Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Piperacillin/Tazobactam in Korean Patients with Acute Infections

BACKGROUND: For more effective and safer usage of antibiotics, the dosing strategy should be individualized based on the patients’ characteristics, including race. The aim of this study was to investigate the population pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles of piperacillin and tazobactam in Korean patients with acute infections. MATERIALS AND METHODS: At least four consecutive 2/0.25 g or 4/0.5 g doses of piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP) were intravenously infused over 1 h every 8 h for patients with creatinine clearance (CL(cr)) ≤50 ml/min or CL(cr) >50 mL/min, respectively. Blood samples from 33 patients at a steady-state were taken pre-dose and at 0 min, 30 min, and 4-6 h after the fourth infusion. The population PK analysis was conducted using a non-linear mixed-effects method. A likelihood ratio test was used to select significant covariates, with significance levels of P <0.05 for selection and P <0.01 for elimination. RESULTS: Both piperacillin PK and tazobactam PK were well described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. Creatinine clearance and body weight, as covariates on clearance (CL) and volume of central compartment (V1), were selected among the covariates possibly affecting PK parameters of both drugs. CL was defined as CL = 2.9 + 4.03 × CL(cr)/47 for piperacillin and CL = 1.76 + 4.81 × CL(cr)/47 for tazobactam. V1 was defined as V1 = 19.5 × weight/60 for piperacillin and V1 = 22.6 × weight/60 for tazobactam. CONCLUSION: The PK profiles of TZP at a steady-state in Korean patients with acute infections were well described by a two-compartment model with first-order elimination. Both piperacillin and tazobactam clearances were significantly influenced by creatinine clearance.

Effects of mirodenafil on the hemodynamics in hypertensive patients taking amlodipine

While phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors have been used for erectile dysfunction with acceptable safety profile, they can induce orthostatic hypotension in patients taking antihypertensive drugs with blood pressure lowering effect. This study evaluated the hemodynamic effects of 100 mg mirodenafil in hypertensive patients taking an amlodipine. Thirteen hypertensive patients who were taking 5 or 10 mg of amlodipine once daily participated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. A single oral dose of mirodenafil 100 mg or placebo was administered at 4.5 hour after administration of amlodipine. The maximal change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (ΔmaxSBP and ΔmaxDBP) and pulse rate (ΔmaxPR) were compared between mirodenafil and placebo periods. Twelve patients completed this study and were included analysis. The values of ΔmaxPR in standing and supine position were significantly greater in the mirodenafil period (13.25±7.12 and 11.17±4.86 beats/minute) when compared to the placebo (8.50±4.72 and 6.58±3.90 beats/minute). The ΔmaxSBP and ΔmaxDBP in standing position appeared to be lower in the mirodenafil period, but they were not statistically different from those in the placebo period (ΔmaxSBP = -7.42±5.6 vs -4.42±5.37 mmHg and ΔmaxDBP = -7.17±5.72 vs -3.50±3.37 mmHg). Both ΔmaxSBP and ΔmaxDBP in standing and supine position were not significantly different between mirodenafil and placebo. This study demonstrated that mirodenafil exerted minimal hemodynamic effects in the patients taking amlodipine, that is unlikely associated with a clinically significant hypotensive event.