Emerging heterologous mRNA-based booster strategies within the COVID-19 vaccine landscape.

Messenger RNA (mRNA)-based vaccine platforms used for the development of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 have provided a robust adaptable approach to offer protection against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). However, as variants of concern (VoCs), such as omicron and associated sub-variants, emerge, boosting strategies must also adapt to keep pace with the changing landscape. Heterologous vaccination regimens involving the administration of booster vaccines different than the primary vaccination series offer a practical, effective, and safe approach to continue to reduce the global burden of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). To understand the immunogenicity, effectiveness, and safety of heterologous mRNA-based vaccination strategies, relevant clinical and real-world observational studies were identified and summarized. Overall, heterologous boosting strategies with mRNA-based vaccines that are currently available and those in development will play an important global role in protecting individuals from COVID-19 caused by emerging VoCs.

Insights for Oncology Trials Garnered From the Rapid Development of an mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine.

ABSTRACT: The sudden emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in early 2020 stimulated unprecedented scientific initiatives to rapidly develop effective treatments and vaccines. One example was the development of vaccines based on messenger RNA platforms, which received emergency use authorization in the United States less than 1 year after the primary sequence of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virus was published. Novel practices arose from the collaborative efforts and inclusive clinical studies that facilitated the vaccines' rapid development and clinical testing. I describe insights gained from the experience of mRNA-1273 vaccine development that may be applied to or adapted for oncology research. These insights include clinical study design, diversity and inclusion initiatives, speed, and real-world evidence generation, as well as close partnership among regulatory agencies, government, and pharmaceutical companies.

Comparative cost-effectiveness of a 2-dose versus 3-dose vaccine for hepatitis B prevention in selected adult populations.

The hepatitis B virus is highly infectious and can cause incurable liver disease, leading to high morbidity rates, increased healthcare utilization, and high mortality. Multiple preventative hepatitis B vaccine options have been available for decades, but adherence to the traditional 6-month vaccine schedule for the approved 3-dose series remains low in adult populations at risk of hepatitis B exposure. A 2-dose hepatitis B vaccine (HEPLISAV-B) approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2017 induces rapid seroprotection within 1 month and has a safety profile comparable to a commonly used 3-dose vaccine. In a previous cost-effectiveness study, HEPLISAV-B had a favorable cost-effectiveness profile for multiple at-risk populations. The goal of the current analysis was to update and extend previous findings by evaluating cost-effectiveness of HEPLISAV-B compared with a 3-dose vaccine (Engerix-B) in selected adult populations, including patients with diabetes, chronic liver or kidney disease, end-stage renal disease, healthcare personnel, travelers to countries with endemic hepatitis B, and a public health population. Cost-effectiveness was measured as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using a health economics Markov model that accounts for adherence rates, seroprotection rates, healthcare costs, and current pricing considerations. Patients progressed between a series of health states, and the difference in lifetime spending and survival for individuals receiving either HEPLISAV-B or Engerix-B was estimated from the perspective of a US managed care payer, HEPLISAV-B had favorable cost-effectiveness profiles for patients with diabetes, healthcare personnel, travelers, and patients with chronic liver disease and dominant incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis supported the robustness of the cost-effectiveness profiles, and an additional analysis indicated that HEPLISAV-B was cost-effective in the general adult population. Overall, HEPLISAV-B was cost-effective in multiple adult populations recommended for HBV vaccination in the United States.

An open-label, single-arm study evaluating the immunogenicity and safety of the hepatitis B vaccine HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B®) in adults receiving hemodialysis.

BACKGROUND: Hemodialysis patients are at increased risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and are poorly responsive to HBV vaccines. Current vaccine recommendations for hemodialysis patients utilize more than twice the amount of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) used for healthy adults and achieve lower immune responses. METHODS: An open-label, single-arm, multicenter trial was conducted among adults 18 years of age and older who were initiating or undergoing hemodialysis who had not previously received hepatitis B vaccine. Participants received four doses of HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B®) (20 mcg rHBsAg + 3000 mcg CpG 1018, a Toll-like receptor 9 agonist) administered at 0, 4, 8, and 16 weeks. Participants are being followed for 68 weeks. This paper reports the final immunogenicity analysis of the primary endpoint at study week 20 and an interim safety analysis. RESULTS: We enrolled 119 participants receiving hemodialysis who were followed for a median of 47.4 weeks. Of the 119 participants, 75 were in the per-protocol population. At week 20, the seroprotection rate (% with antibodies to hepatitis B surface antigen [anti-HBs] ≥ 10 mIU/mL) was 89.3% and the percentage of participants with anti-HBs ≥ 100 mIU/mL was 81.3%. The anti-HBs geometric mean concentration was 1061.8 mIU/mL. HepB-CpG was well tolerated with no observed safety concerns. CONCLUSION: In patients receiving hemodialysis, HepB-CpG given as four doses was well tolerated and induced very high anti-HBs concentrations and seroprotection in a very high proportion of recipients.

How New Models Of Vaccine Development For COVID-19 Have Helped Address An Epic Public Health Crisis.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine development and manufacturing have proceeded at a historically unprecedented pace. This speed may be accounted for by the unprecedented scale of resources being devoted to addressing COVID-19; an unusual intensity of cooperation, encompassing the public and private sectors and occurring both within and across national borders; and innovation with respect to both technologies (for example, new vaccine platforms) and processes (for example, vaccine clinical trials). In this article we describe and analyze how resources, cooperation, and innovation have contributed to the accelerated development of COVID-19 vaccines. Similar levels and types of public investment, models of cooperation, and harnessing of innovative processes and technologies could be applied to future epidemics and other global health challenges.

Immunogenicity and safety of a 2-dose hepatitis B vaccine, HBsAg/CpG 1018, in persons with diabetes mellitus aged 60-70 years.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains a major public health issue, although it is a vaccine-preventable disease. Adults with diabetes are at greater risk of contracting HBV than the general population. Commonly used 3-dose HBV vaccines have reduced immunogenicity in older individuals and in those with diabetes mellitus. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of a phase 3 clinical trial, participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged 60-70 years received either 2-dose HBsAg/CpG 1018 (HEPLISAV-B®, n = 327) at 0 and 4 weeks and placebo at 24 weeks or 3-dose HBsAg/alum (Engerix-B®, n = 153) at 0, 4, and 24 weeks. Immunogenicity, including seroprotection rate (SPR) at week 28, and safety were assessed by subgroup (sex, body mass index, and smoking status). SPR was defined as antibody against hepatitis B surface antigen serum concentration ≥10 mIU/mL. RESULTS: The SPR at week 28 was significantly higher with HBsAg/CpG 1018 (85.8% [235/274]) than with HBsAg/alum (58.5% [76/130]) in the per-protocol analysis, for an overall difference of 27.3% (95% CI, 18.0-36.8). SPRs with HBsAg/CpG 1018 were consistently markedly higher compared with HBsAg/alum, regardless of sex, body mass index, or smoking status. Adverse events and deaths were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Two-dose HBsAg/CpG 1018 provides a higher level of seroprotection against HBV than does a 3-dose vaccine (HBsAg/alum) with a similar safety profile in patients aged 60-70 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Study identifier: NCT02117934.

NCRP Program Area Committee 7: Radiation Education, Risk Communication, Outreach, and Policy.

In 2013, the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) established Program Area Committee 7 (PAC 7) to develop projects and provide guidance on "Radiation Education, Risk Communication, Outreach, and Policy." In 2017, the Committee transitioned to new leadership, the membership was updated, and the purpose, goals, and near-term objectives for PAC 7 were reviewed. Building on the foundation created when the PAC was founded, three near-term action items were identified: (1) to include an NCRP communication strategy and checklist for each report, (2) to apply this strategy to an existing report and the imminent Council Committee 1 report on Radiation Protection in the United States, and (3) to conduct an evaluation and user-friendly cataloging of guides for communicating radiation risk. Other potential products and activities, including some previously identified efforts, were also discussed. Finally, the liaison role with other NCRP committees was further developed with specific identification of a liaison on each of the other PACs to help better incorporate communication, education, outreach, and policy into NCRP activities.

Department of Defense Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System Indian Ocean tsunami response.

The Department of Defense (DoD) Global Emerging Infections Surveillance and Response System (DoD-GEIS) identifies and addresses DoD vulnerabilities to emerging infections through a global network of partners. Following the Indian Ocean tsunami of December 26, 2004, DoD-GEIS facilitated the DoD medical response and coordination with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization. DoD-GEIS partners in Southeast Asia (U.S. Naval Medical Research Unit 2, Jakarta, Indonesia; and Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand) rapidly conducted health assessments and established surveillance for communicable diseases that threatened survivors. Preexisting collaboration with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the World Health Organization, and host countries was critical for the DoD-GEIS tsunami response.