Cardiovascular Factors Associated with Septic Shock Mortality Risks.

CONTEXT: The presence of at least one underlying chronic health condition, such as long-term care facility residence, malnutrition, immunosuppression, or prosthetic device use, are well known factors increasing infection risks and progression to severe sepsis. Furthermore, some degree of cardiovascular dysfunction occurs in the majority of septic patients and this prognostic significance has become increasingly recognized. Since septic shock carries the highest mortality risk on the sepsis spectrum, it is important to evaluate the cardiovascular risk impact on mortality in this subset of patients. METHODS: The retrospective parent study contributing these electronic health record data was IRB approved and conducted across four hospital intensive care units within the authors' Michigan healthcare system. Patients with cardiopulmonary arrest or transfers from an outside facility were excluded. The authors evaluated the presence of modifiable and non-modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in septic shock patients upon admission to an emergency department. RESULTS: The authors' final analytic sample included n = 109 adults who were discharged alive compared to those who died during hospitalization. Those patients who died were more often male with an underlying history of hypertension, congestive heart failure, coronary artery disease, or peripheral arterial diseases, were taking pre-admission beta-blocker medications, and had higher APACHE II scores at admission compared to the patients who survived to discharge. Significantly higher mortality risks were found in sample patients with increased troponin levels on admission and atrial fibrillation. CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate triage and prompt treatment of these patient groups with tailored therapy to stabilize and improve cardiac dysfunction in the emergency department could potentially lead to improved survival outcomes. Clinicians need more studies to determine therapeutic targets most impacting underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms such as elevated troponin and atrial fibrillation that greatly increase mortality risks.

Building and Validating a Computerized Algorithm for Surveillance of Ventilator-Associated Events.

OBJECTIVE: To develop an automated method for ventilator-associated condition (VAC) surveillance and to compare its accuracy and efficiency with manual VAC surveillance SETTING: The intensive care units (ICUs) of 4 hospitals METHODS: This study was conducted at Detroit Medical Center, a tertiary care center in metropolitan Detroit. A total of 128 ICU beds in 4 acute care hospitals were included during the study period from August to October 2013. The automated VAC algorithm was implemented and utilized for 1 month by all study hospitals. Simultaneous manual VAC surveillance was conducted by 2 infection preventionists and 1 infection control fellow who were blinded to each another's findings and to the automated VAC algorithm results. The VACs identified by the 2 surveillance processes were compared. RESULTS: During the study period, 110 patients from all the included hospitals were mechanically ventilated and were evaluated for VAC for a total of 992 mechanical ventilation days. The automated VAC algorithm identified 39 VACs with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100%. In comparison, the combined efforts of the IPs and the infection control fellow detected 58.9% of VACs, with 59% sensitivity, 99% specificity, 91% PPV, and 92% NPV. Moreover, the automated VAC algorithm was extremely efficient, requiring only 1 minute to detect VACs over a 1-month period, compared to 60.7 minutes using manual surveillance. CONCLUSIONS: The automated VAC algorithm is efficient and accurate and is ready to be used routinely for VAC surveillance. Furthermore, its implementation can optimize the sensitivity and specificity of VAC identification.

The diagnostic importance of a reduced FEV1/FEV6.

BACKGROUND: On spirometry the FEV(1)/FEV(6) ratio has been advocated as a surrogate for the FEV(1)/FVC. The significance of isolated reductions in either the FEV(1)/FEV(6) or FEV(1)/FVC is not known. METHODS: First-time adult spirograms (n = 22,837), with concomitant lung volumes (n = 12,040), diffusion (n = 14,154), and inspiratory capacity (n = 12,480) were studied. Four groups were compared. 1) Only FEV(1)/FEV(6) reduced (n = 302). 2) Only FEV(1)/FVC reduced (n = 1158). 3) Both ratios reduced (n = 6593). 4) Both ratios normal (n = 14,784). RESULTS: In patients with obstructed spirometry (either a reduced FEV(1)/FVC and/or FEV(1)/FEV(6)), 3.8% only had a reduced FEV(1)/FEV(6), while 14.4% only had a reduced FEV(1)/FVC. The mean FEV(1) was lower when both ratios were reduced. The group with only a reduced FEV(1)/FEV(6), compared to only the FEV(1)/FVC reduced, had a lower FEV(1), FVC, BMI, Expiratory Time, and IC (p values < 0.0001). DL(CO) was also lower (p = 0.005), and the FEV(1)/FVC and RV/TLC were higher (p values < 0.0001). When the patients with only a reduced FEV(1)/FEV(6) had a subsequent spirogram, 60% had a reduced FEV(1)/FVC when their mean expiratory times were 3.5 seconds longer. Ninety percent of this group had strong clinical evidence of airways obstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The FEV(1)/FEV(6) is not as sensitive as the FEV(1)/FVC for diagnosing airways obstruction, but in the presence of a normal FEV(1)/FVC, subjects have greater physiologic abnormalities than when only the FEV(1)/FVC is reduced. The FEV(1)/FEV(6) ratio should not replace the FEV(1)/FVC as the standard for airways obstruction, but there is benefit including this measurement to identify individuals with greater air trapping and diffusion abnormalities.