Treating immigrant patients in psychiatric emergency rooms.

We examine whether patient variables (geographic origin, gender, Spanish language proficiency) and subjective clinician aspects in emergency department psychiatric encounters (diagnostic certainty, clinician's comfort level with patient) are associated with diagnosis and the use of coercive measures. Using a descriptive cross-sectional design, we recorded 467 visits (400 foreign-born and 67 native-born patients) in hospital psychiatry emergency rooms (ERs) in Barcelona between 2007 and 2015. We first assessed the association of patient variables and subjective clinician aspects of psychiatric encounters with service use outcomes and with mental illness diagnosis. Fitted logistic models predicted the likelihood of service use outcomes and estimated the propensity of receiving each diagnosis. The null model evaluated the role of patient's geographical origin, while the full model evaluated the additional roles of patient's gender and language, the clinician's assessment of the influence of culture in diagnosis, and clinician comfort with two outcomes: patient's diagnosis and use of coercive measures in the ER. Women were less likely to receive coercive measures or intramuscular medications compared to men. Significant ethnic/racial and gender differences were found in receiving certain diagnoses. Additionally, a patient's lower Spanish proficiency was correlated with a higher probability of receiving a psychosis diagnosis. The clinician's level of diagnostic certainty was also positively correlated with increasing clinician-reported comfort with patient. Overall, ethnic factors and the subjective aspects of psychiatric encounters were found to influence diagnosis and the use of coercive measures. Cultural competency programs and interpreter services within psychiatric ER settings should thus be required.

HIV Testing in Clinical and Community Settings for an International Sample of Latino Immigrants and Nonimmigrants.

Latino/as in the U.S. and Spain make up a disproportionate percentage of cases of HIV infection, and often are diagnosed later than their non-Latino/a counterparts. Understanding the factors that affect HIV testing in different contexts is critical to best promote HIV testing, which is considered essential to both prevention and early treatment. This study explored differences in HIV testing rates among Latino/a participants in an international study designed to examine behavioral health screening for Latino/a populations. We collected data on testing rates and results from 407 Latino/as - both first generation immigrants and those of Latino/a descent - in the U.S. (Boston) and Spain (Madrid and Barcelona), through interviews conducted in community clinics and agencies. Using multivariate logit models, we evaluated predictors of screening and positive testing, adjusting for sex, age, and clinic type. HIV testing rates were highest in Boston, followed by Barcelona and Madrid (82%, 69%, and 59%, respectively, p < .0001). In multivariate regression models, Barcelona and Madrid patients were significantly less likely to have received testing than Boston patients. Significant positive predictors of HIV testing were: education level higher than high school, HIV concerns, infrequent condom use, other risk behaviors, reports of discrimination, and higher benzodiazepine consumption. Significant differences in HIV testing found in this study help to illuminate best practices for engaging patients in testing across sites.

Los latino/as representan, tanto en Estados Unidos como en España, un porcentaje desproporcionado de los casos de infección por el VIH y, a menudo son diagnosticados más tarde que sus homólogos no latino/as. Conocer los factores que influyen en la realización de la prueba del VIH en diferentes contextos resulta fundamental para la promoción de dicha prueba, lo que se considera esencial tanto para la prevención como para el tratamiento precoz. Este estudio internacional explora las diferencias en las tasas de realización de la prueba de VIH entre participantes latino/as y que fue diseñada para examinar el estado de salud mental de los imigrantes latino/as. Para ello, se han recopilado datos sobre las pruebas del VIH y sus resultados en 407 latino/as - tanto inmigrantes como de ascendencia latina-en los Estados Unidos (Boston) y España (Madrid y Barcelona). La información fue recogida en entrevistas realizadas en clínicas y agencias comunitarias. Se evaluaron los factores que predicen hacerse la prueba de VIH y de tener resultados positivos en la misma, ajustando por género, edad y el sitio de reclutamiento del paciente, y empleando para ello un modelo de regresión logística multivariado. La tasa más alta de realización de la prueba de VIH fue la de la población de Boston, seguida por Barcelona y Madrid (82%, 69%, y 59%, respectivamente, p<.0001). Según los modelos de regresión multivariada, la probabilidad de que los pacientes de Barcelona y Madrid se hicieran la prueba fue significativamente menor que la de Boston. Entre los predictores positivos para realizarse la prueba estaban un grado de escolarización superior a la secundaria, el grado de preocupación por el VIH, el uso infrecuente del condón, el informar experiencias de discriminación y el uso elevado de benzodiacepinas. Las diferencias significativas entre las tasas de realización de la prueba del VIH entre las tres ciudades sugieren la necesidad de gestionar mejores prácticas para atraer a los pacientes hacia la realización temprana de la prueba.