Microbiological analysis of autologous bone particles obtained by low-speed drilling and treated with different decontamination agents.

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of three agents - two antibiotics (amoxicillin and clindamycin) and an antiseptic (chlorhexidine) - to decontaminate bone grafts obtained by low-speed drilling. The study included 248 bone tissue samples harvested from 62 patients by low-speed drilling before dental implant placement. Each of four samples obtained from every patient was dropped, using a sterile instrument, into a sterile tube containing a 500-µl solution of 400µg/mL amoxicillin, 150µg/mL clindamycin, 0.12% chlorhexidine, or physiological saline for 1min. The number of colony-forming units (CFU) was determined at 48h of culture. The use of clindamycin, amoxicillin, or chlorhexidine as decontaminant for 1min significantly reduced the CFU count when compared to physiological saline (control agent). In both anaerobic and CO2-rich atmospheres, significant differences in CFU/mL were found between the control and chlorhexidine groups (P<0.001), control and amoxicillin groups (P<0.001), control and clindamycin groups (P<0.001), chlorhexidine and amoxicillin groups (P<0.0001), and chlorhexidine and clindamycin groups (P<0.0001). In conclusion, clindamycin had the highest decontaminating effect on bone particles obtained by low-speed drilling, followed by chlorhexidine and amoxicillin. Clindamycin may therefore be a valid alternative option for the routine decontamination of intraoral bone grafts.

Tomato nsLTP as an "In Vivo" Diagnostic Tool: Sensitization in a Mediterranean Population.

BACKGROUND: Tomato allergies have been extensively studied but component-resolved in vivo diagnosis with purified allergens has yet to be performed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of sensitization to Sola l 3 in a Mediterranean population, and to compare the resulting sensitization profile with that of individuals sensitized to tomato, peach, and/or purified lipid transfer protein (LTP). METHODS: Sola l 3 was purified, characterized, and used to prepare skin prick tests (SPTs). Two groups of patients were selected. Group 1 consisted of patients with at least 1 positive SPT to tomato, peach, or LTP mixture (marker extracts) who were subsequently tested with Sola l 3 (n = 280). Group 2 (prevalence study) consisted of patients who underwent simultaneous SPT with the 3 marker extracts and Sola l 3 (n = 658). Patients from either group who were positive to any of the 4 extracts were studied in detail (study group, n = 1 23). ELISA and immunoblot assays were performed in individuals with a positive SPT to Sola l 3 to detect the presence of specific IgE antibodies to this allergen. RESULTS: Prevalence of sensitization to Sola l 3 was 3.2% overall and 54.7% in tomato-positive patients. Most tomato-sensitized patients were asymptomatic. Symptoms were more common in Sola l 3-positive individuals. Sensitization to peach and the LTP mixture did not discriminate between Sola l 3-positive and Sola l 3-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms that LTP, not only from peach but also from other fruit and vegetables, including tomato, is an important allergen in the Mediterranean area. Sensitization to Sola l 3 is associated with more symptoms in tomato-sensitized patients.

Profilin sensitisation in a Mediterranean population.

BACKGROUND: Sensitisation to pan-allergens has become an interesting tool for the study of the allergenic profile of different populations. Profilins are one of the most common pan-allergens to be studied because they are responsible for a large number of sensitisations and are clearly related to cross-reactivity and co-sensitisation. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate the profile of sensitisation to profilins and to correlate it with sensitisation to foods and pollens. METHODS: Six hundred and fifty-four consecutive patients were skin-prick tested with a battery of common allergens including pollens, epithelia, mites and moulds and profilin and divided into three groups depending on their sensitisation profile (non-atopic, atopic with pollinosis and atopic without pollinosis). Patients with symptoms were challenged and diagnosed with the offending food extracts. Profilin sensitisation was identified and analysed in detail. RESULTS: According to the classification of the population, the prevalence of profilin sensitisation was estimated at 2.9% in patients suffering respiratory allergy, 4.2% in atopic patients, and 5.9% in pollen-sensitised individuals. Positive association was observed between pollen (except Cupressus and olive) and profilin but not with moulds, mites or epithelia. With respect to foods, positive association was only observed between profilin and melon sensitisation. Lastly, in terms of symptoms, positive association was only observed between profilin sensitisation and OAS. CONCLUSION: Profilin sensitisation seems to be a marker of pollen-related poly-sensitisation in our area. Pan-allergen diagnosis seems to be an essential tool for developing and improving selection of the correct treatment for allergic patients.

Mite exposure in a Spanish Mediterranean region.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of the domestic mite fauna and allergen levels is important for a correct diagnosis and treatment of mite allergy. Our objectives were to describe the domestic mite fauna in the region of Murcia, Spain, to quantify mite allergens in dust samples obtained from mattresses of this area and to assess the influence of geographical, climatic and dwelling factors. METHODS: Dust samples were collected in a transversal descriptive study from mattresses of 51 patients who went to the Allergology Service, and from mattress of 81 neighbours or family members of these patients. A questionnaire about home environment was filled in and obtained by all participants. Mite identification was done by light microscopy and allergen determinations (Der p 1 and Der f 1) by monoclonal antibodies. RESULTS: Sixteen mite species were identified in the 132 dust samples collected. The most frequent species were Dermatophagoides farinae (36% of the samples), Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (32%) and Tyrophagus putrescentiae (5.3%). There were significant differences among climatic regions. The coastal sector had greater mite abundance, being D. pteronyssinus more frequent and abundant than D. farinae. In inland areas D. farinae was the predominant mite species. Allergen levels correlated with the concentration of Dermatophagoides, with higher levels detected in coastal regions. Average annual temperature was the main outdoor factor that correlated with higher mite concentrations. Indoor main predictor of higher levels of mites was the presence of obvious signs of humidity in the home. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates the existence of a mite fauna dominated by D. pteronyssinus and D. farinae with a strong influence of climatic factors and residential characteristics.

Clinical profile of a Mediterranean population sensitised to date palm pollen (Phoenix dactylifera). A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Date palm pollen allergy is frequently associated with polysensitisation. Observational studies have suggested that date-palm-sensitised individuals could be included in a distinct group of polysensitised patients. The objectives of the study were to analyse the clinical characteristics of a group of patients diagnosed of date-palm pollen allergy and to compare them with pollen allergic patients without date-palm sensitisation. METHODS: Forty-eight palm-pollen sensitised individuals were classified as Group A. A control group of 48 patients sensitised to pollens but without palm-pollen allergy were included as Group B. All individuals were skin prick tested with a common battery of aeroallergens. Information about age, sex, family history of atopy, respiratory symptoms, food allergy and sensitisation to other pollens were considered variables of the study. Specific IgE and the allergogram to date-palm pollen were determined in a subgroup of Group A. RESULTS: Significant differences in the family history of atopy and number of sensitisations were observed. Both parameters were significantly higher in Group A. Group A showed high prevalence of asthma and higher level of sensitisation to foods (p < 0.05). Significant differences were obtained for sensitisation to epithelia and pollens. Pho d 2 was the most commonly recognised allergen (83.3%) in the palm-pollen allergic group. CONCLUSIONS: Date-palm pollen allergic patients constitute a homogeneous group characterised for showing bronchial asthma, sensitisation to food allergens and polysensitisation. These results suggest that the reasons for sensitisation to date-palm pollen remain to be elucidated, but could relate to the existence of as yet non-identified pan-allergens.

Acidic ribosomal protein 60S: A new tomato allergen.

Three tomato allergens (Lyc e 1, Lyc e 2 and Lyc e 3) have been characterised until now. Previous studies have demonstrated the existence of other proteins with capacity to bind IgE. The objective of this study was to identify new tomato allergens by molecular biology techniques. A tomato peel cDNA library was screened using a specific pool of sera from sensitised individuals. A clone was obtained and its sequence compared to other described allergens. This clone contained 34 aminoacids from the C-terminal region of an acidic ribosomal protein 60S. This protein showed more than 85% of homology with fungal allergens and 93.8% of homology with the almond allergen Pru du 5. The clone also contains 169 base pairs without homology with other known genes and could correspond to non-coding sequences. The IgE detection with a pool of sera was positive which confirms that is a new tomato allergen.

Allergenic differences among pollens of three Salsola species.

BACKGROUND: Sensitivity to Chenopodiaceae is a frequent cause of allergic respiratory diseases in geographic areas where sensitization to Salsola kali and Chenopodium album has been reported. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pattern of sensitization to 3 Salsola species in patients residing on the Mediterranean coast of south-eastern Spain. METHODS: S. kali, S. vermiculata and S. oppositifolia pollen extracts were prepared. Patients reporting respiratory and/or cutaneous symptoms were skin prick tested with the 3 Salsola extracts. Individuals with positive skin prick tests to at least 1 of the 3 Salsola species were included. Specific IgE was determined by direct ELISA. SDS-PAGE and 2-D analysis were conducted to elucidate the protein profile. The allergenic profile was investigated by immunoblot. Inhibition experiments were conducted to establish cross-reactivity between different species. RESULTS: 246 patients were included. 237 patients (96.3%) tested positive to S. oppositifolia, 189 (76.8%) to S. kali and 185 (75.2%) to S. vermiculata. Protein profile and immunoblot demonstrated similar patterns in all extracts, except in low-molecular-weight allergens of S. oppositifolia. Immunoblot inhibition experiments demonstrated that most high-molecular-weight allergens of S. oppositifolia were inhibited by S. kali whereas low-molecular-weight allergens were totally inhibited only by C. album. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the allergenic importance of other Salsola species, especially S. oppositifolia. We have demonstrated that the 3 species show a high degree of cross-reactivity, but S. oppositifolia shares more allergenic similarities with C. album than S. kali.

Sensitization to tomato peel and pulp extracts in the Mediterranean Coast of Spain: prevalence and co-sensitization with aeroallergens.

BACKGROUND: Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) are consumed world-wide. The prevalence of sensitization to tomatoes remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of skin test reactivity to tomato and to describe the characteristics of tomato-sensitized subjects. METHODS: Individuals attending for the first time during the period of the study to six Allergy centres, located along the Mediterranean coast of Spain, reporting respiratory and/or cutaneous symptoms, were included. All patients were skin prick tested with a battery of inhalant allergens and with peel and pulp of Canary tomato extracts. RESULTS: The study included 1734 individuals (757 males, 977 females; 31.9+/-17.8 years old). The prevalence of sensitization to tomato was 6.52% (113 patients; 65 males, 48 females; 29.5+/-13 years old). The peel extract was positive in 110 patients and the pulp extract in 47 patients; three patients were positive exclusively to pulp. Only 1.8% of individuals reported symptoms with tomato; 44% of them had skin test negative to both extracts. Among tomato-sensitized subjects, 16% reported symptoms with tomato, 97% were sensitized to inhalant aeroallergens, including 84% to pollens (mainly Artemisia vulgaris and Platanus hybrida), with differences between Northern and Southern centres. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence found of skin test sensitivity to tomato is high. Peel extracts detected most of the sensitized subjects. Most of the sensitized subjects were asymptomatic and some patients reported symptoms without skin test sensitivity. Positive subjects were very frequently sensitized to pollens, suggesting allergen cross-reactivity. Regional differences may exist, possibly related to the pattern of sensitization to cross-reacting pollens.

Tolerance of a Salsola kali extract standardized in biological units administered by subcutaneous route. Multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Sensitivity to Salsola kali is a frequent cause of allergic respiratory disease in various regions of Spain. However, there are very few articles in which this allergen has been studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: In order to evaluate the tolerance of this extract, a prospective study has been performed. This study was observational, multi-centred and open, involving 88 patients with allergic respiratory disease due to sensitivity to Salsola, aged between 5 and 52 years. The administration of the extract was performed subcutaneously, through one of two treatment schedules: cluster (8 doses in 4 visits) or conventional (13 doses in 12 visits). A total of 42 adverse reactions were registered, in 26 patients (35 local reactions in 21 patients and 7 systemic reactions in 6 patients). Among the 7 systemic reactions, 4 were registered with the cluster protocol and 2 with the conventional protocol (p = 0.329). In no patients were serious adverse reactions registered. CONCLUSION: The subcutaneous administration of a Salsola extract is safe and well tolerated, both when administered using a conventional schedule and when using a cluster schedule.