51.4% ASA 2, 45.9% ASA 3)]. Average LOS was 7.8 ± 2.1 days for simultaneous TKA, 7.4 ± 1.7 days for single procedure of staged group (p < 0.453) and 14.7 ± 3.1 days if combined (p < 0.001). Cumulative Hb loss was significantly higher in the staged group (3.8 ± 1.2 g/dl vs. 2.4 ± 0.8 g/dl, p < 0.001). Detailed comparison of early outcome parameters between staged and simultaneous procedure depending on ASA score only revealed slightly slower assessment of stairs (p < 0.001) and increased Hb drop per surgery in case of simultaneous procedure (p < 0.011) if ASA score was ≥ 2. Only patients scored ASA 3 demonstrated a significant longer LOS per procedure in simultaneous group (8.5 ± 2.4 vs.7.3 ± 1.6 days, p = 0.034). INTERPRETATION: Simultaneous bilateral TKA results in comparable early outcome and complication rate than staged bilateral procedure-even for patients scored ASA 3. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Intraoperative Periprostehtic Femur Fracture - When is the Cerclage Enough? / Intraoperative periprothetische Femurfrakturen ­ wann reicht die Cerclage?

BACKGROUND AND PLANNING: Intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures are among the most serious complications in both primary and revision arthroplasty. They are often not detected, despite intraoperative radiological control. Since an unnoticed intraoperative fracture often requires revision surgery, which has been associated with increased mortality rates, intraoperative diagnosis and corresponding direct and sufficient treatment are crucial. There are patient-, surgery-, and implant-specific risk factors that increase the possibilities of intraoperative fractures. The most common risk factors on the patient side are age, gender, and various pre-existing conditions, such as osteoporosis or rheumatic diseases. A minimally invasive approach and a cementless press-fit fixation are the most significant surgery- and implant-specific risk factors. The Vancouver classification or the modified Mallory classification are available for the classification of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures. Based on these classifications, treatment recommendations can be derived. Different strategies are available for fracture management. THERAPY: Generally, if the stem is stable, osteosynthesis can be performed with preservation of the implant. This procedure can be applied to the majority of cases with non-displaced fractures by using cerclages as fixation. An unstable implant may require replacement of the stem. In higher grade fractures, stabilisation by using plate osteosynthesis may be necessary. The aim is to achieve the most anatomical reposition possible for the best possible bony consolidation. The ultimate goal is high implant stability and restoration of the biomechanics.

Bilateral simultaneous hip arthroplasty shows comparable early outcome and complication rate as staged bilateral hip arthroplasty for patients scored ASA 1-3 if performed by a high-volume surgeon.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare early outcomes after simultaneous and staged hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with bilateral symptomatic pathology. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all patients scheduled for primary THA for bilateral hip osteoarthritis (OA, n = 290). Patients either received simultaneous (n = 152, 52.4%) or staged (n = 138, 47.6%) bilateral THA based on individual preference. All operations (n = 428) were performed by one single, high-volume surgeon. Demographic data (e.g., age, ASA score) as well as perioperative parameters (haemoglobin drop (Hb), red blood cell transfusion, length of stay (LOS), operation time, six week complication rate and achievement of inpatient rehabilitation key points) were evaluated. RESULTS: Patients in the simultaneous bilateral THA group were younger (62.8 ± 8.9 vs. 65 ± 9.7 years, p = 0.022) and had lower ASA scores (1.8, (34.2% ASA 1, 55.3% ASA 2, 37.2% ASA 3) vs. 2.0 (18.8% ASA 1, 61.6% ASA 2, 19.6% ASA 3)) than the staged group. While the average LOS was 7.1 ± 1.7 days for simultaneous bilateral THA, the combined LOS for the staged group was 12.9 ± 2.4 days (p < 0.001). The cumulative operation time in the simultaneous bilateral THA group was 61.1 ± 11.5 min and 57.6 ± 7.3 min in the staged group (p < 0.015). Cumulative Hb loss was significantly higher in the staged group (2.1 ± 7.2 g/dl vs. 3.7 ± 1.3 g/dl, p < 0.001). No significant differences were found concerning the complication rate or early inpatient rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous bilateral hip arthroplasty in patients with symptomatic bilateral hip osteoarthritis is as safe and successful as a staged procedure if performed by a high-volume surgeon.

Intraoperative Fractures of the Tibia and Femur in Knee Revision Surgery. / Intraoperative Frakturen von Tibia und Femur in der Revisionssituation.

Intra-operative fractures in knee revision surgery are relatively rare and have not been well studied. They may occur during joint exposition, removal of the prosthesis or cement, or implantation of trial or original components. The fractures affect both the metaphyseal area and diaphysis of the tibia and femur. Tibial fractures are slightly more common than femur fractures. On the femur, the medial condyle is most frequently affected, followed by the femur diaphysis. The use of non-cemented stems is associated with a greater risk of intra-operative diaphyseal fractures than that of cemented stems. Overall, women and patients with an osteopenic bone structure have a higher risk of fractures. It is common that fractures are diagnosed post-operatively. In these cases, conservative therapy may be successful, depending on the stability of the prosthesis and bones. The most common surgical fixation options are cerclages and screws, followed by stem extensions for bridging the fracture. Plate fixation or use of strut grafts are also sensible therapy options. Overall, intraoperative fractures have a high healing potential with stable and good joint function. The revision rate is still 15%, which is most often caused by peri-prosthetic infection.

Evaluation of the patient-accompanying app "alley ortho companion" for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee and hip: study protocol for a randomized controlled multi-center trial.

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common disabilities in the elderly. When conservative management fails, total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is the treatment of choice for end-stage OA. Since quality and durability of implants has steadily improved, pre -and postsurgical processes moved into the focus of research. Hence, eHealth approaches offer an opportunity to provide a more available continuity of care. Regarding individualized pre-, peri-, and postsurgical stages, eHealth is expected to improve patient engagement, self-care, and outcomes across the surgical pathway. Aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the eHealth application "alley" as an adjuvant intervention to TJA. The app provides comprehensive information to empower patient with hip or knee OA to prepare and accompany them for their TJA surgery. Our primary hypothesis is that the pre- and postoperative adjuvant use of the eHealth application "alley" (intervention group, IG) leads to improved functional outcome. METHODS: Prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-center trial including n = 200 patients diagnosed with hip and n = 200 patients with knee OA (n = 200) scheduled for TJA. Patients of both groups will be randomly assigned to one of two study arms. Patients in the intervention group will receive access to the functions of the "alley" app. The app presents informative (e.g., information about osteoarthritis), organizational (e.g., information about medical rehabilitation), and emotional/empowerment (e.g., information about the relationship between mood and pain) content. Patients evaluate their condition and functional level by means of standardized digitally questionnaires. Patients in the control group will not receive any functions of the app. Assessments will be performed at baseline before, 10 days after, 1 months after, 3 months after, 6 months after, and 12 months after TJA. Primary outcome is change from baseline measured by the Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score or Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score 3 months after TJA. The statistical analysis (t-test for independent variables with effect size Cohen's d) is performed separately for patients with TKA and THA. DISCUSSION: Overall, the study aims to improve the understanding of the benefits of eHealth applications in the treatment of elderly patients with knee or hip arthroplasty. The approach is novel since a health care companion is combined with a digital information platform enabling direct and continuous feedback from the patients to the therapeutic treatment team. As the study investigate the effectiveness under everyday conditions, it is not feasible to control whether the patients in the IG read the educational information of the app respectively the control group consume additional information from other sources. However, this increases the external validity of the study if significant effects for the app can be demonstrated. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00025608. Registered on 21 June 2021.

Failure Analysis in Multiple TKA Revisions-Periprosthetic Infections Remain Surgeons' Nemesis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to categorize reasons for failure and to analyze the survivorship of multiple total knee arthroplasty (TKA) revisions. METHODS: The study retrospectively evaluated all multiple TKA revisions performed between 2005 and 2015 at the authors' institutions. Sixty-three patients (35 female, 28 male, age 64 ± 10 years, follow-up 55 ± 36 months) underwent a total of 157 re-revision TKA surgeries (range 2-5). The revision indications were divided up into main diagnoses. Survivorship was evaluated by mixed model analysis. RESULTS: The main overall reason for re-revision was periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (48%), followed by instability (12%), polyethylene wear (11%), malpositioning (8%), and aseptic loosening (8%). Survivorship shortened with an increasing number of revision surgeries (p = 0.003). While PJI was in 38% of all cases, the reason for the first revision, incidence increased constantly with the number of revisions (48% at second revision, 55% at third revision, 86% at fourth revision, and 100% at fifth revision, p = 0.022). If periprosthetic infection caused the first revision, patients showed an average of two more septic revisions at follow-up than patients with an aseptic first revision indication (p < 0.001). In 36% of cases, the reason for follow-up surgery in case of periprosthetic infection was again PJI. CONCLUSION: The probability of survival of the implanted knee arthroplasty is significantly reduced with each subsequent revision. Periprosthetic infection is the main cause of multiple revisions.

Osteolysis following PE Wear of a Hastings Head on a Monoblock Hip Stem.

We report a case of extended osteolysis, requiring a third revision of the left hip in an 85-year-old man 46 years after index operation. Major polyethylene (PE) wear occurred due to a missmatched combination of a bipolar Hastings head with a PE liner and head damage of the originally maintained stem. This case demonstrates that bipolar heads should not be used with PE cup liners since the respective bearing diameters cannot be guaranteed to match due to missing specifications. Furthermore, putting a Hastings head on an already damaged head of the stem should be omitted and rather the stem should initially be revised.

The Safety of Bilateral Simultaneous Hip and Knee Arthroplasty versus Staged Arthroplasty in a High-Volume Center Comparing Blood Loss, Peri- and Postoperative Complications, and Early Functional Outcome.

PURPOSE: In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the use of simultaneous hip and knee arthroplasty compared to staged procedures in patients with bilateral pathology. The aim of this study was to compare simultaneous and staged hip and knee arthroplasty in patients with bilateral pathology by assessing the transfusion rate, postoperative hemoglobin drop, length of stay (LOS), in-hospital complications, 30-day readmissions and early functional outcome. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study that included all patients who were undergoing primary TKA, THA and UKA by a single surgeon in a high-volume arthroplasty center between 2015 and 2020 as simultaneous or staged procedures. Staged bilateral arthroplasties were performed within 12 months and were stratified by the time between procedures. Data were acquired through the electronic files at the Orthopädische Chirurgie München (OCM). For functional outcome, the ability of the patients to walk independently on the ward was compared with the ability to walk a set of stairs alone, which was recorded daily by the attending physiotherapist. RESULTS: In total n = 305 patients were assessed for eligibility and included in this study. One hundred and forty-five patients were allocated to the staged arthroplasty group. This group was subdivided into a hip and a knee group, whereas the knee group was split into TKA and UKA. The second staged procedure was performed within 12 months of the first procedure. One hundred and sixty patients were allocated to the simultaneous arthroplasty group. This group was also subdivided into a hip and knee group, whereas the knee group was split again into a TKA and UKA group. No statistical difference was found between the two groups regarding demographic data. Primary outcome measurements: There was no significant difference in the transfusion rate or complication rate. Secondarily, no statistically significant difference was found between the postoperative hemoglobin drop and the functional outcome, or in the length of stay (LOS) between both groups. Walking the stairs showed a significant difference in the knee group. CONCLUSIONS: There were no significant differences observed in the transfusion rate in-hospital complications, or readmission rate between both groups. The early functional outcome showed no significant difference in mobility for all groups. Simultaneous arthroplasty for knee or hip is as safe as a staged procedure, with no higher risk for the patient, in a specialized high-volume center. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Unicondylar Tibiofemoral Arthroplasty - Opinions of the Members of the German Knee Society (DKG) and the German Professional Association of Orthopaedic and Trauma Specialists (BVOU). / Unikondyläre tibiofemorale Endoprothetik ­ Meinungsbild in der Deutschen Kniegesellschaft (DKG) und dem Bundesverband der Orthopäden und Unfallchirurgen (BVOU).

BACKGROUND: The number of implanted unicondylar tibiofemoral knee arthroplasties (UKA) is despite the potential advantages in comparison to total knee arthroplasties (TKA) in Germany relatively low. Goal of this survey, initiated by the Small Implants Group of the German Knee Society, was to gather opinions and put them into context of the current literature. METHODS: Based on the Delphi method and the AWMF rules and standards, 19 statements were developed, which were presented to the members of the DKG and BVOU in an anonymous online survey using "SurveyMonkey". Overall, 410 colleagues participated. RESULTS: The biggest detected controversies were the determination of indications with respect to the body mass index and the existence of a patellofemoral arthrosis. A general consent was determined that a contralateral tibiofemoral arthrosis grade III - IV and meniscal deficiency in the contralateral compartment are an absolute contraindication. There was a consent that age is not a limitation for the implantation of an UKA. If a personal minimum volume of 15 implantations/year should be implemented was seen controversial. CONCLUSION: The personal opinion, eventually built by personal experiences, appears to be in conflict with the knowledge of scientific literature in many instances. Intensive training and education appears necessary.

Hip Arthroplasty with Increased Expectancy. / Hüftendoprothetik bei gesteigerter Erwartungshaltung.

The patient's demands and expectations after total hip arthroplasty have increased significantly. In particular, the athletic function is the focus of the patient's interest, whereby not the basic sports ability is inquired, but also the achievable sports level. The benefits of increased activity with a reduction in cardiovascular mortality and the minimization of osteoporosis risk are contrasted by amplified wear followed by prosthesis loosening. Activities are categorized in low-, intermediate- and high-impact kind of sport. Patient-based influencing factors such as physical condition and expertise in his sport, as well as the self-reference of the surgeon to the desired sport influence the recommendation and advice of the patient. Innovations in prosthesis design and materials technology allow meeting patient's expectations and aiming to improve the return to sport. After total hip arthroplasty, the majority of preoperatively active patients return to athletic activity, although there is a tendency to shift from "high-impact" to "low-impact" sports. The currently recommended sports include swimming, cycling, Nordic walking, sailing, golf, hiking, dancing and cross-country skiing. A limited recommendation exists for tennis (single), alpine skiing, mountain hiking and sportive running. Not recommended are marathon, football, handball, volleyball, basketball, martial arts, high jump, water skiing and rock climbing. The recommendations are based primarily on expert opinions and are in a progressive extension including "high-impact" sports.

Taper corrosion: a complication of total hip arthroplasty.

The focus on taper corrosion in modular hip arthroplasty increased around 2007 as a result of clinical problems with large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings on standard stems. Corrosion problems with bi-modular primary hip stems focused attention on this issue even more.Factors increasing the risk of taper corrosion were identified in laboratory and retrieval studies: stiffness of the stem neck, taper diameter and design, head diameter, offset, assembly force, head and stem material and loading.The high variability of the occurrence of corrosion in the clinical application highlights its multi-factorial nature, identifying the implantation procedure and patient-related factors as important additional factors for taper corrosion.Discontinuing the use of MoM has reduced the revisions due to metal-related pathologies dramatically from 49.7% (MoM > 32 mm), over 9.2% (MoM ⩽ 32 mm) to 0.8% (excluding all MoM).Further reduction can be achieved by omitting less stiff Ti-alloys and large metal heads (36 mm and above) against polyethylene (PE).Standardized taper assembly of smaller and ceramic heads will reduce the clinical occurrence of taper corrosion even further. If 36 mm heads are clinically indicated, only ceramic heads should be used.Taper-related problems will not comprise a major clinical problem anymore if the mentioned factors are respected. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2020;5:776-784. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.200013.

Discrepancy of Trial Rasp and Femoral Stem Relative Position Within the Femoral Canal of a Coated Tapered System: An Intraoperative, Intrapatient Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: For a successful total hip arthroplasty, the final position of the trial rasp should be adopted by the femoral stem to achieve correct positioning. This study aimed to characterize the discrepancy of the stem and rasp position in vivo of a widely used dual-tapered straight stem with rectangular cross section that is known to have an oversized stem with respect to the rasp. METHODS: The distances between the tip of the greater trochanter and the shoulder of the implant and rasp were measured on 39 intraoperatively acquired fluoroscopic image pairs. Leg-length discrepancy was also measured clinically before and after surgery. RESULTS: A paired t-test showed a significant average protrusion of the femoral stem with respect to the final rasp position of 2.63 mm (standard deviation = 2.3 mm, P < .001), while 88% of the cases had no leg-length discrepancy after surgery. The quantified stem protrusion was statistically significant but did not reach clinical relevance and was easily mitigated in our study. CONCLUSIONS: The quantified stem protrusion appears to be clinically manageable, as only 2 cases required attenuation of stem positioning: in one case by the use of a femoral head with a shorter neck and in the other case by rerasping the femoral bed. Neither case was associated with the most extreme differences in position of the stem with respect to the final rasp. In addition, the used stem shows good overall outcomes in other studies. It appears that factors other than stem and rasp position play a critical role to the surgeon and for total hip arthroplasty success.

Is changing the postoperative pain management in total knee arthroplasty from femoral nerve block to local infiltration analgesia successful? Retrospective trial with the first and last 100 patients.

PURPOSE: In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in local infiltration analgesia (LIA) as a technique to control postoperative pain. We compared this technique to the gold standard the 3 in 1 femoral nerve block (FNB) in postoperative pain management after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in a large patient population. This trial analyzes in the early postoperative phase the pain, range of motion, and consumption of pain medications after TKA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective trial that included all patients who were undergoing primary TKA by one single surgeon in a high-volume arthroplasty center in 2015. Patients who have secondary osteoarthritis due to rheumatoid arthritis or previous knee arthrotomy, as well as revision cases, were excluded. The included patients were divided into 2 groups according to the applied pain management (group 1 FNB, group 2 LIA). Concerning the LIA group, a modified form of composition compared to the first describer without the use of adrenaline was carried out. Post-operative additional pain medications were given on a fixed scheme to the patient. The primary outcome was pain at rest over 7 days after surgery labeled by the numeric pain rating scale (NRS). The secondary outcome measures were the total amount of opioid consumption over the hospital stay and the additional need for non-opioid medication. The conversion of the opiate medications on the morphine preparation was carried out according to the conversion data from the literature. For functional recovery, we compared the range of motion in both groups, which was recorded from the second postoperative day by the attending physiotherapist. RESULTS: In total, 202 patients were assessed for eligibility and included in this clinical trial. Hundred patients were allocated to the continuous FNB group (group 1) and 102 patients to the LIA group (group 2). No statistical difference was found between the two groups regarding demographic data. Primary outcome measurements: The LIA group had a significantly lower NRS score than the continuous FNB group for the measurement in the morning on days 1, 2, and 3 after surgery (day 1, 1.5; day 2, 1.6; day 3, 1.3; p < 0.05). Secondary outcome measurements: The total volume of morphine consumption for the first six postoperative days was significantly lower in the LIA group than the FNB group (FNB 159.8 vs. LIA 96.07). There is also a significant difference between the total morphine consumption of both groups in the direct postoperative course with respect to time and group (two way ANOVA, p < 0.05) On the day of the operation and on the first postoperative day, the intake of additional non-opioids in the LIA group was also significantly reduced compared to the FNB group. No significant difference was observed on the second to sixth postoperative day concerning an additional consumption of non-opioid medications. In terms of range of motion, the LIA group showed a higher active range of motion at the operated extremity than the FNB group during the hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The local intraarticular infiltration therapy (LIA) is a sufficient alternative to regional anesthesia avoiding the known risks of regional procedures. The results of this study reflect the efficiency of this pain management with a lower consumption of analgesics, identical to reduced postoperative pain ratings and an improved ROM in the first postoperative days. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective trial.

Gross Stem Taper Failure with Head Dissociation in a Very Active Patient with an Uncemented Femoral Stem.

CASE: We report a case of gross taper failure (GTF) in a very active 81-year-old man 14 years after index operation. The patient presented with acute hip pain and shortening of the left leg. X-rays showed the dissociation of the head. The stem had to be revised because of the massive stem taper damage. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates that GTF at the head-stem taper junction following mechanically assisted crevice corrosion is not limited to a specific taper design and material. Other risk factors such as high activity level can lead to this failure pattern also in established stem and taper designs.

Total Hip Arthroplasty for High Hip Dislocation. / Hüftendoprothetik bei hoher Hüftluxation.

INTRODUCTION: Total hip arthroplasty in patients with high hip dislocation is a surgically demanding procedure. This is due to the congenital disorder of hip maturation and the resulting anatomical features. The aim of the arthroplasty is implantation of the cup prosthesis in the original centre of rotation, at the same time correcting femoral deformities and reducing the hip joint. INDICATIONS: The indications include advanced osteoarthritis in the secondary acetabulum, existing instability, severe contractures and secondary changes in adjacent joints. CONTRAINDICATIONS: The contraindications include cerebrospinal dysfunction with impaired coordination, muscular dystrophies, overt metabolic bone disorders and complete or nearly complete absence of muscles that stabilise the hip/hip-stabilising musculature. OPERATION TECHNIQUE: The operation is preferably performed through an anterolateral approach with the patient supine or through a posterolateral approach with the patient on his side. Sparing the pelvitrochanteric muscles is crucial for the functional outcome. Exposure of the original acetabulum is essential for correct and secure placement of the cup component. We perform planned shortening femoral osteotomy above an increase in length of more than 3.0 cm in patients without previous surgery and depending on the operative findings in previously operated patients. As a rule of thumb, the bone fragment to be removed should be approximately 60% of the distance between the planned and the preoperative position of the trochanter tip. Additional fixation is necessary only in the absence of primary stability between the parts of the femur divided by the osteotomy. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: In these patients, the postoperative management is determined individually depending on the stability of the prosthetic cup fixation, bone quality, rotational stability of the stem in both segments of the femur after the osteotomy, existing soft tissue contractures and the resulting postoperative leg length difference. COMPLICATIONS: The most frequent complications are nerve injuries, femoral fractures, malpositioning of the components, absence of integration of the components (usually due to inadequate primary stability), joint instability due to damage to the pelvitrochanteric muscles and therefore an increased risk of dislocation, pseudarthrosis of the femoral osteotomy and increased perioperative blood loss due to the prolonged operation time. RESULTS: The currently published results show that subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy in patients with high hip dislocation with anatomic reconstruction of the original centre of rotation delivers good functional results with insignificantly increased 10-year loosening rates compared with standard management of primary hip osteoarthritis.

Modern Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA): With Or Without a Tourniquet?

BACKGROUND: Since arthritis of the knee is one of the most common pathologies in industrialized nations, there has been a growing interest in fast-track total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, while one of the main concerns is the role of a tourniquet, the available data are inconclusive. AIM: This study sought to assess the link between postoperative outcomes and use of a tourniquet in TKA. Our goal was to determine whether it is justified to forego tourniquet use as indicated by the fast-track concept. METHODS: The participants (n = 108) in this retrospective, non-randomized study were assigned into two groups after they satisfied the inclusion criteria: primary gonarthrosis or secondary gonarthrosis without previous arthrotomy. TKA was performed without (Group I, n = 55) or with (Group II, n = 53) a tourniquet. The postoperative outcome was evaluated in terms of postoperative pain, based on a numeric rating scale (NRS) and the need for pain medication, and postoperative function, based on range of motion (ROM) and walking tests. RESULTS: Overall, no significant correlations were observed between tourniquet use and postoperative pain according to the NRS. Group I required less oxycodone, but more non-opioids. There was no significant difference in the improvement in pre- to postoperative ROM with regard to tourniquet use. The final walking distance was significantly longer in Group I. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that there is no strongly significant link between the postoperative outcome and the use of a tourniquet. However, further studies will be needed to determine whether a tourniquet may have some other impact on TKA.

Experiences with using e-learning tools in orthopedics in an uncontrolled field study application.

BACKGROUND: E-learning is widely used in undergraduate medical education and often in blended learning settings for students learning at home. This study should assess the educative value of e-learning tools in orthopedics and traumatology when used under "field" conditions, in comparison with a controlled laboratory-like setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical students were invited for their voluntary online participation in an uncontrolled study (UCS). They were randomly exposed to digital book chapters or podcasts on four different orthopedic diseases, and then filled in pre-/post-tests and evaluations. Test results indicating insufficient study participation were not included in the subsequent analysis. Results in a gain of knowledge and student's satisfaction were compared to existing data of a randomized controlled trial with the same tools in a laboratory environment (RCT). RESULTS: Among 84 included UCS students and 130 RCT students, podcast learners showed a significantly higher gain of knowledge compared to text learners independent of the learning setting (UCS p<0.011; RCT p<0.001). There were no significant differences in the gain of knowledge for the two different learning tools when comparing each the UCS and RCT settings. Evaluations showed positive ratings for both tools, while podcasts were on the average rated higher than texts were. Significantly more UCS participants (n=46) compared to the RCT (n=34) showed signs of disengagement with the study (p<0.05). DISCUSSION: The findings suggest that it is possible to achieve a similar gain of knowledge with e-learning tools in uncontrolled settings and in RCTs. The role of e-learning materials in voluntary and formative learning settings is of value and should be explored in future studies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, case-control study.