The Impact of Altitude on Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Children Dwelling at High Altitude: A Crossover Study.

Study Objectives: Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is prevalent among children and is associated with adverse health outcomes. Worldwide, approximately 250 million individuals reside at altitudes higher than 2000 meters above sea level (masl). The effect of chronic high-altitude exposure on children with SDB is unknown. This study aims to determine the impact of altitude on sleep study outcomes in children with SDB dwelling at high altitude. Methods: A single-center crossover study was performed to compare results of high-altitude home polysomnography (H-PSG) with lower altitude laboratory polysomnography (L-PSG) in school-age children dwelling at high altitude with symptoms consistent with SDB. The primary outcome was apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), with secondary outcomes including obstructive AHI; central AHI; and measures of oxygenation, sleep quality, and pulse rate. Results: Twelve participants were enrolled, with 10 included in the final analysis. Median altitude was 1644 masl on L-PSG and 2531 masl on H-PSG. Median AHI was 2.40 on L-PSG and 10.95 on H-PSG. Both obstructive and central respiratory events accounted for the difference in AHI. Oxygenation and sleep fragmentation were worse and pulse rate higher on H-PSG compared to L-PSG. Conclusions: These findings reveal a clinically substantial impact of altitude on respiratory, sleep, and cardiovascular outcomes in children with SDB who dwell at high altitude. Within this population, L-PSG underestimates obstructive sleep apnea and central sleep apnea compared to H-PSG. Given the shortage of high-altitude pediatric sleep laboratories, these results suggest a role for home sleep apnea testing for children residing at high altitude.

Axillary versus infraclavicular placement for endocardial heart rhythm devices in patients with pediatric and congenital heart disease.

Our objective was to evaluate the implant and mid-term outcomes of transvenous pacemaker or internal cardioverter-defibrillator placement by alternative axillary approaches compared to the infraclavicular approach in a pediatric and congenital heart disease population. We conducted a retrospective review of all patients with new endocardial heart rhythm devices placed at 4 pediatric arrhythmia centers. A total of 317 patients were included, 63 had undergone a 2-incision axillary approach, 51 a retropectoral axillary approach, and 203 an infraclavicular approach. Congenital heart disease was present in 62% of the patients. The patients with the 2-incision axillary approach were younger and smaller. The patients with the retropectoral axillary approach were less likely to have undergone previous cardiac surgery and were more likely to have had an internal cardioverter-defibrillator placed. The duration of follow-up was 2.4 ± 1.9 years for the 2-incision axillary, 2.6 ± 2.6 years for retropectoral axillary, and 3.5 ± 1.4 years for the infraclavicular technique (p = 0.01). No differences were seen in implant characteristics, lead longevity, implant complications, lead fractures or dislodgements, inappropriate internal cardioverter-defibrillator discharges, or device infections among the 3 groups. In conclusion, our data support that the outcomes of axillary approaches are comparable to the infraclavicular approach for endocardial heart rhythm device placement and that axillary approaches should be considered a viable option in patients with pediatric and congenital heart disease.