Perceptions and understanding about mesh and hernia surgery: What do patients really think?

BACKGROUND: Surgical mesh and hernia repair have come under increasing scrutiny with large amounts of press, Internet, and social media reportage regarding ongoing mesh litigation, recalls, and patient testimonials. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient perceptions of mesh in hernia surgery. METHODS: A 16-question survey was given to patients presenting for hernia surgery at a tertiary hernia center by trained data analysts before surgeon interaction. RESULTS: Two hundred and two patients were surveyed. Patients believed mesh caused complications (45.1%) and reported concerns about mesh (38.2%). Those who performed their own research, females, and patients with recurrent hernias were more likely to have concerns about mesh (P ≤ 0.03). Most patients (81.7%) thought they were at average risk or less for complications; patients with recurrent hernias (versus primary hernias) and incisional hernias (compared with inguinal or umbilical hernias) had more negative outlooks on complications (all P < .05). Recovery expectations varied, but the failed repair and incisional hernia groups were more likely to expect prolonged recovery (>3 months) (all P < .05). After surgeon-directed education and a mesh education handout, all but one patient agreed to and underwent a mesh repair as indicated. CONCLUSION: Patients had concerns about mesh and were aware of mesh related complications. Patients performing their own research, as well as females and recurrent hernia patients, had worse perceptions of mesh. Recurrent and incisional hernia patients had greater concerns about complications, recurrence, and recovery. Preoperative education concerning mesh and mesh choice for each operation eased patient anxiety.

Preoperative patient opioid education, standardization of prescriptions, and their impact on overall patient satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic has reached a crisis level in America, and many institutions are implementing new guidelines to decrease opioid prescriptions. Although these may positively impact opioid addiction, its influence on patient satisfaction is inadequately described. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of standardized patient education and postoperative opioid regimens on patient satisfaction. METHODS: General surgery patients were counselled and given educational materials preoperatively regarding postoperative pain management. Inpatient discharge prescriptions were based on milligrams of oral narcotic required 24 hours before discharge. Outpatient procedure prescriptions were standardized. Postoperatively, patients received surveys regarding pain control and satisfaction. RESULTS: Of the 198 patients studied, 96% agreed or strongly agreed that they were satisfied with their pain control. 92% agreed or strongly agreed they received enough medication; 7% disagreed, and 1% strongly disagreed. Educational materials were evaluated with 97% agreeing or strongly agreeing they received appropriate information concerning when and what to take. Fifty-five patients (28%) refused opioids or did not take any. Only 10 (5%) requested a refill. CONCLUSION: Preoperative education and standardized postoperative narcotic prescribing can be highly effective while maintaining high patient satisfaction. Introduction across broad fields of surgery will allow uniformity for surgeons, trainees, nurses, pharmacists, and patients.