Probabilistic risk assessment of residential exposure to metal(loid)s in a mining impacted community.

The "Gold Country" region of California is impacted by legacy and active gold mines. Concomitantly, Gold Country has an increased rate of female breast cancer relative to the state average. Using community-based participatory research methods, 40 participants completed surveys and collected a total of 354 water, soil, home-grown foods, and dust samples from their homes, which we compared to state, federal, and international contamination standards for arsenic, cadmium, and lead. All soil samples exceeded U.S. EPA and California EPA soil standards for arsenic. When comparing other media to state, federal and international standards for arsenic, cadmium, and lead, 15 additional exceedances for indoor/outdoor dust, drinking water, and/or vegetable were documented. A probabilistic risk assessment was conducted to determine an adult female's exposure to arsenic, cadmium, and lead and estimated risk. Arsenic exposure, due largely to water (63.5 %) and homegrown food (33.3 %), presents carcinogenic risks in excess of the EPA recommended upper limit for contaminated sites (1 × 10-4) in 12.5 % of scenarios, and exceeds a risk level of 1 × 10-6 in 98.0 % of cases. Cadmium exposure results mainly from homegrown food consumption (83.7 %), and lead exposure results from a broader range of sources. This research indicates that rural areas in Gold Country face environmental exposures different than in urban areas. Exposure to arsenic in the female population of Gold Country may be driven by consumption of home-grown foods and water, and exposure to cadmium is driven by home-grown food intake. Since mining sites are of concern internationally, this risk assessment process and associated findings are significant and can be used to inform and tailor public health interventions. The weight of the evidence suggests that the arsenic exposure identified in this study could contribute to increases in the cancer rate among those living in Gold Country, California.

Especialización médica en Chile: tipos, mecanismos y requisitos de postulación: una actualización de los procesos para los médicos generales / Medical specialization in Chile: a centralized vision

Medical graduates face different postgraduate training options, but their priority is to obtain a primary medical specialty, defined as a specialty that does not derive from other. There are different specialty training programs in Chile, which can be dependent or independent of the Ministry of Health. The information about these programs is available in different Internet sites. However a centralized information service that groups and synthetize these programs is lacking, hampering graduate choice decisions. This article aims to review all specialization program modalities, providing a general vision of the institutional structure and implications that govern the specialization process in Chile.

Plastrón apendicular y manejo clínico actual: una decisión a reconsiderar: a propósito de un caso / Appendicular mass and current clinic management: a decision to reconsiderate: about a case

Introducción: La apendicitis es uno de los principales motivos de consulta e intervención quirúrgica en los servicios de urgencias. Debe tratarse oportunamente dado que puede evolucionar hacia una perforación apendicular y con ello a una peritonitis o un plastrón apendicular, en aproximadamente un 10%, e incrementando las morbilidades, como tiempo de reposo o estadía hospitalaria. Actualmente no existe consenso acerca del tratamiento del plastrón apendicular, por ello, el objetivo del presente trabajo es respaldar y promover la alternativa quirúrgica diferida, versus el manejo médico, como el tratamiento más idóneo del plastrón apendicular. Presentación del caso: Se derivó al Hospital Base Valdivia a una escolar, de 8 años y 11 meses de edad, por dolor en hemiabdomen inferior de 3 semanas de evolución acompañado de sensación febril no cuantificada, vómito y diarrea; se diagnosticó un plastrón apendicular, optándose por el manejo médico; evolucionó favorablemente, dándole el alta. En controles posteriores se planificó una apendicectomía, llevándose a cabo con éxito meses después. La biopsia del apéndice extraído evidenció un carcinoma de apéndice cecal, por lo que se inició el estudio de extensión de neoplasia sin encontrar hallazgos patológicos. Discusión: Actualmente el manejo del plastrón apendicular depende del médico tratante y su criterio. Existen ventajas y desventajas entre la elección de un tratamiento médico o quirúrgico, sea inmediato o diferido; dentro de las ventajas del último destacan la prevención de apendicitis recurrentes y detección temprana del carcinoma apendicular, como en el caso presentado, permitiendo de esta forma un mejor pronóstico para el paciente y evitando el uso de terapias más agresivas.

Introduction: Appendicitis is one of the main reasons for consultation and surgery in the emergency department. It must be treated promptly because it can evolve into a ruptured appendix and thus to peritonitis or an appendiceal plastron, by approximately 10%, and increasing the morbidity, as downtime or hospital stay. There is currently no consensus on the treatment of appendicular plastron, therefore, the objective of this work is to support and promote alternative deferred surgical versus medical management, as the most suitable treatment of appendiceal plastron. Case presentation: A girl of 8 years 11 months old consult for pain in lower abdomen of three weeks of evolution, accompanied by feverish feeling, unquantified, vomiting and diarrhea; Is diagnosed a plastron appendiceal opting for medical management, evolving favorably and giving the discharge. In subsequent controls was planned appendectomy, taking place successfully months later. Biopsy of removed appendix showed a appendix cancer, reason why an extension study of neoplasia was initiated without pathological findings. Discussion: Currently the management of appendicular plastron is dependent on the treating physician and judgment. There are advantages and disadvantages of choosing a medical or surgical treatment, immediate or delayed, inside the advantages of the latter include the prevention of recurrent appendicitis and early detection of appendiceal carcinoma, as in the case presented, thus allowing better prognosis for the patient and avoiding the use of more aggressive therapies.

[Medical specialization in Chile. A centralized vision]. / Especialización médica en Chile: tipos, mecanismos y requisitos de postulación. Una actualización de los procesos para los médicos generales.

Medical graduates face different postgraduate training options, but their priority is to obtain a primary medical specialty, defined as a specialty that does not derive from other. There are different specialty training programs in Chile, which can be dependent or independent of the Ministry of Health. The information about these programs is available in different Internet sites. However a centralized information service that groups and synthetize these programs is lacking, hampering graduate choice decisions. This article aims to review all specialization program modalities, providing a general vision of the institutional structure and implications that govern the specialization process in Chile.

Use of interpreters by physicians for hospitalized limited English proficient patients and its impact on patient outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the impact of inpatient interpreter use for limited English proficient (LEP) patients on length of stay (LOS), 30-day post discharge emergency department (ED) visits and 30-day hospital readmission rates for LEP patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted of all hospitalized patients admitted to the general medicine service at a large academic center. For patients self-reported as LEP, use of interpreters during each episode of hospitalization was categorized as: 1) interpreter used by non-MD (i.e., nurse); 2) interpreter used by a non-Hospitalist MD; 3) interpreter used by Hospitalist; and 4) no interpreter used during hospitalization. We examined the association of English proficiency and interpreter use on outcomes utilizing Poisson and logistic regression models. RESULTS: Of 4,224 patients, 564 (13 %) were LEP. Of these LEP patients, 65.8 % never had a documented interpreter visit, 16.8 % utilized an interpreter with a non-MD, 12.6 % utilized an interpreter with a non-Hospitalist MD and 4.8 % utilized an interpreter with a hospitalist present. In adjusted models, compared to English speakers, LEP patients with no interpreters had significantly shorter LOS. There were no differences in readmission rates and ED utilization between LEP and English-speaking patients. Compared to LEP patients with no interpreter use, those who had a physician use an interpreter had odds for a longer LOS, but there was no difference in odds of readmission or ED utilization. CONCLUSION: Academic hospital clinician use of interpreters remains highly variable and physicians may selectively be using interpreters for the sickest patients.