RESUMO
Background: Pelvic floor muscle training can effectively improve pelvic floor muscle strength and activities; however, its impact on sexual function in women with stress urinary incontinence remains unclear. Aim: The study sought to investigate the impact of pelvic floor muscle training on pelvic floor muscle and sexual function in women with stress urinary incontinence. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study involving women who visited a urogynecologic clinic at a tertiary medical center. Patients with stress urinary incontinence without pelvic organ prolapse underwent pelvic floor muscle training programs that included biofeedback and intravaginal electrostimulation. Other evaluations included pelvic floor manometry, electromyography, and quality-of-life questionnaires, including the short forms of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, Urogenital Distress Inventory, and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire. Outcomes: Clinical characteristics, vaginal squeezing and resting pressure, maximal pelvic floor contraction, duration of sustained contraction, quality-of-life scores, and sexual function were compared between baseline and after the pelvic floor muscle training programs. Results: There were 61 women included in the study. The mean number of treatment sessions was 12.9 ± 6.3, and the mean treatment duration was 66.7 ± 32.1 days. The short forms of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (7.7 ± 3.8 vs 1.8 ± 2.1; P < .001) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (5.9 ± 4.3 vs 1.8 ± 2.0; P < .001) scores significantly improved after the pelvic floor muscle training program. In addition, all pelvic floor muscle activities significantly improved, including maximal vaginal squeezing pressure (58.7 ± 20.1 cmH2O vs 66.0 ± 24.7 cmH2O; P = .022), difference in vaginal resting and maximal squeezing pressure (25.3 ± 14.6 cmH2O vs 35.5 ± 16.0 cmH2O; P < .001), maximal pelvic muscle voluntary contraction (24.9 ± 13.8 µV vs 44.5 ± 18.9 µV; P < .001), and duration of contraction (6.2 ± 5.7 s vs 24.9 ± 14.6 s; P < .001). Nevertheless, the short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire score demonstrated no significant improvement (28.8 ± 9.7 vs 29.2 ± 12.3; P = .752). Clinical Implications: Pelvic floor muscle training programs may not improve sexual function in women with stress urinary incontinence. Strengths and Limitations: The strength of this study is that we evaluated sexual function with validated questionnaires. The small sample size and lack of long-term data are the major limitations. Conclusion: Pelvic floor muscle training can improve pelvic floor muscle activities and effectively treat stress urinary incontinence; however, it may not improve sexual function.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of biofeedback and electrical stimulation-assisted pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) between women with mild and moderate to severe stress urinary incontinence (SUI). METHODS: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a single center from 2014 to 2021. We included 57 patients with urodynamically proven SUI who underwent a biofeedback and electrical stimulation-assisted PFMT. They were categorized into mild and moderate to severe SUI. One-hour pad test from 2 to 10 g was defined as mild SUI, and ≥11 g was defined as moderate to severe SUI. RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients were reviewed during the study period. Incontinence-related symptoms of distress, including the UDI-6, ISI, and VAS, all significantly improved in the mild SUI group (p = 0.001, p = 0.001 and p = 0.010, respectively), while only UDI-6 and VAS statistically improved in the moderate to severe SUI group (p = 0.027 and p = 0.010, respectively). There was significant improvement in IIQ-7 in the mild SUI group during serial treatments, but only in Session 6 in the moderate to severe SUI group. After 18 sessions of treatment, the UDI-6, ISI, and IIQ-7 scores showed significantly greater improvements in the mild SUI group compared to the moderate to severe SUI group (p = 0.003, p = 0.025, and p = 0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Although biofeedback and electrical stimulation-assisted PFMT is an effective treatment option for SUI, it is more beneficial for patients with mild SUI and a 1-h pad weight ≤ 10 g urine leak.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Urethral intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) is associated with severe urine leakage and a higher risk of sling failure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of single-incision slings (SISs) versus transobturator slings (TOSs) in such patients. METHODS: Patients who had stress incontinence and ISD who underwent SIS or TOS procedures from 2010 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The objective and subjective cure rates and surgical adverse events were compared between different slings. Objective cure was defined as no stress urine leakage with a comfortably full bladder. Subjective cure was determined by the patient's satisfaction. Incontinence-related symptom distress and quality of life were evaluated using the short forms of the Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6) and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7). RESULTS: Among 111 patients, 37 underwent SIS and 72 underwent TOS with a median follow-up of 21 (range: 12-72) months and 24 (range: 14-84) months (p = 0.265). For both groups, the UDI-6, IIQ-7, and 1-h pad test all significantly improved after surgery (all p < 0.001). The objective and subjective cure rates were comparable after SIS and TOS procedures (objective: 76% vs. 76%, p = 0.837; subjective: 78% vs. 83%, p = 0.212). There were no significant differences in adverse events, except SISs had a shorter surgery time (16.4 ± 9.3 vs. 27.3 ± 12.4 min, p = 0.020) and lower postoperative visual analog scale pain score (1.3 ± 1.1 vs. 3.9 ± 1.4, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: SISs and TOSs had similar surgical results in women with stress incontinence and ISD after at least 1 year of follow-up. However, SISs had a shorter operation time and lower postoperative pain than TOSs.
