Cirugía Pancreática: Rol de la evaluación nutricional como parte del manejo interdisciplinario / Pancreatic Surgery: Role of nutritional assessment as part of interdisciplinary management

El soporte nutricional óptimo en el campo de la cirugía pancreática aún es objeto de debate. Se buscó evaluar la importancia de la evaluación nutricional en pacientes con resecciones pancreáticas. Análisis retrospectivo de una base de datos prospectiva. Se realizó evaluación nutricional sistemática. Las variables analizadas fueron, tiempo de estadía hospitalaria y en UTI, complicaciones y mortalidad. No se observaron diferencias estadísticamente significativas usando test de forma aislada. Sin embargo la asociación de desnutrición severa por más de un test se asoció a un aumento significativo en la mortalidad post-operatoria. La evaluación interdisciplinaria de los pacientes con tumores bilio-pancreáticos, debe incluir una adecuada valoración del estado nutricional para identificar aquellos con mayor riesgo

The optimal nutritional support in pancreatic surgery is still under debate. We performed a retrospective analysis of a prospective data base. Systematic nutritional assessment was performed. Length of hospital stay and in ICU, morbidityand mortality, were analyzed. We didn't find significative differences between any of the nutritional test. However, patients with severe malnutrition in different tests were associated with higher mortality. Interdisciplinary management of patients with biliopancreatic tumors should include an adequate nutritional evaluation to identify high risk patients.

Reutilización de materiales de colangiografía endoscópica. Estudio prospectivo de minimización de costos / Reusing materials in endoscopic cholangiography. A prospective study on cost minimization

ANTECEDENTES: la colangiografía endoscópica enfrenta el desafío del control de costos en un área de constantes avances tecnológicos. La reutilización es el uso de un dispositivo médico más veces de las especificadas por el fabricante. Esta práctica se halla precedida por las maniobras de reprocesamiento y amparada por la legislación vigente. OBJETIVOS: cuantificar la reducción en el costo de los insumos y evaluar las complicaciones. Método: estudio prospectivo, descriptivo y análisis sobre minimización de costos comparando la reutilización de dispositivos médicos con el uso único de los mismos. RESULTADOS: durante un período de tres meses se realizaron 144 estudios. Con la estrategia de reutilización, se utilizaron: 9 papilótomos, 12 guías hidrofílica, 3 canastillas de Dormia, 4 balones extractor, 5 balones dilatadores y 2 cuchillos de precorte. Representó un costo total de U$ 10 943 (promedio de costo de materiales por cada estudio: U$ 76). Con la estrategia de uso único se hubieran utilizado: 144 papilótomos, 144 alambres guías, 24 canastillas de Dormia, 20 balones dilatadores, 72 balones extractores y 24 agujas de precorte. Esta estrategia hubiera generado un costo total de U$ 126 280 (promedio por estudio U$ 877). Al comparar los valores entre ambas estrategias observamos una minimización significativa en el costo (p< 0.001). No se registraron complicaciones. Conclusión: Con la estrategia de reutilización de los DM los costos se minimizaron significativamente sin generarse complicaciones

BACKGROUND: cost control is challenging endoscopic cholangiography in an area of constant technological advances. Reusing is using a medical device more times than what was specified by the manufacturer. This practice is preceded by reprocessing maneuvers and protected by the applicable laws. OBJECTIVES: to quantify the cost reduction of supplies and assess the complications. Method: a prospective descriptive study and an analysis of cost minimization by comparing the reuse and the single use of medical devices. Results: 144 studies were conducted during a period of three months. The reuse strategy included: 9 papillotomes, 12 hydrophilic guide wires, 3 Dormia baskets, 4 balloon extraction catheters, 5 balloon dilatation catheters and 2 pre-cut knives. It accounted for a total cost of USD 10,943 (average cost of materials per study: USD 76). The single-use strategy would have included: 144 papillotomes, 144 hydrophilic guide wires, 24 Dormia baskets, 20 balloon extraction catheters, 72 balloon dilatation catheters and 24 pre-cut needle knives. This strategy would have amounted to a total cost of USD 126,280 (average per study: USD 877). By comparing the values of both strategies, a significant minimization is seen in the cost (p< 0.001). No complications were seen. CONCLUSION: the strategy for reusing MD involveda significant minimization of costs without causing any complications.

Pancreatitis post-CPRE: ¿precorte temprano o prótesis pancreática?. Ensayo aleatorizado, multicéntrico y análisis de costo-efectividad / Post-ERCP pancreatitis: early precut or pancreatic duct stent? A multicenter, randomized-controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis

Introducción: la pancreatitis es la complicación más frecuente de la colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE). La colocación de una prótesis pancreática es una medida preventiva. Hay evidencias, también, sobre el efecto protector que tendría la realización de un precorte temprano en los casos con canulación difícil. Objetivo: determinar y comparar el coste-efectividad entre la realización de precorte temprano y colocación de una prótesis pancreática en la prevención de pancreatitis post-CPRE. Métodos: estudio piloto, prospectivo, aleatorizado, multicéntrico y análisis de coste-efectividad entre precorte temprano (grupo A) y prótesis pancreática (grupo B) en la prevención de pancreatitis en pacientes de alto riesgo. Se incluyeron pacientes con canulación biliar dificultosa y otros factores de riesgo de pancreatitis. Se analizaron la efectividad y el coste de los procedimientos y sus complicaciones. Resultados: durante dos años se incluyeron 101 pacientes y se aleatorizaron 50 sujetos en el grupo de precorte y 51 sujetos en el grupo de prótesis. No hubo diferencias en las características demográficas de los participantes ni en las indicaciones del estudio. Se registraron dos pancreatitis leves en cada grupo. El coste fue de 1.242,6$ por paciente en el grupo A y 1.606,5$ por paciente en el grupo B. El coste del grupo B fue un 29,3% mayor (p < 0,0001). Conclusiones: el precorte temprano es más coste-eficaz que la prótesis pancreática en la prevención de pancreatitis post-CPRE (AU)

Background: Pancreatitis is the most frequent complication due to ERCP. Pancreatic duct stent placement has been described as a preventive measure. There is also evidence pointing towards the preventive effect that early precut may provide. Aim: To determine and compare the cost-effectiveness of an early precut approach versus pancreatic duct stent placement for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized-controlled pilot study with a cost-effectiveness analysis performed between early precut (group A) and pancreatic duct stent (group B) for the prevention of pancreatitis in high-risk patients. Patients with a difficult biliary cannulation and at least one other risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis were enrolled and randomized to one of the treatment arms. Both effectiveness and costs of the procedures and their complications were analyzed and compared. Results: From November 2011 to November 2013, 101 patients were enrolled; 50 subjects were assigned to group A and 51 to group B. There were no significant differences in terms of baseline characteristics of patients between groups. Two cases of mild pancreatitis were observed in each group. The overall costs were U$ 1,242.6 per patient in group A and U$ 1,606.5 per patient in group B. The cost in group B was 29.3% higher (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: Early precut showed a better cost-effectiveness profile when compared to pancreatic duct stent placement (AU)

Post-ERCP pancreatitis: early precut or pancreatic duct stent? A multicenter, randomized-controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatitis is the most frequent complication due to ERCP. Pancreatic duct stent placement has been described as a preventive measure. There is also evidence pointing towards the preventive effect that early precut may provide. AIM: To determine and compare the cost-effectiveness of an early precut approach versus pancreatic duct stent placement for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized-controlled pilot study with a cost-effectiveness analysis performed between early precut (group A) and pancreatic duct stent (group B) for the prevention of pancreatitis in high-risk patients. Patients with a difficult biliary cannulation and at least one other risk factor for post-ERCP pancreatitis were enrolled and randomized to one of the treatment arms. Both effectiveness and costs of the procedures and their complications were analyzed and compared. RESULTS: From November 2011 to November 2013, 101 patients were enrolled; 50 subjects were assigned to group A and 51 to group B. There were no significant differences in terms of baseline characteristics of patients between groups. Two cases of mild pancreatitis were observed in each group. The overall costs were U$ 1,242.6 per patient in group A and U$ 1,606.5 per patient in group B. The cost in group B was 29.3% higher (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Early precut showed a better cost-effectiveness profile when compared to pancreatic duct stent placement.

Early precut is as efficient as pancreatic stent in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk subjects - A randomized study.

BACKGROUND: The most common adverse event of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is pancreatitis. Precut sphincterotomy has been regarded as a risk factor. Some authors have stated that early precut may actually reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis risk. However, early precut as a preventive measure has not been compared to other preventive measures, such as pancreatic duct stent placement. AIM: To compare the efficacy of early precut sphincterotomy versus pancreatic duct stent placement in high-risk subjects undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the prevention of post-endoscopic cholangiopancreatography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-blinded, randomized trial that took place in two tertiary referral centers in Buenos Aires, from November 2011 to December 2013. ERCP subjects presented at least one of the following risk factors: female sex, age less than 40 years, clinical suspicion of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, previous pancreatitis, and/or common bile duct diameter of less than 8 mm. Only those who presented a difficult biliary cannulation were randomized into two groups: those who received early precut sphincterotomy and those in whom persistency of biliary cannulation was intended, with subsequent pancreatic duct stent placement after cholangiography was achieved. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis, as well as other adverse events incidence, was compared. RESULTS: Overall, 101 patients were enrolled, 51 in the pancreatic duct stent group and 50 in the early precut group. Pancreatitis rate was similar in both groups (3.92% vs 4%, p NS). In all cases, pancreatitis was classified as mild. There were no deaths registered. CONCLUSION: Early precut was associated with an incidence of adverse events similar to pancreatic duct stent placement.

Early precut is as efficient as pancreatic stent in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis in high-risk subjects - A randomized study

Background: The most common adverse event of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is pancreatitis. Precut sphincterotomy has been regarded as a risk factor. Some authors have stated that early precut may actually reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis risk. However, early precut as a preventive measure has not been compared to other preventive measures, such as pancreatic duct stent placement. Aim: To compare the efficacy of early precut sphincterotomy versus pancreatic duct stent placement in high-risk subjects undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the prevention of post-endoscopic cholangiopancreatography. Materials and methods: This was a single-blinded, randomized trial that took place in two tertiary referral centers in Buenos Aires, from November 2011 to December 2013. ERCP subjects presented at least one of the following risk factors: female sex, age less than 40 years, clinical suspicion of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, previous pancreatitis, and/or common bile duct diameter of less than 8 mm. Only those who presented a difficult biliary cannulation were randomized into two groups: those who received early precut sphincterotomy and those in whom persistency of biliary cannulation was intended, with subsequent pancreatic duct stent placement after cholangiography was achieved. The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis, as well as other adverse events incidence, was compared. Results: Overall, 101 patients were enrolled, 51 in the pancreatic duct stent group and 50 in the early precut group. Pancreatitis rate was similar in both groups (3.92% vs. 4%, p NS). In all cases, pancreatitis was classified as mild. There were no deaths registered. Conclusion: Early precut was associated with an incidence of adverse events similar to pancreatic duct stent placement (AU)

No disponible

Altered Esophageal Mucosal Structure in Patients with Celiac Disease.

Background/Aim. Reflux symptoms (RS) are common in patients with celiac disease (CD), a chronic enteropathy that affects primarily the small intestine. We evaluated mucosal integrity and motility of the lower esophagus as mechanisms contributing to RS generation in patients with CD. Methods. We enrolled newly diagnosed CD patients with and without RS, nonceliac patients with classical reflux disease (GERD), and controls (without RS). Endoscopic biopsies from the distal esophagus were assessed for dilated intercellular space (DIS) by light microscopy and electron microscopy. Tight junction (TJ) mRNA proteins expression for zonula occludens-1 (ZO-1) and claudin-2 and claudin-3 (CLDN-2; CLDN-3) was determined using qRT-PCR. Results. DIS scores were higher in patients with active CD than in controls, but similar to GERD patients. The altered DIS was found even in CD patients without RS and normalized after one year of a gluten-free diet. CD patients with and without RS had lower expression of ZO-1 than controls. The expression of CLDN-2 and CLDN-3 was similar in CD and GERD patients. Conclusions. Our study shows that patients with active CD have altered esophageal mucosal integrity, independently of the presence of RS. The altered expression of ZO-1 may underlie loss of TJ integrity in the esophageal mucosa and may contribute to RS generation.

[Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledocho-duodenostomy in advanced pancreatic cancer with duodenal obstruction]. / Colédoco-duodenostomía guiada por ecoendoscopía en cáncer de páncreas avanzado con obstrucción duodenal.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is considered the first-approach for biliary drainage. In cases of ERCP failure, patients are usually referred for percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage or surgical biliary bypass. In the last decade, the indications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the management of patients with pancreatic cancer have increased, and numerous cases of EUS-guided biliary drainage have been reported in patients with failures during the ERCP. Our goal is to report a patient with locally advanced pancreatic cancer who presented with painless jaundice and cholestasis with biliary and duodenal obstruction. A EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy was performed by placement of a self-expanding metal stent.

Esfinterotomía más dilatación con balones de grandes volúmenes versus esfinterotomía en la extracción de litiasis complejas: análisis prospectivo / Sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilation versus sphincterotomy alone for the extraction of complex lithiasis: a prospective analysis

ANTECEDENTES Y PROPÓSITO: la esfinterotomía mediana asociada a dilatación con balones de grandes volúmenes es una alternativa a la esfinterotomía amplia en la remoción de litiasis complejas pero no resulta claro cuál de las dos técnicas es más efectiva. Nosotros comparamos ambos métodos de manera prospectiva. MÉTODO: desde enero de 2012 hasta marzo de 2014 se incluyeron en forma consecutiva 133 pacientes con litiasis complejas. Al grupo A se le realizó esfinterotomía mediana asociada a dilatación con balones de grandes volúmenes y al grupo B esfinterotomía amplia. Se evaluaron las tasas de éxito en la extracción de litiasis, tasa de permeabilidad ductal, la utilización de litotripcia mecánica, dosis, tiempo y dosis por área de la radioscopia y complicaciones vinculadas al procedimiento. RESULTADOS: el grupo A tuvo 44 pacientes y el grupo B 69. La tasa de éxito global en la extracción fue de 86,4% en el grupo A y 70% en el grupo B (p = 0,069). En las litiasis gigantes la efectividad en la extracción fue de 89,3% en el grupo A y 58,6% en el grupo B (p = 0,019). El porcentaje de utilización de litotripcia mecánica fue de 15,9% y 30,4%, respectivamente (p = 0,142). La dosis total de radiación fue de 39,8 mGy vs. 26,2 mGy, respectivamente (p= 0,134). Se presentaron complicaciones en el 6,8% y 5,5% de los procedimientos de cada grupo sin diferencias significativas (p = 0,856). CONCLUSIÓN: la técnica de esfinterotomía con dilatación resulta más efectiva e igualmente segura que la esfinterotomía convencional en el manejo de la coledocolitiasis gigante

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mid-size sphincterotomy associated with large balloon dilation is an alternative to wide sphincterotomy to remove complex lithiases. However, which of the two techniques is most effective remains unclear. Hence, we conducted this study to compare both methods prospectively. Method: Since January 2012 until March 2014, 133 consecutive patients with complex stones were included. Group A underwent mid-size sphincterotomy associated with large balloon dilation and group B underwent wide sphincterotomy alone. Success rates were assessed for: Extraction of stones, ductal patency rate, the use of mechanical lithotripsy, dose, time and dose per radioscopy area as well as procedure-related complications. Results: Group A comprised 44 patients and group B comprised 69 patients. Overall success rate for extraction was 86.4% in group A and 70% in group B (p = 0.069). In giant lithiasis, effective extraction was 89.3% in group A and 58.6% in group B (p = 0.019). Use of mechanical lithotripsy was 15.9% and 30.4%, respectively (p = 0.142). Total radiotherapy dose was 39.8 mGy vs. 26.2 mGy, respectively (p = 0.134). Complications occurred in 6.8% and 5.5% of the procedures in each group, without significant differences among them (p = 0.856). Conclusion: Sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilation is more effective and equally safe than conventional sphincterotomy for the management of giant main bile duct lithiasis

Tumores hiliares biliares: ¿drenaje endoscópico o percutáneo? Análisis prospectivo / Hilar bile duct tumors: endoscopic or percutaneous drainage? A prospective analysis

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVO: existen dos técnicas válidas para el drenaje de los tumores hiliares: el abordaje endoscópico y el percutáneo. Nuestro objetivo primario fue reportar la efectividad y las complicaciones de estos procedimientos. MÉTODOS: análisis prospectivo observacional referido al manejo endoscópico y/o percutáneo de todos los tumores hiliares intervenidos en un hospital de tercer nivel desde octubre de 2011 a octubre de 2014. El grupo A representó a los pacientes abordados endoscópicamente, y el grupo B incluyó aquellos con drenaje percutáneo. Se analizaron las siguientes variables: tasa de drenaje biliar efectivo, tiempo de sobrevida y complicaciones. RESULTADOS: el grupo A tuvo 40 pacientes y el grupo B 22. La tasa de éxito global en lograr un drenaje biliar efectivo fue del 85% en el grupo A y del 90,9% en el grupo B (p = 0,78). En cinco pacientes se requirió un abordaje combinado. La efectividad del grupo A en el drenaje de pacientes con tumores tipo Bismuth IV fue del 58,3%, mientras que el grupo B alcanzó el 81,8% (p = 0,44). La sobrevida media de los pacientes no presentó diferencias estadísticas entre ambos grupos. En el grupo A la tasa de complicaciones alcanzó un 11,5% mientras que en el B fue de 2,94% (p = 0,41). CONCLUSIONES: el drenaje biliar endoscópico y el percutáneo son métodos efectivos en el tratamiento paliativo de los tumores hiliares. Sin embargo, en estenosis tipo Bismuth IV, el drenaje percutáneo resultó más efectivo y seguro

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Both the endoscopic and the percutaneous approach are widely accepted for the drainage of hilar tumors. Our primary objective was to report on the effectiveness and complications of these procedures. METHODS: Prospective observational analysis of the endoscopic and/or percutaneous management of all hilar tumors treated at a referral hospital from October 2011 until October 2014. Group A included patients treated endoscopically and group B included patients treated with percutaneous drainage. The following variables were assessed: Effective biliary drainage rate, survival time and complications. RESULTS: Group A comprised 40 patients and group B, 22 patients. Overall success rate in achieving effective biliary drainage was 85% in group A and 90.9% in group B (p = 0.78). Five patients required a combined approach. In group A, the rate of effective drainage in patients with Bismuth IV-type tumors was 58.3%, while it was 81.8% in patients in group B (p = 0.44). There was no difference in mean survival between both groups. For group A, complication rate was 11.5%, whereas it was 2.94% for group B (p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic and percutaneous biliary drainage are both effective methods for the palliative treatment of patients with hilar tumors. However, for Bismuth IV-type strictures, percutaneous drainage proved to be safer and more effective

Colédoco-duodenostomía guiada por ecoendoscopia en cáncer de páncreas avanzado con obstrucción duodenal / Endoscopic ultrasound-guided choledocho-duodenostomy in advanced pancreatic cancer with duodenal obstruction

La colangiopancreatografía retrógrada endoscópica (CPRE) se considera el tratamiento de primera línea para el drenaje biliar en pacientes con cáncer de páncreas. En los casos de fracaso por CPRE, generalmente se realiza un drenaje biliar transparietohepático o una derivación biliar quirúrgica. En la última década, las indicaciones y la utilidad de la ecoendoscopia en pacientes con cáncer de páncreas han ido creciendo, y se han informado numerosos casos de drenajes biliares guiados por ecoendoscopia como una alternativa al drenaje biliar percutáneo o quirúrgico en fracasos en la CPRE. Nuestro objetivo es comunicar un caso con cáncer de páncreas localmente avanzado que se presentó con ictericia indolora y síndrome coledociano con obstrucción biliar y duodenal, en el que se realizó una colédoco-duodenostomía guiada por ecoendoscopia mediante la colocación de una prótesis metálica autoexpandible.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is considered the first-approach for biliary drainage. In cases of ERCP failure, patients are usually referred for percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage or surgical biliary bypass. In the last decade, the indications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in the management of patients with pancreatic cancer have increased, and numerous cases of EUS-guided biliary drainage have been reported in patients with failures during the ERCP. Our goal is to report a patient with locally advanced pancreatic cancer who presented with painless jaundice and cholestasis with biliary and duodenal obstruction. A EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy was performed by placement of a self-expanding metal stent.

[Sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilation versus sphincterotomy alone for the extraction of complex lithiasis: A prospective analysis]. / Esfinterotomía más dilatación con balones de grandes volúmenes versusesfinterotomía en la extracción de litiasis complejas: análisis prospective.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mid-size sphincterotomy associated with large balloon dilation is an alternative to wide sphincterotomy to remove complex lithiases. However, which of the two techniques is most effective remains unclear. Hence, we conducted this study to compare both methods prospectively. METHOD: Since January 2012 until March 2014, 133 consecutive patients with complex stones were included. Group A underwent mid-size sphincterotomy associated with large balloon dilation and group B underwent wide sphincterotomy alone. Success rates were assessed for: Extraction of stones, ductal patency rate, the use of mechanical lithotripsy, dose, time and dose per radioscopy area as well as procedure-related complications. RESULTS: Group A comprised 44 patients and group B comprised 69 patients. Overall success rate for extraction was 86.4% in group A and 70% in group B (p = 0.069). In giant lithiasis, effective extraction was 89.3% in group A and 58.6% in group B (p = 0.019). Use of mechanical lithotripsy was 15.9% and 30.4%, respectively (p = 0.142). Total radiotherapy dose was 39.8 mGy vs. 26.2 mGy, respectively (p = 0.134). Complications occurred in 6.8% and 5.5% of the procedures in each group, without significant differences among them (p = 0.856). CONCLUSION: Sphincterotomy plus large balloon dilation is more effective and equally safe than conventional sphincterotomy for the management of giant main bile duct lithiasis.

[Hilar bile duct tumors: Endoscopic or percutaneous drainage? A prospective analysis]. / Tumores hiliares biliares: ¿drenaje endoscópico o percutáneo?Análisis prospective.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Both the endoscopic and the percutaneous approach are widely accepted for the drainage of hilar tumors. Our primary objective was to report on the effectiveness and complications of these procedures. METHODS: Prospective observational analysis of the endoscopic and/or percutaneous management of all hilar tumors treated at a referral hospital from October 2011 until October 2014. Group A included patients treated endoscopically and group B included patients treated with percutaneous drainage. The following variables were assessed: Effective biliary drainage rate, survival time and complications. RESULTS: Group A comprised 40 patients and group B, 22 patients. Overall success rate in achieving effective biliary drainage was 85% in group A and 90.9% in group B (p = 0.78). Five patients required a combined approach. In group A, the rate of effective drainage in patients with Bismuth IV-type tumors was 58.3%, while it was 81.8% in patients in group B (p = 0.44). There was no difference in mean survival between both groups. For group A, complication rate was 11.5%, whereas it was 2.94% for group B (p = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic and percutaneous biliary drainage are both effective methods for the palliative treatment of patients with hilar tumors. However, for Bismuth IV-type strictures, percutaneous drainage proved to be safer and more effective.

[Quality and competence in endoscopic cholangiography. Towards certainty]. / Calidad y competencia en colangiografía endoscópica. Rumbo a lo seguro.

INTRODUCTION: The American Society of Gastroenterology (ASGE) and the American College of Gastroenterolog (ACG) have established indicators to recognize high-quality studies in endoscopic retrograde cholagiopancreatography (ERCP). The indicators were: a) Pre-procedure: adequate indication, informed consent, assessment of the degree of difficulty of the procedure and antibiotic prophylaxis. b) Intraprocedure: cannulation, choledocholithiasis extraction and stents placement rates. c) Postprocedure: full documentation and complications rates. METHODS: Between October 2010 and October 2012 we performed a retrospective, descriptive, observational and self-evaluative study to assess the compliance with ERCP quality indicators proposed by the ASGE. RESULTS: Preprocedural indicators were evaluated in 734 studies. Cannulation, choledocolithiasis extraction and stents placement under the hiliar bifurcation rates were 96.2%, 95.4% and 100%, respectively. The complication rate was 5.6% and the mortality was 0.27%. The severity of complications was evaluated according to the classification of Masci (30 mild, 7 moderate and 4 severe). CONCLUSIONS: Quality is a basic tool that allows the comparison between our actions and the indicators already predetermined as suitable. The appropriate indication is an indicator to improve. We believe that 12% of registered normal studies could be due to a difficult accessibility to magnetic resonance cholangiography in our health system. Achievement of the internationally validated indicators place us as a high-quality endoscopic cholagiography unit and as a training center with appropriate expertise.

Significant bone microarchitecture impairment in premenopausal women with active celiac disease.

Patients with active celiac disease (CD) are more likely to have osteoporosis and increased risk of fractures. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) permits three-dimensional exploration of bone microarchitectural characteristics measuring separately cortical and trabecular compartments, and giving a more profound insight into bone disease pathophysiology and fracture. We aimed to determine the volumetric and microarchitectural characteristics of peripheral bones-distal radius and tibia-in an adult premenopausal cohort with active CD assessed at diagnosis. We prospectively enrolled 31 consecutive premenopausal women with newly diagnosed CD (median age 29 years, range: 18-49) and 22 healthy women of similar age (median age 30 years, range 21-41) and body mass index. Compared with controls, peripheral bones of CD patients were significantly lower in terms of total volumetric density mg/cm(3) (mean ± SD: 274.7 ± 51.7 vs. 324.7 ± 45.8, p 0.0006 at the radius; 264.4 ± 48.7 vs. 307 ± 40.7, p 0.002 at the tibia), trabecular density mg/cm(3) (118.6 ± 31.5 vs. 161.9 ± 33.6, p<0.0001 at the radius; 127.9 ± 28.7 vs. 157.6 ± 15.6, p < 0.0001 at the tibia); bone volume/trabecular volume ratio % (9.9 ± 2.6 vs. 13.5 ± 2.8, p<0.0001 at the radius; 10.6 ± 2.4 vs. 13.1 ± 1.3, p < 0.0001 at the tibia); number of trabeculae 1/mm (1.69 ± 0.27 vs. 1.89 ± 0.26, p 0.009 at the radius; 1.53 ± 0.32 vs. 1.80 ± 0.26, p 0.002 at the tibia); and trabecular thickness mm (0.058 ± 0.010 vs. 0.071 ± 0.008, p < 0.0001 at the radius with no significant difference at the tibia). Cortical density was significantly lower in both regions (D comp mg/cm(3) 860 ± 57.2 vs. 893.9 ± 43, p 0.02; 902.7 ± 48.7 vs. 932.6 ± 32.6, p 0.01 in radius and tibia respectively). Although cortical thickness was lower in CD patients, it failed to show any significant inter-group difference (a-8% decay with p 0.11 in both bones). Patients with symptomatic CD (n = 22) had a greater bone microarchitectural deficit than those with subclinical CD. HR-pQCT was used to successfully identify significant deterioration in the microarchitecture of trabecular and cortical compartments of peripheral bones. Impairment was characterized by lower trabecular number and thickness-which increased trabecular network heterogeneity-and lower cortical density and thickness. In the prospective follow-up of this group of patients we expect to be able to assess whether bone microarchitecture recovers and to what extend after gluten-free diet.

Serological tests for celiac disease as indicators of long-term compliance with the gluten-free diet.

OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of celiac disease (CD)-related antibodies in monitoring clinical outcome of patients remains unclear. Our aims were to determine dynamics of antibodies after diagnosis and to assess their performances in monitoring patients' long-term compliance with the gluten-free diet (GFD). METHODS: We prospectively estimated the performance of seven celiac disease-related antibody tests at diagnosis and at 1 year and more than 4 years after treatment initiation in 53 adults. The ability of antibodies to identify patients partially compliant to treatment was explored by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The derived cut-off values ('compliance' cutoffs) were compared with cut-off values used for diagnosis ('diagnostic' cutoffs). The degree of compliance with the GFD was assessed using a standardized, multidisciplinary approach. RESULTS: Concentrations of all antibodies decreased significantly at 1 year after diagnosis. The decline continued for more than 4 years in strictly compliant patients (P<0.05-0.001). The gap between 'compliance' and 'diagnostic' cut-offs values was wider at 1 year than at more than 4 years. The predictability of partial compliance determined by the area under receiver operating characteristic curves was relevant for most tests examined at 1 year (areas ranging: 0.64-0.72) and more than 4 years (0.58-0.78). Immunoglobulin A antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides and tissue transglutaminase had the best performance for monitoring long-term compliance. CONCLUSION: Decreased concentrations of antibodies were significantly associated with the degree of compliance with the GFD. Immunoglobulin A antibodies to deamidated gliadin peptides and tissue transglutaminase had the best and more consistent performances. The serial measurement of antibody levels seems to be more reliable in monitoring compliance than the positive/negative expression of results.

Gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in patients with celiac disease and the effects of a gluten-free diet.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Celiac disease (CD) patients often complain of symptoms consistent with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We aimed to assess the prevalence of GERD symptoms at diagnosis and to determine the impact of the gluten-free diet (GFD). METHODS: We evaluated 133 adult CD patients at diagnosis and 70 healthy controls. Fifty-three patients completed questionnaires every 3 months during the first year and more than 4 years after diagnosis. GERD symptoms were evaluated using a subdimension of the Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale for heartburn and regurgitation domains. RESULTS: At diagnosis, celiac patients had a significantly higher reflux symptom mean score than healthy controls (P < .001). At baseline, 30.1% of CD patients had moderate to severe GERD (score >3) compared with 5.7% of controls (P < .01). Moderate to severe symptoms were significantly associated with the classical clinical presentation of CD (35.0%) compared with atypical/silent cases (15.2%; P < .03). A rapid improvement was evidenced at 3 months after initial treatment with a GFD (P < .0001) with reflux scores comparable to healthy controls from this time point onward. CONCLUSIONS: GERD symptoms are common in classically symptomatic untreated CD patients. The GFD is associated with a rapid and persistent improvement in reflux symptoms that resembles the healthy population.

New serology assays can detect gluten sensitivity among enteropathy patients seronegative for anti-tissue transglutaminase.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with celiac disease (CD) may be seronegative with the commonly used test for IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase (anti-tTG) antibodies. Our aim was to explore whether newer assays incorporating synthetic deamidated gliadin-related peptides (DGPs) or other TG isoenzymes as antigen are useful for detecting gluten sensitivity in IgA anti-tTG-seronegative patients. METHODS: We assayed serum samples obtained at diagnosis from (a) anti-tTG-seronegative patients with a CD-like enteropathy (n = 12), (b) skin biopsy-proven dermatitis herpetiformis (DH) patients (n = 26), and (c) IgA anti-tTG-positive CD patients (n = 26). All patients had typical total IgA concentrations. All patients underwent intestinal biopsy and serum testing for (a) detection of IgA and IgG isotypes of both anti-DGP and anti-tTG in a single assay (tTG/DGP Screen; INOVA Diagnostics), (b) simultaneous detection of both IgA and IgG anti-DGP antibody isotypes (DGP Dual; INOVA Diagnostics), and (c) detection of antibodies to transglutaminase 3 (TG3) or transglutaminase 6 (TG6). RESULTS: All anti-tTG-seropositive patients also tested positive in anti-DGP assays. Overall, tTG/DGP Screen detected 6 (31.6%) of the 19 anti-tTG seronegatives, and anti-DGP Dual produced positive results in 5 (26.3%) of these cases. Whereas both assays detected 2 anti-tTG-negative DH patients with partial villous atrophy, they were positive in only 2 of the 5 cases with no histologically discernible mucosal damage. Testing for antibodies to TG3 and TG6 identified 7 (36.8%) of the 19 anti-tTG-negative patients, 5 of which were also positive for anti-DGP. CONCLUSIONS: Detection of anti-DGP with tTG/DGP Screen or anti-DGP Dual, or detection of antibodies to other TG isoenzymes, enhances the sensitivity for detecting gluten sensitivity among non-IgA- deficient, anti-tTG-seronegative patients with CD-like enteropathy.

[Treatment of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal in the last 20 years in a gastroenterology hospital]. / El tratamiento de los pacientes con carcinoma epidermoide del canal anal en los últimos 20 años en nuestro hospital.

UNLABELLED: Anal cancers compromise only 1.5% of all digestive tumors. At present, concurrent radiochemotherapy (RT-CT) is the treatment of choice for most of these lesions. OBJECTIVE: To collect and analyze clinical data from the medical records of all consecutive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCAC) treated by the Oncology Section in 20 years. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The medical records of 108 patients with SCCAC were reviewed: 64% were women, mean age was 57.6 years (27-85), only 1 patient was HIV(+). RESULTS: Initial treatment: 87 patients were treated with RT-CT (81%), 5 CT only, 2 RT only, 8 local resection and 6 abdominoperineal resection (APR). 1) Patients initially treated with RT-CT: cobalt therapy was given to 76% of pts and linear accelerator was used in 24% of patients. 24% of patients received Mitomycin C based CT (modified Nigro), 66% Cisplatin based CT and 10% 5FU alone; 66% had clinical complete response (CCR) (26% of them relapsed). Median follow up was 2.16 years (1 month-15.5 years), median time to progression was 11.8 months and overall survival was 76.7% at 3 years (CI 95%: 65.2-87.7). 2) Patients initially treated with local resection: 6 patients NED and 2 relapsed (1 had CCR after RT-CT). 3) Patients initially treated with APR: 5 with curative intent (4 had local recurrence), and 1 was palliative. 4) Surgical rescue after RT-CT in 6 patients with curative intent (4 APR and 2 local resections), and in 15 patients was palliative (2 APR and other surgeries in 13). CONCLUSIONS: Our group is pioneer in the use of Cisplatin based RT-CT for the treatment of patients with SCCAC. Complete response rate and overall survival at 3 years, were similar to those reported by international data. As this is probably one of the largest series of SCCAC in Argentina, we hope that this analysis of our data would be a starting point to develop prospective clinical trials.