Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Int J Health Policy Manag ; 11(4): 508-513, 2022 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33105965

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As health systems across the world respond to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), there is rising concern that patients without COVID-19 are not receiving timely emergency care, resulting in avoidable deaths. This study examined patterns of self-reported health service utilization, their socio-demographic determinants and association with avoidable deaths during the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: A cross-sectional telephone survey was conducted between March 22 and April 1, 2020, during the peak rise in confirmed COVID-19 cases in Hong Kong. Cantonese-speaking Hong Kong residents over 18-years-old were recruited using a computerised random digital dialling (RDD) system. The RDD method used stratified random sampling to ensure a representative sample of the target population by age, gender, and residential district. A structured self-reported questionnaire was used. RESULTS: Out of 1738 placed calls, 765 subjects responded to the questionnaire (44.0% response rate). The factors associated with avoiding medical consultation included being female (37.2% vs. 22.5%, P<.001), married (32.8% vs. 27%, P=.044), completing tertiary education (35.3% vs. 27.7% (secondary) vs. 14.8% (primary), P=.005), and those who reported a "large/very large" impact of COVID-19 on their mental health (36.1% vs 30.5% (neutral) vs. 19.7% (very small/small), P=.047) using logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Married females with both higher educational attainment and concern about COVID-19 were associated with avoiding healthcare services. Timely public communication to encourage and promote early health seeking treatment even during extreme events such as pandemics are needed.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/terapia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde , Hong Kong/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias
2.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 8(1): e32140, 2022 01 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34727524

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic and countries' response measures have had a globally significant mental health impact. This mental health burden has also been fueled by an infodemic: an information overload that includes misinformation and disinformation. Suicide, the worst mental health outcome, is a serious public health problem that can be prevented with timely, evidence-based, and often low-cost interventions. Suicide ideation, one important risk factor for suicide, is thus important to measure and monitor, as are the factors that may impact on it. OBJECTIVE: This investigation had 2 primary aims: (1) to estimate and compare country-specific prevalence of suicide ideation at 2 different time points, overall and by gender and age groups, and (2) to investigate the influence of sociodemographic and infodemic variables on suicide ideation. METHODS: A repeated, online, 8-country (Canada, the United States, England, Switzerland, Belgium, Hong Kong, Philippines, and New Zealand), cross-sectional study was undertaken with adults aged ≥18 years, with measurement wave 1 conducted from May 29, 2020 to June 12, 2020 and measurement wave 2 conducted November 6-18, 2021. Self-reported suicide ideation was derived from item 9 of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). Age-standardized suicide ideation rates were reported, a binomial regression model was used to estimate suicide ideation indication rates for each country and measurement wave, and logistic regression models were then employed to relate sociodemographic, pandemic, and infodemic variables to suicide ideation. RESULTS: The final sample totaled 17,833 adults: 8806 (49.4%) from measurement wave 1 and 9027 (50.6%) from wave 2. Overall, 24.2% (2131/8806) and 27.5% (2486/9027) of participants reported suicide ideation at measurement waves 1 and 2, respectively, a difference that was significant (P<.001). Considerable variability was observed in suicide ideation age-standardized rates between countries, ranging from 15.6% in Belgium (wave 1) to 42.9% in Hong Kong (wave 2). Frequent social media usage was associated with increased suicide ideation at wave 2 (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.47, 95% CI 1.25-1.72; P<.001) but not wave 1 (AOR 1.11, 95% CI 0.96-1.23; P=.16). However, having a weaker sense of coherence (SOC; AOR 3.80, 95% CI 3.18-4.55 at wave 1 and AOR 4.39, 95% CI 3.66-5.27 at wave 2; both P<.001) had the largest overall effect size. CONCLUSIONS: Suicide ideation is prevalent and significantly increasing over time in this COVID-19 pandemic era, with considerable variability between countries. Younger adults and those residing in Hong Kong carried disproportionately higher rates. Social media appears to have an increasingly detrimental association with suicide ideation, although having a stronger SOC had a larger protective effect. Policies and promotion of SOC, together with disseminating health information that explicitly tackles the infodemic's misinformation and disinformation, may importantly reduce the rising mental health morbidity and mortality triggered by this pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Adolescente , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Desinformação , Humanos , Infodemia , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34062769

RESUMO

Nearly a year after the classification of the COVID-19 outbreak as a global pandemic, it is clear that different factors have contributed to an increase in psychological disorders, including public health measures that infringe on personal freedoms, growing financial losses, and conflicting messages. This study examined the evolution of psychosocial impacts with the progression of the pandemic in adult populations from different countries and continents, and identified, among a wide range of individual and country-level factors, which ones are contributing to this evolving psychological response. An online survey was conducted in May/June 2020 and in November 2020, among a sample of 17,833 adults (Phase 1: 8806; Phase 2: 9027) from eight countries/regions (Canada, the United States, England, Switzerland, Belgium, Hong Kong, the Philippines, New Zealand). Probable generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depressive episode (MDE) were assessed. The independent role of potential factors was examined using multilevel logistic regression. Probable GAD or MDE was indicated by 30.1% and 32.5% of the respondents during phases 1 and 2, respectively (a 7.9% increase over time), with an important variation according to countries/regions (range from 22.3% in Switzerland to 38.8% in the Philippines). This proportion exceeded 50% among young adults (18-24 years old) in all countries except for Switzerland. Beyond young age, several factors negatively influenced mental health in times of pandemic; important factors were found, including weak sense of coherence (adjusted odds ratio aOR = 3.89), false beliefs (aOR = 2.33), and self-isolation/quarantine (aOR = 2.01). The world has entered a new era dominated by psychological suffering and rising demand for mental health interventions, along a continuum from health promotion to specialized healthcare. More than ever, we need to innovate and build interventions aimed at strengthening key protective factors, such as sense of coherence, in the fight against the adversity caused by the concurrent pandemic and infodemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Adolescente , Adulto , Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Bélgica , Canadá , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/epidemiologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Inglaterra , Hong Kong , Humanos , Nova Zelândia/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Filipinas , SARS-CoV-2 , Suíça , Adulto Jovem
4.
BMJ Open ; 10(11): e041191, 2020 11 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33203637

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Globally, the COVID-19 pandemic has overwhelmed many healthcare systems, which has hampered access to routine clinical care during lockdowns. Informal home care, care provided by non-healthcare professionals, increases the community's healthcare capacity during pandemics. There is, however, limited research about the characteristics of informal home care providers and the challenges they face during such public health emergencies. DESIGN: A random, cross-sectional, population-based, RDD, telephone survey study was conducted to examine patterns of home care, characteristics of informal home care providers and the challenges experienced by these care providers during this pandemic. SETTING: Data were collected from 22 March to 1 April 2020 in Hong Kong, China. PARTICIPANTS: A population representative study sample of Chinese-speaking adults (n=765) was interviewed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The study examined the characteristics of informal home care providers and self-reported health requirements of those who needed care. The study also examined providers' self-perceived knowledge to provide routine home care as well as COVID-19 risk reduction care. Respondents were asked of their mental health status related to COVID-19. RESULTS: Of the respondents, 25.1% of 765 provided informal home care during the studied COVID-19 pandemic period. Among the informal home care providers, 18.4% of respondents took leave from school/work during the epidemic to provide care for the sick, fragile elderly and small children. Care providers tended to be younger aged, female and housewives. Approximately half of care providers reported additional mental strain and 37.2% reported of challenges in daily living during epidemic. Although most informal home care providers felt competent to provide routine care, 49.5% felt inadequately prepared to cope with the additional health risks of COVID-19. CONCLUSION: During public health emergencies, heavy reliance on informal home healthcare providers necessitates better understanding of their specific needs and increased government services to support informal home care.


Assuntos
Adaptação Psicológica , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Pessoal de Saúde/psicologia , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Assistência ao Paciente/métodos , Vigilância da População , SARS-CoV-2 , Idoso , COVID-19/psicologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Hong Kong/epidemiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pandemias
5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33202706

RESUMO

The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic brought about several features that increased the sense of fear and confusion, such as quarantine and financial losses among other stressors, which may have led to adverse psychosocial outcomes. The influence of such stressors took place within a broader sociocultural context that needs to be considered. The objective was to examine how the psychological response to the pandemic varied across countries and identify which risk/protective factors contributed to this response. An online survey was conducted from 29 May 2020-12 June 2020, among a multinational sample of 8806 adults from eight countries/regions (Canada, United States, England, Switzerland, Belgium, Hong Kong, Philippines, New Zealand). Probable generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depression episode (MDE) were assessed. The independent role of a wide range of potential factors was examined using multilevel logistic regression. Probable GAD and MDE were indicated by 21.0% and 25.5% of the respondents, respectively, with an important variation according to countries/regions (GAD: 12.2-31.0%; MDE: 16.7-32.9%). When considered together, 30.2% of the participants indicated probable GAD or MDE. Several factors were positively associated with a probable GAD or MDE, including (in descending order of importance) weak sense of coherence (SOC), lower age, false beliefs, isolation, threat perceived for oneself/family, mistrust in authorities, stigma, threat perceived for country/world, financial losses, being a female, and having a high level of information about COVID-19. Having a weak SOC yielded the highest adjusted odds ratio for probable GAD or MDE (3.21; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.73-3.77). This pandemic is having an impact on psychological health. In some places and under certain circumstances, however, people seem to be better protected psychologically. This is a unique opportunity to evaluate the psychosocial impacts across various sociocultural backgrounds, providing important lessons that could inform all phases of disaster risk management.


Assuntos
Transtornos de Ansiedade/epidemiologia , Infecções por Coronavirus/psicologia , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/psicologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Bélgica , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Canadá , Estudos Transversais , Inglaterra , Feminino , Hong Kong , Humanos , Masculino , Cura Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nova Zelândia , Pandemias , Filipinas , SARS-CoV-2 , Estresse Psicológico , Suíça , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
7.
BMJ Open ; 9(4): e026109, 2019 04 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30948594

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Capillary blood lactate testing with handheld analysers has great advantages to reduce the time needed for clinical decisions, and for extended use in the prehospital setting. We investigated the agreement of capillary lactate measured using handheld analysers (CL-Nova and CL-Scout+ measured by Nova and Lactate Scout+ analyzers) and the reference venous level assessed using a point-of-care testing (POCT) blood gas analyser (VL-Ref). DESIGN: A prospective observational study. SETTING: A university teaching hospital emergency department in Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS: Patients triaged as 'urgent' (Category 3 of a 5-point scale), aged ≥18 years during 2016 were eligible. 240 patients (mean age 69.9 years) were recruited. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the agreement of the capillary blood lactate level measured by handheld lactate analyser when compared with the reference standard technique, namely venous blood samples obtained by venepuncture and analysed using the blood gas analyser. The secondary outcome measure was the difference in values of venous lactate using blood gas analysers and handheld lactate analysers. RESULTS: The results of VL-Ref ranged from 0.70 to 5.38 mmol/L (mean of 1.96 mmol/L). Regarding capillary lactate measurements, the bias (mean difference) between VL-Ref and CL-Scout+ was -0.22 with 95% limits of agreement (LOA) of -2.17 to 1.73 mmol/L and the bias between VL-Ref and CL-Nova was 0.46, with LOA of -1.08 to 2.00 mmol/L. For venous lactate, results showed the bias between VL-Ref and VL-Scout+ was 0.22 with LOA being -0.46 to 0.90 mmol/L, and the bias between VL-Ref and VL-Nova was 0.83 mmol/L with LOA -0.01 to 1.66 mmol/L. CONCLUSION: Our study shows poor agreement between capillary lactate and reference values. The study does not support the clinical utility of capillary lactate POCT. However, venous lactate measured by Scout+ handheld analyser may have potential for screening patients who may need further testing. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02694887.


Assuntos
Estado Terminal , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Ácido Láctico/sangue , Sistemas Automatizados de Assistência Junto ao Leito , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/sangue , Capilares , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Veias , Adulto Jovem
8.
Emergencias (St. Vicenç dels Horts) ; 27(5): 313-315, oct. 2015. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-143248

RESUMO

Objetivos: Los dispositivos automáticos de muñeca para medir la presión arterial (PA) son más compactos y fáciles de usar, sobre todo cuando el acceso a la parte superior del brazo está restringido, por ejemplo, en situaciones de emergencia. Métodos: Hemos probado el dispositivo de muñeca Omron HEM-650 utilizando los criterios de validación del protocolo de la Sociedad Británica de Hipertensión en un gran servicio de urgencias (ED) de Hong Kong. Se realizaron 3 mediciones en 85 pacientes con el dispositivo Omron HEM-650 y el esfingomanómetro de mercurio. También se utilizó la medición automatizada convencional de PA con banda para el brazo mediante un dispositivo oscilométrico (Colin BP-88S NXT) para la comparación. Resultados: El Omron HEM-650 logra una calificación de grado B para las presiones arteriales sistólica y diastólica y demostró una precisión y fiabilidad aceptables en pacientes chinos en el servicio de urgencias. Conclusiones: El dispositivo de muñeca Omron HEM 650 se recomienda para su uso en pacientes adultos de urgencias. Se necesita más investigación para su uso en mujeres embarazadas y los pacientes en estado crítico (AU)


Aims: Automated wrist cuff blood pressure (BP) devices are more compact and easier to use, particularly when access to the upper arm is restricted, for example in emergencies. Methods: We tested the Omron HEM-650 wrist device using the validation criteria of the British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol in a major emergency department (ED) in Hong Kong. 85 patients had three measurements each by both the Omron HEM-650 wrist device and the mercury sphygmomanometer. The conventional automated BP with arm cuff was also measured using an oscillometric (Colin BP-88S NXT) device for comparison. Results: The Omron HEM-650 achieved a grade B for both systolic and diastolic BP and demonstrated acceptable accuracy and reliability in Chinese patients in the emergency setting. Conclusions: The Omron HEM 650 wrist device can be recommended for use in adult emergency patients. Further research is warranted for its use in pregnant women and critically ill patients (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Monitores de Pressão Arterial , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Oscilometria/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
9.
Emergencias ; 27(5): 313-315, 2015 10.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29087056

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Automated wrist cuff blood pressure (BP) devices are more compact and easier to use, particularly when access to the upper arm is restricted, for example in emergencies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We tested the Omron HEM-650 wrist device using the validation criteria of the British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol in a major emergency department (ED) in Hong Kong. 85 patients had three measurements each by both the Omron HEM-650 wrist device and the mercury sphygmomanometer. The conventional automated BP with arm cuff was also measured using an oscillometric (Colin BP-88S NXT) device for comparison. RESULTS: The Omron HEM-650 achieved a grade B for both systolic and diastolic BP and demonstrated acceptable accuracy and reliability in Chinese patients in the emergency setting. CONCLUSION: The Omron HEM 650 wrist device can be recommended for use in adult emergency patients. Further research is warranted for its use in pregnant women and critically ill patients.


OBJETIVO: Los dispositivos automáticos de muñeca para medir la presión arterial (PA) son más compactos y fáciles de usar, sobre todo cuando el acceso a la parte superior del brazo está restringido, por ejemplo, en situaciones de emergencia. METODO: Hemos probado el dispositivo de muñeca Omron HEM-650 utilizando los criterios de validación del protocolo de la Sociedad Británica de Hipertensión en un gran servicio de urgencias (ED) de Hong Kong. Se realizaron 3 mediciones en 85 pacientes con el dispositivo Omron HEM-650 y el esfingomanómetro de mercurio. También se utilizó la medición automatizada convencional de PA con banda para el brazo mediante un dispositivo oscilométrico (Colin BP-88S NXT) para la comparación. RESULTADOS: El Omron HEM-650 logra una calificación de grado B para las presiones arteriales sistólica y diastólica y demostró una precisión y fiabilidad aceptables en pacientes chinos en el servicio de urgencias. CONCLUSIONES: El dispositivo de muñeca Omron HEM 650 se recomienda para su uso en pacientes adultos de urgencias. Se necesita más investigación para su uso en mujeres embarazadas y los pacientes en estado crítico.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...